Workch:
after all the blabbing, you got a simple question and this is how you shamelessly tell us that you don't know the answer.

Answer the questions

You seem lost in the argument that you lost all sense of existential consciousness. So yeah, I will leave my argument to your conscience!

nairaman66:


You seem lost in the argument that you lost all sense of existential consciousness. So yeah, I will leave my argument to your conscience!

You seem ignorant.
Answer his questions.
Product of bad education system of Nigeria, always lousy with empty skulls

If evolution is false then why is there a variation between you and your siblings?
Noisy illiterate

Workch:
You seem ignorant.
Answer his questions.
Product of bad education system of Nigeria, always lousy with empty skulls

If evolution is false then why is there a variation between you and your siblings?
Noisy illiterate

What a birdbrain! How do you explain semblance from different parents? What about twins? Your ilks are the reason the world is getting dumber by the day.., dysfunctional wretched atheists with no bearing!

nairaman66:


What a birdbrain! How do you explain semblance from different parents? What about twins? Your ilks are the reason the world is getting dumber by the day.., dysfunctional wretched atheists with no bearing!

OK answer his questions

Identical Twins contain exactly the same chromosomes because the fertilized zygote divided obviously after crossing of the chromosomes hence variation cannot occur since there was no recombination. This was literally taught in ss2 under the topic meosis and mitosis but because you are a profound reflection of an average Nigerian student, you missed the class or was busy playing with biro in class or maybe your parents didn't have enough money to send you to a good school . Now look at you embarrassing your generations asking stupid questions about twins, what you should actually be teaching your younger ones.

My job is to expose the ignorance of lousy illiterates like you because I'm confident that you know nothing. You are just an indoctrinated fool with lousy attitude

Now tell me why you don't look exactly like your siblings.

I will disgrace you here, illiterate

Biglittlelois:



Yeah it happened millions of years ago based on the scientists and their paper research, so we should believe their hypothesis, but we should not believe biblical scholars and researchers with their evidenced and facts, or you think they don't exist? you see the double standard?

Last year, was it not the same scientists that confirmed the creation story of the earth filled with water and darkness before creation started? We should believe scientists of today instead of what has been said and confirmed 2000 years ago? Funny lots.

wow smh , you are so filled with the holy spirit

FatherOfJesus:
this comment is wrong in biology because humans are animals by all standards, even to cellular level. A simple observation of human cell under a microscope bears all the hallmark of an ideal animal cell. Get this basic education
It's not stupid, you re just scientifically illiterate

It's not a calculation, like I said earlier, you re scientifically illiterate and not willing to be educated, evolution is an observed fact and we observe it every minute in science, you don't need maths or calculations to do so.

They are not assumptions, they are facts but you need atleast a degree in science from a reputable university and not mushroom Nigerian universities and then go further to study a postgraduate in the field of biology to be master and properly ubderstand how it works. The fact that a layman like you don't understand it is why it's called science and why people have to get doctorate degree in this specialty.

By the way, it doesn't mean that you cant have peripheral knowledge like I do and then learn how to observe the evidence with a scientific mind and not like a church rat mind who always see everything from a belief point of view

I couldn't have said it better

FatherOfJesus:
Because there's a gap doesn't mean that evolution didn't happen.
And again, because most of you are church guys and are here to stiffly defend your beliefs in your creation myths, you probably do not do your reseech properly before making any comment.

There are no gaps or whatsoever when you study the geological aspect of evolution, the fossil records and radiometric dating explains all the gaps. The gaps you talk about can be seen in the gradual skull:body ratio in fossils of other extinct apes. We have evidence that the brain/skill/body ratio consistently increased over years from the austrolopithecus species until date when you follow the evolutionary branch of homoninis. The amazing thing about this fossils of results we got is that, they are consistent with radiometric dating and the geological timeline. We were able to extrapolate that the size of our neocortex in relation to other apes made the difference. BTW, neocortex is repsonsible for higher cognitive activity which brought about consciousness in humans.
We have extanct species of hominids that are way more conscisous than chimpanzees and gorilla, we could figure this from their brain/body ratio. The most recent are the neantherdals, they were much more conscious than chimpanzees and less conscious than humans, early homo sapiens actually saw them. So that's the gap dude, they are in the fossil records.

Lastly, humans are apes, your statement is a goof in biology.
You cannot campare humans to apes when humans themselves are apes

well said , since I noticed the average Nigerian has an IQ of 70 , I decided not to bother to explain to them , they are biologically unable to understand...... Save God's magick though.

