Ponziponzi's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Ponziponzi's Profile › Ponziponzi's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 26 pages)
FSBoperator:Lol. That’s an ore concentration plant and do not add much value to the ore. When you mine, the ore comes with stone, soil and sand, and you won’t want to export all those as it’s a waste of resources. So they set up plants to crush the stones and get the main ore out so only the valuable part is shipped. It’s not adding much value and it’s a lot further away from battery manufacturing. It’s like when you harvest corn and you decide to remove the corn from the cobs at the farm before bringing them home. That’s good but it doesn’t mean you are ready to start making cornflakes. |
FSBoperator:Lol. Looks like I poked a nerve there. I was just pointing out the obvious, there is currently no much value added to the minerals we export and I see no plans to build one. |
rossipki:Just as Shell, Chevron, Agip, Total, etc., have been adding value to the crude oil they have been exporting for the last 50 years, Abi? Who will add value to your minerals if you don’t build capacity for it and I currently see no plans. |
Lordly13:This propaganda doesn’t help, it just distorts the reality and gives a false sense that one side is at the end of the road which is not the case in reality. For example, the Interfax data show that Russia produced about 8.64million/day in Sept 2026, which is far more that 3mbpd you mentioned. See link: https://interfax.com/newsroom/top-stories/119524/. Ukraine is inflicting real damages on Russian refining capacity but that won’t change much in the war as Russia considers the war an existential threat. The only way this war will end is via negotiations that will consider the security concerns of both Russia and NATO. Ukraine is just a collateral damage in all this. |
MrSword:I don’t think there is any Russian President that will fold and leave the war. He/she will be killed the next day. It’s an existential threat for them. |
Infamous:Nothing and that’s not the point. The allegation is that he forged his academic credentials, so why will anyone listen to an alleged liar? You need some credibility to warrant listening to. He can still be a political analyst in his house or his beer parlour. |
Kobojunkie:China is the second-largest economy in the world by nominal GDP and the largest by PPP. It is also the number-one trading partner for more countries than any other country. This is a fact. China’s manufacturing capacity exceeds that of the U.S., Germany, Japan, and India combined. This is also a fact. China is a behemoth. You can have a problem with China, but that does not change the facts. |
Krismas:Lol! You guys are deluded? Innoson is a glorified, low-grade car assembly plant. Most of their parts are imported as semi or full knocked down parts from China. Even China with enormous industrial capability and know-how are still struggling to have commercial jet engine made, Nigeria has no hope in building one. |
dgitrader:And so? Who asked you? You buy what is available. |
Nwaikpe:I can say the same for Anambra. I haven’t been to Anambra but I know they eat people there. |
Nwaikpe:Have you been to China? Chinese people are far more humane than an average Nigerian. |
Leepeak:These are beer parlour arguments. You can make the same case that Tinubu will use the Nigeria Police Force to fight his opponent and to protect himself, so Nigeria should not have its own police, but should ask the USA or UK to police us. That will be mum.u talk Policing is local, and state police (or even local government policing) will be more effective than the current Federal system inherited from the colonial powers. All these NYPD and LAPD you hear about are municipal police units comparable to the local government police. In New York state alone, there are more than 300 different and independent municipal police departments. Just like, say, in Lagos, Ikeja, Aggege, Lagos Island, etc each has a different and independent police unit. I believe this is overdue. |
Leepeak:What are you saying? The governor should have all the power to control the police in he/her state. That’s why he is the governor. |
