Ponziponzi's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Ponziponzi's Profile › Ponziponzi's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 26 pages)
ManOfSon:I understand your point, but I believe the reasoning is flawed. The fact that you’re renting a car from a dealership doesn’t prevent them from selling you a car if you want to buy one — just like a company in China selling semi-trucks for transporting goods doesn’t stop China from helping Nigeria build a cargo railway, if that’s what they need. These are entirely different markets. Similarly, the sale of portable generators to individuals in Nigeria has nothing to do with a corporation working with the government to develop power generation stations, transmission, or distribution infrastructure. That’s why I mentioned earlier that this line of thinking is a bit simplistic. Your reference to Ajaokuta Steel Company also isn’t really applicable here. The project wasn’t completed for several reasons — including Nigeria’s default on contractor payments, change of governments and their priorities, and the collapse of the Soviet Union, which had been providing both technical support and partial funding. None of these factors align with the usual conspiracy theories often thrown around. Today, most of the steel used in Nigeria is imported from China and India, and the technology at Ajaokuta is now outdated. Without a complete overhaul, the plant simply won’t be competitive in the current global market. When it comes to building power infrastructure, many countries, especially in the West, have the technical capacity to handle such projects in their own environments. But executing the same scale of work in a country like Nigeria, with its complex security challenges and logistical hurdles, is a different matter entirely. For large-scale power projects in Nigeria, you don’t just need technology — you also need reliable logistics, a strong supply chain, secured project financing, technical expertise, and most importantly, the willingness of skilled professionals to work in often remote and unstable areas. As of 2025, only China has the combination of scale, capacity, and political willingness to handle all of that. |
Celestialsword:I believe having so many military bases is a big and expensive challenge to US. They are too costly to maintain and could eventually be unsustainable. The US currently have about 500k troops across Europe, Middle East, Asia and Africa when it is not actually in any war. Just imagine how much it cost to maintain all those troops and the equipment that are just seating there redundant or see very limited action. I haven’t even mention all those fleets they have on the ocean with thousands of navy personnel on rotation and equipment and jets that have to constantly maintained. You can see why the US defence budget is so big— more than the next 10 countries combined. This is a world power problem, it happened to Rome, the Dutch and the British empire, the US is feeling it. As a world power, you get stretched trying to main your power around the world and it can get exhausting. It seem Trump is trying to do something about it. You just can’t keep spending resources on something that brings very little value to you while other countries are just free loading. China unlike the US currently don’t have that problem, they spend their budget to build new military infrastructure and equipment. That’s why they are building new fighter jets and increasing their fleets at a rate faster than any country right now. If things go on like this, it’s just a matter of time before they close the gap. |
Crafteck1:I won’t trust that source. If someone or an organization is all negative about a product, company or country all the time, they are probably not objective and I won’t consider them a reliable source. |
ManOfSon:I understand your point, but it's too simplistic. China is the manufacturing hub of the world, and it makes sense that we import portable generators from them. The demand for generators will remain, even if we achieve reliable electricity, because of the growing needs of various sectors. To be candid, no other country has the same level of motivation, resources, expertise, and capacity to address Nigeria’s electricity challenges as China. They are the leaders in this field, with no close competitors. Nigeria can keep signing contracts with companies like Siemens, but when the time comes to actually implement large-scale solutions, they will have to turn to those who are capable of delivering. For example, China added more than 300,000 MW of electricity in just one year – roughly 50% of the total global additions for that period. To put that into perspective, Nigeria’s total installed capacity is about 10,000 MW, Rwanda’s is around 500 MW, Egypt’s is about 60,000 MW, the UK’s is 120,000 MW, and Brazil’s is 250,000 MW. China’s annual addition alone is more than the total installed capacity of most countries, including Nigeria. To get results, we need to work with those who have the capability to make it happen. Simple as that! |
ManOfSon:Who do you think they can partner with to help solve Nigeria’s energy problem? |
Axis313:So who do you think they should work with? |
incogni2o:Why should they do that? They are not Cowards. |
AmiableMosquito:Nigeria is not doing Dangote any favours. If the country denies Dangote access to raw materials and undermines its operations by importing products from abroad despite domestic production capabilities, why would any company invest here? For example, if you continue to import steel, why would anyone plan to invest in building a steel plant locally? It doesn't make sense. |
Lush100:How will that happen? Most of those companies also sell their products in China and to many other countries. If they move to the US, how will they compete in the rest of the markets. |
Nonybb:Critical thinking is lacking in Nigeria. With her youths thinking like this, that country has a big problem. |
mrvitalis:Do you have any education at all? Just trying to understand your thought process. |
