₦airaland Forum

PrideofLincoln1:
I have a friend in NY that wanted to burn down his house because the wife got the house in a divorce settlement and she was staying there with her boyfriend while my friend was stuck with $2,300 monthly mortgage. I told my friend point blank that he will spend his fruitful years in jail if he set the house on fire. Told him to just move on and forget about his ex wife living in the house he's still paying for.

Nastymods:
Ya donkey, you Isa not know gravitation is tha force of ah gravity. Ya isa donkey, ah certified idiot. Gravitation is ah property of gravity.

Theory of gravity isa everywhere but u Isa donkey.

benalvino3:
I am not comparing the theory of Gravity to Critical race theory. I said; Just like the theory of gravity is universal, Critical race theory should be universal and be tested everywhere in the world.

WispyEthereal:
This last part was my answer to you many weeks ago Mr dumbolino! So are you still trying to explain to me the differences between theories and laws after all this time as if I never knew from the start? Is this how you expect me to appreciate your fake theory of gravity?

BasedUsername:
At this point you're either delusional or a liar

https://media.gettyimages.com/videos/footage-shows-the-17yearold-boy-who-is-suspected-of-having-shot-two-video-id1268890015


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LojfGWZwHg0?t=528

This coming from the guy that thinks counter protesting is grounds for murder is fvcking amazing.

Bro, I don't even know what's wrong you. Stop embarrassing yourself

https://apnews.com/article/racial-injustice-brunswick-georgia-b033cc134abf8d95169da9d6fae13677

That said, how does a trespassing warning even taint someone's memory? Trespassing is a trivial matter and Arbery shouldn't have been chased and killed by those men.

I supported the protests which actually started out peaceful. I even had some siblings go because my folks were hesitant about all of us going. The Lekki Toll Gate incident was a tragedy that made me lose all how in this country.

However, I did not support the destruction and looting of businesses and I did not support the harassment of drivers to say "end sars".

benalvino3:
You should ask yourself why you are still trying because, by now you should have known to ignore him and not continue.

Logic does not exist, he will twist your words, lie, contradict himself and will never accept proven facts like the countless videos and fact presented to him.

Leave it. Let it go, you will be moving circles.

AmazonTopaz:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fB7MwvqCtlk



Sanpipita this was the video I was referring to. It seems the pseudo party of education and parents isn't interested in the safety of their kids in schools so they legislate in support of open carry without permits which in turn endangers the children and sanctity of life they claim to care for so much for being pro-life.

Shameless hypocrites,it is easy to get a gun in some states in America than to vote in those states.

feedthenation:
Trump Tested Positive for COVID Before Biden Debate, Not After, Says His Ex-Chief of Staff

Ex Chief of Staff Mark Meadows claims the president tested positive for COVID three days before the first Biden debate but went ahead anyway. A week later, he was hospitalized.

The Guardian obtained a copy of Meadows’ upcoming book, The Chief’s Chief, which claims Trump tested positive three days before his first debate against Biden on Sept. 29 last year. Meadows recounts Trump taking off on a helicopter from the White House lawn on Sept. 26 to get to a Pennsylvania rally right after attending the Supreme Court confirmation event for Amy Coney Barrett—now known to have been a super-spreader event.

Meadows recounts the White House doctor calling him as Marine One lifted off with Trump on board. “Stop the president from leaving,” Sean Conley purportedly told Meadows. “He just tested positive for COVID.”

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/dec/01/trump-tested-positive-covid-before-biden-debate-chief-staff-mark-meadows-book

budaatum:
I see you already tried to educate him. Lol.

budaatum:
You really are a funny dude. See as you sneakily describe gravity as a theory.

