Opolopoopolonio:


Yes. But it won't be any different from what we have now. Ukrainians would not want to do anything that will destroy their land and people in a catastrophic way.

It will be similar to how they lost/gave up the Chernobyl nuclear plant for safety reasons.

Well Russia is ready to burn everything down

BigBelleControl:
The truth is none of them is guaranteed victory in case of a full-blown war because one cannot say the actual military strength of the other.

But they should just start something and stop this cat and dog fight.

We know the full military strength of Russia, they are talkatives n show offs unlike the Americans that keep theirs highly classified.
Mess with America at your own peril….

uchennaq:
The US military successfully tested a hypersonic missile prototype on May 4, the Lockheed Martin version of the Hypersonic Air-breathing Weapon Concept (HAWC) that can travel faster than March 5 (five times the speed of sound). It reached altitudes greater than 65,000 feet and flew for more than 300 nautical miles.

This was the second successful flight in the HAWC program of the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).

The US successfully tested the first one in mid-March but kept it quiet for two weeks to avoid escalating tensions with Russia as President Joe Biden was about to travel to Europe, according to CNN.

But Russian used same hypersonic missile early March against Ukraine

Toktee:
Am done trying to educate Putin's elements and robots online.

Don't even waste your time bro.

Nor mind them.

Them dey support that loser in the Kremlin.

uniquetechng:
Don't believe or trust Americans , they are masters in mind games.

US keep developing dangerous weapons without announcing or making details public.

Remember US annual defence budget is $750m annually while that of Russia is $56bn , so what do you think America do with $750bn defence budget annually ? Yeah building unclassified weapons.

Till this day no one knows the bomb US used in Hiroshima, not even the Russians can tell.

You wrote $750m first. Next defense budget will get to $1tr or more cos the manufacturers will make for U.S.A and Ukraine. Empty barrel like Russia makes the loudest noise, No country should pray to witness arsenal of America Military.

ken6488:
Well Russia is ready to burn everything down

Don't be deceived by the Donbas. The West may deliberately want Ukraine to give it up for peace to reign. Afterall, the Donbas has been at war for the past 8 years.

If Russia want anything more, they will see HELL!!!

zigzagluv:
WHERE CAN I HIRE GOOD, WEB DEVELOP IN NIGERIA , UR PHP/LARAVEL, HOW MANY YEARS EXPERIENCE?

I don't think there is any directory where u can find them.

4years php, 2years Laravel

WhatchDoGG:

Mind u Iraq and Libya was never a full blown war like what Russia declared on Ukraine

War is War .... You cannot twist the Narrative.

I stand with Ukraine, The US and NATO but I would boldly tell you that War crimes were committed by American and NATO forces in Iraq and Libya.

rayval:
Well. How many times do you see the US publicizing her arsenal? there is a saying that big dogs do not back, they only bite. US is ready and intentionally wanting a war and guess what? they are choosing to use Europe as the battlefield. And the only thing holding them back is the narrative when it starts and ends. Because US would always want to be on the good side of history. Russia would have stood a ground, But I am 100% certain that they wont... anywhere there is corruption, expect failure.

War no be the number of bullets. It is more of sense

Bro US does not publicize what it doesn’t have, if the US has a weapon, they will choke it down our throats using Hollywood and other media means.. US has the track record of showing off.

Besides US is behind in most weapons arms race and an example is the hypersonic missile which only Russia and China has.

https://www.newsweek.com/russia-reacts-us-hypersonic-missile-failure-pentagon-chgb-test-1721004?amp=1

Mind you, Russia is fighting with 200k size army against NATO trained 700k Ukraine army… Guess what my friend, Russia is gaining more ground in the eastern part and advancing westwards. Doesn’t that give you a hint that Ukraine is losing and NATO cannot face Russia.

When you talk of nuclear weapons, no nation in the world stands a chance against Russia. See image below for clarification.

Tobi890:
funny set of people, NATO have admitted it many times that they can't take on russia, someone from Nigeria knows NATO strength and abilities more than NATO themselves, whatever that makes you happy

The war is not nuclear. We all know the outcome of nuclear war, and there are no winners.
This is NATO vs. Russia ONLY. I dont want to deal with Russian pseudo-allies like China and American allies like Japan.
Russia faces three major problems that inhibit it from anything close to a victory. I’ll explain each of them.

