₦airaland Forum

effort1:
You just successfully made a fool of yourself.

So, where did he mention bombing?

Or are you a kidnapper and you are afraid intervention of the UN will stop your business?

Rossinkipp:
Donkey, does he have to mention ''bombing'' before your donkey brain can put two and two together?

What does his 'speaking to foreign powers' regarding his proposed ''intervention'' suggest in your dull brain?

That he wants them to send a delegation to Abuja to beg Buhari or what? 

Is that what you think he means by ''intervention''?

You're an absolute donkey to imagine the UN will enter Nigeria and stop kidnapping.

Even the very recent history of places the UN and USA have entered, from Somalia to Syria to Sudan to wherever, shows the UN and US presence only ever makes such problems escalate, not decline. But does your dull brain research anything? Is it not a case of ''na oyinbo, so dem go solve everything'', in your dumbass, simpleton head?

Rossinkipp:
Iraq, Libya, Yemen, Afghanistan, Syria, Somalia, Vietnam, Cambodia, etc etc, are testament to this roll-call of disaster.

Why does Soyinka want to add Nigeria to this inglorious list?

Rossinkipp:
Honestly my brother, I'm disappointed in Soyinka. Surely he MUST know the tragic history of western interventionism in Africa from the slave trade to the colonial invasions down to modern disasters from Somalia to Mobutu Sese Seko, who was installed by the US in Zaire after they orchestrated the assassination of the progressive leader Patrice Lumumba.

Even Gen. Murtala Ramat Muhammed, Nigeria's best ever president, was assassinated in 1976 with the CIA getting implicated at the time for its role.

That Soyinka can look back at all this and still be calling for them to invade Nigeria absolutely beggars belief.

Rossinkipp:
This thread is not for mental midgets and half witted street touts.

Rossinkipp:
The problem with your reasoning is that those American bombs will fall on YOU far more than any 'ISWAP' bombs ever have.

US intervention will also lead to the northern insurgents taking their fight further south.

They will see the south as US supporters. Their retaliation against US attacks will come in the form of attacks on the christian south.

Suddenly going to the market in Onitsha or Lagos would be like attempting so in Basra or Baghdad, with bombs going off, and destroying life as we know it in the south.

Then you will find US planes bombing the south to ''rid them of the terrorists''.

Suddenly the entire south is a hellhole of war, destruction, and refugees, like Syria.

All this should be EASILY predictable by anyone not blinkered by US worship.

vedaxcool:
Soyinka the spiritual father of cultism terror is another tribal bigot with no iota of balanced view. Despite Sunday Igboho humiliating security personnel the old man pretended that the man is Saint going around with a Bible preaching.

Imagine an elderly man, calling for white men to once again govern him because he has accepted inferior status to them.

Afghanistan proved one thing, outsiders can never sort out your problems for you, but to Soyinka outsiders are the only ones who can.

gratiaeo:
Lol. have op abandoned his thread? A northerner with cow brain want to teach Nobel laureate international politics

effort1:
Does the federal government already have information about Boko haram terrorists sponsors or not?

When has it become the duty of the US to watch your country for you, you dumb son of a Useless father?

jmoore:
Ordinary bandit shot down aircraft.

Ordinary bandits invaded NDA, an institution meant to train soldiers that will protect this country and they met no resistance.


Leave those lightheaded creatures.


Failure unlimited!!! And Soyinka is your problem.

jmoore:
Ordinary bandit shot down aircraft.

Ordinary bandits invaded NDA, an institution meant to train soldiers that will protect this country and they met no resistance.




Failure unlimited!!! And Soyinka is your problem.

vedaxcool:
[s][/s]

Describing your father once again.

Rossinkipp:
Donkey, does Soyinka have to say ''bomb Nigeria'' before you can decipher what he's suggesting?

Here is an excerpt from his shocking statement:

https://www.newtelegraphng.com/soyinka-un-should-intervene/

The literary icon said Nigeria should take the opportunity of the next United Nations General Assembly to seek help especially on child kidnapping in the North before the new ‘slave trade’ becomes international responsibility. He said, “Up till now, we have been saying, ask for help, this thing is beyond you. The failures started a long time ago, nobody is saying it is you who started it, but of course, your failure and incompetence have also escalated it like every other leader we have had. We now say, it’s an issue that can be taken legally as an international responsibility.

