₦airaland Forum

budaatum:
No body takes your word for anything here. Please show us where buda argued "that black students", which buda once was, "struggle to think analytically for racial and cultural reasons".

The fact that you "struggle to think analytically" for whatever reasons, does not mean all we blacks are dumb like you, ben.

nobody expect to utter truth. you are full of lies.

the bold you tried to project on me, please show us who is lying by presenting evidence that was ever my stance. it is you who was in support of a book that imply blacksy and latinx are not smart enough to compete with whites. We discuss the book "Equity in maths - Dismantling Racism in maths"

you should try to stop lying... you are a very dishonest person.

basilico:
Pathetic. You side with paedophile

if the left legalise cannibalism, budaatum will be for it. a guy who talks from both side of his mouth.

My body my choice is something he does not believe in but he has memes or photo quotes all over his phone concerning that.

benalvino3:
a book that imply blacksy and latinx are not smart enough to compete with whites.

You are obviously far too dishonest to admit that you ignorantly inferred that the book claimed "maths is racist".

benalvino3:
if the left legalise cannibalism, budaatum will be for it. a guy who talks from both side of his mouth.

My body my choice is something he does not believe in but he has memes or photo quotes all over his phone concerning that.

Next, you would claim that buda does not believe that you have the right to use your brain or not, because, your body but not your brain, right?

Dude please go to school. And pay the fees this time!

budaatum:
You are obviously far too dishonest to admit that you ignorantly inferred that the book claimed "maths is racist".

master of lies and deceit. there is a difference between me saying the "Book Implies" and the title of the book. I am not talking of the title for the gazillion time. you claim to be the master of comprehension but you have to lie to make yourself look like you are making a point. again, I said the book implies and i have already quoted the part where the book implies blacks and latinx are not smart enough. You need to hold on to you lies. unlike you, i read the book which is why i can make such claim. you did not.

you are supporting a book that says equity in maths but also claim you don't want equity in maths or any subject for you children. Again you talk from both sides of your mouth and most times you just argue because its something from the left.

budaatum:
No body takes your word for anything here. Please show us where buda argued "that black students", which buda once was, "struggle to think analytically for racial and cultural reasons".

The fact that you "struggle to think analytically" for whatever reasons, does not mean all we blacks are dumb like you, ben.

also, the book implies that blacks and latinx cannot compete with whites so they need equity in maths. you were for the book. I said you supported a book that make that claim.

Aren't you a liar? That's my assumption or yours? The bolded was what you were arguing for and I and Ibime argued that it's rubbish and their socalled instructions implies that blacks are not smart enough.

the bolded was what you were for. That means you were arguing for a book that implies that. I did not say you make that statement master of comprehension

benalvino3:
also, the book implies that blacks and latinx cannot compete with whites so they need equity in maths.......

If this were about slavery you'd ignorantly insist that blacks would be free if they keep their chains!

Equity in maths instruction, ben!

As in, do not use the stupid untrue excuse that "blacks and latinx cannot" to refuse to teach them to the same standard as whites are taught!

budaatum:
If this were about slavery you'd ignorantly insist that blacks would be free if they keep their chains!

Equity in maths instruction, ben!

As in, do not use the stupid untrue excuse that "blacks and latinx cannot" to refuse to teach them to the same standard as whites are taught!

bullshit. segregation is a thing of the past. a lot of Nigerians go to abroad to study. if they are not being taught at the same standards the next white guy, then why are they flocking over there?

buda, How is it possible for 100 people to be in a class, 50 blacks and 50 whites and some how the blacks who are in the same maths class with the whites are being taught differently?

i have provide quotes and quotes from the book that implies blacks and latinx students cannot compete with whites so they need equity. I have read the book which is why i was able to quote literatures from the book.

But have you noticed that you have been posting only the title of the book? you can't seem to go past the title. you think i claimed the title implies.... when i am saying the BOOK implies.

the title of a book and the book itself are not the same thing. whats in the book is more valuable than the title.

As in, do not use the stupid untrue excuse that "blacks and latinx cannot

thats what the book you support is implying na... which is why they want equity for blacks and latinx student

benalvino3:
bullshit. segregation is a thing of the past. a lot of Nigerians go abroad for study. if they are not being taught at the same standards the next white guy, then why are they flocking over there?

buda, How is it possible for 100 people to be in a class, 50 blacks and 50 whites and some how the blacks who are in the same maths class with the whites are being taught differently?

i have provide quotes and quotes from the book that implies blacks and latinx students cannot compete with whites so they need equity. I have read the book which is why i was able to quote literatures from the book.

