₦airaland Forum

Lindabanks:
A teenage armed robber identified as Monday Omoruyi

AFONJA

pazienza:
The same SE state Nzeogwu was from.

Damn!!
Boy this reply was on point!

introvert2:
Pls,gurus in the house.I want to create a website but I have no programming skill.I just need help on how to create my own website without programming knowledge.Thank you.

wix.com

Who is he?

Eggs and weight loss don't go hand in hand

I'm not surprised. Land grabbing is an AFONJA heritage.
From Tinubu to Fayose to Alao-Akala to Igboho

E dey their blood

Igboho go & face Iskilu Wakili and stop posting rubbish news on nairaland. Coward!!

Hahahahaha
See dem in red valentine attire for celebrations wey don cast
See dat mama in wrapper and sneakers. Na wa!!

Nothing wey Buhari no go see inside coffin

GeneralDae:
Website first, then as the business grows App comes in.

Thanks

Donpre:
Depends on what your business is.

I would say a website as it can be reached across multiple devices and operating system. You would only have to maintain one code base unlike apps that would need maintenance across multiple platforms.

You could plan ahead and build your website on REST APIs, that way half the work for the app if you ever come back to do that would be done already.

Thanks

I want to monetize an e-business idea.

I only have funds for one option, so I'd like to know, which guarantees me more revenue through traffic?

Website or app?

Hmmm... which kain mastiff?
This thing na confam ekuke weiler. He jus play with charcoal that's all

TimeManager:
Makinde asked the CP to arrest him. IGP also ordered his arrest. Makinde has to invite him.

kiss the truth!

AFONJA coward excuse
Na today dem issue Igboho arrest? Iskilu will use Igboho for suya, he knows

seunmsg:
[s]Makinde should swallow his pride and invite Sunday Igboho to deal with the so called Wakil. [/s]

Makinde did not invite Igboho to deal with Seriki Fulani. Why does Igboho need the invite to face Iskilu Wakili in the same Oyo State?

No wonder Igboho is dodging Wakili.
200 men to handle one fulani man.

Nothing wey Tinubu no go see for gutter

Nothing wey Igboho no go see for Ayete

But where is proof that the car is his?
He stands beside a car and its automatically his own? Nawaoo.
So if I go to Eko hotel or Sheraton and take a pic beside any sports car there, it means I have acquired it.
Okay.

Why is this generation so gullible especially we women?

Beverlyjean:
Then y did they now give modric ??

GBAM!!!
I love this

Anyone who supports Modric's 2018 Ballon D'Or and is against Sneijder's 2010 robbery is a hypocrite (like the fulani maluu I quoted above)..
The exact same thing happened.


Modric won everything in club football but didn't score well since he is a midfielder. Played magnificently @ World Cup but lost in the final.
Result= Won Ballon D'Or against CR7 who was the social media favourite because of goals scored.
Sneijder won everything in club football but didn't score well since he is a midfielder. Played magnificently @ World Cup but lost in the final.
Result= Lost Ballon D'Or against Messi who was the social media favourite because of goals scored.

Hypocrisy

ThierryJay:
[s]

I am not lying, unlike you that I've exposed your mistruths, I was referring to the top three finalists who were the credible contenders. You don't expect me to bring in all the 30 nominated players into the discussion do you? Even Fifa/UEFA uses the top three to separate wheat from the chaff.

My point is Henry came 2nd in Fifa award, and 2nd in Ballon D'or which shows consistency in performance level to warrant nomination as the best across both awards. Nedved only appeared in contention for Ballon d'or and was missing for Fifa award which implies a bit of inconsistency somewhere, as most Ballon d'or holders eventually go on to win the FIFA award.

Nedved dragging Czech to Euro 2004 is not a big deal. It would be a big flop if Czech did not qualify to be among 16 countries out of 28 total European countries when there were only 7 European powerhouses (England, Holland, Spain, Italy, Germany, France and Portugal) meaning 9 slots were still to be jostled for by the remaining average and below-par Andorras, Faroe Islands and the Liechensteins which are in the majority. How is this a feat when Czech were even better than the level of Belgium and Croatia then with Karel Poborsky, Big man Jan Koller, Liverpool's Milan Baros, etc?

