Fahvvy:
All this long epistle and yet, you ended up saying nothing ...

Texcyndy:
Antichristian, why are you jobless? Use your time well. You are just wasting your time and your life fighting Christianity that will keep marching on. The gates of hell cannot prevail against it. Channel your energy to a productive thingand your life will have a little meaning.
My advice for you though is that you should repent and surrender to Jesus Christ. Don't let the devil mess up your life.

AntiChristian:


I think we can derive that Jesus had two different genealogies to Joseph the adopted father of God!

Texcyndy:

Your problem is big. I can see it.

AntiChristian:


Even your God had a big problem looking for who to be killed for the sins of his creations!

Jesus had to help as the son.

Is that not weird too?

Texcyndy:

You are wrong. Nothing can shake The Almighty God. Try again you will fail again

AntiChristian:


Correct the error! Start from the OP and correct my errors!

Who is the father of Joseph the adopted father of God?

Which geneology of Jesus is correct Matthew's or Luke's?

Texcyndy:

Demons are controlling you. I can see them.

AntiChristian:


You can see demons? Then you need a psychiatrist! Go get help!

Fahvvy:
All this long epistle and yet, you ended up saying nothing ...

Texcyndy:
Antichristian, why are you jobless? Use your time well. You are just wasting your time and your life fighting Christianity that will keep marching on. The gates of hell cannot prevail against it. Channel your energy to a productive thingand your life will have a little meaning.
My advice for you though is that you should repent and surrender to Jesus Christ. Don't let the devil mess up your life.

Lukuluku69:


Boss, why not direct this same word of Advice to many of your brethrens here on Nairaland?

For every Thread opened by the one you quoted there is at least 4-5 Threads opened by Christians on Islam and Muslims.

Texcyndy:

Good morning Boss.
I don't support whatever God doesn't support. If I see anyone who needs advice, whether they are Christians or not, I advice them.

Lukuluku69:


Well said Sir.

We all should support what God supports. That's is Godly.

But here on Nairaland, do Christians support what God support? There are hundreds of issue which God did not support plaguing Christiandom, some fundamental issues but you hardly see Christians taking a stand on them but you will come across same Christians raising issues which they largely have no idea about about Islam.

I can tell you that some Muslims actually became members on Nairaland because of the abuses from Christians.

Them opening threads and joining issues with Christians is simply reactionary and nothing more.

Texcyndy:

You are right in some of your statements.
I have a Muslim neighbor who lives his life mocking Christians. I just laugh at him and go my way.
He is one the Muslims who provoke Christians to talk about Islam. Just like what antichristian is doing.
When I try to have a discussion on religion with Muslims and he doesn't accept my points, I pray for them.

Lukuluku69:


The mocking thing actually goes both ways but my experience is the Christians do it more. It is not the mocking alone, they demonize every and anything they don't understand.

You know we can only relate as per our experiences, for me it is the Christians who do most of the mocking.

Both the Bible and the Quran says invite people with beautiful preachings to the way of your Lord. Appeal to their Souls, appeal to their intellects, appeal to their experiences but you will rather see the Christians not doing any of these but rather come with their views and want you to accept it without any question and if you reject it, the abuses and mocking starts.

I have had opportunity to sit amongst Christians without them knowing what Faith I subscribed to, what was said about Islam and Muslims is outta this world.

There is a Church right in front of my house, the Pastor sermon is never complete till he mention Islam and Muslims!

I have been reading posts on Nairaland for 2-3 years as a guest but when I see what was being said about the Faith I hold dear and what was being said about the person of those you beloved, I decided to join at least to say something and like I said, sometimes when a Muslim mock, it is reactionary and nothing more.

Texcyndy:

Well, from what I know, the Muslims preach against Christians more in their mosques than Christians talking about Muslims in churches.

Texcyndy:

Well, from what I know, the Muslims preach against Christians more in their mosques than Christians talking about Muslims in churches.

Lukuluku69:


Of course we will believe more in what our experiences say. And I can tell you that the Christians say stuff more than what the Muslims say about Christians.