WispyEthereal:
water is a property of the antlantic ocean so when asked to define the Atlantic ocean I could as well describe water! never mind salinity, never mind feeder rivers, never mind the estimated volume, never mind the marine ecosystem, never mind currents, never mind depth, never mind the seabed topography, never mind the area covered along thd longitude and latitude lines and coastlines bordering it, lemme just describe water and I'm good! mumurideen oderop0 dindinrin dadandindin asinwin ewure akure adedapo adedayo omo omolara olobo agbero, not every discourse is for you! No be everything you go shook your gangrened mouth put! You see how you are disgracing your ancestors? For your olodo mind gravitation equals gravity so therefore theories of gravitation become theories of gravity! chai! Who do your ancestry this thing? Please na beg I beg you, do not breed! See multi generational stupidity on full blast! The difference between the two is so simple even an art major would have grasped it on the first presentation, but you are hopelessly brainless so it is not strictly entirely your fault sha!

WispyEthereal:
to be fair to benalvino3, there is a nastymods dumber than him here, they really are dumb and dumber

Nastymods:
[s]Ya donkey ya isa confused. ya isa fool who isa not able to ah digest anything. the Ocean isa water. that isa fact. gravitation isa gravity that isa fact.

Elect isa mean to ah choose someone. Election isa mean tha act of choosing someone.
tha same with ah gravitation ya donkey.

Gravity (from Latin gravitas 'weight' ), or gravitation, is a natural phenomenon by which all things with mass or energy—including planets, stars, galaxies, and even light —are attracted to (or gravitate toward) one another.
this isa from tha wikipedia.

Ya donkey ya ah isa say they isa wrong ya Certified idiot isa know nothing.

gravitation isa gravity ina action. it ah common sense.

educate
VERB
give intellectual, moral, and social instruction to (someone), typically at a school or university.

education
NOUN
the process of receiving or giving systematic instruction, especially at a school or university.

educational
ADJECTIVE
relating to the provision of education

gravity
NOUN
physics
the force that attracts a body towards the centre of the earth, or towards any other physical body having mass.

gravitation
NOUN
movement, or a tendency to move, towards a centre of gravity, as in the falling of bodies to the earth.

gravitational
ADJECTIVE
relating to movement towards a centre of gravity.

since ya isa confused water for ah see.

tell ah us if Educate and Education are ah completely different ah thing. YA isa goat

ah cordin to ah ya, Elect isa different for ah election. ya isa not understand ah english [/s]

Nastymods:
Ya donkey ya isa confused. ya isa fool who isa not able to ah digest anything. the Ocean isa water. that isa fact. gravitation isa gravity that isa fact.

[s]Elect isa mean to ah choose someone. Election isa mean tha act of choosing someone.
tha same with ah gravitation ya donkey.

Gravity (from Latin gravitas 'weight' ), or gravitation, is a natural phenomenon by which all things with mass or energy—including planets, stars, galaxies, and even light —are attracted to (or gravitate toward) one another.
this isa from tha wikipedia.

Ya donkey ya ah isa say they isa wrong ya Certified idiot isa know nothing.

gravitation isa gravity ina action. it ah common sense.

educate
VERB
give intellectual, moral, and social instruction to (someone), typically at a school or university.

education
NOUN
the process of receiving or giving systematic instruction, especially at a school or university.

educational
ADJECTIVE
relating to the provision of education

gravity
NOUN
physics
the force that attracts a body towards the centre of the earth, or towards any other physical body having mass.

gravitation
NOUN
movement, or a tendency to move, towards a centre of gravity, as in the falling of bodies to the earth.

gravitational
ADJECTIVE
relating to movement towards a centre of gravity.

since ya isa confused water for ah see.

tell ah us if Educate and Education are ah completely different ah thing. YA isa goat

ah cordin to ah ya, Elect isa different for ah election. ya isa not understand ah english [/s]

Nastymods:
ya donkey ya ask for tha theory, ya isa have it but ya isa ignore it

gambojimeta:
Ya half donkey- half monkey son ofu gorilla Isa crops outs da physiks definitions andi leave alone da englis definition

Ya andi Jabulani Isa lie andi da Satan Isa envies

Apart Fram nat hafing money fa school fees andi ya mental healths, no wonders dem Akure unifasity Isa chase ya away Fram unifasity.

Ya brain Isa full ofu poooops ta undastands basic physics

feedthenation:
Trump Tested Positive for COVID Before Biden Debate, Not After, Says His Ex-Chief of Staff

Ex Chief of Staff Mark Meadows claims the president tested positive for COVID three days before the first Biden debate but went ahead anyway. A week later, he was hospitalized.