But have you noticed that you have been posting only the title of the book? you can't seem to go past the title. you think i claimed the title implies.... when i am saying the BOOK implies.

the title of a book and the book itself are not the same thing. whats in the book is more valuable than the title.




thats what the book you support is implying na... which is why they want equity for blacks and latinx student

respond Budaatum

ono:
This is truly sickening and horrific!! The US has been taken over by vile evil beings. This is what buda and his ilk, lovers of the Fruited Plains, wants running in the US.

Go take ya meds old man. No one isa ah support rape ya dumb dumb.

basilico:
Soros is a Uber wealthy hedge funds manager.He donated 18B to his Open Society Foundation. Which funnels those funds to anyone pushing leftwing causes in almost every country. He sponsors leftist candidates esp nowadays he donates to State AGs, State Secretaries of State, Congress, Senate and Presidential candidates. He has caused national economies to crash after hedging against them.
Facebook Oversight Board of 20 members, 18 are associated with Open Society Foundation.

Ya isa need ah lobotomy. Ya isa antisemitic piece of ah thrashness.
Like soros like ah Koch hey? Such dumb dumb people

benalvino3:
bullshit. segregation is a thing of the past. a lot of Nigerians go to abroad to study. if they are not being taught at the same standards the next white guy, then why are they flocking over there?

First, I've told you that I learn at the same standard but at a far superior standard than one got in school. And the reason a lot of Nigerians go abroad to study is because they too seek superior education than is given in Nigeria, as you continously stand as proof.

benalvino3:
buda, How is it possible for 100 people to be in a class, 50 blacks and 50 whites and some how the blacks who are in the same maths class with the whites are being taught differently?

This just shows how naive and ignorant you are. Can segregation not be a consequence of schools themself being better funded in some areas than others? Or is that like the typical irresponsible individual that you are, people should grin and bare it instead of requesting change?

https://soeonline.american.edu/blog/inequality-in-public-school-funding

ono:
This is truly sickening and horrific!! The US has been taken over by vile evil beings. This is what buda and his ilk, lovers of the Fruited Plains, wants running in the US.

I take it you are saying this before doing your Soros homework.

budaatum:
First, I've told you that I learn at the same standard but at a far superior standard than one got in school. And the reason a lot of Nigerians go abroad to study is because they too seek superior education than is given in Nigeria, as you continously stand as proof.


This just shows how naive and ignorant you are. Can segregation not be a consequence of schools themself being better funded in some areas than others? Or is that like the typical irresponsible individual that you are, people should grin and bare it instead of requesting change?

https://soeonline.american.edu/blog/inequality-in-public-school-funding

your comprehension is in the gutter budaatum or you are knowingly playing dumb

First, I've told you that I learn at the same standard but at a far superior standard than one got in school. And the reason a lot of Nigerians go abroad to study is because they too seek superior education than is given in Nigeria, as you continously stand as proof.

they seek better education no one is disputing that. But they went to abroad to be taught in a standard that is on par with everyone else in their class room.
i am trying to understand why you think whites are being taught differently from blacks so.
you statement below is implying that blacks don't get the same education as whites

As in, do not use the stupid untrue excuse that "blacks and latinx cannot" to refuse to teach them to the same standard as whites are taught!

when i say your comprehension is bad it will sound like i am downplaying you or you think you are smart because some folks will like the rubbish you post. you say you go school and better educated than me. i no object, use your education practically then.

I asked you this:

buda, How is it possible for 100 people to be in a class, 50 blacks and 50 whites and some how the blacks who are in the same maths class with the whites are being taught differently?

and you answered with this nonsense and unrelated crap.

This just shows how naive and ignorant you are. Can segregation not be a consequence of schools themself being better funded in some areas than others? Or is that like the typical irresponsible individual that you are, people should grin and bare it instead of requesting change?

you are dishing out more insults and attacks than making sense. thats your problem.

I said 50 black students in the same school and in the same class room studying the same subject from the same maths teacher. How is it possible the 50 black student will be getting something different from what the 50 white students are getting.

do you argue because you get paid or you are addicted to arguing ? what has state funding or financing of public school has to do with what i asked you?

MASTER OF COMPREHENSION STRIKES AGAIN


if this guy sees the book for what it is implying; why cant you?
Erec Smith, a professor of rhetoric and composition at York College of Pennsylvania and co-founder of Free Black Thought, is among those who accuse the book’s authors of their own form of bigotry.

