₦airaland Forum

Janosky:
Sifia pained LIENUS.
You refused to go and confirm that William Tyndale Bible did NOT agree with every other Trinitarian Bible in those verses highlighted in my previous post.
Until you do that, you are yarning GIBBERISH making FALSE claims.

Matthew 11:10 Greek lexicon.

Anyone sent by Jehovah God, is his angel carrying out the heavenly Father's assignment.
Learn from both Screenshots.
Mumu LIENUS

Emusan:
JaNosense always spews nonsense as his name implies.

William Tyndale John 1:1 "1In the beginning was that word, and that word was with god: and god was that word."

What do you notice here?
Tyndale used lower case "god" in the two cases.

But the lying liar JWs won't see that.

No wonder he couldn't answer why Tyndale Bible so differ from his demonic translation

Emusan:
The same screenshot you couldn't learn from before you start your ranting.

Moses is an Angel, Aaron is an Angel, John the Baptist is an Angel

Even the screenshot says the human elders in Revelation is an Angel.

Emusan:
God sent MOSES and Aaron, that made them Jehovah Angels.

Sense truly far from you.

So John the Baptist is also an ANGEL, wonders of watchtower delusion

Emusan:
Las Las, no where says Jesus is Michael.

@Daniel 10:13 & Genesis16:7, Judges 6:11 reads " the angel of the Lord", the same Archangel Michael, Jesus Christ in heaven.
Who leads angels in glory, 2 Thess 1:7-9 & Matthew 25:31, Revelation 12:7-9.
"The angel of the Lord,"Archangel Michael says: " Jehovah rebuke you"
Zechariah 3:2= Jude 1:9

Janosky:
Small case "god"
Is that how your other Trinitarian mentors rendered John 1:1?
John 1:34 ,49 William Tyndale Bible
"And I saw it, and bare record, that this is the son of God"
@ John 1:34 William Tyndale Bible already "bear record" that your 2 deities is NOT the one true God.

After Emusan LIENUS calmed down to learn & received SENSE

When SENSE was far from Emusan LIENUS.

He still went back to play dumb
Genesis16:7, his Trinitarian mentors and even his friend, KNOWMORE56 taught him that Jesus Christ is " the angel of the Lord".
@Daniel 10:13 & Genesis16:7, Judges 6:11 reads " the angel of the Lord", the same Archangel Michael, Jesus Christ in heaven.
Who leads angels in glory, 2 Thess 1:7-9 & Matthew 25:31, Revelation 12:7-9.
"The angel of the Lord,"Archangel Michael says: " Jehovah rebuke you"
Zechariah 3:2= Jude 1:9

Rather, Emusan refused that biblical truth & confused himself (@ Luke 1:11 , Matthew 1:20) that it is Gabriel "an angel of the Lord"

Emusan:
[s]Now You see how the dumb JaNosense is exposing his ignorance the more.
[/s]
For Tyndale to use a lower case in verse 1 for God which the Word is with, shows that the second God and the First God means the same thing to Tyndale.

Now, as you've been lying, isn't the same thing other Trinitarian Bible said?

But your demonic translation changed it to "A god"

Emusan:
[s]You forgot this is your first attribute with the name JaNosense
Keep crying, I enjoy your cry

[/s]


Las Las you will still never find where Jesus is called Micheal



See the clown talking when in reality he's the very one who refuse the Biblical truth when Bible openly say Gabriel is the Angel of the Lord.

Emusan:
Was it not the same reason you claimed ALL ANGELS are called Angel of Jehovah when no where to hide your shameless lying face?



Not only that you added that John the Baptist, elders in heaven, Moses, Aaron, even yourself and the 8 old men in New York are ALL ANGELS (since they are sent by Jehovah) that means JaNosense is also an Angel of Jehovah

I love this show

ALL angels belong to JEHOVAH their God.
Genesis 16:7, Daniel 10:13, Jesus the archangel Michael is "ha malak,"the angel of (the Lord) Jehovah.
You can't change the Biblical proof of your Trinitarian mentors.

MaxInDHouse:
Just give an instance as in just one example where a servant of God gave alms (Cash) to a beggar from Genesis to Revelation. Period!