The Guardian obtained a copy of Meadows’ upcoming book, The Chief’s Chief, which claims Trump tested positive three days before his first debate against Biden on Sept. 29 last year. Meadows recounts Trump taking off on a helicopter from the White House lawn on Sept. 26 to get to a Pennsylvania rally right after attending the Supreme Court confirmation event for Amy Coney Barrett—now known to have been a super-spreader event.

Meadows recounts the White House doctor calling him as Marine One lifted off with Trump on board. “Stop the president from leaving,” Sean Conley purportedly told Meadows. “He just tested positive for COVID.”

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/dec/01/trump-tested-positive-covid-before-biden-debate-chief-staff-mark-meadows-book

AmazonTopaz:
If they come for reproductive rights,they will come for voting rights, LGBTQ rights and others setting America back to the 20th century.

Also I loved solicitor general, Elizabeth Prelogar line of argument that what Mississippi is trying to do is an attack on people's liberty and she clearly made the justices know what could be at stake if they support such a ban that other rights are not safe for example marriage equality will be under attack remember that Alito and Thomas never supported Obergefell.

15 justices over time followed precedents and understood viability but the hard right 6 conservatives on the court don't seem to understand this because they wanna sound political and let SCOTUS lose it's legitimacy.

Julie Rikleman and Elizabeth Prelogar nailed the arguments today very brilliant litigators but this will not convince the current justices we have in SCOTUS right now.

Cc.
Prideoflincoln1,wispyethereal,sanpipita and budaatum

AmazonTopaz:
If they come for reproductive rights,they will come for voting rights, LGBTQ rights and others setting America back to the 20th century.

Also I loved solicitor general, Elizabeth Prelogar line of argument that what Mississippi is trying to do is an attack on people's liberty and she clearly made the justices know what could be at stake if they support such a ban that other rights are not safe for example marriage equality will be under attack remember that Alito and Thomas never supported Obergefell.

15 justices over time followed precedents and understood viability but the hard right 6 conservatives on the court don't seem to understand this because they wanna sound political and let SCOTUS lose it's legitimacy.

Julie Rikleman and Elizabeth Prelogar nailed the arguments today very brilliant litigators but this will not convince the current justices we have in SCOTUS right now.

Cc.
Prideoflincoln1,wispyethereal,sanpipita and budaatum

budaatum:
Dumping precedence is not a bad thing since it allows one to dump the bad too. I'm not one to worship forebears.

I would love to see how this new law would be enforced in the Land of the Free and the Brave, and what it does to the demographics of states who adopt it. They might need new mother and child prisons.

sanpipita:
I don't think they will be stupid enough to overturn Roe v Wade, Americans might be divided but there are things that unite them more than divide them, abortion rights is one of it, even conservatives will want to retain abortion rights but fingers crossed

sanpipita:
I don't think they will be stupid enough to overturn Roe v Wade, Americans might be divided but there are things that unite them more than divide them, abortion rights is one of it, even conservatives will want to retain abortion rights but fingers crossed

basilico:
[b]

[s]An attorney who represented the victims of billionaire Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual assault said that in 2009:
Edwards: The only thing that I can say about President Trump is that he is the only person who, in 2009 when I served a lot of subpoenas on a lot of people, or at least gave notice to some pretty connected people, that I want to talk to them, is the only person who picked up the phone and said, let’s just talk. I’ll give you as much time as you want. I’ll tell you what you need to know, and was very helpful, in the information that he gave, and gave no indication whatsoever that he was involved in anything untoward whatsoever, but had good information. That checked out and that helped us and we didn’t have to take a deposition of him in 2009.
[/]

Furthermore Trump said in an interview

https://mobile.twitter.com/PapiTrumpo/status/1465802161955254284

[b]Transcript:

Interviewer: "Uh...Bill Clinton?"

President Trump: "Nice guy....ah....got a lot of problems coming up, in my opinion, with the famous island, with Jeffrey Epstein. Lot of problems.

[b]
Different interview/interviewer below asking about his remarks in the prior interview.

