₦airaland Forum

let us look at were US led wars are concentrated,all in oil producing areas,i can not help but agree with the OP,america is on a mission and definitely one that is not good,with the fall in oil prices and Mrs haverd borrowing money all over the place and yet we are still broke,you definitely know that there is a deliberate effort to do damage to Nigeria,not to forget US refusing to sell us arms and blocking others from doing same,why the boko haram guys get brand new arms from only God knows were,when we all know americans are the largest arms dealers in the world

ProfCorruption:
Why are you propagating this useless junk here and there?

1.Get this into your skull: as far as the US is concerned, Nigeria is an inconsequential country. There is a lot to break Nigeria without America putting her hands on it.

2.US used to be among the biggest importer of crude oil globally, she is now an exporter. What does that tell you? Price will fall. It's an elementary economics. It is ridiculous to think the US that is working towards energy independence is doing so to spite Nigeria. Nigeria? Lol. Nigeria is nothing but at the center of global chagrin.

Let me ask you, pointblank, what is in Nigeria for the US?

my brother thank you,i have always wonder why no lawyer ever brings that up,while women keep using all the laws that back them,cause i have said it before,if you wear a mini skirt and you were raped,legally speaking you were the first aggressor

OshovieWilliams:
[color=#000099][/color]
The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria is a system of rules made to ensure the normal and congruent functionality of the Nigerian government and people. It imposes on all duties just as it provides for all protection. Knowledge of the Constitution is knowledge of the supreme laws that guide our country.
In the Constitution, there are certain laws that are overlooked; maybe because they are too paltry for consideration(which is very false) or those who own a paper copy of the Constitution are more interested in esoteric laws mostly for political reasons. They are laws that affect you and your "minor" and "not-so-important" daily activities. They are laws that should prevent you from doing 7 things you do without knowing they tag you "criminal". These laws make these 7 "normal" activities illegal.(there even could be more) These laws are embeded in section 45(1) and (a) and (b):
"Nothing in subsections 37, 38, 39, 40 and 41 of this Constitution [note that these sections stated your Fundamental Rights] shall invalidate any law that is reasonably justifiable in a democratic society-
(a) in the interest of defence, PUBLIC SAFETY[take note], PUBLIC ORDER, PUBLIC MORALITY[very important] or PUBLIC HEALTH
(b) for the purpose of protecting the RIGHTS and FREEDOM of other persons"

Now what those subsections expatiate is that you have your right to freedom of whatever the Constitution has accorded you, BUT those rights could be derogated from you if your expression of those rights goes against the interest of defence, public safety, public order, public morality, or public health; and if they violate the rights of others.

Now here are 7 "normal" things you do that contravene the supreme laws of this Constitution:

1. Indecent Dressing: it's against the "interest...of public morality"

2. Preaching Noisily in Public (and disturbing people in their sleeps): it's against "interest...of public order". I could tag it "noise polution"

3. Public Display of Affection (PDA): It's against the "interest... of public morality"

4. Burning of Tyres: it's against the "interest...of public safety [and] public health"

5. Obstructing Traffic During Cultural Festivities or Blocking of Streets: it's against the "interest...of public order" and it infringes on the limited right to freedom of movement according to Section 41(1).

6. Violent Masquerading: (flogging people also): it's against the "interest...of public safety...public order[and]public morality". It also infringes on the limited Right to Dignity of the Human Person according to section 34(1) and (a)

7. Smoking in Public Places: it's against the "interest...of public health".
(this list is not comprehensive: you could add more from your understanding of these subsections)

So next time you do these things, just know that you are treading on the same path as that corrupt politician, armed robber or vandal. Accoridng to the Constitution you are all EQUAL violators because you are all equal before the law according to section 16(1) and (a) and section 17(2) and (a).

children of isreal abi no be watin una they talk for church,isreal has forsaking you,foolish black people.i have said it the white have enslaved the minds of black people.over 90% of all black are still slaves

good to know

coogar:
getting her is easy....
she has a name & she has a face.....how hard can it be to have her cuffed?

Am sorry for you,I wouldn't insult my time by exchanging words with you

AdannayaBella:
I can and will (with no apologies) insult somebody whose view is full of shít. I mean, who are you that I should respect? In any case, I'm also sorry for your type. Having to live with the IQ of a sponge must be terrible. I feel for you, sir.

that's the point if he denied the child there is no way she would have named the child with his surname,that is what happens when a man denies a child

Mondisweets:
sharing the same surname does not mean you automatically have rights and obligations of a custodian parents. If he denied the child right from conception, he cannot shout, i now have parental rights of custodian parent simply because the child has his surname.

the Gods forbid,it is an abomination to donate your sperm,in fact use the right word,to sell your sperm.does are part of the sickness the western way of life brings,raising sick children,that is why half of there children have different psychological problems

semitunde:
Have you heard of spêrm donors? I guess in your culture, they are entitled to claim the child.

the painful part is most of you who are fight this course would turn back to tell the man that he has committed a crime by not bank rolling the woman while bring up the child,

Mondisweets:
Sorry is depriving the child of her mother's love at the expense of the "father's love" an advantage?



