edi287:

You don't know me. Shut up clown...

I have said what I know about you. And you may not know but you are oozing coon behavior.

Kokobilo87:


I have said what I know about you. And you may not know but you are oozing coon behavior.

Your entire lineage are coons. I'm not obliged to prove anything to you.
Don't ever insult me in a middle of a conversation provided I didn't.
Clown. Bleep you think you are - a coon determiner or something? Fool.

edi287:

An axe is more dangerous than AR 15?? You no longer trust the police to protect you because you want to carry assault weapons around?

A terrorist planning to kill does not need an automatic rifle.

2 days now and you still don't see the scam

Ban gans totally and thete are still more deadlier choices of . mass murder.Ask those Tsarnaev brothers who bombed Boston marathon.
Then there shall be laws to regulate sale of fertilizer ie ammonium nitrate?

edi287:

Your entire lineage are coons. I'm not obliged to prove anything to you.
Don't ever insult me in a middle of a conversation provided I didn't.
Clown. Bleep you think you are - a coon determiner or something? Fool.

Stop being a tool. Be a critical thinker. That's all I can say to you. You started with this saying you are on the fense. You could have been truthful and say I am just another tool

basilico:


A terrorist planning to kill does not need an automatic rifle.

2 days now and you still don't see the scam

They don't need it, their preferred tool is a bomb but since that is harder to get they go with guns and if it's harder they will go with cars or knife. He has a point that guns can kill more compared to knives. But cars can be more dangerous to regulate and be more lethal if these people make cars their weapon of choice. Let's just hope that does not happen.

The issue of gun control, the issue I have is that they have made it political. It is like they want people to die so they can control you more.

But they are going after the wrong guns. The ones that kill most people are not talked about much, the ones that can really defend you from the government are the ones they want to take away

Kokobilo87:


Stop being a tool. Be a critical thinker. That's all I can say to you. You started with this saying you are on the fense. You could have been truthful and say I am just another tool

Your dad is a tool. Bleep you and your entire lineage.

basilico:


A terrorist planning to kill does not need an automatic rifle.

2 days now and you still don't see the scam

Ban gans totally and thete are still more deadlier choices of . mass murder.Ask those Tsarnaev brothers who bombed Boston marathon.
Then there shall be laws to regulate sale of fertilizer ie ammonium nitrate?

A terrorist will inflict more damage with a gun than an axe.
You are trying to indirectly say an axe causes as much damage as an AR 15 and I don't know what to think of that.

Kokobilo87:


So no rebels can stand too but they fight anyway and sometimes they even keep the government force at bay. The 2nd amendment has a historical battle behind it. Everyone has the right to defend themselves from the government. Period

You have a right to defend yourself from an unlawful government not a lawful one so the statement is not a blanket one.

The only way a militia can stand against an army of the US caliber is by using unconventional tactics and those have nothing to do with having assault rifles.

basilico:


Google this " a well regulated militia"

Google the meaning of regulated.

edi287:

A terrorist will inflict more damage with a gun than an axe.
You are trying to indirectly say an axe causes as much damage as an AR 15 and I don't know what to think of that.

How many lives need to be lost.How many mass shootings happen in a year compared to those gang fights. Rifles kill only 3% . Handguns 97%.

You want to go after rifles.

LordReed:


Google the meaning of regulated.

Sometimes I wonder whether some people just troll or make sadistic comments just because they have nothing else to say.


The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

LordReed:


You have a right to defend yourself from an unlawful government not a lawful one so the statement is not a blanket one.

The only way a militia can stand against an army of the US caliber is by using unconventional tactics and those have nothing to do with having assault rifles.

You have a right to defend yourself from an unlawful government not a lawful one

Did you use reasoning to type this nonsense? Has anyone ever said they have the right to defend themselves from a lawful person or government?

Taliban stand against the US army. At least they have weapons making the US think twice on how they move about. That is the point.

The f-15 and the f-22 raptors are not a means to win a battle alone. They don't make an army walk freely.

basilico:


How many lives need to be lost.How many mass shootings happen in a year compared to those gang fights. Rifles kill only 3% . Handguns 97%.

You want to go after rifles.

Don't mind the tool that is sitting on the fence

No

Kokobilo87:



Did you use reasoning to type this nonsense? Has anyone ever said they have the right to defend themselves from a lawful person or government?

