₦airaland Forum

AmazonTopaz:
I am just glad that democrats are winning the redistricting battle against the Republicans this time around.

Haha they have been attacking Marc Elias and his team, more litigations is happening, think by June they will conclude most redistricting.

sanpipita:
Haha they have been attacking Marc Elias and his team, more litigations are happening, think by June they will conclude most redistricting.

That man and democracy docket are doing a great job defending democracy.

AmazonTopaz:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usryT1v-EzQ.

Raumdeuter take your time to watch this so much for the pro parents party you don't want me to vaccinate your kids or let the wear mask yet you want to police my trans kids.

GQP hypocrisy

Republicans have a strange behavior, they always say government shouldn't be having much control on people's lives yet all they do is to make bills to control people's lives.

Sanpipita ah lazy nut job who isa wait for tha reparation and tha failed student ina tha aba have ah talk on tha propaganda

This thing Republicans are doing will backfire soon more questions like this will be asked by Americans, you can't keep riling against control then go on to cherry pick on what to control.

Amazontopaz

AmazonTopaz:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usryT1v-EzQ.

Ramdeuter take your time to watch this so much for the pro parents party you don't want me to vaccinate your kids or let the wear mask yet you want to police my trans kids.

GQP hypocrisy

Do you think it's right to perform gender change surgery on a minor?

sanpipita:
This thing Republicans are doing will backfire soon more questions like this will be asked by Americans, you can't keep riling against control then go on to cherry pick on what to control.

Amazontopaz

Do you think it's right to perform gender reassignment surgery on a minor?

Do you think it's right for schools to teach children under 8yrs about sexuality without their parent consent

raumdeuter:
Do you think it's right to perform gender reassignment surgery on a minor?

Do you think it's right for schools to teach children under 8yrs about sexuality without their parent consent

Is this the issue? if I don't think it's right for a kid to perform gender assignment surgery doesn't that mean its a universal parental decision for everyone, some parents will support their kids on these two things, Republicans used this logic too say don't make vaccines mandatory and let everyone choose, why can't we allow parents choose how to raise their kids, Republicans keep saying let parents decide till it's something they don't like.

raumdeuter:
Do you think it's right to perform gender reassignment surgery on a minor?

Do you think it's right for schools to teach children under 8yrs about sexuality without their parent consent

Is this the issue? if I don't think it's right for a kid to perform gender assignment surgery doesn't that mean its a universal parental decision for everyone, some parents will support their kids on these two things.

Republicans used this logic too say don't make vaccines mandatory and let everyone choose, why can't we allow parents choose how to raise their kids, Republicans keep saying let parents decide till it's something they don't like.

sanpipita:
Is this the issue? if I don't think it's right for a kid to perform gender assignment surgery doesn't that mean its a universal parental decision for everyone, some parents will support their kids on these two things.

Republicans used this logic too say don't make vaccines mandatory and let everyone choose, why can't we allow parents choose how to raise their kids, Republicans keep saying let parents decide till it's something they don't like.

That is the issue and it has to do with common sense laws for those who have common sense
So if a parent decide to marry out their 5yr old children the state should allow them and not interfere?

If a parent decide to starve their children the state should allow them and not interfere?

If parents decide to kill or castrate their children they should be allowed and not interfere?

Sensible people will know parents should be allowed to have a right on how their children are raised while lines should be drawn when it some to issues bordering on abuse and insanity like performing gender altering surgery on a minor

Republicans don't like gender surgeries on minors, Republicans don't like sexual teaching to children under 8 by anyone without parental consent. The question is why do Democrats like it and why are you defending it? Is there a 7yr old that is not your child you will want to discuss sex with without the parents knowledge?

raumdeuter:
Do you think it's right to perform gender change surgery on a minor?