“What is happening now has become an international responsibility, the international community is really obliged to take action since there is failure on the part of governance to fulfil its obligations under the UN Charter in this case genocide.” While lamenting the spate of kidnap of school pupils and the exchange in form of ransom in some parts of the country, he said “We are calling on the United Nations to intervene and stop the slave trade. To live up to its noble intentions and declarations, rescue these children and put a stop to it. “And if Nigeria continues to stand on her sovereignty, I think the protocols, I leave this to the experts, I speak as a layman from what I know. I think the protocols enable that organisation (UN) to do a Namibia, in other words, to declare sections of this country as protectorates under the UN.

“Why not? If the government has failed to protect its own people, failed to fulfill its responsibilities under protocols to which it is signatory, the UN has a right and a responsibility to declare those zones UN protectorates. “What I am saying to you publicly is what we have been discussing with some foreign heads of states because we want this situation tabled.

We do not want what we are undergoing now to become the new normal peculiar to the Nigerian nation. We want intervention at this stage.”

....

These are highly tendentious comments suggesting he wants MILITARY intervention by foreign powers.

Do you intervene with mouth and mere declarations?

Where has the UN ever said ''we declare this country (or part of it) a UN protectorate'', without foreign troops invading and fighting the military of the invaded country?

Fash20:
You make no sense man

vedaxcool:
You are wasting your time. They have been told over and over again that the reason why they cannot prosper is because some people from the north sit on their destiny. They are soo foolish that they cannot explain why THE US WHICH HAS A DRONE BASE IN NIGER AND CHAD TOTALLING 3 HAVE NEVER GIVEN NIGERIA ONE SHRED OF INTELLIGENCE IN OUR FIGHT AGAINST BH.

They suffer congenital imbecility which induces genetical inferiority.

Rossinkipp:
What ISWAP invasion?

The phantom one in your little tribalist head?

When there is a US invasion, you will know the difference.

Mr Nigeria hater. Pray your family won't be victims of the US bombing raids, because we KNOW that 'ISWAP' have no interest in you.

huptin:
US will give you intelligence so that you can pass it to your brothers - BH and bandits. You must really thing Americans are fools

Rossinkipp:
Wole Soyinka reportedly stated that he is in talks with the UN to ''seize control of part of Nigeria from Buhari''.

Soyinka sounds very naive regarding all this.

Or maybe he's just trying to pull the govt's legs?

The idea of the UN ''taking over'' any portion of Nigeria is so incomprehensibly stupid and inconceivable, that the professor must have been speaking tongue-in-cheek.

I mean, FIRSTLY, the intervening countries (since the UN has no army or navy or airforce of its own) will have to declare war on Nigeria, and fight the Nigerian military, and bomb/kill Nigerians, and defeat the Nigerian military, BEFORE they are able to send any UN forces to Nigeria to ''seize control''.

Is Soyinka indirectly proposing a US military invasion of Nigeria?

If not, WHAT exactly is he proposing?

When the UN ''seizes'' any land, there is usually a US military involvement. Soyinka knows that.

So....is he proposing a US military invasion of Nigeria?

And IF SO, based on WHAT exactly?

That there is insecurity in Nigeria?

That bandits kidnap people?

That people are killed by bandits?

Is that why Soyinka says Nigeria should be invaded by America?

America, have they stopped their own horrendous insecurity?

Gun crime there is on a stratospheric level, with over 50,000 homicides per annum, equivalent to 30 Boko Harams operating all at once.

So why is SOYINKA calling on people who are drowning in insecurity themselves, to invade Nigeria to bring 'security' here?

How can Americans give what they themselves don't have?

Has Soyinka studied the history of US/western military intervention in nations, and how they ALWAYS make the situation 1000 times WORSE?

Iraq, Libya, Yemen, Afghanistan, Syria, Somalia, Vietnam, Cambodia, etc etc, are testament to this roll-call of disaster.

Why does Soyinka want to add Nigeria to this inglorious list?

Why is he committing what surely appears to be treason, by calling for foreign military bombardment of this country, and the killing of Nigerians by foreigners who will come here and ''seize control'' of our territory?

Whose side are you really on Mr Soyinka?

The imperialists seem to have you in their pocket.

vedaxcool:
but they were foolish enough to sell tucanos to the government. Comfort yourself with whatever tale you can concoct.

huptin:
Selling* is different from giving* you may need the help of a dictionary here.

Only a fool gives something freely to terrorists. We know that the Tuscano will eventually end up in the hands of Boko haram its just a matter of time. But at least no one will accuse the US of not selling to Nigeria.

vedaxcool:
[s][/s]

Another incoherent garbage.