ParadiseDark's Posts
Nairaland Forum › ParadiseDark's Profile › ParadiseDark's Posts
Roycemadeit:Thanks, but it's not in your place to tell me who to engage with. |
MaxInDHouse:Uhn!? If the “true religion” is the only thing capable of creating global peace, then what happens to everyone who does not accept it? Do they all have to convert, disappear, or die before this promised peace can exist? If peace is only possible when everyone belongs to the same religion, then you have not really described the elimination of hatred. You have described the elimination of religious difference and may be the assumption that peace requires uniformity. |
No religion can establish itself as “true” simply because its followers believe it, inherited it, or made it dominant. Religious truth cannot be demonstrated through popularity, tradition, conquest, or cultural influence. Christianity, Islam, and other religions make competing claims about God, reality, morality, and existence. Where those claims contradict one another, they cannot all be objectively true. Therefore, claiming that one religion possesses absolute truth requires evidence beyond personal conviction or cultural inheritance. Christianity’s dominance in Africa does not demonstrate its divine truth. Its expansion was deeply connected to colonialism, missionary activity, political power, education, and cultural influence. Many Africans embraced Christianity sincerely, but sincerity is not evidence of supernatural truth. The same standard applies to every religion. A belief does not become true because millions accept it, because ancestors practiced it, or because an empire spread it. |
The word "gold-digger" has become one of those labels people throw around with remarkable confidence, as though its meaning were settled beyond dispute. Mention the term, and an image immediately springs to mind: someone who enters a relationship with one goal and one goal only, to extract as much money as possible from another person. It is a convenient definition, simple enough to fit into everyday conversation and powerful enough to condemn without further thought. But what if that definition is incomplete? What if we've mistaken one expression of gold-digging for the whole phenomenon? Before we dismiss the term, it may be worth asking a more uncomfortable question: What exactly is "gold"? Most people instinctively answer, "Money." Yet money has never been the only thing people value. Human beings pursue whatever they believe will improve their lives, and those pursuits rarely look the same from one person to the next. For one individual, "gold" is financial stability, a partner whose resources provide protection from uncertainty. For another, it is intelligence, someone whose ideas challenge them and whose conversations leave them richer than before. Others are drawn to beauty, influence, emotional maturity, social status, ambition, kindness, sexual compatibility, or simply the promise of a better future. Each person defines value differently because each person carries different desires, fears, insecurities, and aspirations. What appears priceless to one individual may seem almost worthless to another. If that is true, then perhaps the real question is not whether gold-diggers exist. The real question is whether all of us are searching for some form of gold. After all, when we choose a partner, do we not hope they possess qualities we consider valuable? We admire generosity, loyalty, intelligence, beauty, humor, confidence, stability, or compassion because those qualities enrich our lives in one way or another. If relationships involve an exchange of value, then reducing the idea of gold-digging to money alone oversimplifies something far more complex. This does not mean every relationship is manipulative or insincere. Nor does it suggest that love is an illusion. Rather, it invites us to acknowledge a truth we often avoid: attraction is rarely random. It is shaped by what we value, consciously or unconsciously. Perhaps we have spent so much time judging the person who seeks financial security that we have ignored the countless other forms of value-seeking that society quietly celebrates. This is one of the ideas explored in my book, The Art of Gold-Digging: How to Secure the Man Without Raising Suspicion. |
Many people hear the phrase "gold-digger" and think of someone chasing money. But what if "gold" simply means value? Beauty. Security. Status. Intelligence. Peace. If we're all searching for something valuable, are we all "gold-diggers" in some way? That question inspired my book: The Art of Gold-Digging: How to Secure the Man Without Raising Suspicion It's not just about dating. It's about human nature, relationships, trust, and the hidden motivations behind our choices. 📖 The Art of Gold-Digging: How to Secure the Man Without Raising Suspicion By R. Okoh https://selar.com/68wvva
|
No one likes being played. And if they do, they at least want to understand the rules of the game, the odds, and what they stand to lose. The worst kind of betrayal isn’t financial. Money can be re earned, debts repaid, and at the very least, a bad investment chalked up as an expensive life lesson. But emotional fraud? That’s the kind of theft that doesn’t just empty your pockets. It empties your soul. It rewrites your past, makes you question your present, and leaves you terrified of your future. |