Israeli media figures and commentators turned sharply against Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff this week, accusing two of US President Donald Trump’s closest Middle East envoys of helping push an Iran deal that many in Israel view as dangerous and incomplete. The criticism came amid mounting Israeli concern over the emerging US-Iran memorandum of understanding, which critics say prioritizes regional calm and the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz while leaving Iran’s nuclear program, missile program, and support for regional proxies for later negotiations. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Monday that Israel would continue to act to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons, regardless of the agreement. Israeli officials also told Ynet that Netanyahu had made clear to Trump that Israel did not view itself as bound by the Lebanon clause in the agreement and would keep operating against Hezbollah threats. But while Netanyahu avoided a direct public attack on Trump’s envoys, some Israeli commentators did not. Channel 14, a right-wing Israeli television channel often described as Israel’s answer to Newsmax because of its strongly conservative, pro-Netanyahu editorial line and influence among right-wing viewers, carried some of the sharpest criticism. Channel 14 anchor Tal Meir used her Monday morning program to criticize Kushner and Witkoff, accusing them of turning their backs on Israel “at the moment of truth.” “They got a little confused in this event,” Meir said, according to Channel 14. “You are part of these people.” Meir argued that Israel was defending the Jewish people as a whole, including Jews living outside the country. “We are here, among other things, to defend you too,” she said. “In the end, this is your real home, and we are guarding it for you and for your future generations. And you turn your backs on us like this? Simply losers.” Kushner and Witkoff painted as sell-outs The comments reflected a broader emotional tone in parts of the Israeli right, where Kushner and Witkoff are being judged as American negotiators and as Jewish figures with a perceived obligation toward Israel. Channel 14 also reported that Yinon Magal, host of The Patriots, attacked Kushner and Witkoff on X, writing that Trump had come out of the agreement looking like a “loser.” According to the report, Magal accused the two envoys of acting under Qatari pressure and “selling their brothers in Israel.”[b] The anger toward Kushner and Witkoff has intensified because the two men had previously been praised in Israel for their role in hostage negotiations and Trump’s broader Middle East policy. Their current role in the Iran track has now made them targets for Israeli frustration over what many see as a rushed diplomatic process that does not meet Jerusalem’s security demands. Ynet reported that the memorandum appears to fall short of four demands Netanyahu had set out only days earlier: removing Iran’s enriched uranium, dismantling enrichment infrastructure, limiting missile production, and ending support for terrorist proxies. According to the report, those goals are currently “not on the horizon.” The media believes the US-Iran agreement falls short The Israeli backlash is also linked to the structure of the agreement itself. Critics argue that the deal addresses the immediate crisis around Hormuz while pushing the hardest questions about Iran’s nuclear and regional military capabilities into a later stage Channel 14 cited Israeli security officials warning that the agreement was based on a fragile structure, signed in American haste, and left the core of the nuclear threat without a real answer. For now, the strongest public criticism of Kushner and Witkoff is coming from Israeli right-wing media rather than from official Israeli government statements. But the tone marks a significant shift from the praise the two envoys received in Israel only months ago. Kushner and Witkoff, once viewed by many Israelis as trusted channels into Trump’s inner circle, are now becoming symbols of what critics describe as Washington’s willingness to prioritize a regional diplomatic win over Israel’s strategic concerns. Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/politics-and-diplomacy/article-899553#google_vignette |
Mattswaggz:Read! Stop being ignorant. Trump pulled out of the JCPOA in 2015 and reimposed sanctions, and Iran had no obligation to stop enrichment or follow the agreement. Everyone knows they were enriching and have enrich up to 60%. I will say this deal is worst that who Obama and the EU negotiated in 2013. |
CanadaOrBust:The fact that you want it to happen doesn't mean it will. Having a preconceived mindset based on what you want to believe, and then looking for sources that support it, is the height of intellectual laziness and idiocy. It certainly doesn't deserve an intelligent discourse or my time. |
Sheuns:It's understandable they're worried. China is rising fast, and the US can't stop it at this point. That said, China won't become the sole hegemon like the US, a multipolar world is emerging, and it will take time for the US to accept that after decades as the world's only superpower. The most dangerous period is between now and that acceptance, but the shift seems irreversible. Global military presence is a double-edged sword. It allows power projection but at enormous cost; paying, feeding, and maintaining hundreds of thousands of troops and equipment, including 11 aircraft carriers with rotating crews, often without combat. That's why the US defence budget keeps growing (Trump's proposed $1.5T exceeds the next 10 countries combined), much of it just for operations and maintenance. It's unsustainable. It's a natural process for great powers as seen in Rome, the Dutch Republic, the Ottoman Empire, and Great Britain. China's economic influence will naturally grow as it expands trading partners (it's already the top partner for most of the world). You can see some resemblance of it happening a week ago when China-backed Kyrgyzstan won a secret UN Security Council vote against US-backed Philippines |