Emusan:
Can you give US just one instance where a servant of God gave ALMS (CASH) to A BROTHER from Genesis to Revelation?

Janosky:
Mumu WAILER.
Two gods mean the same thing to Idol worshipper of two gods.
Polytheists pretending to be Christian.
John 1:34 ,49 William Tyndale Bible
"And I saw it, and bare record, that this is the son of God"
John 1:34,49 William Tyndale proven Emusan LIENUS.
You knew your Trinitarian mentors already said the word "is NOT God in person" .
In essence, the word is godlike.
NWT, your Trinitarian Moffat Bible and the Emphatic Diaglott are accurate.
Mr LIENUS, your opinions is of ZERO value.


Matthew 1:20 Greek lexicon.
Gabriel "an angel of the Lord"
Bros, stop DECEIVING yourself.

ALL angels belong to JEHOVAH their God.
Genesis 16:7, Daniel 10:13, Jesus the archangel Michael is "ha malak,"the angel of (the Lord) Jehovah.
You can't change the Biblical proof of your Trinitarian mentors.

John 7:16 was Jesus not sent with a message as other angels were sent?
Matthew 11:10, was John the Baptizer not sent as everyone else is sent @ John 9:4?

John 9:4
WE must do the works of Him who sent Me."
Emusan is not among the "WE " working with Jesus for Jehovah God

Janosky:
Mumu WAILER.

Two gods mean the same thing to Idol worshipper of two gods.
Polytheists pretending to be Christian.

John 1:34 ,49 William Tyndale Bible
"And I saw it, and bare record, that this is the son of God"
John 1:34,49 William Tyndale proven Emusan LIENUS.

You knew your Trinitarian mentors already said the word "is NOT God in person"

In essence, the word is godlike.

NWT, your Trinitarian Moffat Bible and the Emphatic Diaglott are accurate.
Mr LIENUS, your opinions is of ZERO value

Matthew 1:20 Greek lexicon.
Gabriel "an angel of the Lord"
Bros, stop DECEIVING yourself.

ALL angels belong to JEHOVAH their God.
Genesis 16:7, Daniel 10:13, Jesus the archangel Michael is "ha malak,"the angel of (the Lord) Jehovah.
You can't change the Biblical proof of your Trinitarian mentors.

John 7:16 was Jesus not sent with a message as other angels were sent?
Matthew 11:10, was John the Baptizer not sent as everyone else is sent @ John 9:4?

John 9:4 WE must do the works of Him who sent Me."
Emusan is not among the "WE " working with Jesus for Jehovah God

MaxInDHouse:
Emusan has nothing tangible to say on anything sacred all what he's targeting is how to get the attention of a JW and start trading words with you, that's all.

So no matter what you present to Emusan he will only go into hiding for some time if he find out that you've proved him a lie, then he will come back at you again when his last stupidity might have been forgotten. Luke 4:13

That's why i decided not to engage him again in any further discussion until he apologizes for falsely accusing me on a public forum like this when there is no evidence!

Each time you reply his post he feel relieved but instead of showing appreciation that you count him worthy of a response he will seize the opportunity to pour his frustration on you!

For instance this is the question i asked a critic who wants to dispute the fact that Jesus never gave any beggar money:

This question i directed to someone else but then Emusan take it upon himself to reply my post with this:

Who are the so called "US" in question?
Obviously all he's just looking for is to start an argument with any JW then use that as an avenue to trade words with you!

Emusan:
And here come the pretender couple with hypocrisy.
Says the author and finisher of humanity.
Just imagine this idiot who uses different excuses to boycott questions.
Anyways, I know it pains you whenever you see people rising up exposing the lies of your GB.Just like I said, you will wait tired, you stop engaging me but you have mentioned my moniker more than 2 times in a single post, is that not delusionsOh my word is still stand, you once promoted a Pyramid scheme on this platform with your deleted moniker maximus69. Take me to anywhere you want.
And this post of yours came because I quoted you or reply your post bah :DWe are still waiting for the answer to that question.See painment, this Emusan won't stop putting sand in this people garri
The "We" are the True Christians who know how to give ALMS as Jesus taught.
If you're inside the "WE" raise your hand