WriterNig:



U.S Army & Marine Intelligence Officer, Scott Ritter;


Scott Ritter is an external Contributor to Energy Intelligence. He is a former US Marine Corps Intelligence Officer whose service over a 20-plus-year career included tours of duty in the former Soviet Union implementing arms control agreements, serving on the staff of US Gen. Norman Schwarzkopf during the Gulf War and later as a Chief Weapons Inspector with the UN in Iraq from 1991-98.

Nazgul:
There's nothing special about Russia. The west is just afraid of their nukes.

Without those nukes, there's nothing special about the Russia military. Hitler and his tiny Germany invaded them in WW2 when they were still solvet union and about 10 times the size of Germany; and almost succeeded if not for the Russian winter and logistics problems.

NATO can take on Russia in an invasion warfare but if Russia decides to deploy their nukes on American and British cities, the tide of the battle would change, cos no one is ready to gamble millions of lives of her citizens over a war that could have been avoided.

This is what America and her allies are afraid of.

Akalia:
You be JJC, to make an argument with you dey shame me because I am condescending so low due to your poor and limited knowledge of the subject. Pls swerve. Go argue with novices in your category.

SenatePresdo:


US can't invade its neighbours, because there is no need for that. Canada and Mexico are US allies, so why should they invade them?

US that invades countries far away from its continent, can actually invade a neighbouring country if there was a need to.

US of America never had the power to stop Russia from developing any weapon at any point in history.
Go and check Cold War.

USA used their first Nuke in 1945 while Russia tested its first Nuke in 1949, just 4 years later.

It's because of the threat US posed to world security that made other countries seek for Nukes.

If Japan had Nukes, USA wouldn't have nuked innocent civilians in hiroshima.

Don't be biased because US controls media.

uniquetechng:
Don't believe or trust Americans , they are masters in mind games.

US keep developing dangerous weapons without announcing or making details public.

Remember US annual defence budget is $750bn annually while that of Russia is $56bn , so what do you think America do with $750bn defence budget annually ? Yeah building unclassified weapons.

Till this day no one knows the bomb US used in Hiroshima, not even the Russians can tell.

Tchalz:

Did public opinion affect the massive losses they suffered in terms of equipment and manpower?? They failed! Same way the Ukrainians are claiming victory in Kyiv when the Russian Forces withdrew

wiseoneking:
Not entirely true though about Nukes. I just look up to comparison between Russia and America in terms of nukes, Russia is slightly 300 higher than Americans. But the truth is that America has the largest anti missiles system of any nation. Then Israel and Russia. Russian anti missiles system is quite less than that of America.
The difference between Russia and America NATO alliance is that the former doesn't care about the destruction of the world but the later is extremely careful about the impact even if they won.

abbey621:


How do you know that? Wars are fought based on funds, if the public suppoorted the war, more funds would have been made available and a larger scale operation could occur. Go and check the sentiments back in the 1970s, most people were anti war unlike the 1940s where most Americans wanted war.

Spirit04:
lol I know you are ashamed of yourself but are too delusional to admit. Because you see 35 is bigger than 22 you just assumed F35 is better than F22 nairaland kids sef

Nazgul:
There's nothing special about Russia. The west is just afraid of their nukes.

Without those nukes, there's nothing special about the Russia military. Hitler and his tiny Germany invaded them in WW2 when they were still solvet union and about 10 times the size of Germany; and almost succeeded if not for the Russian winter and logistics problems.

NATO can take on Russia in an invasion warfare but if Russia decides to deploy their nukes on American and British cities, the tide of the battle would change, cos no one is ready to gamble millions of lives of her citizens over a war that could have been avoided.

This is what America and her allies are afraid of.

uniquetechng:
Don't believe or trust Americans , they are masters in mind games.

US keep developing dangerous weapons without announcing or making details public.

Remember US annual defence budget is $750bn annually while that of Russia is $56bn , so what do you think America do with $750bn defence budget annually ? Yeah building unclassified weapons.

Till this day no one knows the bomb US used in Hiroshima, not even the Russians can tell.

uchennaq:

Without Nukes, USA is still world power, I will if you say without Nukes Russia is useless. They have used almost all their asernal in Ukraine, yet they keep sending more tanks. Now they have lost about 30% of their military might in Ukraine.

uniquetechng:
Don't believe or trust Americans , they are masters in mind games.

US keep developing dangerous weapons without announcing or making details public.

Remember US annual defence budget is $750bn annually while that of Russia is $56bn , so what do you think America do with $750bn defence budget annually ? Yeah building unclassified weapons.

