wirinet:


So after scouring the internet searching for a report of police acting without backup in an active shooter situation, this is all you could come up with?

Did you read the full article, or you just read a few lines and then shouted eureka?

Screenshot below is also in the report;

donjazet:
This is the kind of people that very foolish black people are aligning with.

Goodvibes007:

The police guns are only quick to fire when it's a minority.

The picture below has a guy that just shot 3 people surrendering. He surrendered but did not drop his weapon. It would also only take him a fraction of a second to turn his assault rifle on the police. Yet, he walked home safely with his strapped assault rifle, even after shooting 3 or so people right there in the presence of the cops. His privilege earned him atleast a right to defend himself in court. If he was black or brown, the cops would very quickly apply your Jay Z rule of squeezing first and ask questions later would apply.

Banning guns won't keep guns off the street.

salford1:

Do not reply that animal quoting you. He is a well known lunatic on this thread. If you observe well enough, you would realise many posters do not reply his quotes. He would try to drag you into the mud by quoting you several times. Please starve him of attention - it drives him wild like the animal that he is. It also has over 5 usernames and would switch between them to try and engage you. Just so you are aware.

As for the other Nigerian based coons on this thread popularly called umudike republicans or wannabe American far-right, chose those you quote wisely. They haven't fully recovered from the orange turd's loss. One of them even thinks former orange man is still the president. This shows you how crazy some of them are.

PrideofLincoln1:
I am still surprised people are still going back and forth with those two unemployed Coons who will be trolling at 3 or 4 am Nigeria time while their contemporaries are sleeping. You hear where the famous midget said Kyle Rittenhouse was legally allowed to carry a gun and he was defending himself. How can he be legally allowed to carry a gun when he was 17 years old when he killed those two guys in Kenosha. I told you these Umudike rats are beyond appalling. That's the same way he called a 26 year veteran of the police department a Rookie. Who engage with a brain less slowpoke who spends his whole day on Google about a country no one in his lineage can get a Visa to.

PrideofLincoln1:
I am still surprised people are still going back and forth with those two unemployed Coons who will be trolling at 3 or 4 am Nigeria time while their contemporaries are sleeping.

You hear where the famous midget said Kyle Rittenhouse was legally allowed to carry a gun and he was defending himself. How can he be legally allowed to carry a gun when he was 17 years old when he killed those two guys in Kenosha.

I told you these Umudike rats are beyond appalling. That's the same way he called a 26 year veteran of the police department a Rookie. Who engage with a brain less slowpoke who spends his whole day on Google about a country no one in his lineage can get a Visa to.

obixcel:
Maxine Walters, ''If we don't get a guilty verdict we must not only stay in the streets we have to be more confrontational''
Hello Liberals

obixcel:
Maxine Walters, ''If we don't get a guilty verdict we must not only stay in the streets we have to be more confrontational''
Hello Liberals

Bluebyrd:

The same hypocrites who said Trump should be impeached for asking his supporters to "make their voices heard peacefully and patriotically" are nowhere to be found to condemn her. And to think that this witch Maxine Walters was one of the people that voted to impeach Trump for his own comments.

Kokobilo87:
Bro, it seems Chauvin will be acquitted from what the judge is laying out now.
If you are in Minneapolis you better close your business and leave town now

obixcel:
Adding to the fact that a so called Member of Congress, Tlaib, had tweeted in advocacy for the Police to be abolished entirely

obixcel:
I'm certainly sure shop owners will have their shops boarded for added protection. it's coming, the riots are inevitable, just how many flat screen TVs will be looted

Kokobilo87:



Yeah, and the pig in Canada aka salford1 align himself with these treasonous libs

Kokobilo87:


No protection will stand if the police are overwhelmed and kamala Harris and xibiden are bailing out criminals

obixcel:
They are totally brainwashed by the MSM

PrideofLincoln1:
My Buddy, you have to tell me how guns should be banned in US since it's the 2nd Amendment. Let me surprise you with this. Majority of Americans are not happy with the gun violence happening in America but one thing majority of Americans will not agree to is banning of guns. That's unamerican as anything I can think of. I am a fierce defender of the 2nd Amendment and I won't give up my gun because the thugs and the Nazis are going to have their guns no matter what. How do I defend my family since I don't want to go down like a wuss. What needs to be done is strict regulations like mental capacity test, insuring your guns at least with liability like we have car insurance and banning the Sales of guns at gun shows where you don't need any identification to buy guns and guess the people against that. The NRA and their Republican lapdogs.

feedthenation:


---I agree with your statement here---I'm for the totality of the 2nd Amendment---but there have to be strict regulations on gun ownership and even further regulations on gun manufacturers---

