₦airaland Forum

Kokobilo87:
tha houseboy isa front ina line for tha jab. he isa junk tha donk. ibime isa mental unstable

Ya and ya papa Isa ah dah definition of ah mentally unstable.
Ya isa still gonna go write ya name wit ah French fries at ah McDonald's tah proves ya isa in ah Texas ya sad homoerotic mule?

Kokobilo87:
tha US isa dying ah slowly


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oq4xILmPZ9c

Ah I isa ah see ya up 3:14am in dah morning tah ah mine dah bitcoin fah dah rednecks.
Sad sad mule as ah usual isa ah comes ah heer hoping Ibime isa ah geeves him dah attencion papa isa nah giveth him.
Ya isa ah miss Lincoln ya mule? Ya isa kiss ya dp calling him Dada and hoping he isa ah adopts ya ya mule?

Kokobilo87 dah sad addicted homoerotic mule isa ah awake dah whole night.
Ya isa ah comes heer and ah lie Dat ah isa ah heer by ah 1:33am and ah 3:10am ah Texas time bekus he isa ah doeth bitcoin
Ya useless homoerotic mule luvs dese thread mah Dan ya family
NL isa where ya start and ah finish ya day. Wat ah sad sad mule ya isa ees
Get ah therapy ya mule

I isa ah sees ya Kokobilo87 dah mule aka ah "guest"
Stap sleeping on ah NL and goeth tah improve ya relationships wit ya papa or ah sumthing ya cursed toxin baby

Oi Kokobilo87 dah mule. Ya isa ah good? Ya isa mining bitcoin fah dah rednecks? Dah time ina Texas isa 3:53am. Ya steel dreaming and ah thinking of ah Lincoln and ah ibime ya attencion seeking homoerotic mule?
Ya isa ah school on dah side like ur step bro Jeshal dah sodomite? Ya isa ah need Dat bitcoin monee tah share wit dah Sodomite fah NYSC. He isa ah tew broke tah find dah gurls Dat isa ah agree tah hees batty hole luving wais

Ginalz:
I isa ah sees ya Kokobilo87 dah mule aka ah "guest"
Stap sleeping on ah NL and goeth tah improve ya relationships wit ya papa or ah sumthing ya cursed toxin baby

Da chief donkey Isa addicted fa Nairaland. Tha kokobilo87 Isa eat, sleep, poop fa Nairaland. Stupid sodomite

obixcel:
Basilico isa challenged, I hope you've gotten ur 4th dose of the vaccine.

Ya Donkey

gambojimeta:
Da chief donkey Isa addicted fa Nairaland. Tha kokobilo87 Isa eat, sleep, poop fa Nairaland. Stupid sodomite

NL isa ah escape route fah dah harsh realities of hees poor useless lyfe. Everi hour of dah day he isa comes heer and ah hope Ibime ah say "hi" tah him. I isa ah tink he isa ah ejaculated wen Dat ah happens

Ginalz:
NL isa ah escape route fah dah harsh realities of hees poor useless lyfe. Everi hour of dah day he isa comes heer and ah hope Ibime ah say "hi" tah him. I isa ah tink he isa ah ejaculated wen Dat ah happens

Hehehehehe

This is unrelated to the task I gave you, and is an attempt to deflect from what the evidence you posted suggests.

You have failed. Please resit the task.

basilico:
According to CDC data, children aged 5-14 years-old have accounted for only 161 COVID-19 deaths since the start of the pandemic. In comparison, this same group has experienced 194 pneumonia deaths. To put these numbers into perspective, the CDC cites over 530,000 COVID-19 deaths for the ages 65 years and up. As New York Magazine observed, “The Kids Were Safe from COVID the Whole Time.”