Aging technology: Though Russia has a large, impressive arsenal of tanks and artillery, most of them were made by a different nation for a different doctrine in a different time. Most of their tanks and planes were built by the Soviets, with the purpose of overwhelming force. During the Cold War, more or less they had a doctrine of mass assault. Overwhelm your enemies, and losses don’t matter. That was the philosophy of the Soviets. Nowadays, that doctrine doesn't work. In this modern day and age, numbers aren't everything. See the Gulf War. Iraq had the 5th largest army in the world, and in just 7 months, that army was annihilated, mostly by the US and NATO forces. While the coalition lost on 200 troops, Iraq was permanently devastated, and was removed from the great powers of the Middle East. So even though Russia has a sizeable force of machinery, just like Iraq, though they are numerous, they are fundamentally inferior to NATO equipment. Russia has no mass produced plane like the Eurofighter Typhoon or the F-35, nor does it have tanks like the Leopard or M1 Abrams.

No buffer zone: For an extremely long time, Russian interactions with it’s neighbors was based on the need for a Russia buffer zone. This remains true today. In order for Russia to fight an offensive war, they need a buffer. Russian population and industry centers are all located to the West of the Ural mountains. The reason nations like the US have been so successful in projecting power is how far removed they are. The US when it wages a war never has to worry about an attack on the homeland. Though fighting on home territory has it’s advantages and disadvantages, one cannot deny that when a war is being fought in someone else’s backyard, the industrial strength of a nation has a greater chance of staying intact. Not only does Russia lack a buffer, but they lack the capability to defend the home front. In the skies, the US alone outnumbers Russia 4 to 1. In modern war, air dominance can make or break a military campaign, and with 1/4 air power as the US ALONE, there is no hope for Russia to maintain an aggressive assault on Europe. Even fighting over home skies on defense, it is still likely that Russia will take much worse casualties than the US. With American and NATO air dominance set, the coalition can destroy any fledgling attempt at a Russian war machine, and without industry, a nation has no hope of survival. I can already hear people talking about how potent Russian air defense is, and I’m here to tell you, it isn't what it seems to be. Though they have an impressive number of SAMs, they aren't as accurate as one would think. In a confrontation over Syria, an Israeli F-35 (manufactured by the States) repeated bested the Russian S-400, which is the best in the Russian arsenal. American technology is just better. Period. But even if Russia somehow managed to bat off the US, they could still be economically crushed through the sea. The Russian navy is so weak, that NATO sea dominance is almost assured. With sea dominance comes economic starvation, which leads to the crumbling of industry, even if they manage to defend the skies.

Economic and strategic weakness: Though Russia is rich in natural resources, their ability to wage war is extremely limited. In order to take advantage of their resources and build a juggernaut of a war machine needed to take down NATO, you would need manpower and a strong economy. In Russia, these factors are painfully absent. NATO has a population of around a six hundred million people. Russia on the other hand, has about 140 million, giving NATO another 4 to 1 advantage. On the economic front, it gets even worse. Russia’s GDP is about 1.2 trillion USD, while NATO has an economy of 18.35 trillion USD. Even Italy has a larger GDP than Russia, despite having half the population, and having 1/60th of the land.

In the end, though this war would be horribly costly and not worth the price, when the smoke clears, it is abundantly clear who will be on top. NATO. Russia is not the power it once was. It is economically inferior to even minor countries, its military is aging and decrepit, and they dont have the flexibility they used to have during the Cold War. Also, NATO has a trump card that Russia has no chance of besting.

Opolopoopolonio:
Nonsense!

This is one cowardly soldier probably working for the Russians.

If not for Truman, George Patton and Douglas MacArthur were ready to take on the Russians during WWII.

In fact, Patton once said if he found himself between the Germans and Russians, he would shoot both ways...

This Scott Ritter is the kind of person that allowed Russia to build a nuke in the first instance just because they want fight another major war. Russia should NEVER have been allowed to have nukes!!

You take pride in ignorance

usj:


You take pride in ignorance

Without using Google, tell me who Truman, George Patton and Douglas MacArthur are.

Your question was trash in the first place. I hope you are aware Taliban defeated Russia and chased them away. America chose when to leave Afghanistan willingly while in charge of Afghanistan while Russia was chased out.

ken6488:
Stop escaping the question list one war USA has won alone and I give you two Russia has won

Toktee:
The war is not nuclear. We all know the outcome of nuclear war, and there are no winners.
This is NATO vs. Russia ONLY. I dont want to deal with Russian pseudo-allies like China and American allies like Japan.
Russia faces three major problems that inhibit it from anything close to a victory. I’ll explain each of them.