Kokobilo87:
Bro, it seems Chauvin will be acquitted from what the judge is laying out now.
If you are in Minneapolis you better close your business and leave town now

PrideofLincoln1:
My Buddy, you have to tell me how guns should be banned in US since it's the 2nd Amendment. Let me surprise you with this. Majority of Americans are not happy with the gun violence happening in America but one thing majority of Americans will not agree to is banning of guns. That's unamerican as anything I can think of. I am a fierce defender of the 2nd Amendment and I won't give up my gun because the thugs and the Nazis are going to have their guns no matter what. How do I defend my family since I don't want to go down like a wuss. What needs to be done is strict regulations like mental capacity test, insuring your guns at least with liability like we have car insurance and banning the Sales of guns at gun shows where you don't need any identification to buy guns and guess the people against that. The NRA and their Republican lapdogs.

Ibime:


Well I wish you luck. Since you like guns so much, your Police will keep killing citizens and you will keep crying racism even if racism may have nothing to do with the incident but fear of guns.

See the policeman that shot Philandro Castille? Nothing racist about him. My man was just too shaky.

feedthenation:


---The verdict rests with these jurors---whether Derek Chauvin is declared guilty or acquitted---by the way Derek Chauvin is on trial, not George Floyd and not the Minneapolis Police---

Juror #9- multiracial, female, 20s
She grew up in a small town in northern Minnesota and has an uncle who is a police officer in Brainerd, Minn. She was “excited” to get a summons in this case, which “everyone’s heard about, everyone’s talked about and everyone’s going to talk about long after the trial is over.”

Juror #92- white, female, 40s
She feels White people are favored by the justice system but strongly disagrees with defunding the police. She said media coverage of Chauvin depicted him as “an aggressive cop with tax problems,” which drew a laugh from the former officer’s attorney.

Juror #27- black, male, 30s
An immigrant who came to the United States more than a decade ago, he once lived near where Floyd was killed. The man said a friend showed him the video of Floyd’s death; afterward, he told his wife: “It could have been me.”

Juror #91- black, female, 60s
A grandmother originally from South Minneapolis, she says she has a relative on the city’s police force, but they aren’t close. She expressed a positive view of the Black Lives Matter movement, saying: “I am Black. My life matters.”

Juror #44- white, F, 50s
An executive at a non-profit health-care advocacy group and a single mother to two teenage boys, the juror said she discussed White privilege with a Black co-worker. The co-worker’s son is the same age as the juror’s older teenager. “But my White son, if he gets pulled over, doesn’t have to have fear.”

Juror #52- black, M, 30s
He has not seen the video of Floyd’s death in full and wonders why the other officers on the scene did not stop Chauvin. He expressed mixed views on police, saying he once saw them “body slam then mace an individual simply because they did not obey an order quick enough.” But he knows other police officers from his gym and called them “great guys.”

Juror #79- black, M, 40s
An immigrant who has been in the Twin Cities for about 20 years, he now lives in the suburbs of Minneapolis. He says his view of Chauvin is “neutral” and wants to hear more of his side before making a judgment.

Juror #118- white, F, 20s
A newlywed social worker, she asked about Chauvin: “Was that his training to do that?” She thinks things in policing should be changed but strongly opposes cutting police funding.

Juror #131- white, M, 20s
A married accountant, he questioned why four police officers responded to a 911 call about a counterfeit $20. He also was critical of professional athletes who knelt during the national anthem.

Juror #2- white, M, 20s
The first juror seated said he never watched the video of Floyd’s death, but he saw a video still of Chauvin on top of him. He described himself as willing to change his mind on issues.

Juror #96- white, F, 50s
She said the video might not show the entirety of what happened, calling it “a snippet.” She also said that, in her view, Chauvin “took a different role in the situation than the other officers” who were there.

Juror #85- multiracial, F, 40s
A self-described “working mom and wife,” she described police officers as humans who “can make mistakes.” She also agreed that people who don’t listen to the police have themselves to blame for negative outcomes, saying: “You respect police and do what they ask.”

Juror #55- white, F, 50s
A single mother of two who rides motorcycles in her spare time, she described being scared by the unrest that gripped Minneapolis last year. She also mentioned seeing officers confront an unarmed White teenager last summer, calling it “harassment” and saying that when she tried to intervene, an officer ordered her to stay back.

Juror #19- white, M, 30s
A corporate auditor, he said a “friend of a friend” works for the Minneapolis police but that they had not discussed the case. If there are conflicts in the jury room, he said he would reexamine his own views, but “if I still felt that my viewpoint was the one that I believed in, I think I’d stand by that viewpoint.”

Juror #89- white, F, 50s
A registered nurse who works with ventilated patients, her medical training was highlighted during the questioning process.