In other words vaccinate 30m kids to save 161 lives.

basilico:
According to CDC data, children aged 5-14 years-old have accounted for only 161 COVID-19 deaths since the start of the pandemic. In comparison, this same group has experienced 194 pneumonia deaths. To put these numbers into perspective, the CDC cites over 530,000 COVID-19 deaths for the ages 65 years and up. As New York Magazine observed, “The Kids Were Safe from COVID the Whole Time.”

In other words vaccinate 30m kids to save 161 lives.

Sometimes I wonder if you read your own posts at all. You are suggesting that it's OK for 161 kids to die as a consequence of not vaccinating children? Are you a human being at all? If one of those 161 kids was a child of yours, would you still think it's OK for kids to die? Is this politics or heartlessness?

God have mercy!

budaatum:
This is unrelated to the task I gave you, and is an attempt to deflect from what the evidence you posted suggests.

You have failed. Please resit the task.

Still upto your old tricks. You want me to quote whats wrotten then you come up with some alternative viewpoint and drag me through the mud for a few hours.

Anyway read this. And tell me whether the data implies more deaths for the fully vaccinated. I got it from one of those 81 linked studies.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FCOigV2VIAIEWkS?format=jpg&name=900x900

Konkoja:
Sometimes I wonder if you read your own posts at all. You are suggesting that it's OK for 161 kids to die as a consequence of not vaccinating children? Are you a human being at all? If one of those 161 kids was a child of yours, would you still think it's OK for kids to die? Is this politics or heartlessness?

God have mercy!

Apparently you dont understand. 161 children are reported to have died from covid. The solution to this according to the experts is to vaccinate 30m kids above 5 years.
At the same time trashing Ivermectin and HCL, of which the link I pasted has 81 research studies on the two drugs.
Go through the links, they show IVM and HCL reduces mortality .

Oh and the US army has 380k cases of infections and 400 or so deaths. Solution. Force a vaccine mandate on the whole military whole denigrating Ivermectin and HCL

basilico:
Still upto your old tricks. You want me to quote whats wrotten then you come up with some alternative viewpoint and drag me through the mud for a few hours.

Anyway read this. And tell me whether the data implies more deaths for the fully vaccinated. I got it from one of those 81 linked studies.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FCOigV2VIAIEWkS?format=jpg&name=900x900

The following is from you own link. Bas, do more vaccinated die from covid than unvaccinated?

basilico:
At the same time trashing Ivermectin and HCL, of which the link I pasted has 81 research studies on the two drugs.
Go through the links, they show IVM and HCL reduces mortality .

You love lying far too much!

budaatum:
You love lying far too much!

Ya tha king of tha lie. Ya not calling anyone ah lie ya donkey

budaatum:
The following is from you own link. Bas, do more vaccinated die from covid than unvaccinated?

Im also following the science.
Looks like more vaxxed died than the unvaxxed in UK in September.

You almost had me here. The rates are irrelevant. The total deaths of vaxxed is more than unvaxxed.
If 10 out of 100 vaxxed succumb that will be a rate of 10%.
If 2 out of 5 unvaxxed succumb the rate will be 40%.
But in reality 10 vaxxed died, 2 unvaxxed died.

Kokobilo87:
Ya tha king of tha lie. Ya not calling anyone ah lie ya donkey

Ya pa, Adedayo Adedara Isa king of lie. Ya fulish donkey

basilico:


Im also following the science.
Looks like more vaxxed died than the unvaxxed in UK in September.

Wheni Isa ya going ta die Fram swollen testacle afta ya takee fauci vaxx. Ya conspiraci natcase apprentice donkey

JUST IN - U.S. GDP at disappointing 2.0% in Q3 vs 6.7% in prior Q2, missing the estimate of 2.7% by 0.7%.

The US isa die

We will weather the storm !

We have a great country!

God bless America - home of the brave!

The US isa survive.

Kokobilo87:
JUST IN - U.S. GDP at disappointing 2.0% in Q3 vs 6.7% in prior Q2, missing the estimate of 2.7% by 0.7%.

