Polynek:
una get luck shaa

MrColdsweat:


We caged lukaku for several years at Everton with the likes of skrtel, carra, agger, lovren etc.

Lukaku is too small for van dijk....

Van dijk is a rolls Royce of a defender. Na only Messi give van dijk wahala

MrColdsweat:


Go back 5 years. Liverpool have spent the least amongst the top clubs....

enemyofprogress:
Boat were justified

Jazzman01:


For what? When I watched the full match live.

fujirice:

You watched it with tension
Go and watch the highlights now that you are relaxed

MrColdsweat:


We caged lukaku for several years at Everton with the likes of skrtel, carra, agger, lovren etc.

Lukaku is too small for van dijk....

Van dijk is a rolls Royce of a defender. Na only Messi give van dijk wahala

Jazzman01:


Which fûcking Tension are you talking about? I am NOT a Liverpool fan, neither am I a Chelsea fan.

MrColdsweat:


Well, you have spent almost £400m in 2years. You couldn't beat a team who have spent just £50m in 3years. A team who have to sell before they can buy.

Na Liverpool give una mouth.

We will meet at the bridge.

maynation:

I don't know who are the 'us' atletico will beat but my own Liverpool won't lose no games to ATM nor any other teams in the group.
As much as I know we lost a few chances, I am still very satisfied with the result.
It's a draw not a loss and it's against a team like Chelsea not some random teams.
It's a game of football, win some, lose some and draw some, I haven't seen a reason to start throwing blames.
Our boys did extremely well and they can always do better..
Leeds and Milan will pay dearly.
YNWA!

seunny4lif:

Because the ball was going straight to the net
Same as na Red card for last man

Martinez39s:
Dororo and EbukaHades10, how far?

Jazzman01:


Don't mind them. I don't understand the sudden hype about Lukaku or Is it not the same Lukaku that played for Everton and United? Dude is an average player. I won't be surprised when Tuchel starts benching him.

descartes400:


Don't show hypocrisy here!

Jazzman01:


It wasn't balanced. Go and check the stats again. Before Chelsea scored, Liverpool were dominating. That dude was right. Chelsea's plan was to defend and counter as they always do.

upthechels1960:
Join us

Wordson:
1-1... Niceeee....
We will return to finish d job in second half..

SenatePresdo:


It's too early to depend on what other teams play.

MrColdsweat:


But Na una mate dey use red card dey win match.

Why are you happy for scraping a draw?

Shouldn't you be thanking mendy instead of shamelessly bragging?

Humanoid01:

Oga Liverpool is a top team with a deadly attack. If it took them a red card and a penalty to score their only goal, and ended up not winning the game, how do you think the game would have ended if there was no red card? Before the red card, Chelsea had created a number of clear cut chances but they couldn't convert them. Believe me you, if Chelsea had gone two goals up, Liverpool wouldn't have gotten a goal in that game.

Jazzman01:


World class my foot. He should be grateful for the disciplined defenders covering him. How many shots does he face per game?

HIGHESTPOPORI:
Before the red card Liverpool had chances upon chances.

HIGHESTPOPORI:
And you needed to park the bus like burnley to escape with a point.Liverpool didn't tell James to turn to a keeper and catch a ball going into the net.

MrColdsweat:


Bla bla...

Educate yourself. Stanford bridge is a rented stadium

donbrowser:


Yes and they scored 4 out of the chances upon chances. Your pikin no sabi book, you dey blame handwriting

donbrowser:


You should have borrowed Messi and Ronaldo so you can play good attacking football.

u have time to argue ooooo.... Dem never see anything... Tuchel and our boys go do dem shege this season

flexyrule:
C.Ronaldo will not win the golden boot in EPL.

I won't argue this.

Just bookmark this page... Or quote this comment.