Leave it for the parents and doctors to decide not lawmakers.
It is none of your business especially for a party that wants to limit how government control their lives or prevent them from regulating their guns but want to regulate the personal lives of others the hypocrisy is glaring.

sanpipita:
This thing Republicans are doing will backfire soon more questions like this will be asked by Americans, you can't keep riling against control then go on to cherry pick on what to control.

Amazontopaz

Hypocrisy is the GQP

AmazonTopaz:
Leave it for the parents and doctors to decide not lawmakers.
It is none of your business especially for a party that wants to limit how government control their lives or prevent them from regulating their guns but want to regulate the personal lives of others the hypocrisy is glaring.

Should we also allow parents who decide to starve their children

Marry off their children underage, even kill their children go ahead since you don't want govt to interfere

raumdeuter:
That is the issue and it has to do with common sense laws for those who have common sense
So if a parent decide to marry out their 5yr old children the state should allow them and not interfere?

If a parent decide to starve their children the state should allow them and not interfere?

If parents decide to kill or castrate their children they should be allowed and not interfere?

Sensible people will know parents should be allowed to have a right on how their children are raised while lines should be drawn when it some to issues bordering on abuse and insanity like performing gender altering surgery on a minor

Republicans don't like gender surgeries on minors, Republicans don't like sexual teaching to children under 8. The question is why do Democrats like it and why are you defending it? I[b]s there a 7yr old that is not your child you will want to discuss sex with without the parents knowledge[/b]?

Interfere interfere interfere goes against what your party teaches.

There are reasons why parents are the guardians of kids leave the parents to decide for themselves and stop invading people's privacy by taunting them.
@bold,I am sure that when you were taught sex education in school your teacher waited for your parents to come and give permission first before you were taught about it or was that not included in your educational curriculum even some parents deliberately wait for teachers to expose their kids to puberty.

Oh I forgot it is not about CRT so parents no longer have a right anymore but lawmakers should get to decide the others laws for them.The hypocrisy is deafening.

No parent will intentionally hurt a child so your points are a bit sketchy the parents allowing reassignment surgeries consulted with the doctors and they saw it to be in the best interest of their children.

You are talking about common sense laws then let the parents use their common senses to decide and stop defending what does not even correlate with what their true aim is.

AmazonTopaz:
Interfere interfere interfere goes against what your party teaches.

There are reasons why parents are the guardians of kids leave the parents to decide for themselves and stop invading people's privacy by taunting them.
@bold,I am sure that when you were taught sex education in school your teacher waited for your parents to come and give permission first before you were taught about it or was that not included in your educational curriculum even some parents deliberately wait for teachers to expose their kids to puberty.

Oh I forgot it is not about CRT so parents no longer have a right anymore but lawmakers should get to decide the others laws for them.The hypocrisy is deafening.

No parent will intentionally hurt a child so your points are a bit sketchy the parents allowing reassignment surgeries consulted with the doctors and they saw it to be in the best interest of their children.

You are talking about common sense laws then let the parents use their common senses to decide and stop defending what does not even correlate with what their true aim is.

I was not taught about sex under the age of 8 by any teacher

What is your intention of teaching under 8 children about sex without their parents approval?

No parent will intentionally hurt their child? Obviously liberals live in alternate world. What then is the role of Child protective services since parents don't hurt their children intentionally

raumdeuter:
Should we also allow parents who decide to starve their children

Marry off their children underage, even kill their children go ahead since you don't want govt to interfere

To be realistic how many children have government fed?the GQP does not like handouts and social spending anyway and don't over exaggerate parents don't intentionally starve their kids anywhere in the world.

You are just over exaggerating even in Afghanistan or the north where child marriage is done it is as a result of poverty, no hope and choice that is why it is the duty of government to provide these amenities to avoid that and make life good instead of policing the privacy of how parents choose to raise their children.

Your party is not interested in that but rather interested in control

AmazonTopaz:
To be realistic how many children have government fed?the GQP does not like handouts and social spending anyway and don't over exaggerate parents don't intentionally starve their kids anywhere in the world.