The US isa die

Kokobilo87:
JUST IN - U.S. GDP at disappointing 2.0% in Q3 vs 6.7% in prior Q2, missing the estimate of 2.7% by 0.7%.

The US isa die

Ya donkey Isa wish USA Isa die Kikikikikiki

If US Isa die, naijeriya our kontry Isa 200 feet Ina groundi Ya Ondo poophead donkey

basilico:


Im also following the science.
Looks like more vaxxed died than the unvaxxed in UK in September.

You almost had me here. The rates are irrelevant. The total deaths of vaxxed is more than unvaxxed.
If 10 out of 100 vaxxed succumb that will be a rate of 10%.
If 2 out of 5 unvaxxed succumb the rate will be 40%.
But in reality 10 vaxxed died, 2 unvaxxed died.

Do let me know how you explain the last two columns.

You should know you are dealing with a mad man who takes vaccine to protect himself, yet argues all day that vaccine has no efficacy.

Like I said, most of these alt-right loons are emotionally unhinged. Can't separate their emotions from their brain. His brain has taken action, yet his emotions are still arguing. That's why Trumpanzeeism is a mental illness.

budaatum:
Do let me know how you explain the last two columns.

You almost had me here. The rates are
irrelevant. The total deaths of vaxxed is more
than unvaxxed.
If 10 out of 100 vaxxed succumb that will be a
rate of 10%.
If 2 out of 5 unvaxxed succumb the rate will
be 40%.
But in reality 10 vaxxed died, 2 unvaxxed died.


The ratio is worked out using the vaxxed deaths vs population of the vaxxed.
And the unvaxxed deaths vs unvaxxed population

Simple maths.
Total who died between Aug 20 to Sep 19 was from first table 1272 fully vaxed and 198 unvaxxed.

Ibime:
You should know you are dealing with a mad man who takes vaccine to protect himself, yet argues all day that vaccine has no efficacy.

Like I said, most of these alt-right loons are emotionally unhinged. Can't separate their emotions from their brain. His brain has taken action, yet his emotions are still arguing. That's why Trumpanzeeism is a mental illness.

Where have I said the vaccine dont work? It was supposed to end the pandemic , apparently it has not.
The facts behind the vaccine are covered up to profit the pharma industry.
Of course if your body has the antigens either by natural immunity or the vaccine, it means you are likely to overcome the rona early stages. Theoretically.
Im against mandates Not the vaccine itself which anyway prevents serious illness.
And the endless booster shots while waiting for the approved effective treatment to be developed

And Im vaccinated.

And there is a story you might want to read a 2014 opinion post from the uber leftist trash Huffington Post .It shows how Dr Fauci delayed approval of a drug that helps HIV patients.
You do trust huff post, don't you?

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/whitewashing-aids-history_b_4762295/amp

Ibime:
You should know you are dealing with a mad man who takes vaccine to protect himself, yet argues all day that vaccine has no efficacy.

Like I said, most of these alt-right loons are emotionally unhinged. Can't separate their emotions from their brain. His brain has taken action, yet his emotions are still arguing. That's why Trumpanzeeism is a mental illness.

Ya donkey houseboy tha data isa show, you Isa ignore it. Ya a donkey witha no job.

Kokobilo87:
JUST IN - U.S. GDP at disappointing 2.0% in Q3 vs 6.7% in prior Q2, missing the estimate of 2.7% by 0.7%.

The US isa die

Biden Admin In Talks To Offer Up To $450K To Every Illegal Border Crosser Separated Under Trump: Report

https://www.dailywire.com/news/biden-admin-in-talks-to-offer-up-to-450k-to-every-illegal-border-crosser-separated-under-trump-report

basilico:
Biden Admin In Talks To Offer Up To $450K To Every Illegal Border Crosser Separated Under Trump: Report

https://www.dailywire.com/news/biden-admin-in-talks-to-offer-up-to-450k-to-every-illegal-border-crosser-separated-under-trump-report

tha black people like prideoflincoln1 isa tha donkey jackass tha democrats isa play for tha fool everyday.