CanadaOrBust:Yes, China has a demographic problem that will worsen over time, but so do most countries in Asia and Europe. See the list of approximate total fertility rates (births per woman). For context, a rate of 2.1 is considered the replacement level. Country South Korea ~0.7–0.8 Taiwan ~0.8–0.9 Singapore ~0.9–1.0 Hong Kong (SAR) ~0.8–1.0 Macau (SAR) ~0.7–1.0 Italy ~1.2 Spain ~1.2 Japan ~1.2–1.3 China ~1.0–1.2 Greece ~1.2–1.3 To say China is on an irreversible downward trajectory is laughable. There is absolutely no evidence to support that claim. China has grown at around 5% annually over the past five years—how many $20 trillion economies can achieve that? This year, China’s economy is expected to grow at roughly twice the rate of the US and contribute about 26% of global GDP growth, which is nearly three times the US contribution of around 9%. They also recorded the highest trade surplus in history last year, and it is projected to continue expanding this year. The “China decline” narrative has been repeated for more than 30 years, yet it has not materialized. In fact, during that period, China’s economy has grown from roughly $4 trillion to around $20 trillion—about a fivefold increase. I agree that the US moving manufacturing and technology to China kick-started its development, but that was not done as charity. At the time, China had low-cost skilled labour and a large market, so US companies shared technology and provided investment to train workers to produce products for them. These were then sold in the Chinese market, with the surplus exported back to the US. US companies made substantial profits from this arrangement. For example, a Nike shoe produced in China for about $25 (including materials, labour, electricity, and other costs) is sold in the US for around $250. That is roughly $225 in value captured in the US. This made many CEOs and companies very wealthy, but often at the expense of the working class in these industries. China, in turn, used the revenues generated to uplift its population, develop world-class cities, and invest in education and infrastructure. It is also moving up the value chain, as it does not want to remain simply a production base for US companies. The US and many Western companies are not pleased with this shift, but it is the natural outcome of development. In fact, I do not doubt that China will continue to move up the manufacturing supply chain for the next 2-3 decades and will be a leader in many areas. The claim that the US has closed its market is not entirely accurate. Just last year, the top 100 US companies generated a total of about $368 billion in revenue from China alone. Many US companies still have a large presence there. For example, KFC has more than 12,000 stores in China (almost twice the number in the US), Starbucks has more than 8,000, and McDonald’s has around 7,000 stores across the country and continues to expand. Even Microsoft controls more than 80% of the desktop operating system market in China. In 2019, before China’s EV expansion accelerated, General Motors sold more cars in China than in the rest of the world combined, although it has since been losing market share due to increased competition and a lack of innovation relative to local EV players. This does not seem like a country that is closed to US companies. |
Sheuns:If the US have all these, then why are they worried? Why all the propaganda here and there? I know the rise of China can be scary; they rose from nowhere and are here now. Since the fall of the Soviet Union, the US hasn't had any near-peer rival until China came, and they will be here for a while. The US will just have to accept it and live with it. This will take time, but they have no options than to accept. |
CanadaOrBust:So why are you interested in their downfall? What do you gain as a Nigerian from China’s downfall? China lifted more than 800 million of her people out of poverty in less than 30 years. This has never been done in human history. A country that moved from being dirt poor country to one of the most technology advanced country in the world in less than three decades. Instead of you looking at what they have done right and try to implement it, you are looking and happy for their downfall. I understand that the US government as the world leader are not happy to have a peer competitor in China but how does that help you and your family. Let’s image China crashes today, will that improve your life and that of your children? Just think about it and stop consuming news and information not meant for you. |