Many people hear the phrase gold-digger and immediately think of someone chasing money. But what if "gold" simply means value? Some people seek beauty. Others seek intelligence. Others seek security. Others seek influence. Others seek peace. If that's true, then perhaps we're all searching for some form of "gold." This question led me to write a book titled: The Art of Gold-Digging: How to Secure the Man Without Raising Suspicion The book isn't simply about dating. It explores human nature, relationships, trust, attraction, and the hidden motivations behind the choices we make. Over the coming weeks, I'll be sharing short excerpts and thought-provoking ideas from the book here on Nairaland, not just to promote it, but to spark meaningful conversations. I believe some of these ideas will challenge assumptions many of us have held for years. So let me start with this question: Do you think every relationship is an exchange of value? Why or why not? I'd genuinely like to hear different perspectives. If you'd rather read the complete work instead of waiting for future excerpts, you can get the book here: 📖 The Art of Gold-Digging: How to Secure the Man Without Raising Suspicion By R. Okoh https://selar.com/68wvva |
To me, dating and courting are two different stages of a relationship, and much of the confusion surrounding relationships today comes from treating them as though they are the same thing. I see dating as a period of discovery. It is the process of getting to know people, learning about their values, personalities, ambitions, and character. The purpose of dating is not commitment but evaluation. It is a time to determine who you connect with and who you may want to build something deeper with. Because of this, I do not automatically associate dating with exclusivity. If I am still in the process of discovering who is most compatible with me, it seems strange to behave as though I have already made a final choice. This does not mean deception, irresponsibility, or sleeping around. It simply means acknowledging that dating is a stage of exploration. What often confuses me is how many people expect the responsibilities of marriage during the dating stage. They expect loyalty, sacrifice, emotional investment, and sometimes even financial or domestic obligations from someone who is still being evaluated as a potential partner. To me, commitment should follow certainty, not precede it. Courting, on the other hand, begins after a choice has been made. It is what happens when two people decide they want to pursue marriage together. At that point, the purpose is no longer discovery but preparation. Dating asks, “Who do I want?” Courting asks, “Can we build a life together?” This is where exclusivity makes sense to me because the selection process has already ended. The focus is now on understanding how both people function together in a serious and intentional way. Courtship is, in many ways, preparation for marriage. Marriage then becomes the commitment that follows successful courtship. My understanding is simple: dating is discovery, courting is preparation, and marriage is commitment. Each stage has a different purpose, and I think many relationship problems arise when people expect one stage to perform the role of another. |
*Present-day Christianity* stands on doctrines refined and enforced through councils convened under imperial and ecclesiastical authority. At the First Council of Nicaea, called by Constantine the Great, Christ was declared fully divine, “of one substance” with the Father. The First Council of Constantinople, under Theodosius I, affirmed the divinity of the Holy Spirit, completing the Trinity. The Council of Ephesus, convened by Theodosius II, declared Mary as Theotokos, securing Christ’s unified identity. The Council of Chalcedon, under Marcian, defined Christ as fully God and fully man in two natures, without confusion. Through these and later councils, Christianity became a structured system: one God in Trinity, salvation through the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, authority rooted in apostolic tradition and scripture, and doctrine guarded not by private insight but by collective agreement. *The Christian Truth is something defined, defended, and declared by politicians.* |
A man is not special because he is a man. He is only the sum of what he has lived through, what he has learned, what he has chosen to become. Strip away the noise, the titles, the inherited authority, and what remains is simply experience. The same applies to a woman. No more, no less. Gender does not grant wisdom. It does not install understanding. It does not come with some hidden manual for leadership or control. It is experience that shapes perception, and perception that shapes action. Anything else is just tradition trying to pass itself off as truth. So the idea that a man should lead simply because he is male begins to look thin, almost fragile. If he has not grown, if he has not learned, if he has not confronted the world enough to understand it, then what exactly is he leading with? Biology? It becomes even clearer in marriage. Two people come together, not as roles handed to them by society, but as individuals shaped by different journeys. If one is to lead, it should be because they are capable in that moment, not because they were born into a gender that claims authority. And if both are capable, then leadership becomes shared, fluid, shifting when necessary. Anything rigid begins to feel dishonest. I find it strange how much weight we have placed on something so arbitrary. A body difference became a system. A system became a rule. And the rule became something people defend without ever stopping to ask if it still makes sense. It doesn’t, at least not to me. What makes a person valuable is not what they are called, but what they have come to understand. And if that is true, then the hierarchy built on gender starts to collapse on its own, quietly, without needing to be forced. |