“The workbook’s ultimate message is clear: Black kids are bad at math, so why don’t we just excuse them from really learning it,”

benalvino3:
your comprehension is in the gutter budaatum or you are knowingly playing dumb



they seek better education no one is disputing that. But they went to abroad to be taught in a standard that is on par with everyone else in their class room.
i am trying to understand why you think whites are being taught differently from blacks so.
you statement below is implying that blacks don't get the same education as whites


when i say your comprehension is bad it will sound like i am downplaying you or you think you are smart because some folks will like the rubbish you post. you say you go school and better educated than me. i no object, use your education practically then.

I asked you this:


and you answered with this nonsense and unrelated crap.


you are dishing out more insults and attacks than making sense. thats your problem.

I said 50 black students in the same school and in the same class room studying the same subject from the same maths teacher. How is it possible the 50 black student will be getting something different from what the 50 white students are getting.

do you argue because you get paid or you are addicted to arguing ? what has state funding or financing of public school has to do with what i asked you?

MASTER OF COMPREHENSION STRIKES AGAIN


if this guy sees the book for what it is implying; why cant you?
Erec Smith, a professor of rhetoric and composition at York College of Pennsylvania and co-founder of Free Black Thought, is among those who accuse the book’s authors of their own form of bigotry.

“The workbook’s ultimate message is clear: Black kids are bad at math, so why don’t we just excuse them from really learning it,”

budaatum ya respond

benalvino3:
i am trying to understand why you think whites are being taught differently from blacks so.
you statement below is implying that blacks don't get the same education as whites.

First, I never said whites are being taught differently to blacks. Those fighting for CRT are the ones making that claim, and despite it not being in UK, my own personal experience gained from working on School Admissions and Exclusion, where more black kids were routinely excluded than whites followed by gypsies, I agree that they just might have a case, but more importantly do I defend their right to state their case and not be silenced by ill-informed you!

It is about time America reflect again on its racist past. And this is only just the beginning, thank Gott.

Kokobilo87:
budaatum ya respond

Hush ya attencion seeking mule. Must ya alwais shows ya thirst fah ah attencion everi Dai? Go get ah hug from papa or mama or sumting ya mule.

budaatum:
First, I never said whites are being taught differently to blacks. Those fighting for CRT are the ones making that claim, and despite it not being in UK, my own personal experience gained from working on School Admissions and Exclusion, where more black kids were routinely excluded than whites followed by gypsies, I agree that they just might have a case, but more importantly do I defend their right to state their case and not be silenced by ill-informed you!

It is about time America reflect again on its racist past. And this is only just the beginning, thank Gott.

budaatum:
If this were about slavery you'd ignorantly insist that blacks would be free if they keep their chains!

Equity in maths instruction, ben!

As in, do not use the stupid untrue excuse that "blacks and latinx cannot" to refuse to teach them to the same standard as whites are taught!

ya say that but if ya claim ya not say that and ya against it, ah say ya and benaldo are in tha same side but ya make a false premise and ya attribute tha false premise to benaldo. i ah follow this discussa wella.

budaatum:
First, I never said whites are being taught differently to blacks. Those fighting for CRT are the ones making that claim, and despite it not being in UK, my own personal experience gained from working on School Admissions and Exclusion, where more black kids were routinely excluded than whites followed by gypsies, I agree that they just might have a case, but more importantly do I defend their right to state their case and not be silenced by ill-informed you!

It is about time America reflect again on its racist past. And this is only just the beginning, thank Gott.

good, i like that you have clarify or moved away from that. the very first time this topic started, i asked the question how are whites in the same class not affected by the so-called white supremacy since they learn (see and hear) the same thing from their tutor. You and salford started explaining unrelated rubbish. salfrd said he use to think indians and chinese are better than him in their engineering class. you came and started talking about Nigeria.

the Book that you always paste the title here is nothing more or less Critical Race Theory. if you watch the zoom meeting of the women who wrote the crap you would realise that and you will question why they are even holding any position.

the US will be looking for foreign engineers more and more since their schools are being overrun by valueless ideology that does not add to the development of a student.

the book said it is white supremacy to what Black and latinx students to get the right answer
i in a way agree(except for the white supremacy part) that getting the right answers in maths should not always be the ultimate priority as i have written assignments and test where i and my friends land in the different answers yet none of us failed the question. when solving, a little mistake will change everything so it is important to show your work so that the tutor will know if you know what you are doing and where the mistake occurs.
but the same book that says getting the right answer is bad which which i agree(to some extent) with but where i disagree is the book wanting only black and latinx students to be exempt from this the same book says wanting students to show their work is white supremacy.