Taliban stand against the US army. At least they have weapons making the US think twice on how they move about. That is the point.

The f-15 and the f-22 raptors are not a means to win a battle alone. They don't make an army walk freely.

The idiot does not know why the atomic bomb was used. Had US invaded Japan every citizen was fired up, ready to kill any soldier using any means. Casualties would have been humongous.

Same case with America. With 300m guns and a trillion bullets in the hands of civilians no foreign army would dare to invade a united people. With a rifle behind every blade of grass. And the rifle holders know how to shoot

basilico:


How many lives need to be lost.How many mass shootings happen in a year compared to those gang fights. Rifles kill only 3% . Handguns 97%.

You want to go after rifles.

Where did I say guns should be seized? I support universal background checks and ban on assault weapons just like your hero Trump once did.
Semi automatic rifles have been used in 6 of the 10 deadliest mass shootings

Kokobilo87:


Don't mind the tool that is sitting on the fence

Your mom is a tool and she's not on the fence.

edi287:

Where did I say guns should be seized? I support universal background checks and ban on assault weapons just like your hero Trump once did.
Semi automatic rifles have been used in 6 of the 10 deadliest mass shootings

Okay they have been used . How many casualties in those shootings?

Compare that to the casualties in a typical month in Chicago from handguns

Where did Trump support assault weapons ban. Trump is always talking about 2nd amendment. Media was always on a hit piece over Trump, gleefully showing Don Jnr killing a lion etc. When its time to canvass for votes politicians speak from both sides of the mouth.
Like Obama "If you like your doctor....."

basilico:


Okay they have been used . How many casualties in those shootings?

Compare that to the casualties in a typical month in Chicago from handguns

You need to stop bringing Chicago up as a counter point. All Chicago does is reinforce my point even more about making sure guns don't get into the wrong hands as much as you can.

edi287:

Where did I say guns should be seized? I support universal background checks and ban on assault weapons just like your hero Trump once did.
Semi automatic rifles have been used in 6 of the 10 deadliest mass shootings

Assault rifle is semantics. Dude get a clue. A sword is an assault weapon too.

Honest question: an AR-15 and a Gluck pistol which is more deadly?

My answer, AR-15 Carries 30 rounds, it is not automatic and can fire at most 30 rounds in 30 seconds. It is not easily concealed.

A Gluck pistol carries 17 rounds and can fire at most 17 rounds in 17 seconds. This is where things get interesting. You can fire two glucks at the same time, x2 the rounds now exceeding the AR-15. It can be easily concealed meaning, you can pull another 2 glucks instead of reloading and continue firing in less Than 4 seconds. If you play video games or have any military training you will understand why they advice to use the secondary weapon instead of reloading the primary weapon. It takes less time. One person can carry at least 10 Gluck pistols on him without being noticed. Ar-15 even if you conceal it well you can't carry more Than 3 and you cannot conceal all.

edi287:

You need to stop bringing Chicago up as a counter point. All Chicago does is reinforce my point even more about making sure guns don't get into the wrong hands as much as you can.

He brings Chicago up because Coons likes you, PrideofLincoln1 and salford1 don't care about blacks dying. You only comeout of your caves when the media wants to use you as a tool to carry out their political agendas. How many guns in Chicago was gotten legally? Do you know the gun laws in Chicago? You don't know that. They have strict gun laws but everyweek you hear 30 to 40 people shot. Coons like you don't know or care to know because the racist left don't talk about it as they want blacks to remain down while they import people from other countries to replace them. All for power.

Kokobilo87:


Assault rifle is semantics. Dude get a clue. A sword is an assault weapon too.

Honest question: an AR-15 and a Gluck pistol which is more deadly?

My answer, AR-15 Carries 30 rounds, it is not automatic and can fire at most 30 rounds in 30 seconds. It is not easily concealed.

A Gluck pistol carries 17 rounds and can fire at most 17 rounds in 17 seconds. This is where things get interesting. You can fire two glucks at the same time, x2 the rounds now exceeding the AR-15. It can be easily concealed meaning, you can pull another 2 glucks instead of reloading and continue firing in less Than 4 seconds. If you play video games or have any military training you will understand why they advice to use the secondary weapon instead of reloading the primary weapon. It takes less time. One person can carry at least 10 Gluck pistols on him without being noticed. Ar-15 even if you conceal it well you can't carry more Than 3 and you cannot conceal all.

