Oasis001:


My first Choice is Samson Siasia, but he's still serving Ban. He's an attack-minded Coach that plays good football.

TheLoneCitizen:


Oh I understand.

I know you selected Amunike already.

But Nigeria's Eddie Newton has expressed his interest in the Super Eagles job. PRK.

He has achieved milestones at every club he's coached.

In his first managerial season, he finished 3rd in League One behind Leicester, MK Don's second highest finish in their history.

In his second job, guided West Brom back to the EPL.

At Chelsea, he won them the Champions League and FA Cup in one season.

Just last year, he won Trabzonspor their first trophy in 10 years. He was sacked because of FFP and Trabzonspor couldn't afford new signings.

He is currently director at 2020 Champions, Basaksehir.

What do you think?

BascoVanVeli:
I did a top 5 goals on Okocha's Super Eagles career for those who might want to check it out


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8zc5WY9h9Q

TFLASHOGEE:
I laugh in Latin make we kuku bring back Sunday mba he his our hero

Subzero047:


If only they will send back Ighalo, Inviting Moses back is a good idea but Ighalo’s invitation makes it look ridiculous

AndSunGorilla:

Siasia is really good and very committed despite all the sabotage from the NFF and sports ministry. However if only Siasia no dey try use national team to sell players, his success would have been a lot more honestly. For example I question him for starting the late Isaac Promise at the final of the Beijing Olympics. Also because we didn't have a good back up for Azubuike at the Rio Olympics we suffered against Germany in the semis and lost.

TFLASHOGEE:
since their only reason for inviting ighalo his experience then mba should be brought back at least he has the experience of scoring the winning goal of giving us an afcon title make we kuku jam pack the national team infact agbim should be brought back he has more experience than maduka he his an afcon winner awon wareeey people

Oasis001:


You can't blame him for RIO Squad Selection. Most of the Clubs didn't release his first targets. Remember Mikel forced it to be at the Tourney and paid for it darely when he returned back to Chelsea.

Siasia is tactically sound and better than rest local Coaches. You will always love how he sets up his Team tactically and he does dominate possession with direct, pacy football.

He did well at Beijing, lost to star studded Argentina Team by a lone Goal. Same Argentina Team destroyed Ronaldinho led Brazilian Team by 3 unreplied Goals.

He did well at Rio also. Amuzie wasn't his first choice as Lb, same goes to Sadiq and some Members of the Squad.

SiaOne na baba!

Oasis001:


My first Choice is Samson Siasia, but he's still serving Ban. He's an attack-minded Coach that plays good football.

Truidstar:
siasia's team set up...yes. Tactically sound...No.

daveP:



I tell you. If NFF is serious, they can try a plea on his case. I don't know how possible is that. I just feel they've got such power IMO.


One thing is certain though, Discipline will be restored to the camp. So dem party riders, whether true or false, will have to align. Next is the business of exploiting opponents' weaknesses, an offshoot of studying them well individually. The tactics is the overall capping.


If only though.


Only i dunno who stubborn pass between him and Amodu.



But sincerely, asides cash wasting, is the time actually ripe for indigenous coaches? Just asking?

TheLoneCitizen:

Chelsea is a short-term club, nothing to do with Mourinho. Just last season, they sold Tomori and Zouma, to buy Kounde for a more expensive fee.
If Chalobah wasn't a goal-scoring defender, Chelsea would never have given him a chance no matter how good he was.

Do you realise how many stars of today Mourinho has molded from scratch? For Afena-Gyan's debut goal, Mourinho snubbed more established stars like Zaniolo, Perez and Mayoral because he trusted in youth.

The Pogba you're talking about has fallen out with every United coach. Solksjaer couldn't trust him weeks before his sack. Carrick can't even trust him as interim.

Oasis001:


Why No?

Oasis001:


Why No?

TheLoneCitizen:


Oh I understand.

I know you selected Amunike already.

But Nigeria's Eddie Newton has expressed his interest in the Super Eagles job. PRK.

He has achieved milestones at every club he's coached.

In his first managerial season, he finished 3rd in League One behind Leicester, MK Don's second highest finish in their history.

In his second job, guided West Brom back to the EPL.

At Chelsea, he won them the Champions League and FA Cup in one season.

Just last year, he won Trabzonspor their first trophy in 10 years. He was sacked because of FFP and Trabzonspor couldn't afford new signings.

He is currently director at 2020 Champions, Basaksehir.

What do you think?