In 2003, Nedved only trumped Henry in the area of UCL performance, Henry's contribution to the EPL that year was more spectacular than Nedved's input to Juve's Scudetto win in terms of goals, assists and overall brilliance of play. On the national front, Henry bested Nedved by propelling France to Confederation cup win in the absence of Zidane. That Czech did not qualify is because France and Henry bested them at the Euros and not a matter of choice as you are making it look like. Would CR7 or Messi say that Lewandoski's imminent win at the Club world cup is only because they did not participate when they also had the opportunity to qualify for that tournament by besting Bayern? How silly would that have seemed?

Social Media definitely did not vote Messi as Ballon d'or winner in 2010, so I'm not sure what you are talking about. Point is Sneijder wasn't even on the podium yet we are still talking about how he deserved the award. How much more someone that is on the podium and you are now trying to use voting points gap to say he doesn't deserve it. How inconsistent![/s]

1. So explain how Zidane won 2003 FIFA Best and Ronaldo came 3rd yet both of them also did not make Balon D'Or top 3 that same year (just a reverse of Nedved's case).


2. You agree that Nedved trumped Henry in CL performance that year (this is the ONLY tournament they participated together).


Now let's even profile Henry's 'almighty' 2002/03 season for Arsenal;
*Henry won NOTHING noteworthy with his club.
*Individually, he was bested by others. How?
He was not the highest goal scorer, Ruud Van Nistelrooy beat him to that
Van Nistelrooy also won EPL Player of the season (Nedved won this)
Henry did not win the league, Van Nistelrooy did with Man United (Nedved won this)
CL, Van Nistelrooy got to the semis & was highest goal scorer, Henry scored half of his tally & crashed out @ group stage (Nedved got to the final)

So Oga, explain to me, how Henry can even be considered better than Van Nistelrooy that season not to talk of Nedved. Looking at it closely now, Henry was wrongfully considered for the awards by FIFA & French magazine. He had no business being there because he was 2nd best in everything.


3. As for the Confed cup I'll educate you, qualifiers are not played for the Confederations cup Oga . The winners of all continental tournaments play it like Cameroon, Japan etc. Hence France since they won Euro 2000 (a tournament Zidane shone like a million stars and not Henry). As a matter of fact, Trezeguet outshone Henry in that tournament, scoring the winning goal and earning the label 'golden boy' which prompted Juventus to fork out millions to sign him and kick Henry out.
Zidane was Euro 2000 player of the tournament, golden boot was Kluivert. Henry won nothing in Euro 2000. So please don't spin us another lie like we have short memories or uninformed about football like you.


4. Another lie you have written is that Nedved did not contribute to Juventus' 2003 success. So explain how he won Serie A player of the season 2003??


5. Social media has a HUGE influence in swaying public opinion towards any player for an award. To deny this means you must live a life of lies as you have continually displayed on this thread. 2010, 2013 balon d'ors, 2014 World cup golden ball, and most recently Modric's Balon D'Or award.

I have deduced that you know nothing about football. Liar.

Akinblogdotcom:
and she is even considering taking the case to court.

I don't understand this part

Why are we women always fond of blaming others for our bad decisions??

Ademola47:
Grammarians in the house, please which one is more correct between these two sentences

[s] 1.Everybody knows his or her name
2.Everybody knows their name. [/s]

I've searched the internet for a seemingly convincing answer but the results are contradictory.

Each person knows their own name.

Hmmm. Vanuatu kwa
Nothing wey Aisha no go see for the other room

The future is female
We women will soon chase men out of this planet

ThierryJay:
I see that you lie a lot, with confidence. You also have comprehension issues. A combination of both depicts a worrying gap in the logical department.

First - EPL was not ranked 4th in 2003. Between 2000 - 2005, EPL was ranked 2nd, AHEAD of the Serie A based on UEFA coefficients per country. Check link for proof: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UEFA_coefficient. Its not surprising as Arsenal beat Juventus twice during this period, beat Inter scandalously and defeated Roma in their own backyard. Man Utd and Liverpool also defeated Juventus and AC Milan when they played during this period. Only spanish teams were the bane of EPL teams during this period and rightly so. See extract at the end of my post if the link is too long.