Happy reading

DissTroy:
Just because the Homo sapiens became doesn't mean he wasn't crude. He was. Just because he could make fire doesn't mean he was civilised.

True

The Homo sapien took thousands of years before he formed communities and became a seafarer.

Wrong, humans were always communal, never solitary creatures, we have an innate impulse to seek out others like us for the protection afforded by a community, not just protection of self, also protection of interests, check our closest living primate relatives chimpanzees for reference

Even as homo erectus, he was spreading into different areas so by the time he evolved to Homo sapien, he was already in different areas of the world in between the thawing of ice and periodical warming of the earth.

True about the spreading, though I subscribe to the school of thought that there was only ever one ice age

If you research, you'd find archaeological findings of human remains in Europe dating back to 300,000 years ago. Those were part of the people spreading.

True again about the spread, but the bone of contention between you and I is about the color of humans involved in this spread, I posit that they were all black, maybe different shade of black but still black like their original African ancestors and herein is the crux of our disagreement, you posit that they evolved into white people over time, I totally disagree, genetics doesn't work like that

It's just like monkeys or say lions. A male gets kicked off at adolescent to got start his own pride so he moved far away. Then his own progeny moved farther away. Then farther away. Remember the Homo sapien was also a hunter gatherer with no map of the world or guide.

On this method of spreading, very plausible, can't fault that

By the time the homo sapien would have moved from, say, Sudan to Sweden, tens of thousands of years had passed and at that point he looked nothing phenotypically like his ancestors in Sudan. The colder climate and lesser sunshine changed their skin colours and hair type over the thousands of years as adaptation.

Wrong and very very wrong! The phenotype for melanin is dominant and as long as breeding is done with a spouse of same colouring, skin colour will never change! Neither will hair thickness, yes there may be slight changes from time to time depending on weather and the perfusion of blood underneath the skin to keep warm but those changes aren't permanent. Whiteness is a recessive trait that resulted from genetic quirks due to certain populations exposure to mutagens that favoured survival in certain places over generations! Simple point being white people evolved from a specific period of time at a specific location and spread from there and the rest is history. My favourite theory on this is that they evolved around the ice age at the base of the icewall near the steppes in Asia, how this is socially possible amongst a black population you may ask, ostracization, we talk about world history in terms of those that survived to breed, never the human cost of the survival, when whiteness resulted from genetic mutation over and over again and again across generations in a given population, ostracization meant they were cast out and also that they had only each other to breed with perpetuating the recessive gene for whiteness amongst their descendants and at a certain point they were large enough to form their own communities during the ice age but being forced to live in the habitable extremes of a harsh period of time on the planet favourably disposed them to previously unconsidered means of survival---> violence which later became a mainstay of their psyche and conditioned them to prevail against other groups of humans in later stages but that is a topic for another day. The point is, whiteness evolved at a particular place and at a particular time due to the presence of mutagens favouring its evolution and social factors unkind to whiteness ensured it survived and thrived and when it spread out in conquest, it discovered that most habitats in the north favourably disposed them to better chances of survival than others, this greater rate of survival made them dominant over a long period of competition with other races and human subspecies like denisovians and Neanderthals, not an evolution of skin color as you put it. Do you know that over 90% of blue eyed people in the world can trace their ancestry to a single individual from that Caucasus thousands of years ago? That is genetics for you, there's always a source code no matter how remote and far fetched, there's always a first.

