₦airaland Forum

You guys are joking right? The first one brought out Wikipedia and then you brought out the sister of Wikipedia, Britannica.

guysbewise:
@peggywebbs

Your idea of Christian theology is Wikipedia, Pixstory and non religious texts.

How do you sleep at night knowing that you are just lazy? Like seriously? If you had brought out Hebrew texts, ancient scrolls and actual factual theological references, I'd have taken seriously. Please rest, Nero Caesar is long dead and his never coming back. He's sleeping with his ancestors and probably has his generation walking around in some country around the world. Thank you.

Maynman:
What’s a religious phenomena?
Or you think there’s only one religion in the world? What’s the origin of the word “religion”?
Even your religion is gotten from JUDAISM.

I said the book, bible you are reading is from UNKNOWN AUTHORS, it seems you are reading to reply that’s why you are finding it hard to comprehend.

Save me the bullshit and mention just one out of the THEOlogical books, just ONE!, we are going to cross check your 666 claims and how there was many doctrines during “paul time”.
peggywebbs, Don’t be a lying Monolatrist.
Just mention ONE of the THEOlogical books you’ve read, just ONE!

You can only lie to yourself, 666 is about king nero.

What do you know about early Christians and their pagan ways?

Keep limiting your mind and keep letting people who probably discovered Middle east God later on tell you only Middle east gods are to be worshipped while abandoning your culture gods.
If you continue kidding yourself with a random book written by UNKNOWN AUTHORS, you will worship ABRAHAMAIC GODS till you die.

Yawn, lying monolatrist, when are you going to mention the names of the THEOlogical books you’ve read.
You can write all these epistle but can’t list the books?
Are they specifically created book for Chrestians and yahweh will kill you if you mention the title?

If you had check the Wikipedia pages, you’ll see the hebrew texts, factual theological references and ancient scriptures but you are an illiterate you don’t understand how Wikipedia works.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yahweh
https://www.worldhistory.org/Yahweh/

peggywebbs:
Your idea of Christian theology is Wikipedia, Pixstory and non religious texts.

How do you sleep at night knowing that you are just lazy? Like seriously? If you had brought out Hebrew texts, ancient scrolls and actual factual theological references, I'd have taken seriously. Please rest, Nero Caesar is long dead and his never coming back. He's sleeping with his ancestors and probably has his generation walking around in some country around the world. Thank you.

peggywebbs:
You guys are joking right? The first one brought out Wikipedia and then you brought out the sister of Wikipedia, Britannica.

Why are you talking like a illiterate? Don’t you know what Wikipedia and britannica are?
Because you want to defend your deity you can’t think straight again?
Why is it that Wikipedia and britannica are saying the same thing, you are just living in delusion, you’ve been brainwashed from birth, it’s difficult to think straight.
Why don’t you bring your THEOlogical books and let’s crosscheck or you can you mention the title of the “THEOlogical books”, we’ll do the crosscheck, come on theist
Or you can’t mention the name of the “Theological books” you’ve read, will yahweh kill you?

iamyungkhalifa:
Have been reading your comment since morning guy you are just an ignorant atheist. am a christain (catholic) and i have read lot of books both by atheist and non atheist author. How many books have you read in your lifetime . Although the early christain kept some book hidden till today some are in the vatican archive and the rest scatter all across the world . Though i keep telling people the bible is an history book to know what happen in the past and there are some apocrypa books (the holy bible included) too . But never deny the existence of GOD. Protestants and pentecostals are more ignorant and argue most but the one things is there is GOD and it is best to believe him and his son. Okay

Says a brainwashed theist.
Please don’t confuse Catholic for your Catholic Church.
How many books have you read in your lifetime to be basing your whole life on random books written by UNKNOWN AUTHORS?
Who are these Christians that kept some books hidden in the vatican? Post references, talk is cheap!
Bible literally means collection of books bwaahahah