The narrative is ban AR-15. Twist everything to justify outright ban on semi auto rifles.
Lefties, give them an inch they will take a mile.
Once they ban semi auto rifles , they will then go for handguns. It will take them some time they are playing a long game.
And with useful idiots parroting ban assault You bet they will eventually go for all guns at the end

Just to add Trump was against bumper stocks which turns a semi auto to full auto. The nonsense about assault weapons from Trump was about the bumper stocks.

But media will lie.

basilico:


The narrative is ban AR-15. Twist everything to justify outright ban on semi auto rifles.
Lefties, give them an inch they will take a mile.
Once they ban semi auto rifles , they will then go for handguns. It will take them some time they are playing a long game.
And with useful idiots parroting ban assault You bet they will eventually go for all guns at the end .

Before Hitler started his tyranny he made sure of taking the guns from the jews.

Kokobilo87:



Did you use reasoning to type this nonsense? Has anyone ever said they have the right to defend themselves from a lawful person or government?

Taliban stand against the US army. At least they have weapons making the US think twice on how they move about. That is the point.

The f-15 and the f-22 raptors are not a means to win a battle alone. They don't make an army walk freely.

Are you dumb? Can you not understand english? You wrote:

Kokobilo87:


Everyone has the right to defend themselves from the government.

So I should be the one asking you if you reasoned before typing.

Do you know who supplied the Taliban the weapons they are using against the US Army? The CIA! Is the CIA going to give weapons to the citizens of the US? Are the citizens of the US going to be able to walk into a store and purchase those caliber of weapons? Don't be an unreasoning dumbass.

basilico:


Sometimes I wonder whether some people just troll or make sadistic comments just because they have nothing else to say.


The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Are you are dummy? What is the meaning of regulated?

Kokobilo87:


Before Hitler started his tyranny he made sure of taking the guns from the jews.

Another fake news purveyor. You dumbass bring fake news that can easily be fact checked.

Adolf Hitler became chancellor of Germany in January 1933, but it was only in March 1938 that the Third Reich promulgated its Waffengesetz, or weapons law, which required police permission for ownership of a handgun. Other firearms were left unregulated.

LordReed:


Are you dumb? Can you not understand english? You wrote:


So I should be the one asking you if you reasoned before typing.

Do you know who supplied the Taliban the weapons they are using against the US Army? The CIA! Is the CIA going to give weapons to the citizens of the US? Are the citizens of the US going to be able to walk into a store and purchase those caliber of weapons? Don't be an unreasoning dumbass.

OMG look at the argument this turd is making. This is hilarious.

LordReed:


Are you are dummy? What is the meaning of regulated?

Semantics. Why does that Oakland hustler maintain an AR-15? DM him to give up his arms

basilico:


Semantics. Why does that Oakland hustler maintain an AR-15? DM him to give up his arms

You are the one quoting the constitution but want to play the semantics game when the obvious is staring you in the face. GTFOH.

Kokobilo87:


He brings Chicago up because Coons likes you, PrideofLincoln1 and salford1 don't care about blacks dying. You only comeout of your caves when the media wants to use you as a tool to carry out their political agendas. How many guns in Chicago was gotten legally? Do you know the gun laws in Chicago? You don't know that. They have strict gun laws but everyweek you hear 30 to 40 people shot. Coons like you don't know or care to know because the racist left don't talk about it as they want blacks to remain down while they import people from other countries to replace them. All for power.

Your mother and father are coons stuck in your right wing breitbart, Alex Jones chamber.
Stick to sucking Trump's dick and never quote me again.

Kokobilo87:


OMG look at the argument this turd is making. This is hilarious.

You are a slowpoke and have no argument.

LordReed:


Another fake news purveyor. You dumbass bring fake news that can easily be fact checked.

Adolf Hitler became chancellor of Germany in January 1933, but it was only in March 1938 that the Third Reich promulgated its Waffengesetz, or weapons law, which required police permission for ownership of a handgun. Other firearms were left unregulated.

Here you go

Kokobilo87:


OMG look at the argument this turd is making. This is hilarious.

Turd is brainwashed. Regurgitation of what he was told, never given a chance to think critically.
Typical leftist mantra of take an empty brain, feed it with lies and you have a stooge