You are just over exaggerating even in Afghanistan or the north where child marriage is done it is as a result of poverty, no hope and choice that is why it is the duty of government to provide these amenities to avoid that and make life good instead of policing the privacy of how parents choose to raise their children.

Your party is not interested in that but rather interested in control

Go to the nearest Child Protective Services or talk to a social worker and hear about what some parents do to kids?

Oh you are not in America, you only read what the liberal media feeds you.

raumdeuter:
I was not taught about sex under the age of 8 by any teacher

What is your intention of teaching under 8 children about sex without their parents approval?

No parent will intentionally hurt their child? Obviously liberals live in alternate world. What then is the role of Child protective services since parents don't hurt their children intentionally

Oh good to know that but you said nobody teaches a child about those stuff without approval from the parents and I am asking you if you were not taught sex education.
Don't over exaggerate nobody does anything without the approval of parents.
Against anything seen to be abusive the doctors don't see reassignment surgery as abuse neither do child protection services go after parents who do reassignment surgery.

Be realistic dude

raumdeuter:
Go to the nearest Child Protective Services or talk to a social worker and hear about what some parents do to kids?

Oh you are not in America, you only read what the liberal media feeds you.

I have been to America and anywhere my money can take me even Nigeria has social workers.

Bring out the statistics on the reasons why child protection services exist in the first place.

Like I said parents do not intentionally hurt their kids and no parent consulting with a doctor for what is in the best interest of their kids end up in child protection services, protection services exist today not because of what liberals do to their kids.

Raumdeuter since the GQP is now interested in kids rights and protecting children is it not time to outlaw male circumcision you know since the parents are not capable enough of caring for their children or making good parental decisions and it is now the job of the GQP why not outlaw circumcision on minors and wait till they are 18 to decide for themselves?

We already know that the rate is declining already let's just completely abolish it and criminalise it then send anyone to jail who thinks of abusing their boys

benalvino3:
Like I said, you are always here to downplay or claim nonsense that is going on Is not going on. You must defend the leftist delusion. These are not done by one person.

That's 6 people, Ben. And even if it's 60, still a tiny percentage of any group you put them in and a very tiny number compared to instances where the allegations were actually true!

Go on, Ben, I dare you to provide a list of people found guilty and jailed for racial abuse. Let's see if you find as many as 6.

AmazonTopaz:
I have been to America and anywhere my money can take me even Nigeria has social workers.

Bring out the statistics on the reasons why child protection services exist in the first place.

Like I said parents do not intentionally hurt their kids and no parent consulting with a doctor for what is in the best interest of their kids end up in child protection services, protection services exist today not because of what liberals do to their kids.

There is a difference between visiting and living in a place

Visitors to Nigeria have a different experience than those who live there

Yes some parents intentionally hurt their kids, there are parents who p1mpp out their kids, there are parents who flog their kids with intentions to harm and there are parents who have actually killed their kids

raumdeuter:
There is a difference between visiting and living in a place

Visitors to Nigeria have a different experience than those who live there

Yes some parents intentionally hurt their kids, there are parents who p1mpp out their kids, there are parents who flog their kids with intentions to harm and there are parents who have actually killed their kids

Like I said parents don't intentionally hurt their kids the percentage is even less than 20.

Bring out evidence of liberal policies hurting kids and why exactly some of these kids end up there another thing is since these services exist why does government not actually tackle the problem an example would be letting women decide for themselves if they are capable of training the kids instead of shoving it down their throats that they must keep a pregnancy they are not interested in keeping then going around to show the kids hell on earth and later getting social services involved.
That is what government should be doing not telling me what the best interest for my child is especially when doctors in the field mostly do not see it that way

raumdeuter:
That is the issue and it has to do with common sense laws for those who have common sense
So if a parent decide to marry out their 5yr old children the state should allow them and not interfere?

If a parent decide to starve their children the state should allow them and not interfere?