Maynmann:
Says a brainwashed theist.
Please don’t confuse Catholic for your Catholic Church.
How many books have you read in your lifetime to be basing your whole life on random books written by UNKNOWN AUTHORS?
Who are these Christians that kept some books hidden in the vatican? Post references, talk is cheap!
Bible literally means collection of books bwaahahah

yea but that bible is not complete . Although i'm not here to argue with you . An atheist mind is a reprobate mind. Not yielding, and leads to destruction

iamyungkhalifa:
yea but that bible is not complete . Although i'm not here to argue with you . An atheist mind is a reprobate mind. Not yielding, and leads to destruction

I’ll say again, bible literally means collection of books.
We have the jewish book called tanakh, and Christian book called New Testament.
So which one is incomplete?
Also I’m not here to argue with you. A theist brain has been indoctrinated and brainwashed with deities, and if that theist doesn’t think for himself he’ll worship that deity ignorantly till he Dies.
What a life theist are living basing their life on random books with UNKNOWN AUTHORS, i pity their innocent kids

Maynmann:
I’ll say again, bible literally means collection of books.
We have the jewish book called tanakh, and Christian book called New Testament.
So which one is incomplete?
Also I’m not here to argue with you. A theist brain has been indoctrinated and brainwashed with deities, and if that theist doesn’t think for himself he’ll worship that deity till he Dies.
What a life theist are living basing their life on random books with UNKNOWN AUTHORS, i pity their innocent kids

can i ask you a question?

iamyungkhalifa:
can i ask you a question?

Can i also ask you a question?

Maynmann:
Can i also ask you a question?

you could ask but thats after i ask mine

iamyungkhalifa:
you could ask but thats after i ask mine

Okay, monolatrist.

Maynmann:
Okay, monolatrist.

have you ever question your existence, why you existed in this your present form, the source of your existence, and what you happen if you cease existing?

iamyungkhalifa:
have you ever question your existence, why you existed in this your present form, the source of your existence, and what you happen if you cease existing?

Yes i have.

Now my question, the books you are basing your whole life on, have you done any research on it?
I hope you know Christianity is from Judaism.
Have you done research on Judaism?

Maynmann:
Yes i have.

Now my question, the books you are basing your whole life on, have you done any research on it?
I hope you know Christianity is from Judaism.
Have you done research on Judaism?

when you ask you inner self this question what did you discover ? Yes have done research on judaism . I mean lot of researches

iamyungkhalifa:
when you ask you inner self this question what did you discover ? Yes have done research on judaism . I mean lot of researches

I only discover beliefs and opinions, I simply don’t know.

And you know Judaism is from yahwism?
Which Judaism did you research on?
Rabbinical judaism?
Hellenistic judaism?
Second temple judaism?

Maynmann:
I only discover beliefs and opinions, I simply don’t know.

And you know Judaism is from yahwism?
Which Judaism did you research on?
Rabbinical judaism?
Hellenistic judaism?
Second temple judaism?

i did all although i only did little about temple judaism because i already know all are ancient practice and a new way has been given. The ancient was cursed . Remember all the means been mention in revelation because they were teach by the fallen angels. likes of safel, racquel and lot more

iamyungkhalifa:
i did all although i only did little about temple judaism because i already know all are ancient practice and a new way has been given. The ancient was cursed . Remember all the means been mention in revelation because they were teach by the fallen angels. likes of safel, racquel and lot more

Bwahahahah, What are you saying?
You know all ancient practice but you read little on 1st and 2nd temple judaism? How come
Kindly post your sources.

emmanueloti65:
your are wrong again, the kingdom described to be strong as iron is the fourth kingdom which is Rome not america (daniel 2: 40).

the broken kingdoms of iron and clay came out of Rome (Daniel 2:41), and are ten in number not two. these kingdoms are represented by the ten toes that do not mix or come together and there bond is symbolised by iron mixed with clay .

the iron and clay mixure indicates that they will not come together or their relationship will not be strong with each other as compared to the ancient Roman empire, in other words the iron and clay has to do with the weak bond of the ten kingdoms because iron and clay can never mix together yet it has the strength of the fourth kingdom which is iron meaning these ten kingdoms still has the influence of Rome in it ( the papacy) this is not speaking of two nations working together as you assume so you are very wrong Mr. it seems you are the one who needs to go and read the book of Daniel.

