The only way I can accept that humans and other animals didn’t evolve from a common ancestors is when I cut the flesh of other animals and that of human, analyze their cells in the flesh and blood under a microscope and they cells don’t look exactly the same.

So far, I have done this severally by viewing the blood cells of a rat and that of humans under the microscope and they always appear the same.
So why are they looking the same if humans were created specially in the image of a god?

If you can show me that they are not the same under a microscope, I will accept creation

Workch:
The only way I can accept that humans and other animals didn’t evolve from a common ancestors is when I cut the flesh of other animals and that of human, analyze their cells in the flesh and blood under a microscope and they cells don’t look exactly the same.

So far, I have done this severally by viewing the blood cells of a rat and that of humans under the microscope and they always appear the same.
So why are they looking the same if humans were created specially in the image of a god?

Because how do you test a door panel of a Corrolla and a Yaris to Find Mr. Toyoda?

That is a crazy stupid way to obtain evidence beyond the creation!

Shall Mr Toyoda be inside his Corolla and Yaris?

The Experiment was already a failure an initio.

Dtruthspeaker:


Because how do you test a door panel of a Corrolla and a Yaris to Find Mr. Toyoda?

That is a crazy stupid way to obtain evidence beyond the creation!

Shall Mr Toyoda be inside his Corolla and Yaris?

The Experiment was already a failure an initio.

you can find Mr. Toyota because his logo is on the car, maybe Yahweh would have placed his logo on rats and chickens.

Mumu

Workch:
The only way I can accept that humans and other animals didn’t evolve from a common ancestors is when I cut the flesh of other animals and that of human, analyze their cells in the flesh and blood under a microscope and they cells don’t look exactly the same.

So far, I have done this severally by viewing the blood cells of a rat and that of humans under the microscope and they always appear the same.
So why are they looking the same if humans were created specially in the image of a god?

If you can show me that they are not the same under a microscope, I will accept creation

Aha! Have you gone insane?

Has a rat created several diverse and wonderful things as man the Replica of God has done?

Or does a rat look like man?

Dtruthspeaker:


Aha! Have you gone insane?

Has a rat created several diverse and wonderful things as man the Replica of God has done?

Or does a rat look like man?

I just checked my bumbum and my pet dog, I didn’t see the logo of Yahweh just like Toyota will always do.

Since you know how to bring up irrational comparisons

Workch:
you can find Mr. Toyota because his logo is on the car, maybe Yahweh would have placed his logo on rats and chickens.

Mumu

remember you are supposed to be a Tercel (maybe you do not know the Tercel so let me say Camry) checking for Mr Toyoda through door panels.

The Logo means as you said is "why are they looking the same".

Workch:
I just checked my bumbum and my pet dog, I didn’t see the logo of Yahweh just like Toyota will always do.

Since you know how to bring up irrational comparisons

Change of Post! We are talking Rats and Toyotas not bumbums and dogs!.

Can You Explain To Me How The Bone Of A Baby Form Inside The Mother's Womb? Then I Will Explain To You How God Created Man In His Own Image!

Dtruthspeaker:


Change of Post! We are talking Rats and Toyotas not bumbums and dogs!.

you brought the Toyota comparison, so I am just gonna play along your dumb comparison.

Since Toyota puts their label on their door panel, I have not seen Yahweh’s label on my hand.

jetwonder:
Can You Explain To Me How The Bone Of A Baby Form Inside The Mother's Womb? Then I Will Explain To You How God Created Man In His Own Image!

Well, how can I take you seriously when you don’t know that babies don’t have bones until about 3-4years after birth, cartilages form in the womb and not bones.

Anyways, I still don’t see that as relevant to this topic. It’s unnecessary distractions. Maybe because you don’t have an explanation for this

Workch:
you can find Mr. Toyota because his logo is on the car, maybe Yahweh would have placed his logo on rats and chickens.

Mumu

Change of Post! You allege that man does not look like God but is the same as a rat.

And now you are running all over looking for God's Logo. Change of post.

I have already answered you that man creates diverse things exactly as God did and a rat has not and already the physical evidence already PROVES THE DISSIMILARITY BETWEEN A RAT AND A MAN!

Workch:
you brought the Toyota comparison, so I am just gonna play along your dumb comparison.

Since Toyota puts their label on their door panel, I have not seen Yahweh’s label on my hand.