PulaPower:Just a very minor difference mainly to cater to the rules of the regions, but fundamentally they are the same and are likely produced in the same factory. |
GeneralOuki:I don't have the strength for this pen.is swinging contest. Just know that most Israeli technology depends on US IP and technology. Their entire semiconductor industry is US-based, and even when it's not directly US, they depend on US tools and IP. Even their almighty Iron Dome is heavily dependent on US technology. Most of their tech companies also rely heavily on money from the US, like Wall Street. The US defense budget is more than $1 trillion, so what's $30 billion/year? Funding the IDF isn't just about giving money or weapons alone. A lot of the technology comes from what the US has developed because of their enormous R& investment. All this myth that Israel is an island, that they're some kind of superhuman with super intelligence who can do anything, is just bullshit. They are a regional military power propped up by a global superpower's supply chain. Without US tools, IP, and spare parts, their high-tech military grinds to a halt. They know this, that is which is why they are desperately trying to lock in the relationship permanently, not walk away from it, and they shouldn't. |
GeneralOuki:Many countries have INS systems, not just Israel. And many of their technologies are still dependent on U.S. IP and the global supply chain. Also, it is not a substitute for GNSS. I didn’t say they can’t build jets; even Sweden and Turkey have their own fighter jets. They were pressured not to build theirs by the Americans because they fund a large part of the IDF budget. That is why America is their father. Even if they decide to build, they will need a lot of U.S. technology and supply chain. No matter what you call the F-35, it is a product of Lockheed Martin, a U.S. company. Israel needs the US for everything; their existence depends on the support of the US. The US provides them with economic, technological, and military lifelines. That’s why they listen to the US and spend money to gain influence. |
Heffalump:This is an ignorant statement! There is no doubt that the influence of Jewish communities has grown in recent decades, largely due to the enormous pity and guilt many Western countries carry over the atrocities committed against Jews in the early 1900s. Millions were killed in cold blood across many European countries simply for being Jewish. Even those who did not directly participate did little to stop it. After WW2, Jews were widely seen as victims and were protected. Many in the older generation still carry that sense of guilt and feel a responsibility to protect them. However, things have been changing recently because of the situation in Gaza. Many young people in the West, who do not share the same historical guilt over what happened to the Jews, are no longer viewing them primarily as victims but increasingly as aggressors, similar to how Russia is viewed in Ukraine. If this continues, support will likely wane, and their influence in the West may reduce. In fact, this shift is already beginning to happen. |
LordIsaac:US is the father, without their backing, how will the state of Isreal survive. They don’t even have their own GNSS, they relay on US GPS. They don’t current operate any domestically produced fighter jets, they are all produced by the US. |
Thewrath:It’s even worse than I thought. Your reasoning is poor. I’ve noticed a real dip in critical thinking among many Nigerian youth lately. They often just parrot ignorant takes without a second thought. I’m not sure if it’s the education system or just a general lack of effort. How is someone supposed to engage this? |
Livegamesonly:Why should they have military to say no? |
Thewrath:Not everyone have a slave mentality like you do. So, they should give out their resources for aids because they are not using it. People like you shouldn’t have children, it would do their generation a lot of service. |
SeverusSnape:And yet, Russia has one of the largest Jewish communities in the world. Nigeria has none, except some gum-bodies. |
fineboynl:You guys are funny. I thought Trump has already changed the regime. |
investment. All this myth that Israel is an island, that they're some kind of superhuman with super intelligence who can do anything, is just bullshit. They are a regional military power propped up by a global superpower's supply chain. Without US tools, IP, and spare parts, their high-tech military grinds to a halt. They know this, that is which is why they are desperately trying to lock in the relationship permanently, not walk away from it, and they shouldn't.