The last kingdom is like iron mixed with clay!

Maynmann:
Bwahahahah, What are you saying?
You know all ancient practice but you read little on 1st and 2nd temple judaism? How come
Kindly post your sources.

unfortunately i dont read books online . I go to the church library and read hard copy. what are your source. I could give you authors name and their works maybe you could find a way to read it out yourself

iamyungkhalifa:
unfortunately i dont read books online . I go to the church library and read hard copy. what are your source. I could give you authors name and their works maybe you could find a way to read it out yourself

Yes please give me the author names and their work.
We live in digital age only laymen are not “online” now.
I’m Sure their books are “online” to download and read

Maynmann:
Yes please give me the author names and their work.
We live in digital age only laymen are not “online” now.
I’m Sure their books are “online” to download and read

try the popular dantes works . The epistles of clement, the shepard of hermans to remember a few

iamyungkhalifa:
try the popular dantes works . The epistles of clement, the shepard of hermans to remember a few

I’m talking about history books talking about Judaism , what exactly are all these?

MaxInDHouse:
The last kingdom is like iron mixed with clay!

Mr you seem not to know what your talking about. study the Bible pls stop following Jehovah's witness doctrines verbatim. the feet of iron and clay is made up of ten kingdoms that broke out of Rome which is the fourth kingdom. Daniel 2:41 made it clear that the feet of iron and clay is the fourth kingdom that shall be divided.

go and study your Bible instead of arguing want you don't know.

emmanueloti65:
Mr you seem not to know what your talking about. study the Bible pls stop following Jehovah's witness doctrines verbatim. the feet of iron and clay is made up of ten kingdoms that broke out of Rome which is the fourth kingdom. Daniel 2:41 made it clear that the feet of iron and clay is the fourth kingdom that shall be divided.

go and study your Bible instead of arguing want you don't know.

What's the name of your own religion or church?

MaxInDHouse:
What's the name of your own religion or church?

by asking this question you are telling me that you are not a follower of Christ but a follower of religion and church.

emmanueloti65:
by asking this question you are telling me that you are not a follower of Christ but a follower of religion and church.

I don't believe in the Christ without religion and church!

MaxInDHouse:
I don't believe in the Christ without religion and church!

you have personal relationship with Christ through his word not through religion or church. that is the reason you have wrong doctrines

He He He...me bring books for you. You just admitted your research starts and stops at Wikipedia. I'm not the one who made a bogus claim that Nero Caesar is the antichrist. I have no duty to provide you with proof whatsoever. If you could raise such a claim, I believe you must have done heavy research on the topic to prove it. Asking for my proof is like telling me to do the work . hence why I called you lazy. If you really want to know the truth, you'll be ready to speak to Israeli rabbis, dig out religious texts, look at arguments from all angles.

But no..you chose the Wikipedia route. No wonder professors warn against lifting research from Wikipedia in thesis. Good luck...not to sound like I'm avoiding, I was very much curious about this topic barely three years ago. I did my research, up to the point of your conclusion...I even watched a documentary by Morgan Freeman, where he too like you concluded that 666 was Nero Caesar. The popular opinion does not make the right one...if you're really interested in knowing what the book of revelation is about, it means you're going to go deeper into the topic with an open mind and without bias.

No Christian will argue revelation with you. Good night.. I've got my week planned.

Maynmann:
Why are you talking like a illiterate? Don’t you know what Wikipedia and britannica are?
Because you want to defend your deity you can’t think straight again?
Why is it that Wikipedia and britannica are saying the same thing, you are just living in delusion, you’ve been brainwashed from birth, it’s difficult to think straight.
Why don’t you bring your THEOlogical books and let’s crosscheck or you can you mention the title of the “THEOlogical books”, we’ll do the crosscheck, come on theist
Or you can’t mention the name of the “Theological books” you’ve read, will yahweh kill you?

peggywebbs:
He He He...me bring books for you. You just admitted your research starts and stops at Wikipedia. I'm not the one who made a bogus claim that Nero Caesar is the antichrist. I have no duty to provide you with proof whatsoever. If you could raise such a claim, I believe you must have done heavy research on the topic to prove it. Asking for my proof is like telling me to do the work . hence why I called you lazy. If you really want to know the truth, you'll be ready to speak to Israeli rabbis, dig out religious texts, look at arguments from all angles.