Toyota does not put their logos on the door panels!

And your ABILITY TO CREATE this post, is Proof of your Likeness to God in that He Too Wrote with His Finger!

A Rat can not do that!

And No Logo is required to Own You, because there is NO ONE ELSE.

Workch:
Well, how can I take you seriously when you don’t know that babies don’t have bones until about 3-4years after birth, cartilages form in the womb and not bones.

Anyways, I still don’t see that as relevant to this topic. It’s unnecessary distractions. Maybe because you don’t have an explanation for this

babies don't have bones until 3 to 4 years old Nothing person no go see for naira land

Dtruthspeaker:


Change of Post! You allege that man does not look like God but is the same as a rat.

And now you are running all over looking for God's Logo. Change of post.

I have already answered you that man creates diverse things exactly as God did and a rat has not and already the physical evidence already PROVES THE DISSIMILARITY BETWEEN A RAT AND A MAN!

Then don’t bring the dumb Toyota comparison, it doesn’t make any sense.

The pictures below are images of white blood cells of a rat, dog and human viewed under a light microscope. Can you show the the one that belongs to human?

If you can’t, why?

josh123:
babies don't have bones until 3 to 4 years old Nothing person no go see for naira land

I am not the reason why you didn’t pay attention in biology class. I am not going to lecture you on the differences between a bone and cartilage. It’s your problem if you are scientifically illiterate about it.

However, just focus on the topic and don’t drag me from pillar to post.

Workch:
Well, how can I take you seriously when you don’t know that babies don’t have bones until about 3-4years after birth, cartilages form in the womb and not bones.

Pure Lie! All Babies Bun Wit Back Bone, Skull, Even Bone At The Fingers. Babies Cannot Sit Nor Stand Without Bone In Their Body

Workch:
Then don’t bring the dumb Toyota comparison, it doesn’t make any sense.

The pictures below are images of white blood cells of a rat, dog and human viewed under a light microscope. Can you show the the one that belongs to human?

If you can’t, why?

Physically, a Rat is Clearly Distinct and Different from a man and even 4 year olds know that they do not need to go tear them up to see any further difference!

Dtruthspeaker:


Physically, a Rat is Clearly Distinct and Different from a man and even 4 year olds know that they do not need to go tear them up to see any further difference!

if they look different then show me the cell of a human in that picture.

jetwonder:
Pure Lie! All Babies Bone Wit Back Bone, Skull, Even Bone At The Fingers

lol

Workch:
if they look different then show me the cell of a human in that picture.

Is bread not different from snake? Why in the world would I be looking for a difference?

Bread is for the eating and snake is for the killing.

Dtruthspeaker:


Is bread not different from snake? Why in the world would I be looking for a difference?

Here comes another dumb comparison.
Show me the cell of a human in that picture or we may have to conclude that the cells of a rat and human must have come from a common ancestor because they look the same.

Workch:
I am not the reason why you didn’t pay attention in biology class. I am not going to lecture you on the differences between a bone and cartilage. It’s your problem if you are scientifically illiterate about it.

However, just focus on the topic and don’t drag me from pillar to post.

Stfu!!! Use am pay light bill

josh123:
Stfu!!! Use am pay light bill

lol

Workch:
Here comes another dumb comparison.
Show me the cell of a human in that picture or we may have to conclude that the cells of a rat and human must have come from a common ancestor because they look the same.

You do not buy rice after doing iodine test so that you could ensure it is different from beans.

The physical has Proven It's difference Already!

So you are making a foolish demand.

Dtruthspeaker:


Toyota does not put their logos on the door panels!

And your ABILITY TO CREATE this post, is Proof of your Likeness to God in that He Too Wrote with His Finger!

A Rat can not do that!

And No Logo is required to Own You, because there is NO ONE ELSE.

Waoh!!!

Workch:
The only way I can accept that humans and other animals didn’t evolve from a common ancestors is when I cut the flesh of other animals and that of human, analyze their cells in the flesh and blood under a microscope and they cells don’t look exactly the same.

So far, I have done this severally by viewing the blood cells of a rat and that of humans under the microscope and they always appear the same.
So why are they looking the same if humans were created specially in the image of a god?