If i remember correctly this is only when the father and the mother are married. An extra-marital child remains the responsibility of his/her mother.

as far as nigerian law is concern that does not qualify as kidnapping

semitunde:
Oh, so kidnapping a minor, of 2 yrs for that matter, is not a crime either in Nigeria or UK?

And pls, the baby was kidnapped by the granny, not the seeming father. Even if the seeming father had done the kidnapping, the name of the crime won't change.

how many Nigeria you know

Mondisweets:
which Nigeria? see lies? Equal gini?

after you get her

coogar:
the criminal grandma shouldn't have perpetrated the crime in a country where women can be king, alpha & omega and the men there are wimps.....

she should have waited for the girl to bring the child to nigeria before stealing the child. the criminal grandma cannot escape this one....she's going down.

did she show you any document to prove that he refused his role,the child is carrying the fathers name,if not there is no way in hell the grandmother would have been able to carry the baby though the airport.it was easy because they both are carrying same surname.like i said in the begining always hear all sides of a story before you make your conclusion

Mondisweets:
the mother is a sole custodian. Well obviously if he refused his paternal responsibilities right from conception, there was no way he could have "regained" them without a court order granted to him in his favour. the only way he could have had joint custody or access to the child granted to him, would have been by way of a court order, instead of having his mother take a child he does not have parental rights and obligations towards (before the law), without the consent of the mother.

in britain the woman can be king,alpha and omega and the men there wimps but in Nigeria husband and wife have equal and different roles to play in a childs life and they both have equal rights to the child

coogar:
send me a link, please....
it's always a pleasure to see the faces behind some mouthful monikers.



lost custody? where? in your dreams?
in which court was it decided that she lost custody? if the court ruled like you claim, why was the father not present in court so the child can be handed over to him?

you think you are in your firewood background hamlet where you can talk nonsense? you don't have a prayer, donedy. your mother would soon become the most famous nigerian criminal. her only option now is to join boko haram & relocate to sambisa forest.



she's the mother of the child or do you have any maternity test that proves otherwise? in the UK, all mothers automatically have parental responsibility for their child from the moment of the child's birth.......

for the fathers, certain steps have to be taken for him to have parental responsibility.

drug dealing is a crime both in nigeria and the uk,so the government must work together,but a man collecting his own child isnt a crime in Nigeria,so the british government would meet a brick wall

semitunde:
Not if the crime was commuted on British soil, it will be tried in prosecuted by the britsh.

There was a recent case of a Nigerian drug dealer I guess, who ran to Nigeria. He was traced, tracked, caught and with the aid of interpol, is being returned to Britain for prosecution. This is regardless of his status as either a Nigerian or British. In fact he was referred to as a Nigerian.

you lack respect,if not you would have know that you cant insult somebody because he holds a different view from you.i am sorry for your type

AdannayaBella:
Sweet Jesus!

Just shut the fúck up already. Where do you dimwits even emanate from? It boggles my mind how anyone could be this stúpid.

in this case has a right of custody been granted to either of the parent?

Mondisweets:
if he doesn't have the rights of a custodian parent, then he can be found guilty of kidnapping a child. If he only has the right to access/contact with the child, he cannot exceed the limits by making himself a custodian parent by fire by force.

did she use the court to gain custody of the child in the first place
secondly why in God's name would i want to come and leave in britain,Nigeria is too sweet for me to leave,i can visit and spend some few days but i definitely can't stay outside Nijia for more than two weeks

coogar:
whose ugliness?
shymexx - you cannot be monopolising all these pictures. let a brother see some, biko.



if the father knew that, why did he not exercise his rights through the courts to take custody of the child? why use his mother to take law into his own hands?

crime against a minor? in the UK?
i pity una generation. christ would be back before anyone remotely close to that family would be allowed into britain again.....



ain't you the spokesperson of the family?

the question was simple enough

Ilekere:
I won't sit here and give you what Nigeria took away from you. Education is your right, it's not a privilege.

Anyone else want to educate this man, go for it.

what does that statement tell you,and i am still asking you did she tell you she asked the father,women don't own sole power over children you know?

coogar:
a father stole his child. did the child's mother give any consent before the child was taken?

this was her tweet about an hour ago....

@OfficialTemmy: Things r moving along now. [b[b]]The authorites are on my side[/b]. I cant say much but by God's grace i ll get her back. Thank u all so much! I❤️u all[/i]

like you assumed,i didn't go to school,please you that finished PHD please read and tell me

bournvita:
No. Only people who have seen the four walls of a university have the right to assign me to look things up. You unfortunately do not have that right. To acquire such right, you need to bag a bachelor's degree in something even if it is in Palm oil and vegetable...just something and then only then can you....hurry up Cos I might change the rules and ask for post grads instead.