Part III – Between Tiredness and Truth Maybe I think too much. But how can one live in a country like this and not think deeply? How can you watch people die from poverty, negligence, and wickedness and still say life is wonderful? I am not Dark. I am honest. Life, as I see it, is both blessing and burden. It gives and it takes. It smiles and it strikes. Some days, you wake up grateful; other days, you wake up empty. Maybe that is what it means to be alive, to exist between gratitude and grief. Yet, despite everything, I do not hate life. I only want it to Paradise. I wish people were more conscious. I wish we stopped doing things simply because others do them. I wish we stopped calling weakness faith and responsibility rebellion. I write because silence feels like slow death. Writing is the an honest way to breathe. It allows me to speak without being interrupted by noise. To think without being dismissed as cynical. To feel without needing permission. When I write, I am not trying to impress. I am trying to understand. Maybe that is what gives meaning to life, the constant reaching for understanding. To keep searching, to keep asking, even when no answer comes. Maybe life is not about finding peace but about learning to stand in the storm without losing yourself. People say, “Everything happens for a reason.” Maybe the reason is to wake up. Maybe life keeps breaking us so we can stop pretending. So we can start seeing what we have ignored. Still, there are moments when I look at the sky at night and something soft stirs in me. Maybe that is what people call hope. Not a loud hope, but a quiet one, the kind that whispers that meaning still exists somewhere, even if it is small, even if it hides. Maybe that is what keeps many alive. For me, it is not certainty, but curiosity. In the end, I think life is not a promise; it is a question. One that asks, how deeply can you love? How bravely can you live? How honestly can you see? |
Part II – The Weight of Society The world speaks of faith, but it has lost its honesty. I look around and see people who mention God the most but trust Him the least. They say God will provide, but they never leave home without guards. They say He will protect, but they live behind fences taller than their dreams. They tell you to have faith, but you can see in their eyes that they are afraid of their own sermons. It makes me wonder when we stopped thinking for ourselves. When did we surrender reason to those who profit from our confusion? The pulpits echo promises that sound good but deliver nothing. We were taught that faith means silence, that obedience is holiness. But what if faith was meant to make us conscious, not controlled? What if belief was supposed to awaken us, not blind us? I think of how our ancestors lived before the missionaries came. Before the slavers arrived with mirrors, guns, and holy books. We were not perfect, but we had a rhythm, a sense of balance with the earth. Then came the strangers, telling us our ways were evil, that our gods were demons. We believed them, because they came with power, and because they carried death for those who refused. So we abandoned ourselves. We gave up our voice. Now we pray to a God who never spoke to us directly. We wait for words from men who build empires from our hopes. We raise our children to inherit confusion. We tell them to dream but not to question, to believe but not to think. And in doing so, we breed another generation of silence. It frightens me. The thought of bringing a child into this cycle of confusion and calling it purpose. To see them grow, only for the same broken system to devour them. To imagine their laughter fading into the noise of this chaos. It feels like betrayal. People say life is beautiful. Maybe it is, but beauty does not equal meaning. Beauty fades. What endures is responsibility. To make life better than we found it. To fix what is broken, even if we did not break it. That is what I wish we taught our children, not just how to pray, but how to build. I remember 2020. The EndSARS protest. The young people who stood up. The courage, the music, the unity. They demanded change and were met with bullets. The same system that was supposed to protect them silenced them. I often wonder what would have happened if parents had led that protest. If fathers and mothers had taken the frontlines. Maybe the story would have ended differently. Maybe this country would have remembered what responsibility means. But most parents stayed home. Some prayed, others advised silence. Yet, silence was what brought us here. We pray for safety from dangers we create. We cry for mercy from the consequences of our neglect. We call it faith, but it is fear dressed as piety. |