Aging technology: Though Russia has a large, impressive arsenal of tanks and artillery, most of them were made by a different nation for a different doctrine in a different time. Most of their tanks and planes were built by the Soviets, with the purpose of overwhelming force. During the Cold War, more or less they had a doctrine of mass assault. Overwhelm your enemies, and losses don’t matter. That was the philosophy of the Soviets. Nowadays, that doctrine doesn't work. In this modern day and age, numbers aren't everything. See the Gulf War. Iraq had the 5th largest army in the world, and in just 7 months, that army was annihilated, mostly by the US and NATO forces. While the coalition lost on 200 troops, Iraq was permanently devastated, and was removed from the great powers of the Middle East. So even though Russia has a sizeable force of machinery, just like Iraq, though they are numerous, they are fundamentally inferior to NATO equipment. Russia has no mass produced plane like the Eurofighter Typhoon or the F-35, nor does it have tanks like the Leopard or M1 Abrams.

No buffer zone: For an extremely long time, Russian interactions with it’s neighbors was based on the need for a Russia buffer zone. This remains true today. In order for Russia to fight an offensive war, they need a buffer. Russian population and industry centers are all located to the West of the Ural mountains. The reason nations like the US have been so successful in projecting power is how far removed they are. The US when it wages a war never has to worry about an attack on the homeland. Though fighting on home territory has it’s advantages and disadvantages, one cannot deny that when a war is being fought in someone else’s backyard, the industrial strength of a nation has a greater chance of staying intact. Not only does Russia lack a buffer, but they lack the capability to defend the home front. In the skies, the US alone outnumbers Russia 4 to 1. In modern war, air dominance can make or break a military campaign, and with 1/4 air power as the US ALONE, there is no hope for Russia to maintain an aggressive assault on Europe. Even fighting over home skies on defense, it is still likely that Russia will take much worse casualties than the US. With American and NATO air dominance set, the coalition can destroy any fledgling attempt at a Russian war machine, and without industry, a nation has no hope of survival. I can already hear people talking about how potent Russian air defense is, and I’m here to tell you, it isn't what it seems to be. Though they have an impressive number of SAMs, they aren't as accurate as one would think. In a confrontation over Syria, an Israeli F-35 (manufactured by the States) repeated bested the Russian S-400, which is the best in the Russian arsenal. American technology is just better. Period. But even if Russia somehow managed to bat off the US, they could still be economically crushed through the sea. The Russian navy is so weak, that NATO sea dominance is almost assured. With sea dominance comes economic starvation, which leads to the crumbling of industry, even if they manage to defend the skies.

Economic and strategic weakness: Though Russia is rich in natural resources, their ability to wage war is extremely limited. In order to take advantage of their resources and build a juggernaut of a war machine needed to take down NATO, you would need manpower and a strong economy. In Russia, these factors are painfully absent. NATO has a population of around a six hundred million people. Russia on the other hand, has about 140 million, giving NATO another 4 to 1 advantage. On the economic front, it gets even worse. Russia’s GDP is about 1.2 trillion USD, while NATO has an economy of 18.35 trillion USD. Even Italy has a larger GDP than Russia, despite having half the population, and having 1/60th of the land.

In the end, though this war would be horribly costly and not worth the price, when the smoke clears, it is abundantly clear who will be on top. NATO. Russia is not the power it once was. It is economically inferior to even minor countries, its military is aging and decrepit, and they dont have the flexibility they used to have during the Cold War. Also, NATO has a trump card that Russia has no chance of besting.

Bro if there was going to be war, Russia wouldn’t fight alone because it’s a battle for the world order…it will be NATO Vs Russia, China, India, North Korea + some other nations who are fed up of American hegemony .. these nations will not sit down idle while Russia fights alone. Read history about world war 1 and 2.

Guess who would win? Nobody, the earth would be a nuclear dump site.