jaxxy:We've been hearing a lot of vague rhetoric, especially from the mainstream media over the past three years, about concepts like survival, mutual respect and democracy. But what do these terms really mean in practice? Take mutual respect, for example—how is it defined? If a group of countries decides to place weapons near another nation's border to contain it, one side might see that as justified, while the other views it as a strategic threat. Achieving victory in this battle is nearly impossible. Russia is not going anywhere—they will remain in Europe, and they see this as an existential threat. Because of that, they have more at stake in the long run than the Europeans and are willing to endure significant losses, including people and financial resources. The only scenario that could shift the tide of this war is if European nations directly engage with their troops, fully committing to war—at the cost of millions of lives. However, if Europe enters a war in its current state, the consequences would be devastating, both economically and politically. Massive divisions would emerge across Europe and within individual countries, as the justification for war would become increasingly difficult—especially as casualties mount, such as children in Germany losing their lives. The recovery could take decades, and European leaders understand this reality. As I’ve said before, what is the endgame for Europe? If they seek "mutual respect," they must sit down with Russia, define what that truly means, and ensure both sides understand and accept it. Simply repeating these words on TV or after every meeting holds no real value. |
Gboss247:How is this related to my comment, sir? |
jaxxy:So what the endgame? |
jaxxy:Just repeating what you hear on TV. If was that easy, it would have happened 3 years ago. Europeans will have to learn how to live with the Russians. |
mrvitalis:Many companies have folded due to lack of electricity. They just put it as high cost of production. Heavy industries relies in cheap electricity without which they will be uncompetitive. It is one of the reason our manufacturing industry is in a state of comatose. |
omoredia: |
How can we increase capacity when we don’t produce steel in Nigeria. All we do is recycle steels from scraps and that’s why we have a lot of criminals stealing any metal in sight, even manholes. |
Thefirmorganics:My apologies. Good luck, sir I can now see that Nigeria’s problem goes beyond revenue—it’s a crisis of intellectual capacity and critical thinking among its youth. I once wondered whether this stemmed from an IQ issue among Black people or a failure of proper education in critical thinking. However, after interacting with other Africans, especially from the East, it’s clear that the real problem lies in the lack of proper education in developing critical thinking skills in Nigeria. |
Thefirmorganics:I understand that you may not have enough knowledge to fully grasp economics and leveraging. It takes time and a certain level of education, so let me help a little. A country like Nigeria cannot fund infrastructure development solely from its internal resources—it’s simply not feasible because the country doesn’t generate enough revenue to cover such large-scale projects. Nigeria's infrastructure development needs are estimated at around $3 trillion. Meanwhile, Nigeria’s projected total revenue for last year was approximately $25 billion, and considering that the country ran a deficit last year (spending more than it earned), saving to build infrastructure is just unrealistic. To increase revenue, Nigeria needs to improve its productivity, which is not possible without essential infrastructure like power, water, and transportation. So, where will Nigeria get the funds and expertise to achieve this? From external sources. The key is to prioritize infrastructure projects that will have a high impact on the economy and the well-being of the people, while securing favourable loan terms without over-leveraging to ensure the debt can be repaid as agreed. This is a common strategy used by both governments and private companies. For example, Dangote didn’t use his own money to build his refinery because he doesn't have it. Instead, he secured some loans using the refinery as collateral and plans to pay them off over the next few years as production ramps up. This is how strategic financing works for both governments and businesses. You can thank me. |
erico2k2:And why should anyone cancel your debt. No one forced you to take it in the first place. Africans need to take responsibility, no one is responsible for feeding you. Wake up |
Thefirmorganics:At least you have someone willing to give you money to build infrastructure and help you to build it. Who else in the world can offer you this? |
yommen:NNPC that cannot even run their own refineries efficiently. What has their impact be in the last 30 years? It’s better they pack up and leave the downstream sector. We didn’t miss NITEL, we won’t miss NNPC. |
orisa37:Nobody cares about you, my brother. With the level of your IQ, I don’t think they need people like you there. |
orisa37:You need serious help. |
JimD:You don't know what you're talking about. The US is not the one being invaded here—it's Ukraine, and it needs all the help it can get from the US. The truth is, without the US, Ukraine cannot fight this war. Military equipment is not the only thing they need; they also rely on logistics, intelligence, GPS, and internet connectivity, such as Starlink, which are largely controlled by the US. Even in terms of equipment, most NATO supplies come from the US, which has a greater manufacturing capacity than the rest of NATO combined. Canada… lol, many of these countries can't even defend themselves without US support. Once again, I’ll say that Ukraine’s president made a catastrophic mistake today. He has seriously hurt Ukraine’s position, and it will take significant effort to repair. He is in trouble—he has a lot to lose in this situation. If you don’t have parents and your uncle is paying your school fees with no other options, you have to be humble and endure a lot just to get what you need in the end. I hope this works out for him, but right now, he must be regretting it. |
3kay945:I'm sure he will be back. He has no other options. |
JimD:What options does Ukraine have? They need the US. I believe Ukraine's president made a catastrophic mistake today |
seunjungle1:He made a big mistake. He should have been more diplomatic, as he has no choice—he needs the US. This is an absolute disaster for Ukraine. He should have kept his cool, I believe he is just inexperience with diplomacy. |
Streetdoctor:Deep seek is just not free but it’s open access with open weights. You can build on it and make it anything you want. It’s just like an android software that several companies can build their applications on. There is nothing like that out there. |
Free2Fly:. China has a big used car market. It’s even cheaper now for ICE cars. |