Till this day no one knows the bomb US used in Hiroshima, not even the Russians can tell.

Opolopoopolonio:


I said people like Scott Ritter not Scott Ritter himself allowed Russia to develop their first nuke. A great mistake!

WriterNig:
Like for Russia, share for USA/Nazi/NATO

ponyonm:


How do you guys judge things? Less than 200k soldiers taking on 700k plus Ukrainian soldiers trained to NATO standards, plus mercenaries from all over the world and also getting weapons from about 20 countries and getting 24hrs intelligence from over 30 countries, yet have lost over 30% of their territory in about 90 days, and you say they are dealing with Russians?

Opolopoopolonio:


Just shut up!

Opolopoopolonio:


Just shut up!

Nazgul:
There's nothing special about Russia. The west is just afraid of their nukes.

Without those nukes, there's nothing special about the Russia military. Hitler and his tiny Germany invaded them in WW2 when they were still solvet union and about 10 times the size of Germany; and almost succeeded if not for the Russian winter and logistics problems.

NATO can take on Russia in an invasion warfare but if Russia decides to deploy their nukes on American and British cities, the tide of the battle would change, cos no one is ready to gamble millions of lives of her citizens over a war that could have been avoided.

This is what America and her allies are afraid of.

Great0ne1:

Another pile of trash. People with similar personality to Scott ritter can never play a role in soviet nuclear break through, because they can't and didn't need to. The end of world war two, gave birth to two major world power united States of America and Soviet union. Wonder why you think us or anybody could have stopped that. Us only have such influence on defeated nations like Germany, Japan and Italy. Then don't dictate to fellow world power

What do you mean by the bolded? Are you in anyway suggesting that PUTIN is a bad leader?

aaronxy:

Their nuke and weather is the special thing about them. They've natural gas other Eu nations need. They are special.

Nazgul:

US would not use nukes on Russia cities because of their civilian population, USA has a high respect for human lives, but Putin wouldn't blink twice if the opinion of nuking New York, Texas or California presents Itself regardless of it's high civilian population.

That's the difference between both of them, and that's why the US are threading softly and cautiously. They're more concerned about human lives.

Spirit04:
lol government give them contacts not control them. You give someone contract to produce something for you does the person have rights to sell it without your approval? Cadillac make cars for their government officials, Ford make cars for police and Secret Service that's how those Defense Corp also get contracts from their government just like Sukhoi and Tupolev in Russia

WhatchDoGG:
Oga listen to urself comparing military defense company and Private car manufacturers? Just admit it that u don't know how this firms operate, oga go do ur research US government screen and validate every single principal staff in those US defense companies meaning they directly responsible for employment.... Asper the weapon aspect why didn't Nigerian government buy their weapons and ordinary RPG's directly from general dynamics? Or the recently acquired 12 tucano jets directly from Lockheed Martin? Because it will be cheaper dealing directly with the manufactures but no it's only US govt despite the the tucano jets not been a flagship military equipment nor the rocket launchers, ask urself if general dynamics and Lockheed Martin is a leading private defense that operate independently why haven't other countries award them contracts to produce their own weapon according to their test and style? Rather will always go to US government to US govt rejects

sweetman2022:

Mr Man I can say you are saying gebberish. US is using that huge amount because they pokenose into other countries business, doing their policing with military presence using NATO, that's why they have to spend much. It is simple as that, not this unimaginable weapons you are talking about.

Opolopoopolonio:
Nonsense!

This is one cowardly soldier probably working for the Russians.

If not for Truman, George Patton and Douglas MacArthur were ready to take on the Russians during WWII.

In fact, Patton once said if he found himself between the Germans and Russians, he would shoot both ways...

This Scott Ritter is the kind of person that allowed Russia to build a nuke in the first instance just because they don't want to fight another major war with Russia. Russia should NEVER have been allowed to have nukes!!

Opolopoopolonio:
Nonsense!

This is one cowardly soldier probably working for the Russians.

If not for Truman, George Patton and Douglas MacArthur were ready to take on the Russians during WWII.

In fact, Patton once said if he found himself between the Germans and Russians, he would shoot both ways...

This Scott Ritter is the kind of person that allowed Russia to build a nuke in the first instance just because they don't want to fight another major war with Russia. Russia should NEVER have been allowed to have nukes!!

WhatchDoGG:
U see how ignorant u are? So for ur little crayfish mind u think US is the sole sponsor if NATO....for your info NATO's wellbeing is the collective responsibility of the member States....so don't go about misinforming the gullible ones