so which is it? why do they even bother to ask the student to be in maths class then? you don't have to get the correct answer and you dont have to show your work. thats the equity and anti racism or white supremacy the book is selling.

how can a mathematician send a satellite to the orbit of the earth if he does not have to get his maths right? how can others review his calculations and find issues if he does not have to show his work? Bill gate is behind this nonsense, recently he has been behind a lot of rubbish

budaatum:
Next, you would claim that buda does not believe that you have the right to use your brain or not, because, your body but not your brain, right?

Erm, as dystopian as his comparison goes about the Left supporting cannibalism, the Left/supposed Liberals actually already support cannibalism.

The State of Idaho allows for cannibalism. You are allowed to eat human beings by the Left.
https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title18/T18CH50/SECT18-5003/
Yes, you guessed correctly - Idaho is a Leftist
state.

DissTroy:
Erm, as dystopian as his comparison goes about the Left supporting cannibalism, the Left/supposed Liberals actually already support cannibalism.

The State of Idaho allows for cannibalism. You are allowed to eat human beings by the Left.
https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title18/T18CH50/SECT18-5003/
Yes, you guessed correctly - Idaho is a Leftist
state.

Idaho allows cannibalism then goes ahead to post link where same Idaho finds cannibalism a punishable offence, you couldn't read what you post of what? you guys are incredible

Idaho isnt even a leftist state, Trump won Idaho by 30% Idaho governor is republican, republicans outrightly control Idaho state legislature, but again you guys are incredible

sanpipita:
Idaho allows cannibalism then goes ahead to post link where same Idaho finds cannibalism a punishable offence, you couldn't read what you post of what? you guys are incredible.

Idaho isnt even a leftist state, Trump won Idaho by 30% Idaho governor is republican, republicans outrightly control Idaho state legislature, but again you guys are incredible

You're definitely dyslexic. You should have your head examined.

Here's Chapter 50, Item 2:
"It shall be an affirmative defense to a violation of the provisions of this section that the action was taken under extreme life-threatening conditions as the only apparent means of survival." https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title18/T18CH50/SECT18-5003/

Cannibalism is allowed in the state of Idaho under life-threatening conditions. If there's a famine or you can't afford food, that constitutes as life-threatening conditions and you are allowed to butcher and barbecue Budaatum if you can lure him. Completely legal in Idaho.

DissTroy:
You're definitely dyslexic. You should have your head examined.

Here's Chapter 50, Item 2:
"It shall be an affirmative defense to a violation of the provisions of this section that the action was taken under extreme life-threatening conditions as the only apparent means of survival." https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title18/T18CH50/SECT18-5003/

Cannibalism is allowed in the state of Idaho under life-threatening conditions. If there's a famine or you can't afford food, that constitutes as life-threatening conditions and you are allowed to butcher and barbecue Budaatum if you can lure him. Completely legal in Idaho.

They only say there could be viable defense for the act under certain circumstances, in the end its a punishable offence for 14 years max, so much for being legal.

sanpipita:
They only say there could be viable defense for the act under certain circumstances, in the end its a punishable offence for 14 years max, so much for being legal.

Stop lying shameless and adding what isn't there. This is exactly what Buda does - whataboutism.

The punishment for cannibalism in Idaho is 14 years imprisonment if found guilty but according to Chapter 50, Item 2, if your defense is that you did it under life threatening conditions (which I have stated some as examples), you haven't committed a crime. That clause is the caveat for handing down guilty sentences.

You can't be punished by the same law that gives an excuse to commit such a heinous crime. A punishment is meted out ONLY when you are found guilty. But you can't be if it's under those cricumstances.

Had pill to swallow, I know. I was just as much in disbelief when I came upon it long ago.

What if I post links and evidence of Western countries which have legalised bestiality? You'd be dumbfounded then.

DissTroy:
Stop lying shameless and adding what isn't there. This is exactly what Buda does - whataboutism.

The punishment for cannibalism in Idaho is 14 years imprisonment if found guilty but according to Chapter 50, Item 2, if your defense is that you did it under life threatening conditions (which I have stated some as examples), you haven't committed a crime. That clause is the caveat for handing down guilty sentences.

You can't be punished by the same law that gives an excuse to commit such a heinous crime. A punishment is meted out ONLY when you are found guilty. But you can't be if it's under those cricumstances.