Second - Juventus only won the league in 2003, so where did Treble talk come from? Ac Milan won both their Copa Italia and UCL in 2003.

Third - The gap between Nedved and Henry in the voting is irrelevant. Afterall, we are talking about what should/could have been. Why did you now say you agree that Sneijder should have won over Messi in 2010 when the gap was even more astronomical as Sneijder wasn't even in the top three finalists? The focus is on other relevant parameters other than the actual voting results which is being under scrutiny here, Comprendre?

Fourth - Henry achieved nothing in 2003?? Gosh what a blatant lie. He won the FIFA confederations cup as its best tournament player and also won the FA Cup for Arsenal. He also won the EPL player of the year.

Fifth - Henry scored 6 goals in three matches against top opposition in 2003 - Inter, Roma and Valencia- that was my point. He scored 7 goals in total in the UCL in 2003 which is an overall decent UCL performance.

My point is Nedved may have won the Ballon D'or but Henry had a very good case to win it as well which is why he was recognized in contention for the 2003 Fifa world player of the year gong while Nedved was not. The absolute truth is that in 2003, Thierry Henry was a better player than Pavel Nedved.

Mister, I really don't see what you are driving at here.
Most of your defence for Henry are in areas where he either lost out or finished 2nd best.

1. Nedved won his league title, Henry didn't
(And please FA cup or Coppa Italia is not relevant for Balon D'Or if not, Kanu should be winning 2008 Balon D'Or too lol).

2. Czech Rep did not play in the Confed cup so we can't really say if Nedved would have been better.

3. The tournament they both played that year, the CL, Nedved finished 2nd while Henry crashed out of d group stage!

4. Nedved was declared the best midfielder of the year in Europe, Henry was not the best UEFA forward that year.

5. Henry scored 6 goals in CL, there were at least 8 other players who scored more than him.

Nedved was also Serie A player of 2003, UEFA midfielder of 2003, UEFA team of the year etc. He was not a striker so we can't compare using goals.

Nedved dragged Czech Rep to Euros that year, Henry had the likes of Zidane, Desailly, Deschamps, Vieira, Barthez, etc to support him.

Also, we all know the reason why Messi polled more votes than Sneijder was social media. Nothing else. In 2003, the votings were pure. No twitter, instagram bullshit.

And, in 2003 FIFA awards, Nedved came 4th. Stop lying.

ThierryJay:
Not true. EPL was already a top league by 2003. Man U won the 1999 UCL, Leeds and Man Utd got to semifinal of 2001 and 2002 UCLs respectively. In 2003, Henry scored over 40 goals and 20 assists. Henry was the EPL player of the year in 2003.

Henry drove France to win the FIFA Confederations cup in 2003 and was the player of the tournament, so his influence was not only in the EPL. He also performed excellently in crucial UCL matches against Roma, Inter Milan and Valencia, scoring 6 goals and 2 assists in those three matches.

No other player was statistically better than Henry in 2003 in the top leagues across all competitions both national and club combined.

In 2003, Henry was the most exciting top player to watch in Europe with his demonstration of speed, flair, skill and va-va-voom.

Combine all of the above factors and it's obvious that Henry deserved the 2003 Ballon D'or over Nedved whose only major impact was in the UCL for Juventus.

Nonsense.

The EPL was ranked 4th in 2003.
Nedved almost won the treble in 2003 so what are you saying? Nedved won UEFA best midfielder that year too.

Henry was not even UEFA best forward in 2003, it was Van Nistelrooy, so please again, what are u saying?

The gap between Nedved and Henry in the voting was just too much. As a matter of fact, Maldini who came third behind Henry by just 5 points should have been 2nd.

Fact is Henry achieved nothing in 2003, no league title, kicked out of d CL group stage!!! Haba! All he did was score 30 goals in the EPL.

You said Henry scored 6 goals, Van Nistelrooy scored 12 in the CL. Henry did not even qualify from his CL group in 2003, Arsenal finished 3rd!!

You must be a deluded Arsenal fan. Please argue with facts.