ParadiseDark's Posts
Nairaland Forum › ParadiseDark's Profile › ParadiseDark's Posts
The Standards of Dressing and Perception Some people have come to believe there is a universal standard for how one should dress, particularly in professional settings, including the entertainment industry. This perception, heavily influenced by societal norms and perhaps the polished idealism portrayed in science fiction, leads to assumptions about what constitutes appropriate attire. For instance, consider an audition scenario: a person shows up dressed casually or, as some might say, "shabbily," with their belly button exposed or their breasts unrestrained because they chose not to wear a bra. Immediately, judgments are formed based on appearance. The question then arises: why should appearance overshadow talent? The essence of the movie industry lies in its ability to transform an individual into a character. If someone, regardless of their attire, can convincingly embody the role they’re auditioning for, why should their casual or unconventional dress matter? Costumes and wardrobe departments exist to dress actors according to the film’s requirements. The core focus should remain on the actor's ability to bring a character to life, not their personal dress code at an audition. Judging someone as "shabby" or "inappropriate" because they don’t conform to societal norms of dressing is more reflective of the observer’s moral biases than the individual’s capabilities. Societal perceptions of appropriate dress are not static—they evolve over time. What seems unacceptable today may become standard tomorrow. Moreover, in some films, actors are deliberately dressed to look disheveled or provocative. One could point to performances where actors, such as Mercy Johnson, have played roles in which their attire exposed much of their bodies. Yet, these actors delivered stellar performances that captivated audiences. The Problem with Moral Judgments Posting pictures of underdressed individuals online to ridicule them highlights a deeper societal issue: the obsession with projecting morality onto others. But why should someone's personal style or choice of dress become the focal point of their competence or character? In other professions, like healthcare, you might encounter doctors and nurses with tattoos and piercings. These visible markers of self-expression don’t undermine their professional skills or dedication. If it doesn’t impact their work, why should it matter? Dressing and Character Are Not Synonymous Equating someone’s appearance with their moral or professional character is a flawed assumption. A neatly dressed individual could be dishonest, while a casually dressed one could be a person of integrity. Criminals don’t always fit the stereotypes of rugged appearances or tattoos; they could very well look like an everyday pastor or a well-dressed neighbour. Ultimately, society needs to shift away from this fixation on appearance. Judging people based on their clothing choices, especially in contexts where those choices don’t hinder their abilities or professionalism, is not only unfair but also unproductive. A person’s worth, talent, and character are far more complex than what they choose to wear. |
It’s baffling, isn’t it? The overblown spectacle surrounding the simple repair of a bad road highlights a deeper issue. Why should something as routine as road maintenance—an obligation of governance—warrant such fanfare? Today, while heading to the bank and passing through Ogba, near Area G and NIJ, I noticed a crowd of pressmen. Cameras, microphones, reporters, and even drones filled the air. It was as though some grand feat was being celebrated. But no, it was just a road repair. Not a bridge, not a monumental infrastructure project—just patching up a road that had been in disrepair for months. The presence of so many media outlets—TVC, NTA, AIT, and others—raised an even more curious question: who orchestrated this coordinated display? Media houses, supposedly operating independently, converging at the same spot suggests a larger, unseen hand at work. It’s a telling reminder that the news we consume is often shaped by someone else’s agenda. Beyond the media spectacle, though, lies the core absurdity: why is fixing a road, something that should be a basic function of governance, treated as a remarkable achievement? It feels more like an attempt to create the illusion of progress where none exists. Rather than celebrating the bare minimum, perhaps the focus should be on holding those in power accountable for why the road was left in such a state for so long in the first place. |
This is one of the reasons why I'd say not everyone ought to be a parent. Be that as it may. I'll say there is no hurry in achieving success, life is not a competition. You disliked your dad so much that I can't help but see that you love him. Make something out of yourself first and you will see that same old man become proud of you and don't be surprised if he asks for forgiveness. But, in the meantime, don't waste too much time thinking about him and all the traumatic experiences you've witnessed. So you won't become that which you hate. |
Righteousness2:I Don't Blame You, It Is Because They Made God A Man. And You Ladies Who Strive To Get To Make Heaven, Una For Hear Am... But, Fortunately For You Heaven Doesn't Exist. |