If parents decide to kill or castrate their children they should be allowed and not interfere?

Sensible people will know parents should be allowed to have a right on how their children are raised while lines should be drawn when it some to issues bordering on abuse and insanity like performing gender altering surgery on a minor

Republicans don't like gender surgeries on minors, Republicans don't like sexual teaching to children under 8 by anyone without parental consent. The question is why do Democrats like it and why are you defending it? Is there a 7yr old that is not your child you will want to discuss sex with without the parents knowledge?

Go and preach your common sense to people who think vaccine and mask mandates is dictatorship and went far as rioting against vaccine and mask mandates, you claim you want to protect kids yet you are against them getting vaccinated from a pandemic.

Where was this common sense when Republicans kept saying people should choose and decide for themselves and their kids over basic things like masks.

AmazonTopaz:
Leave it for the parents and doctors to decide not lawmakers.
It is none of your business especially for a party that wants to limit how government control their lives or prevent them from regulating their guns but want to regulate the personal lives of others the hypocrisy is glaring.

Doctors to decide? Doctors to make laws? Hahahaha this is tha aspiring lawyer, ya head is full of tha cum

raumdeuter:
I was not taught about sex under the age of 8 by any teacher

What is your intention of teaching under 8 children about sex without their parents approval?

No parent will intentionally hurt their child? Obviously liberals live in alternate world. What then is the role of Child protective services since parents don't hurt their children intentionally

So they isa ah be ah sex worker at ah age ye

AmazonTopaz:
I have been to America and anywhere my money can take me even Nigeria has social workers.

Bring out the statistics on the reasons why child protection services exist in the first place.

Like I said parents do not intentionally hurt their kids and no parent consulting with a doctor for what is in the best interest of their kids end up in child protection services, protection services exist today not because of what liberals do to their kids.

Hahahaha ya was ah exposed to ah be ah student who isa live Ina Aba. Ya isa still ah lie. This isa interesting. Ah chronic liar.

ASUU isa go ona strike, ya isa drop out already.

budaatum:
That's 6 people, Ben. And even if it's 60, still a tiny percentage of any group you put them in and a very tiny number compared to instances where the allegations were actually true!

Go on, Ben, I dare you to provide a list of people found guilty and jailed for racial abuse. Let's see if you find as many as 6.

Hmmm. You said it like that... Same people like you who will not understand that racists are a small percentage of the society as well.

Make I hear. You keep making excuses you don't make for the other side.

It's not about percentage anyway... This kinds of behavior is often from the left.

raumdeuter:
There is a difference between visiting and living in a place

Visitors to Nigeria have a different experience than those who live there

Yes some parents intentionally hurt their kids, there are parents who p1mpp out their kids, there are parents who flog their kids with intentions to harm and there are parents who have actually killed their kids

Please o. If they claimed to have been to the space station... You have no way to disprove them

Grant them the experience they say they have.
When I visit the United States... I experienced what it is like being the president of the United States.

Laugh Wan kill me

benalvino3:
Hmmm. You said it like that... Same people like you who will not understand that racists are a small percentage of the society as well.

Make I hear. You keep making excuses you don't make for the other side.

It's not about percentage anyway... This kinds of behavior is often from the left.

Sides of the behaviour of racism, Ben?

Show me where the side of the Right is discriminated against so buda can rise up and defend them please because discrimination against people because of their race is against the law as is lying you were racially discriminated against.

https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/advice-and-guidance/race-discrimination

budaatum:
Sides of the behaviour of racism, Ben?

Show me where the side of the Right is discriminated against so buda can rise up and defend them please because discrimination against people because of their race is against the law as is lying you were racially discriminated against.

https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/advice-and-guidance/race-discrimination

I can't be the one to tell you the sky is blue.

benalvino3:
I can't be the one to tell you the sky is blue.

But you sure are the one to tell me 6 instances of false racial discrimination claims, Ben, right?