Senomii:

Oga! Keep your fuckin, unnecessary explanations and foolish opinions to yourself, you and useless father ain't feeding me neither did any of your family members contribute to my education, I can believe in whatever I want, debunk whatever I want , and neither do I believe in what science says or any religious bla bla whatever, I believe in nothing and no one! And this will forever remain my stance for as long as I'm alive

And they finally resort to violence . Typical , seen this one too many time.

FatherOfJesus:
dude I have a degree in biochemistry, postgraduate degrees in clinical chemistry, epidemiology and a post graduate certificate in evolutionary biology. I'm an authority in this topic, I'm not doing this to bra though.

It's not controversial, it's fact. I observe it everyday. Yes, we have a common descent. We have more evidence for this than gravity, atoms and blackholes comoind.
We can easily see it in your DNA, it's like it cannot even be hidden

illiterate, I'm going have to educate you here. There's nothing like "evolution is just a theory" that's what scientifically illiterate people say.
We have evolution and we have the theory of evolution, read that carefully because you need basic education. They are different things.

A theory in science is the best explanation for a natural phenomenon.
The theory of evolution tries to explain evolution, just like atomic theory explains atoms, cell theory explains cells and theory of gravity explains gravity. The theory can be modified but the natural phenomenon (evolution, atoms, gravity, cells are constant), we can only modify how we explain them as we get better knowledge about them. So illiterate, evolution is is fact, theory of evolution explains this fact.
BTW, because something is a law in science does not mean it's infallible. Only illiterates like yours think that theories can become a law, that's not how it works. I will give you an example, Albert Einsteins theory of gravity superceded Newton's law of gravity, a theory superceded a law, . So whether theory of evolution is a theory or a law, it doesn't matter. If it's wrong then it's wrong

I think my last statement already cured this blissful Ignorance. Go get a refund from your elementary school or maybe you didn't pay attention in class.

I literilly worship at your Feet

philiancoop:

And the ideas from those men keep changing as they find out that the old stuff they said was rubbish.
But for now, this is correct. Until they find something more correct, this becomes wrong rubbish. � great

since youre the genius here , I'll agree.

FatherOfJesus:
nope, that's not what I meant. I'm not sure you understood my statement but I'm going to give you an example. Science is really hard, that's why a layman doesn't understand it but I'm going to be patient with you.


For example, we have atomic theory, atomic theory is a theory trying to explain the nature of atoms.
The first atomic theory I can remember was proposed by jj thompson, this theory accurately predicted that an atom consists of positive and negative charged particles, we tested it and it was correct but he couldn't figure how these particles are arranged with the atom. Dalton discovered that atoms formed coumounds, so we need to modify this theory, because we have new evidence. Rutherford then experimented the arrangement of atoms like planetary system, we need to update, then Chadwick discovered neutron, we needed to update. Bohr again discovered energy levels and orbits of atoms, we needed to update againtofsy we are observing new things about atoms in quantum physics, we will have to update further.
You will notice that while updating, there was never a time someone said atoms done exist, only thr explanations kept getting updated as new evidence comes.
This is the same thing with evolution, there's never going to be a time the scientific community will say that evolution doesn't exist and then replace it with creation, we can only update the theories when new evidence comes. We have updated the theories many times anyways, from lamarckian theory of evolution, to Darwin's theory of evolution and then we discovered DNA and inheritance pattern, we needed to include to what we called neodarwinian theory of evolution today. It has never told us that evolution didn't happen

That's the beauty of science, we don't stop learning and improving and this has worked so far. This is why we were able to invent many stuffs.

you're a genius too?

FatherOfJesus:
So why don't you look exactly like your siblings?

I mean, it's common sense since you were birthed by same parents. Let me know why

Workch:
after all the blabbing, you got a simple question and this is how you shamelessly tell us that you don't know the answer.

Answer the questions

he is a Christian with Christian quotes l over his profile, how would he answer your questions , people like him have no idea how fire was 'created ' because it was not written in the Bible , this shows the limited scope they encycle blindly

nairaman66:


You seem lost in the argument that you lost all sense of existential consciousness. So yeah, I will leave my argument to your conscience!

they was never an argument really , you were plain ignorant. On this topic maybe, I'm sure you will do well in the preaching department .

nairaman66:


What a birdbrain! How do you explain semblance from different parents? What about twins? Your ilks are the reason the world is getting dumber by the day.., dysfunctional wretched atheists with no bearing!

again the average theist results to insults and tantrums .

nairaman66:


These questions are too subtle to address the argument of evolution. Come up with something concrete, you can do better!