But no..you chose the Wikipedia route. No wonder professors warn against lifting research from Wikipedia in thesis. Good luck...not to sound like I'm avoiding, I was very much curious about this topic barely three years ago. I did my research, up to the point of your conclusion...I even watched a documentary by Morgan Freeman, where he too like you concluded that 666 was Nero Caesar. The popular opinion does not make the right one...if you're really interested in knowing what the book of revelation is about, it means you're going to go deeper into the topic with an open mind and without bias.

No Christian will argue revelation with you. Good night.. I've got my week planned.

All these epistle and you can’t mention the name of the THEOlogical books you’ve read.
Lying shamelessly to defend your deity.

Here you're getting closer. This was the point I made in one of my early comments. Revelation is not like any of the books in the New testament. It wasn't written by John the apostle or the early disciple. It had been contested but eventually it was accepted because it was beyond reasonable doubt to contain knowledge that could only come from God.

The author had no connection with the time of Nero Caesar, or the early disciples. So please go and dig deeper and then you can modify your topic.

Maynmann:
Yawn, lying monolatrist, when are you going to mention the names of the THEOlogical books you’ve read.
You can write all these epistle but can’t list the books?
Are they specifically created book for Chrestians and yahweh will kill you if you mention the title?

If you had check the Wikipedia pages, you’ll see the hebrew texts, factual theological references and ancient scriptures but you are an illiterate you don’t understand how Wikipedia works.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yahweh
https://www.worldhistory.org/Yahweh/

peggywebbs:
Here you're getting closer. This was the point I made in one of my early comments. Revelation is not like any of the books in the New testament. It wasn't written by John the apostle or the early disciple. It had been contested but eventually it was accepted because it was beyond reasonable doubt to contain knowledge that could only come from God.

The author had no connection with the time of Nero Caesar, or the early disciples. So please go and dig deeper and then you can modify your topic.

What century was it written?
Who is the author?
King nero was which century?

Why don’t you post links of your research, TALK IS CHEAP!

How low can you go to defend your deity?

But you were the one that made a bogus claim that Nero Caesar is not the antichrist, when the evidence is there right in front of you. When you add up 50+200+6+50+100+60+200 = 666 "Nero Caesar" from Greek NRON QSR in the Hebrew alphabet is: נרון קסר which when interpreted numerically represents the numbers: 50 200 6 50 100 60 200, which add up to 666.

Britannica is a reliable source so if you are not sure of what you read on Wikipedia about Roman occupation of Israel 2000 years ago then you can cross check it with Britannica.

The made up revelation events to control your mind today happened in year seventy when Rome destroyed the Temple in Jerusalem where the Holies of Holies was located.

peggywebbs:
He He He...me bring books for you. You just admitted your research starts and stops at Wikipedia. I'm not the one who made a bogus claim that Nero Caesar is the antichrist. I have no duty to provide you with proof whatsoever. If you could raise such a claim, I believe you must have done heavy research on the topic to prove it. Asking for my proof is like telling me to do the work . hence why I called you lazy. If you really want to know the truth, you'll be ready to speak to Israeli rabbis, dig out religious texts, look at arguments from all angles.

But no..you chose the Wikipedia route. No wonder professors warn against lifting research from Wikipedia in thesis. Good luck...not to sound like I'm avoiding, I was very much curious about this topic barely three years ago. I did my research, up to the point of your conclusion...I even watched a documentary by Morgan Freeman, where he too like you concluded that 666 was Nero Caesar. The popular opinion does not make the right one...if you're really interested in knowing what the book of revelation is about, it means you're going to go deeper into the topic with an open mind and without bias.

No Christian will argue revelation with you. Good night.. I've got my week planned.