Had pill to swallow, I know. I was just as much in disbelief when I came upon it long ago.

What if I post links and evidence of Western countries which have legalised bestiality? You'd be dumbfounded then.

I said item 2 was a viable defense for certain circumstances you then go on using your second paragraph to agree to what I said but again I'm lying shameless, maybe English is hard for you I can't tell.

Anyway you can go to Idaho and cannibalize let's see how far item 2 takes you in court

sanpipita:
Anyway you can go to Idaho and cannibalize let's see how far item 2 takes you in court

Again, whataboutism. Facts are facts, and there's nothing more factual about this issue than the evidence from the official Idaho government website I provided.

I didn't draft or pass Idaho's laws. Any argument for or against cannibalism in Idaho would always be subject to the dictates of the law and the law is clear about the exceptional legality of cannibalism.

What you should do if so concerned is drum up support for change, start ( a faux) outrage on Twitter (add one phobia tag to it), and force the government of the state to completely outlaw that heinous caveat.

Use Cancel Culture for good this one time instead of trying to destroy the livelihoods and reputations of those who do not agree with liberal or woke ideologies on social media, including, most recently, Dave Chappelle for stating gender is a fact and not a societal construct.

Even POC might be victims if that law isn't ratified. For all we know, they might already have been victims by racist folks even as recently as the 60's or in the heights of the Civil Rights Movement.

Just got my booster jab. Benalvino eat your heart out.

DissTroy:
Erm, as dystopian as his comparison goes about the Left supporting cannibalism, the Left/supposed Liberals actually already support cannibalism.

The State of Idaho allows for cannibalism. You are allowed to eat human beings by the Left.
https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title18/T18CH50/SECT18-5003/
Yes, you guessed correctly - Idaho is a Leftist
state.

Mr American expert, sorry to rain in on your party. Idaho is one of the most Republican States in the Union. The Google you rely on should have told you that. Idaho is as Red as any other Red Republican States as they come. Just have to correct you before your friends starts giving you their likes.

PrideofLincoln1:
Mr American expert, sorry to rain in on your party. Idaho is one of the most Republican States in the Union. The Google you rely on should have told you that. Idaho is as Red as any other Red Republican States as they come. Just have to correct you before your friends starts giving you their likes.

ya donkey shutup

Kokobilo87:
ya donkey shutup

Adedapo Adedara. Ya shut ya dirty stinky donkey gutter ya call mouth. You Isa lick dayo's arshole Wella disa afternoon ya donkey

DissTroy:
Stop lying shameless and adding what isn't there. This is exactly what Buda does - whataboutism.

The punishment for cannibalism in Idaho is 14 years imprisonment if found guilty but according to Chapter 50, Item 2, if your defense is that you did it under life threatening conditions (which I have stated some as examples), you haven't committed a crime. That clause is the caveat for handing down guilty sentences.

You can't be punished by the same law that gives an excuse to commit such a heinous crime. A punishment is meted out ONLY when you are found guilty. But you can't be if it's under those cricumstances.

Had pill to swallow, I know. I was just as much in disbelief when I came upon it long ago.

What if I post links and evidence of Western countries which have legalised bestiality? You'd be dumbfounded then.

I guess you don't realise your defense has to stand the test of validity.

Go on diss, go and cannibalise someone Idaho instead of going to the local supermarket. Show us your "excuse" works in court please.

PrideofLincoln1:
Mr American expert, sorry to rain in on your party. Idaho is one of the most Republican States in the Union. The Google you rely on should have told you that. Idaho is as Red as any other Red Republican States as they come. Just have to correct you before your friends starts giving you their likes.

If you had half the intelligence of a shellfish, you'd have known the back-and-forths between Sanpita and I were entirely templated on the exceptional legality of cannibalism in Idaho. He understands that and has stayed on it.

But being the cherry picker that you are, you selectively skipped the crux of the issue to clutch at straws.

The main issue should be why for any reason should something as heinous as cannibalism be excused in any place, especially the U.S., instead of cannibalism being treated worse than murder and even - this isn't stretching it - punished with a life for a life.

That cannibalism is obviously legal and exucsed doesn't concern you. You don't have to jump at every discussion if you don't have intelligent contributions to make or veer off it if it doesn't contribute to the roundness of the discussions.

Sometimes just sit back and read. You don't have to jump at every post on every page of a thread like a fledgling teenager trying to get noticed by grown-ups. Obviously so since you are always obsessed with "likes".