The problem is not that you disagreed with the guy. Science encourages us to disagree if we see reasons to. That's a natural way of refining the final output. Again, the point is not that the guy could not be wrong. In science, being wrong in a new way is considered progress (just like a change of error message is considered progress in IT). Most times, the one time you're right out of a 100 trials makes the difference.

The issue is the way you disagreed with him. You guys bring unnecessary emotions to this platform and that makes it difficult for you to have civil conversations and effectively pass your message across. You called his work trash instead of contributing your take on the subject. You insulted his education and thereby making yourself the omniscient/infallible one. Now, he's stepping up to defend his education and you're saying his questions are subtle. Do tell, what is subtle about his questions? You've obviously seen he's an authority of some kind on the subject and you're struggling to wriggle out of the fallacious argument you started. Unfortunately, that has proven difficult cause of your approach and everyone can see through it.

Let's learn to treat one another with some respect here even when we clearly do not agree. No need to always be aggressive, loud or hostile.

WoundedLamb:


The problem is not that you disagreed with the guy. Science encourages us to disagree if we see reasons to. That's a natural way of refining the final output. Again, the point is not that the guy could not be wrong. In science, being wrong in a new way is considered progress (just like a change of error message is considered progress in IT). Most times, the one time you're right out of a 100 trials makes the difference.

The issue is the way you disagreed with him. You guys bring unnecessary emotions to this platform and that makes it difficult for you to have civil conversations and effectively pass your message across. You called his work trash instead of contributing your take on the subject. You insulted his education and thereby making yourself the omniscient/infallible one. Now, he's stepping up to defend his education and you're saying his questions are subtle. Do tell, what is subtle about his questions? You've obviously seen he's an authority of some kind on the subject and you're struggling to wriggle out of the fallacious argument you started. Unfortunately, that has proven difficult cause of your approach and everyone can see through it.

Let's learn to treat one another with some respect here even when we clearly do not agree. No need to always be aggressive, loud or hostile.

If you read correctly. This diplomatic post of yours would have been addressed to him. He was the one who fired shots at me when he quoted, I only dropped an opinion. You seem to be biased somewhat with your points.

He was the one who disagreed with me and went further to call me unfounded names! My conclusion is most atheists do not have any sense of acceptance of a different opinion!

Workch:
OK answer his questions

Identical Twins contain exactly the same chromosomes because the fertilized zygote divided obviously after crossing of the chromosomes hence variation cannot occur since there was not recombination. This was literally taught in ss2 under the topic meosis and mitosis but because you are a profound reflection of an average Nigerian student, you missed the class or was busy playing with biro in class or maybe your parents didn't have enough money to send you to a good school . Now look at you embarrassing your generations asking stupid questions about twins, what you should actually be teaching your younger ones.

My job is to expose the ignorance of lousy illiterates like you because I'm confident that you know nothing. You are just an indoctrinated fool with lousy attitude

Now tell me why you don't look exactly like your siblings.

I will disgrace you here, illiterate

Most atheists are zombies and do not have a space in their brains to accommodate critical thinking nor common sense. You fall into this category!

nairaman66:


Most atheists are zombies and do not have a space in their brains to accommodate critical thinking nor common sense. You fall into this category!

OK, so answer the questions?
Please

nairaman66:


Most atheists are zombies and do not have a space in their brains to accommodate critical thinking nor common sense. You fall into this category!

kindly answer my questions.

Why do you not look exactly like your siblings?

Why does chloroquine no long cure malaria?

Why does sarcov2 have the ability to infect all primates and even some mammals outside of primate family.

Why do we need to always research new antibiotics if organisms don't evolve?

Why do we have people who are resistant HIV infection?

Why does Asians have the least ability to metabolize drugs?

I want to see how you will answer these questions without theory of evolution. I really want to learn something new

.

calddon:


Thanks for admitting the internet was created. Life too was created and that includes your intelligent human mind. Just as you read on the internet and in physical books about the creation of the internet, so can you about life, the bible has the answer.

Are you implying that everything must have a creator?

Biglittlelois:



So how did humans or animals came to being? won't a male and female be formed first so that procreation can manifest? You think multitude of breathing things were created at once?

.

