₦airaland Forum

2dominate:
We believe them not to be following the teachings of Jesus.

Will they go to heaven?

2dominate:
Actually it confirm that religion originated from a source and that those that received it in it true forms follow the true religion ordained by God.
In this present time we believe since the arrival of Islam every sincere followers of other religions will see the truthfulness of Islam and accept it,

Are you saying that a Hindu person will make heaven?

Workch:
How does that invalidate the op?

“People who wonder whether the glass I half full or half empty usually miss the point” .
An irrelevant conclusion, also known as ignoratio elenchi or missing the point, is the informal fallacy of presenting an argument that may or may not be logically valid and sound, but (whose conclusion) fails to address the issue in question.

All you do the Elenchi fallacy,you miss the point because you focus on irrelevant issues. This happens wen you learn philosophy and logic in church instead of in a proper school.

How was your last semester grade, you've seemed very excited about your school courses of recent. Focus on the discussion and learn work. To help you avoid back and forth and running in circles, you need to take proper stock of what you have learned and agree on. i am here to help you be an achiever.

1. Is that your new topic?

2. Have you now learned that your OP and thread title are wrong?

Image123:
How was your last semester grade, you've seemed very excited about your school courses of recent. Focus on the discussion and learn work. To help you avoid back and forth and running in circles, you need to take proper stock of what you have learned and agree on. i am here to help you be an achiever.

1. Is that your new topic?

2. Have you now learned that your OP and thread title are wrong?

Proof by assertion, sometimes informally referred to as proof by repeated assertion, is an informal fallacy in which a proposition is repeatedly restated regardless of contradiction and refutation.

When you learn logic in church, you become an expert in committing fallacies.

Workch:
Proof by assertion, sometimes informally referred to as proof by repeated assertion, is an informal fallacy in which a proposition is repeatedly restated regardless of contradiction and refutation.

When you learn logic in church, you become an expert in committing fallacies.

These are not assertions son, they are questions. Look carefully, remember the amount we gathered for your fees.

1. Is that your new topic?

2. Have you now learned that your OP and thread title are wrong?

Image123:
These are not assertions son, they are questions. Look carefully, remember the amount we gathered for your fees.

1. Is that your new topic?

2. Have you now learned that your OP and thread title are wrong?

A complex question is a fallacy in which the answer to a given question presupposes a prior answer to a prior question. Also known as (or closely related to) a loaded question, a trick question, a leading question, the fallacy of the false question, and the fallacy of many questions

Workch:
A complex question is a fallacy in which the answer to a given question presupposes a prior answer to a prior question. Also known as (or closely related to) a loaded question, a trick question, a leading question, the fallacy of the false question, and the fallacy of many questions

You are making me laugh so much here. What is complex about these 2 yes or no questions that i even explained the reasons?

1. Is that your new topic? Yes or No.

2. Have you now learned that your OP and thread title are wrong? Yes or No.

Image123:
You are making me laugh so much here. What is complex about these 2 yes or no questions that i even explained the reasons?

1. Is that your new topic? Yes or No.

2. Have you now learned that your OP and thread title are wrong? Yes or No.

You think the question has to be “complex” to be a complex question in philosophy? Logic died here

Damn, learn some logic outside church. It will help you see things better

Workch:
You think the question has to be “complex” to be a complex question in philosophy? Logic died here

Damn, learn some logic outside church. It will help you see things better

You still forgot to answer the simple question and move forward.

Image123:
You still forgot to answer the simple question and move forward.

If the question is not a loaded question fallacy, maybe I would have answered it.

Lol

Workch:
If the question is not a loaded question fallacy, maybe I would have answered it.

Lol

Trust me, it's not loaded with anything. It's just common sense not to run in circles.

Image123:
Trust me, it's not loaded with anything. It's just common sense not to run in circles.

Some people won’t play into your fallacious and distracting questions gallery. You have to acknowledge that and learn to live with it.

Workch:
Some people won’t play into your fallacious and distracting questions gallery. You have to acknowledge that and learn to live with it.

Keep running, one day you might run to the Cross.

Workch:
Will they go to heaven?

In as much as that depends on God, my belief is that they are not on the right part therefore no.

Workch:
Are you saying that a Hindu person will make heaven?

Why not, but like I said those that were following the true teachings of their messenger.

2dominate:
In as much as that depends on God, my belief is that they are not on the right part therefore no.

Ok, that’s what I want to hear. Thanks

Workch:
Ok, that’s what I want to hear. Thanks

So according to our belief Jesus is Never going near hell

2dominate:
So according to our belief Jesus is Never going near hell

I think you are confused over the topic but I would rather not have anymore debate