Minemrys:

i d0n't get where i menti0ned in the post u replied, abt Amber Heard or j0hnny depp. My point is, y'all are acting up on the Gal gadot case and going out on whed0n n0w, but when Fisher came out with the accusati0ns, y'all were like "dude should shut up". But i didn't see you or any0ne here being harsh on the ladies who affirmed Fisher. Then u turn the blame on fisher and say boyega kept shut and that he suffered similar, hence he should shut up. Dude, you d0n't kn0w what happened in both sets or c0mpanies. You d0n't kn0w how things were resolved behind the scenes. For u and thekingishere to jump into c0nclusi0n and start making inference or c0mparis0ns is like blaming a rape victim who went to court and did everything to get at the rapist while pointing the fact others kept shut. It may be similar case with boyega, which i doubt it is but both guys are different. Like the rape allusi0n, we may never kn0w why the others kept shut. Maybe they were settled, maybe they were scared, maybe they were religious and had to let things be for karma. You never kn0w. But just saying, he suffered same, and kept shut so otherz should do the same, is being a judgmental pers0n. If people were that way, we wouldn't have people clam0ring for biafra, odua nati0n or people going into crime cos, hey we go through same stuff so we should stay calm.
You d0n't have to like any0ne. I d0n't like fisher, i have never met him.

IngeniousLeez:


@ the bolded, yea you didn't mention literally Amber Heard or Depp issue as my bias but You saying I support women as against men is a direct reference to the convo we had previously about Heard vs Emilia Clarke taking Mera role— which in turn is related to the Amber Vs Depp case. So no dey deflect.

Who's going all out on Whedon now?? Lmao... So na today or yesterday I start to dey bash Whedon? Seriously? That Gal Gadot issue with Whedon sef is old news, she refusing some scenes and that face-in-boob$ gimmick is sooo 2018. Just in-depth behind the scenes that we getting now, nothing new.
So I no understand which one you're insinuating I'm only attacking Whedon cos of women bringing up evidence of his misconduct now.

As for the rest I got nothing to say than All is well. I don hear. No wahala.
One thing I have one problem with tho>> you said "don't be judgemental". But aren't we being Judgemental when it's only Ray Fisher and/or other "victims" case we've heard and yet to hear Whedon's account?? I thought it goes both ways with the line of thought~ "all suspects are innocent until proven guilty"??

Minemrys:

i d0n't remember having arguments abt Depp and Heard with u. We only talked abt her sexuality. Bros, speaking of guilty, has whed0n released a counter statement? He hasn't.

pu7pl3:


Neither has Hamada

phr0nesis:
.

Minemrys:

@abduleez1. In law, silence can be interpreted as admittance of guilt in the face of prosecution.

pu7pl3:


Lmaoo, what's this?

Minemrys:

@abduleez.1. In law, silence can be interpreted as admittance of guilt in the face of prosecution.

pu7pl3:


They guilty asf bro especially that Whedon

Minemrys:

brother, prior to jl, and after snyder left, few changes were made in the dc or wb management. I didn't work on the scene, s0me0ne who does, says so, am just a fan who reads what they give to the media. And since the pers0n talking isn't getting sued, then it serves as proof that s0mething did happen per what he says.

Minemrys:

@abduleez1. In law, silence can be interpreted as admittance of guilt in the face of prosecution.

pu7pl3:


Neither has Hamada

phr0nesis:
.

nani667:
Episode 6 ⚡

SMUAG:


Abi o.
Na him acting prowess we wan watch, no b to dey show muscle o.

TheKingIsHere:


Hamada has an NDA with WB.

Speaking or saying anything will get him fired

IngeniousLeez:


Lmao.....

Acting prowess from Dwayne??

Minemrys:

the rock is actually a good actor. Better than jas0n statham. You must have been watching just his acti0n films. He aint that great but he's better than a few cw actors.

TheKingIsHere:


Hamada has an NDA with WB.

Speaking or saying anything will get him fired

TheKingIsHere:


Not when an NDA is involved

TheKingIsHere:


Hamada cannot sue or say anything because of the NDA as an executive.

Ray knows this and know that he was wrong against Hamada that's why he is slowly retracting his initial allegations against him.

Minemrys:

slowly retracting. M0re on that later since pu7pl3 ir0ned that part with u. Am guessing NDA doesn't hold Fisher fr0m accussing an exec but it prevents an exec fr0m suing s0me0ne dragging their name to the mud right? Or it prevents same exec fr0m defending himself seeing as the c0ntroversy fr0m that is already creating negative publicity for wb. Wow! Wb are an excellent management that protects its employees.

pu7pl3:


He is not better than Jason bro

TheKingIsHere:


Pu7pl3 didn't iron that part with me bros, cos he didn't explain how each statement meant the same thing and I decided to let it slide.

Also, an executive will choose hi/her high paying lucrative job over defending anything with an upcoming actor especially when there is an NDA involved.

TheKingIsHere:


I'm just wondering how Shazam will defeat Adam without Henry Cavill Superman (it WB is still adamant)

Minemrys:

and i repeat, NDA does n0t hold u fr0m defending yourself. Go check what NDA is about. If it is the way u are saying, then obviously, there's a hole in that wb isn't suing fisher for breaking the NDA.