He who lives in glass house dnt throw stones US knows this.not that NATO cannot easily defeat Russia but they are wary of their nukes,you dnt wrestle with a man with a suicide vest.it will be Mutual Assured Destructio(MAD)

WhatchDoGG:
Oga Lockhead Martin and co are state control a company that can't sell a military equipment, they produce and US government sales it even it is just 9mm bullet or do anything without govt sectioning it , a facility with US secret service agents on guard 24/7, with all their operations strictly classified is that a private facility? Oga US govt just fronting them as private for downplaying purposes��

lol government give them contacts not control them. You give someone contract to produce something for you does the person have rights to sell it without your approval? Cadillac make cars for their government officials, Ford make cars for police and Secret Service that's how those Defense Corp also get contracts from their government just like Sukhoi and Tupolev in Russia

themanderon:
Sanctions upon sanctions yet the Russian economy is still standing strong and even raking in more money from the same people sanctioning them where is the sense in that? I thought by now the Russian economy should have collapsed under the weight of the sanctions but the Russian Rouble has risen to an all-time high. It is the sanctioners that are actually bearing the full brunt of the war with rising food prices and an increase in the price of petroleum products. Yet the same people are sending more arms and funds for the foolish Ukrainians to continue in a war they cannot win. Make peace with the Russians you will always have them as your neighbours. It's an easier route to follow than all these mindless bloodlettings that is taking the world nowhere.

You are just like Putin oga, lying in other to convince or sound relevant ;? Oga I watched a Russian YouTube documentary by some Russian business men few days ago so stop telling people lies

Nazgul:
There's nothing special about Russia. The west is just afraid of their nukes.

Without those nukes, there's nothing special about the Russia military. Hitler and his tiny Germany invaded them in WW2 when they were still solvet union and about 10 times the size of Germany; and almost succeeded if not for the Russian winter and logistics problems.

NATO can take on Russia in an invasion warfare but if Russia decides to deploy their nukes on American and British cities, the tide of the battle would change, cos no one is ready to gamble millions of lives of her citizens over a war that could have been avoided.

This is what America and her allies are afraid of.

olodo.....have u forgotten Berlin was capture and conquest?and Moscow fend off German attack with counterattack,?

Gospel2Day:


Russia does not have more nukes than all NATO countries combined.
So, he can't out-nuke them.

The issue not how many nukes you have,one or two nukes is enough to reduce the entire mother earth to rubble.

Akalia:
My friend F35 has got capabilities that F22 don't. F35 has type A, B, and C versions due to different purposes it could serve in the war theater. F22 is bad ass but it is not at par with F35 because they weren't built for the same purpose. You are the ignorant one here my friend. I just schooled you a little.

lmao you have zero idea what you even talking about. F35 is slower, weaker carry less payload, can never even dare enter fighting space without f22 around. F22 can fight alone without F35. F22 is not badass, it is their most powerful jet

Nazgul:
There's nothing special about Russia. The west is just afraid of their nukes.

Without those nukes, there's nothing special about the Russia military. Hitler and his tiny Germany invaded them in WW2 when they were still solvet union and about 10 times the size of Germany; and almost succeeded if not for the Russian winter and logistics problems.

NATO can take on Russia in an invasion warfare but if Russia decides to deploy their nukes on American and British cities, the tide of the battle would change, cos no one is ready to gamble millions of lives of her citizens over a war that could have been avoided.

This is what America and her allies are afraid of.

So nukes are not special. If it’s not special, why are we not in possession of one??.

Oga nukes are damn special and only a daft will go into full scale war with mother Russia

Toktee:
You sound like educated fellow but are economical with truth.
Pls be honest in answering the above questions....

1...was it America that provoke Russia to invade Finland?
2....was it America that provoke Russia to invade Chechnya, Georgia, etc?
3...was it America that asked Russia to abandoned Budapest accord which led foundation for Enemity between Russia and Ukraine?

In February many world leaders visited Russia ranging French President to German Chancellor etc, both told Putin to stop the plan invasion that Ukraine will never join NATO..

Putin even denied that he will not invade Ukraine of which it was only Britain and the US that were never convinced that Putin will not invade.

Many of you failed to understand the situation cos of your hate for the west especially the US.
Russia want to steal Ukraine land and people and that's exactly what he's doing.


But in the end it's same Russia that wlll lose.

Ukraine is not an inch closer to becoming a member of EU.

Finland answer Sweden will join NATO before September.

Who lose?

The countries in the bombing list below would disagree with you besides why is the country highlighted in yellow below surrounded by Nato? Isn’t NATO supposed to be a defensive alliance?