Biglittlelois:



So how did humans or animals came to being? won't a male and female be formed first so that procreation can manifest? You think multitude of breathing things were created at once?

you first need in your head to de-construct what you think is creation before you truly understand

Senomii:

Oga! Keep your fuckin, unnecessary explanations and foolish opinions to yourself, you and useless father ain't feeding me neither did any of your family members contribute to my education, I can believe in whatever I want, debunk whatever I want , and neither do I believe in what science says or any religious bla bla whatever, I believe in nothing and no one! And this will forever remain my stance for as long as I'm alive

.

Senomii:

Oga! Keep your fuckin, unnecessary explanations and foolish opinions to yourself, you and useless father ain't feeding me neither did any of your family members contribute to my education, I can believe in whatever I want, debunk whatever I want , and neither do I believe in what science says or any religious bla bla whatever, I believe in nothing and no one! And this will forever remain my stance for as long as I'm alive

You just degraded yourself and went down the level of a typical Ad hominem enjoyer.

basic Humoids are so predictable

Subsaharan:


You just degraded yourself and went down the level of a typical Ad hominem enjoyer.

basic Humoids are so predictable

Delusional, you're simply delusional.
Kindly avoid my mentions next time, go for your kind... peace

Senomii:

Delusional, you're simply delusional.
Kindly avoid my mentions next time, go for your kind... peace

...and an even more colourful display of Ad hominems to spice up the show

nairaman66:


If you read correctly. This diplomatic post of yours would have been addressed to him. He was the one who fired shots at me when he quoted, I only dropped an opinion. You seem to be biased somewhat with your points.

He was the one who disagreed with me and went further to call me unfounded names! My conclusion is most atheists do not have any sense of acceptance of a different opinion!

Ok. Maybe I didn't read correctly then. No offense.

Anyone that believes all these posts on evolution hook, line, and sinker is not different from the religious people that believe in the creation stories of the religious texts gullibly.

Science is dynamic, and all theories in science have their limits and scopes.

Thus, one should approach theories and concepts in science with caution, keeping in mind their limits and scopes since they will be, and can be, revised or even abandoned altogether with time.

Taking all these submissions in the OP as facts is tantamount to a situation where
someone copied and pasted some articles on the Big Bang theory from somewhere and swallowed everything without paying attention to parts of the model that are well established facts and others that are speculations.

While there are various pieces of evidence in support of the Big Bang model, just like evolution, many aspects of both theories are speculative and are ongoing areas of research in science.

It's not even an established scientific fact that we're the most advanced intelligent species in the Milky Way galaxy, not to talk of the whole Universe, which is unimaginably big.

But it's a scientific fact that we've not discovered life on any other other planet apart from the Earth.

(Our science even looks primitive since the Age of Scientific Enlightenment is less than 1000 years old, yet it's the most precious thing we've.)

Personally, I posit the following theories all account for life on Earth:
1. Big Bang and abiogenesis
2. Intelligent design by extraterrestrials
3. Evolution (not exactly as outlined in the OP)

This is my own position on the subject matter, not a fact.

A001:
Anyone that believes all these posts on evolution hook, line, and sinker is not different from the religious people that believe in the creation stories of the religious texts gullibly.

Science is dynamic, and all theories in science have their limits and scopes.

Thus, one should approach theories and concepts with caution, keeping them their limits and scopes in mind since they will be, and can be, revised or even abandoned altogether with time.

Taking all these submissions in the OP as facts is tantamount to a situation where
someone copied and pasted some articles on the Big Bang theory from somewhere and swallowed everything without paying attention to parts of the model that are well established facts and others that are speculations.

While there are various pieces of evidence in support of the Big Bang model, just like evolution, many aspects of both theories are speculative and are ongoing areas of research in science.

It's not even an established scientific fact that we're the most advanced intelligent species in the Milky Way galaxy, not to talk of the whole Universe, which is unimaginably big.

But it's a scientific fact that we've not discovered life on any other other planet apart from the Earth.

(Our science even looks primitive since the Age of Scientific Enlightenment is less than 1000 years old, yet it's the most precious thing we've.)

Personally, I posit the following theories all account for life on Earth:
1. Big Bang and abiogenesis
2. Intelligent design by extraterrestrials
3. Evolution (not exactly as outlined in the OP)

This is my own position on the subject matter, not a fact.

Mention one speculation in the theory of evolution. Just one.
I'm waiting

Workch:
Mention one speculation in the theory of evolution. Just one.
I'm waiting

Lols. This question shows you don't read scientific papers carefully.

I don't need to mention what's glaring. Go through these posts again; any statements you see that contain words like could, probably, might, and the likes are speculative.