And Africa was mostly frozen over too at a point during the Ice Age for thousands of years, until, 10,000 to 5,000 years ago, the Sahara wasn't even a desert so its inhabitants during the Ice Age would have the physical adaptations to withstand the cold (hair and others) which we, the present-day inhabitants don't have,

Wrong, wrong and super duper wrong!
At no point in time was Africa ever frozen during the ice age or in any ice age! Get this right, Africa was never frozen, the ice wall didn't go south beyond northern Europe! Africa was wetter and more humid yes, frozen? Never! The sahara was a savanna with an inland sea yes, frozen with a temperate forest or tundra hell no! So at no point in time did homo sapiens evolved in Africa ever need the physical adaptations to withstand any extremely cold weather

and some migrated north as hunter-gatherers forming nuclear groups would not exactly look like us. Our skin colour and hair type are adaptations to Africa's climatic conditions in thw last 10,000 years or so.

True and false!
True on the migration, false on the not looking exactly like us, they would look exactly like us with the only difference being the effect of weather on the production of melanin and its effects on our skin, more sunshine, slightly darker, less sunshine slightly lighter but all phenotypically black!

Put the very darkskinned Jim Iyke and Mercy Johnson in the Artic Circle (the conditions of many parts of the world during the Ice Age) procreating and you'd notice their progeny growing lighter (little sunlight) with thicker hair (the cold adaptation), and less broad noses (easing breathing in the cold).

Wrong, if Jim iyke and mercy Johnson had kids in the artic circle and their kids had kids with others of same skin coloration, generations down the line they will still look like Jim iyke and mercy Johnson, get this, genetics stays true irrespective of weather, the question is whether your genetic make up favourably predisposes you to survive in certain conditions or not, the survivors are adjudged to have evolved from those who didn't, whites were favourably predisposed to survive in temperate Europe, blacks were favourably predisposed to survive in tropical Africa and Asians/native Americans were favourably predisposed to survive in regions that had extremes of both tropical and temperate in different seasons. Now back to the genetics, white people populate the colder parts of the world because they conquered and dominated darker skinned peoples who were the original settlers there and were also more favourably predisposed to survival in that weather meaning more often than not, their offspring survived infancy there, look at modern day Jews as an example, they migrated from Palestine brown and swarthy skinned with thicker hair and came back many generations later looking exactly like Europeans, except the ones that migrated back from the middle East from places like Iran, those stayed truer to their original colouration but still looked more whiter as Iranians are descended from same Aryan stock as Europeans only mixed with south Asians, then contrast this to the Innuit tribes and Eskimo tribes of the Americas, they have lived thousands of years on the ice, close to the north pole, hunted and fished, lived and died generation after generation after generation but their skin never became whiter or their noses narrower because their stock population never changed so they never went through this evolution over time you talked about simply because there were no or not enough phenotypically white people to breed with and induce this change, so they remained true to their stock breed, the Asiatics who crossed the land bridge and the Polynesians who roamed the seas.

Point being, weather doesn't induce mutation even in nature, mutagens do, and survival of a mutagenic trait is then influenced by weather. That is the correct cycle.
And a point on survival of a mutagenic trait, phenotypic expression of skin color in a given location is determined by the amount of sunlight present and the rate of production of vitamin D by its absorption by the skin and also by the carcinogenic effects of prolonged unprotected ultraviolet exposure, black skin has more melanin and produces less vitamin D with less exposure to sunlight reducing chances of survival in areas of reduced periods of sun exposure, white skin contains less melanin and is able to create more vitamin D even with that little exposure to sunlight. Black skin thrives in areas of copious exposure to sunlight producing enough vitamin D while shielding the skin from ultraviolet radiation preventing skin burn and skin cancer, white skin on the other hand is stretched beyond its limits on exposure to tropical sunlight with less protection from ultraviolet radiation leading to skin burns and skin cancers.
On the nose issue, that is a trait adapted to living beneath an ice age ice wall where your breath can freeze in your nose and lungs and suffocate you than it is on polar regions where though cold is not that extreme, narrower, longer noses tend to compress and humidify the breath better than flatter broader noses hence the theory that white people started at the southernmost parts of the icewall along the steppes of modern day Russia

Never take one archaeological research as your evidence. This is an unwritten rule. Even archaeologists disagree on many issues.