Lastly the last picture below shows that Europeans truly love Africa.

Brother please open your mind.

Masterito:
Your question was trash in the first place. I hope you are aware Taliban defeated Russia and chased them away. America chose when to leave Afghanistan willingly while in charge of Afghanistan while Russia was chased out.

America supported the taliban by providing them with arms against the soviet union in 1979 and also the viet cong defeated the America which force America to withdraw during the Vietnam war

Akalia:
Those feautures you call unnecessary are what give these machines the edge they enjoy over their western counterparts. Every piece of overemgineered touch on US made arsenals are built for a purpose and not for some inpractical fancy.
Look, when soviet cum Russian fighter jest were still been flown by linkage controls and all analogue mechanism the US Airforce already had fighter jets that operate the fly-by-wire system.

Now in your myopic view, you would term the fly-by-wire system an overgineered feature by the US weapon manufactures, abi? You don't know jack about military war planes. The US weapon manufacturers have a penchant for pioneering cutting edge innovations and inventions. Take it or leave it.

my dear sit this one out you have no idea what you are talking about. Military gadgets is not luxury vehicles which need fancy things. Which US weapon is better than Russian weapons? Which one has proven better in combat operation? Ak47 is cheaper than M4 and Ar15 but Ak47 is always defeat M4

uchennaq:
The US military successfully tested a hypersonic missile prototype on May 4, the Lockheed Martin version of the Hypersonic Air-breathing Weapon Concept (HAWC) that can travel faster than March 5 (five times the speed of sound). It reached altitudes greater than 65,000 feet and flew for more than 300 nautical miles.

This was the second successful flight in the HAWC program of the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).

The US successfully tested the first one in mid-March but kept it quiet for two weeks to avoid escalating tensions with Russia as President Joe Biden was about to travel to Europe, according to CNN.

Bro that’s a fat lie, stop it now. Don’t just be posting fake news ah ah

The test was not a success, it failed woefully. Stop watching CNN, its a fake news propaganda channel. It’s a far-left deep state Network news station.

https://www.newsweek.com/russia-reacts-us-hypersonic-missile-failure-pentagon-chgb-test-1721004?amp=1

You have half baked knowledge. You know nothing about Vietnam war.

Kingbeewillsee:

America supported the taliban by providing them with arms against the soviet union in 1979 and also the viet cong defeated the America which force America to withdraw during the Vietnam war

Goddson:


The countries in the bombing list below would disagree with you besides why is the country highlighted in yellow below surrounded by Nato? Isn’t NATO supposed to be a defensive alliance?

Lastly the last picture below shows that Europeans truly love Africa.

Brother please open your mind.

Yeah your right just like france is forcing it's former colonies to use the CFA currency so they can have more control in Africa which is Neocolonialism..

Delacroix6:



Hope you know no country has more oil and gas than the USA.
And Uranium is what's needed to make nukes not oil and gas.

I'm not aware that no country has more oil and gas than Russia. Will Google it

Also I know uranium is what's used and Russia ha sit in abundance

You were wrong

So US support for Taliban is enough to defeat Russia. Then imagine how strong the US is.

Kingbeewillsee:

America supported the taliban by providing them with arms against the soviet union in 1979 and also the viet cong defeated the America which force America to withdraw during the Vietnam war

Kingbeewillsee:


Yeah your right just like france is forcing it's former colonies to use the CFA currency so they can have more control in Africa which is Neocolonialism..

Correct ��

I’m happy you are enlightened

infofta:
Which Russia? The one fighting in Ukraine or another Russia.

The one fighting in Ukraine I know for sure cannot stand NATO invasion within two weeks

They can't even beat Ukraine talk more of NATO.

NATO isn't strong enough to invade the whole of russia Has if Russia doesn't have allies such as china,north korea and india, Iran and Brazil . Also China has a military base in Djibouti and Russia can invade America through Alaska and their west coast alongside with china. So NATO can't defeat Russia where will NATO see it oil to continue the war while Iran controls the Persian gulf and the middle east don't like the west especially America and Saudi Arabia who's a USA ally won't give them due to the king of saudi not liking Joe biden. So NATO doesn't have the strength without USA you really expect France, poland,Italy and The UK, Germany to fight Russia without the USA Russia will conquer the whole of Europe alongside with his ally such as Belarus.