If you can show me that they are not the same under a microscope, I will accept creation

What type of dark comparation are you doing at this present and modern age? Lmao

Are you the first person to study or conclude that all forms of life is made up of cells? Both plants & animals?

Is cell theory strange to you?

Ok if yes, how is that related to human body being created?

Your comparison is off it.

Just focus on your puzzle and leave the supernatural creation of man.

Workch:
The only way I can accept that humans and other animals didn’t evolve from a common ancestors is when I cut the flesh of other animals and that of human, analyze their cells in the flesh and blood under a microscope and they cells don’t look exactly the same.

So far, I have done this severally by viewing the blood cells of a rat and that of humans under the microscope and they always appear the same.
So why are they looking the same if humans were created specially in the image of a god?

If you can show me that they are not the same under a microscope, I will accept creation

Workch...I don’t know why you created this thread...may be to ask questions that bug you ....or perhaps for mockery....

the truth is...We are all limited in information... even the science you seem to lean on is extremely limited...

Still, trying to totally equate man and rats just becos their share similarities at cellular level is ignoring very simple facts.....i’ll Mention just one..

-Of all the millions of species in the world..Only man has its unique thinking capacity...The cognitive functions of man is a million light years different from every other species in the planet....what are the odds?..a random cosmic chance right??

Permit me to use the funny car analogy from dtruthspeaker....lol....a 2003 Toyota Camry doesn’t look like a 2005 camry becos the 2005 evolved from its ancestor.... the simple reason is that both cars were crafted by the same maker....

Now I’m not saying you should accept a maker created both becos rats and man share some cellular similarities or a couple of genetic base pairs...I’m only saying there are hints around us this magnificent world isn’t a product of a random cosmic chance...

Yes, I agree life existence appears to be on auto-pilot...but if I were the maker... it seems like a fantastic way to create....make a few and let the the rest come from their kind..

See, I might not be able to show you God’s address or the kind of creation-evidence you want..
still..I can’t ignore the evidence of structure and creation all around us...that would be like assuming nobody created a Toyota or a dictionary jumped out of a printing press by mistake..

Hahjascho:
What type of dark comparation are you doing at this present and modern age? Lmao

Are you the first person to study or conclude that all forms of life is made up of cells? Both plants & animals?

Is cell theory strange to you?

Ok if yes, how is that related to human body being created?

Your comparison is off it.

Just focus on your puzzle and leave the supernatural creation of man.

It means that you are not a special being and not created in any bodies image. You just like a mast of animal cells bro.

Damn, it’s hilarious that you can’t differentiate your cells from that of a rat, you both share common ancestry. What kind of God creates his people with similar compositions of dogs and rats.

Dtruthspeaker:


You do not buy rice after doing iodine test so that you could ensure it is different from beans.

The physical has Proven It's difference Already!

So you are making a foolish demand.

But the cells are the same, you are actually a distant cousin to a rat.
If not, why are the cells looking same?

You were created the in the image of a rat?
It’s so sad that humans and rats have same kind of cells. Did your God deliberately make it that way?

advanceDNA:


Workch...I don’t know why you created this thread...may be to ask questions that bug you ....or perhaps for mockery....

the truth is...We are all limited in information... even the science you seem to lean on is extremely limited...

Still, trying to totally equate man and rats just becos their share similarities at cellular level is ignoring very simple facts.....i’ll Mention just one..

-Of all the millions of species in the world..Only man has its unique thinking capacity...The cognitive functions of man is a million light years different from every other species in the planet....what are the odds?..a random cosmic chance right??

Permit me to use the funny car analogy from dtruthspeaker....lol....a 2003 Toyota Camry doesn’t look like a 2005 camry becos the 2005 evolved from its ancestor.... the simple reason is that both cars were crafted by the same maker....

Now I’m not saying you should accept a maker created both becos rats and man share some cellular similarities or a couple of genetic base pairs...I’m only saying there are hints around us this magnificent world isn’t a product of a random cosmic chance...

Yes, I agree life existence appears to be on auto-pilot...but if I were the maker... it seems like a fantastic way to create....make a few and let the the rest come from their kind..

See, I might not be able to show you God’s address or the kind of creation-evidence you want..
still..I can’t ignore the evidence of structure and creation all around us...that would be like assuming nobody created a Toyota or a dictionary jumped out of a printing press by mistake..

You typed a lot and I still can’t see how this answers my question