True

The date of Pangea when the continental plates shifted to form continents today are still being argued.

True again

The age range of the first humans in Europe have changed more than 4 times in recent years, from 60,000 years to 300,000. The safe bet is taking the mean hence why I was focusing on about 150,000 in my earliest response to you.

Acceptable but still open for debate

They were genetically more closer to black than white but the genetic differentiation from present day blacks is noted meaning we evolved. And we didn't look exactly like them obviously.

Yes they were genetically identical, not just closer and the genetic differentiation implies they interbred with other races over and over again and again, even before mixing with white people, the slight differences in color and hair texture can be explained by the breeding with Neanderthals and denisovians over many generations but essentially they were still black.

Even the typical Nigerian in Lagos or Bayelsa has morphological variations from the typical South African. There are physical attributes you can tell which is which, including facial features. Imagine what 30,000 years of isolation would change us.

Those morphological differences are minuscule and inconsequential as we are essentially the same peoples of Bantu origins migrating from modern day Nigeria and the Cameroons and tens of thousands of years of migration essentially changed nothing

Exactly! Humans didn't migrate as one group. During different stages of evolution even during the Ice Age, migration happened, even as Homo erectus. The evolution happened at different paces and it's not all humans who discovered fire at the same time. That's why we didn't all enter the Stonge Age, Bronze Age and Iron Age at the same time.

True, that is why I said humans are essentially and basically communal creatures driven to seek each other out, share and exchange ideas, trade, war e.t.c and when isolated from others, we evolve unique traits and cultures

The inhabitants of Sentinel Island, for example, are just barely coming to grasp with their own Iron Age. The most isolated and crude set of humans on earth. They still walk with a slight bend

.
These are not unique, these sentinel islands are on the the Indian ocean right? I might have read of them, black, hunter gatherers, naked, elaborate ceremonies?
Well there are similar tribes in the Amazon rainforest deforestation is exposing as still being in the stone age but generally when we come across them, they are all tool makers.

These groups came upon each other e.g The Afro-migration 150,000, 60,000 and 12,000 years (the end of the last Ice Age when they earth began to warm finally) would come upon people who had migrated thousands of years before them and would fight. They even looked different from each other in many ways at that point.

They will look different only in the sense that different locations predisposed certain selective mutations to better survival, when the mutation isn't necessary for survival, they will look different only in that single trait or group of traits but essentially remain genetically black like their African ancestors e.g the Solomon islands, or is it the Christmas islands? Has a black population with woolly hair like us Africans with only difference being in color, they are all blonde, then there's another island on which a 17th century British ship was shipwrecked with one of the crew being color blind, with a significant part of the population up to 20% if I recollect correctly being color blind as s result of that one crew member, that is the effect a single mutation over time can have on a population group.

Blacks are phenotypically blacks due to the conditions found in Africa. Take blacks and put then in Greenland for 10,000 years (removing global warming) even without outside interactions and we'd look different from the African residents.
Evolution is slow and requires a lot of time.

this I have disproved in the mercy Johnson, Jim iyke scenario

benalvino3:
You have not provided a single source to back up your claims. This is nothing but a conspiracy theory. if the nose is cut off to hide their race, why do many have their right hand cut off, some their names wiped out, some their head cut off? Don't you think it has to do with ancient belief?

Some of the kings even warned about vandalism of their own image because they believe they can still be active in life through their statues that's why they bow and give offering and sacrifice to those statues. Most statues receiving offerings with their right hand got their right hand cut off, some statues giving offering got their hands cut off.

If you want anyone to take you seriously, you better start providing sources for your claims. No be to they yarn conspiracy crap here.

no source? My source is the lack of that specific form if vandalism anywhere else, defacing a statue by destruction of its nose, if you have a "sauce" please present it and debunk my conspiracy theory.
Also, on the earliest humans being all black irrespective of the location on the planet, check out cheddar man in England