Part I – The Quiet Doubt Perhaps I am melancholic. Not pessimistic, no. Just not entirely optimistic either. I make my guesses from what stands before me, not from what tomorrow promises. Around me, people are getting married. Some younger than I am, some my age, some who once asked me for advice now post their weddings online. Yet, marriage never crosses my mind. It worries some people who know me, maybe because they think I am afraid of commitment, or because they assume I cannot afford it. But I know it is deeper than that. I think sometimes the problem is not that I do not believe in marriage, but that I no longer believe in what people think marriage is supposed to be. I have seen it become a performance more than a partnership. A checklist item more than a covenant. I have seen people marry for the wrong reasons, pressure, fear of loneliness, age, tradition. They do not ask themselves why; they simply do it because everyone else is doing it. Maybe I have built a wall, not against love, but against illusion. The illusion that marriage or children automatically bring meaning, safety, or fulfillment. I have seen marriages crumble under the weight of pretense, and I have seen children grow lost in homes that were supposed to keep them safe. The world is not gentle, and the promises people build around love are not always strong enough to hold when life begins to shake. Sometimes I imagine myself as a father. I think of bringing a child into a world that cannot guarantee that child’s safety, peace, or even the right to simply live freely. How do you love someone enough to bring them here, only for the world to try to break them? Is that love, or is it a selfish hope to replicate yourself? I do not know. Maybe I am a nihilist. Maybe I am just tired. Because when I look at life, I ask myself, what is so amazing about it? Is it the pursuit of wealth so you can eat what you want until sickness says you cannot? Is it the endless striving that ends in decay? Or is it the act of pretending to be happy simply because everyone else is pretending too? Sometimes I think life is a beautiful trick. A play that everyone joins without knowing the script. We wake, chase, eat, laugh, fear, and pretend we are moving forward. But are we? Or are we simply circling the same emptiness? If I ever have children, I must guarantee their safety, not hope for it. I cannot bring them into a world where chance decides who survives. Maybe that makes me controlling, maybe it makes me human. Because I know what it means to live unprotected, to face life without a shield. So I tell myself, I will not repeat that cycle. I will not surrender my offspring to fate. Fortune favors the bold, and history favors the writer. That is why I write. Not because I have the answers, but because while most people imagine they are talking to God, and I am just talking to myself. |
So, after all this, what should one do? Wait or not wait? Give or withhold? I will not answer for you. That is your journey. But I will say this: whatever you choose, choose it with knowledge, not fear. If you abstain, let it be because you understand your reasons, not because the world once broke you. If you love, let it be because you have found peace, not because you are desperate to belong. Abstinence is good when it is chosen, not imposed. It is wise when it is free from fear. But when it becomes a badge of pain, it imprisons the very soul it seeks to protect. And if you must fall, fall with awareness. If you must rise, rise with wisdom. Do not let your past decide how you hold your body. You are not the sum of those who hurt you. Sex will not make you holy, and abstinence will not make you godly. What will make you whole is understanding, knowing when to say no, and knowing when your “no” has become a cage. So, I ask: what truly governs your body? Is it fear, faith, or freedom? When you close your eyes at night, do you feel righteous, or do you feel repressed? Do you measure love by waiting or by understanding? These are questions only you can answer. Because in the end, abstinence is not about sex. It is about knowing yourself enough to act, or not act, and to be at peace either way. |
Now I will speak plain, as an old man who has seen the games of youth repeat themselves under different names. Sex is not evil. It is life itself. It is the drumbeat of creation, the whisper of continuity. But we - especially in this modern Africa - have dressed it in shame. We speak of it in corners, yet use it in daylight. We condemn it from the pulpit but chase it in secret. What hypocrisy is greater than this? We tell our daughters to hide their bodies but tell our sons to test their manhood. We say, “Don’t do it,” yet we make songs about doing it. Our ancestors were not saints, but they were honest. When the fire of puberty burned, they channelled it through marriage. Today, we channel it through lies. We sell sex for promises, for jobs, for validation. We use it to measure love, to manipulate loyalty, to prove commitment. And then we act shocked when it loses its meaning. Abstinence is no longer sacred - it has become political. A woman says “I’m waiting till marriage,” and the world claps, not because of virtue but because of vanity. And the men - some honour it, some mock it, some pretend. Everyone is performing purity, and no one is truly pure. But let us be honest: desire is not a demon. It is only dangerous when misunderstood. The one who fears it is already enslaved by it. So I ask: what makes abstinence holy if the heart beneath it is bitter? What makes sex sinful if it is shared in love, truth, and peace? Who gave society the right to name what is sacred in the private space of two consenting souls? We must learn what balance means. Morality without understanding is cruelty. And freedom without discipline is chaotic. |