Danielnino00:
It's almost the end of the week...
Rohr is still at the wheels

TheGoodJoe:


I like him but don't know much about him to run a ruling. He is a good choice based on records he looks a good choice.

But good records.

However, I am still a grassroots guy. I don't know if he can fit in that side of things.

We see how it goes.

I don't know if Amunike has shown interest I am just pointing my choice and why.

TheLoneCitizen:


Good this is what I was expecting.

First of all, I want to apologise to readers of this thread for misleading. Eddie Newton has never expressed interest in the Nigerian job, I just used him for a social experiment.

Although I tagged the post, PRK, the short form of prank, I'm very sorry and deserve any insult you send my way.

Now back to Joe.

I did this social experiment, to show you how deeply entrenched you are in racism even to the point you might not be aware of.

What all blacks in the western world are fighting against is what you're wholeheartedly practicing.

Examine yourself thoroughly, brother.

Once again, I apologize.

TheLoneCitizen:


Good this is what I was expecting.

First of all, I want to apologise to readers of this thread for misleading. Eddie Newton has never expressed interest in the Nigerian job, I just used him for a social experiment.

Although I tagged the post, PRK, the short form of prank, I'm very sorry and deserve any insult you send my way.

Now back to Joe.

I did this social experiment, to show you how deeply entrenched you are in racism even to the point you might not be aware of.

What all blacks in the western world are fighting against is what you're wholeheartedly practicing.

Examine yourself thoroughly, brother.

Once again, I apologize.

TheGoodJoe:


So don't tell me about the coach's titles. Tell me about of he checks the boxes.

Can he operate in our grassroots system?

Is he going to play the modern game pattern?

These are what I am interested in. As I said, most foreign coaches that can coach the modern system well will hardly come to coach us.

Our best choices to check these boxes lie in the indigenous coaches.

How is this racism?

TheLoneCitizen:


Look man, first of all I appreciate your professionalism. You've gone this far without using any slur or breaking any gentleman code, I applaud that.

But you see, if you find problem with yourself you need to address it.

You stated authoritatively:

"With all his CV and profile, I will take Siasia over a white man without thinking. I will take others over him. A white man will never give us the kind of Work..."

Then I told you that the use of the term 'white man' is racist, because you're discriminating based on skin colour regardless of qualification.

But then you corrected me that you meant foreigners in general not white:

"I said we should cut the white men or... foreigners because it cost more, we hardly get thorough jobs from them, and with little to show for it."

But then I showed you Eddie Newton, a foreigner who is not white, and you immediately fell in love with me. This is a man who doesn't identify as African except for his Nigerian ancestry and skin colour. He is no different from Vierra or Rashford or Ashley Cole.

You did not contest his CV nor pay as you did the whites earlier on.

This shows your bias not towards foreigners but towards whites. That my good man, is racism.

Saying: no matter the qualification I will choose a black manager over a white manager,
is different from saying
I prefer an indigenous manager over a foreign manager.

This means if a white man who was born, raised and identifies as a Nigerian comes for the Super Eagles job, you will not endorse because of his skin colour.

That's racism, man. If you don't want foreigners it's understandable, I also do not, but saying you don't want whites is a capital crime.

TheLoneCitizen:


Look man, first of all I appreciate your professionalism. You've gone this far without using any slur or breaking any gentleman code, I applaud that.

But you see, if you find problem with yourself you need to address it.

You stated authoritatively:

"With all his CV and profile, I will take Siasia over a white man without thinking. I will take others over him. A white man will never give us the kind of Work..."

Then I told you that the use of the term 'white man' is racist, because you're discriminating based on skin colour regardless of qualification.

But then you corrected me that you meant foreigners in general not white:

"I said we should cut the white men or... foreigners because it cost more, we hardly get thorough jobs from them, and with little to show for it."

But then I showed you Eddie Newton, a foreigner who is not white, and you immediately fell in love with me. This is a man who doesn't identify as African except for his Nigerian ancestry and skin colour. He is no different from Vierra or Rashford or Ashley Cole.

You did not contest his CV nor pay as you did the whites earlier on.

This shows your bias not towards foreigners but towards whites. That my good man, is racism.

Saying: no matter the qualification I will choose a black manager over a white manager,
is different from saying
I prefer an indigenous manager over a foreign manager.

This means if a white man who was born, raised and identifies as a Nigerian comes for the Super Eagles job, you will not endorse because of his skin colour.

That's racism, man. If you don't want foreigners it's understandable, I also do not, but saying you don't want whites is a capital crime.