[b]
Interviewer #2: "....Epstein in your remarks, in the Q and A about..."

President Trump: "Well I think he's got a problem...."

Interviewer: "What do you think the problem will be?"

President Trump: "I don't know, but that island was really a cesspool, there's no question about it. Just ask Prince Andrew. He'll tell you about it[/s]. [/b

WispyEthereal:
And what exactly does this prove? I said medic my foot and that stands, I watched both clips and the full fiftysomething minutes of your you tube video, you know what I saw? Police shooting rubber bullets in the air most likely, and flashbangs according to the lady recording to disperse the crowd from Sheridan road back to where most armed protect the blue or protect a property protesters were assembled at a gas station, most armed, there were exchanges, there was confrontation all mostly verbal and a few shovings here and there, all this in the midst of two obviously armed groups, I saw protesters throwing projectiles at the police, two people were hit, one wasn't shown and the commentary alleged it was rubber bullets, the other lady who was limping whom Rittenhouse was trying to present himself as an EMT to was hit by a projectile (unspecified), Rittenhouse himself was waaaay forward of the others who claimed to be protecting properties, for better or worse that was the protesters zone along that road by default.
But all that doesn't matter, there were very many people with guns and by that video on that night, the only people shot at or should i add "deliberately" shot at in respect to the unseen person suspectedly hit by a rubber bullet, and the only persons killed were all shot by the murderer Rittenhouse! He simply had no right to be there except to protest against the police, those of his inclination were further down the road as the video clearly showed
So own the rotteness of your own mindset, your "my killer is holier than yours attitude" and there is no evidence that you will present that will change that, in any other civilised society that animal will be in jail already.



This is rich from a guy who thinks a murderer that espouses his political ideology should be canonised and made a saint and all his sins whitewashed and behold he is a born again new creature and if others don't buy his silly narrative he cries foul and tries to compare a murderer to actual victims in a bout of fevered false equivalency! Mr miss me with your sanctimonious BS! And I never said a counter protester should be murdered, gosh! Are you benalvino3 's spoof account, because you are beginning to act like him, I said a murderer should be murdered or executed because there were many counter protesters on that night, only one of them murdered people, feel free to reinterpret as you see fit!



I type from my recollection, except the topic is stimulating I won't research it, I don't argue to win, having said that, I stand corrected, I remember writing "I stand to be corrected though" and that is all that is, so you have proven that arbery was due to be served a trespass notice, until he was he hadn't been served one and as such that is inconsequential




Oh but it does, to justify a murder by cannonisers of murderers like you, something must be made to stick, something to cast shade on the character of the personality that was the victim, even breona Taylor wasn't spared, her crime was having an ex who was a suspected drug dealer, trayvon martins was accused of being physically imposing for a child and standing his ground against a stranger trailing him without justification, the list never ends, the young kid whose name I have forgotten who was murdered in the fiftees on the accusation of a white woman as having assaulted her is still there, black wall street tulsa was burned down because of a white young female elevator operator ran out screaming because a black shoe shine boy entered the lift and a white mob naturally assumed she had been assaulted, a boy silently released without charges later after a successful black community had been burned down and many blacks murdered. So you cannonisers of murderers have a playbook, murder someone, cast doubt on the victim's personality, if that fails, plead mental insanity, the white ace in the hole getaway card


You shouldn't have, because I am drawing parallels between BLM and #EndSars and protests can be organised to the best of peoples abilities but there will always be people outside the cause who exploit that to commit crimes but it never in any way discredits the protesters or the protests

Destruction and looting of businesses by who? That is the critical question to points to your duplicity, you are rushing headlong to ascribe all that to the protesters because that is the only way to validate your pretensions that BLM protesters were violent and destructive

Kellzzyy:
"He simply has no right to be there expect to protest against the police"
Do you reason from your anus?
So as a free citizen in a free state he had no right to be there but anti-state looting mobs had the right to be there?

adamusuleiman1:
Lamb Isa go ta meet da wolf kikikiki

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/jeffrey-epstein-introduced-trump-14-ghislaine-maxwell-accuser-says-rcna7253