You are a troll abeg go and sit down let us see road.

I repeat a father took his child,Nigeria can't help you arrest a father for asking his mother to go get his child

coogar:
they don't have to wait for her to come back. a minor was taken in the UK, that child automatically becomes their priority. grandma would soon be in a stainless handcuff.



50calibre is the hottest naija guy of his generation. look before you leap, mondi.

define what you understand by the word uneducated
i can't worry about my child been taking by my wife,that because in Nigeria we encourage family not promote separation
LASTLY ONCE AGAIN I REPEAT A FATHER CAN'T STEAL HIS OWN CHILD

Ilekere:
Where does NL find these uneducated lots?

Let's assume that in Nigeria no crime has been committed, wouldn't you worry that a relative can steal your child and Nigerian law wouldn't do anything about it?

That's the part that worries me. The fact that child abduction (from relatives) is absolutely legal in Nigeria.

But, an international crime has been committed. She committed a crime in Britain and ran to Nigeria, she'll be found. Remember the daycare worker that left kids entrusted in her care alone to go shopping, house burnt down and she ran to Nigeria? They snuffed her azz out and brought her back to the US.

Well Nigerian can't help you,whenever grandma enters uk again,then uk law can take its course

coogar:
she has to answer for the crime she committed. whether it's a crime in nigeria is a moot point. no one is asking nigerian courts to sentence her, we are saying grandma should be brought back to the UK to answer for the crime she committed.



i am now bornagain.



dailymail cannot wait to hear that this woman has been arrested. expect this story to cover about 3 pages - they will print photos of the grandma's house, her neighbours & the whole shebang!

i believe that was the assignment i gave you

bournvita:
Go on google...read history come back and share your knowledge with us

after all that hope you feel better now,as for crime,is society that determines what amounts to a crime,and this is arrived at by the thinking of such society,like i said before probably in the uk a crime may have been committed but for Nigeria,no crime has been committed,and you can't force us to see things the way you see it just because you are in uk

coogar:
you are a consummate retärd!
and with the quality of utterances dropping out of your arsë.....you were likely raised from a polyandrous marriage - by the look of things, you probably have 8 daddies all shacking up with you in a small apartment.

we have to literally educate you that a crime has been committed & you won't keep your trap shut with your irresponsible firewood background. if you have any iota of decorum, you should log out & find somewhere to wail.....you are a waste of sëmen.

YOU ARE ENTITLED TO YOUR OPINION

soulglo:
This makes no sense

dont get it twisted does are not way of life,and secondly for the record wearing cloths and technology including education started right here in Africa,go and read history

bournvita:
The western way of life doesn't work for us so...tell me why are you wearing clothes? What are you not walking around naked covered in plantain leaves? Why did you attend primary/secondary school....I will hold off on university.

What are you browsing Nairaland with? A phone? A laptop? A tablet? You bought any of the above or all of the above made by the people in the west and you are spewing thrash? Throw them all away and then come back and preach this nonsense to me. I will be all ears then...

my sister you are lost from the way you speak,i know you came from a broken home or raised by single parent or you are a lesbian.i am not insulting you,and please don't take it as such but that what you are leading me to believe.you kind of thinking if what the father of that child is trying to prevent

coogar:
why can't the boy make another spërm? why must it be the one he rejected?



criminals have always been captured by any means possible......why are you getting hot under the collar? are you the grandma?

this matter would keep going round in circles,which doesn't help the matter,the solution is not ownership but well been of the child,the child needs the father and mother,if the girl claims she loves the child as she is claiming,she would be more than willing to mend the fence for the well being of the child,but rather what i see here is someone fighting for ownership,i keep advising black women,western way of life doesn't work for us,it may work for them but it doesn't work for us,and if you check the black women abuse the western way of life at an alarming rate even the white women don't do this things

bournvita:
.

It...okay the child is a IT. So being a seed of his gave his mother the right to take her child away without asking the mother?

did the mother ask the child father

bournvita:
.

It...okay the child is a IT. So being a seed of his gave his mother the right to take her child away without asking the mother?

can you steal your seed,its just like saying the boy stole his sperm

coogar:
and being the boy's seed means the child can be stolen?

well said,now please help me ask the girl if she had the consent of the father before she went to hide the child in uk?if am to go by what you said the girl should be arrested first for kidnapping her own child
and just for the record,it is not possible for a husband To Molest his own wife,that can only happen in the imagination of the white men.the funny part is this same white men don't have laws that say wifes can molest her husbands,what a sick world you people leave in

soulglo:
YES!!!! YESS!!!!! YESSSS!!!! Onoja12 a father can kidnap his own child. A mother can also kidnap her child. No parent has the right to take away a child without the consent of the other. Only on NL will you hear that husbands cannot rape their wives and parents cannot kidnap their children. You have asked thus same question a couple of times already and I think you just want someone to tell you that every father has the right to take any child their sperm contributed in making. That's not how it works.