You are free to propagate your ideas, Philosophy and all that, as long as you can accept that the other guy have a right to accept or reject them. Then leave it at that. God has not made any man a watcher over other men.

Preach your message and leave it at that. That is what the Quran says. Preach your message and leave it at that, to God is everyone's return.

For you to know that it is the Christians who do the mocking more, visit the Religion, Politics and Foreign Affairs section on Nairaland and take notes of what are being posted on a daily basis.

The Muslim fight back like the Op of this thread try to do is just reactionary.

Texcyndy:

I have already told you what I experience.

AntiChristian:
"Truth For The Truth Seekers" Book Reading Continued

https://knowislam.com.ng/truth-for-the-truth-seekers.../

CONTRADICTION 15
According to the gospel of Matthew, there are twenty-six generations from David to Jesus while according to Luke there are forty. As the period of time between David and Jesus is one thousand years, the gap from one generation to another according to Matthew is forty years and according to Luke, twenty-five years. This contradiction is so clear that it requires no comment. It has been a cause of great embarrassment to the Christian theologians and scholars from the very inception of these two gospels. [Shaykh Kairanvi Rahmathullah]

This contradiction is so serious that it has caused great embarrassment to both ancient and modern scholars. Their claim that the genealogical tables were kept safe by the Jews is false as it has been historically proved that there were destroyed in times of calamities and unfortunate incidents that have dogged the history of the Jews. For this obvious reason, errors are found in the text of Ezra as well as in these gospels. Now, if this was the condition of the scriptures in Ezra's time, one can imagine the condition of these texts in the time of the disciples. If the genealogies of the notable personalities and the priests could not be preserved, how much reliance can be put on the genealogy of poor Joseph who was only a carpenter? It is a possible assumption that the evangelists might have adopted two different genealogical tables concerning Joseph, the carpenter without proper regard to their accuracy.

The only explanation for this contradiction presented by some scholars is to say perhaps Matthew has described the genealogy of Joseph whereas Luke might have written the genealogy of Mary. In this case, Joseph would become the son-in-law of Heli who was himself without a son. This explanation is unacceptable and is rejected for several reasons. firstly because in this case, Jesus would not be a descendant of Solomon but of Nathan, as he would be included in the genealogy on his mother's side not that of Joseph, the carpenter. If this were so, Jesus could not have possibly been the Messiah, since the Messiah who had been predicted by the prophets had to be a descendant of Solomon.
Secondly, this explanation is not acceptable until it is proved through authentic historical reports that Mary was indeed the daughter of Heli and Nathan's line was through her. It is expressly in the gospel of John that the parents of Mary were Jehoachim and Joanna. And though this gospel is not recognised by the modern Christians as a revealed book written by John. St.Augustine said that he found a statement in a certain book that Mary was a Levite. This goes against her being a descendant of Nathan. Besides, we find the following statements in the book of numbers:
"And every daughter that possesseth an inheritance in any tribe of the children of Israel, shall be wife unto one of the family of the tribe of her father, that the children of Israel may enjoy every man the inheritance of his fathers"
"Neither shall the inheritance remove from one tribe to another tribe: but every one of the tribes of the children of Israel shall keep his own inheritance" [Numbers 36:8-9]

And in the gospel of Luke, we read:
"There was a certain priest named Zacharias, of the course of Abia: and his wife was of the daughter of Aaron".
It is known in the gospels that Mary was closely related to Zacharias [Elizabeth] which implies that Mary was also a descendant of Aaron. We have just read the commandment of Torah [Pentateuch] that any daughter of the tribe of Israel should be married to her own tribe, therefore, Joseph also should be a descendant of Aaron, and Jesus in this case would be a descendant of David.
To avoid this confusion, two different genealogies were written. Since these Gospels were not known until the end of the second century, the writer of one genealogy remained unknown to the other genealogist. This is the apparent reason for the present contradictions in the two gospels.

Thirdly, had Mary being the daughter of Heli, it must have been in the knowledge of ancient writers, who would not have knowingly presented such unbelievable explanations which later on, were rejected and laughed at by modern writers.

Fourthly, the gospel of Matthew says:
"Jacob begat Joseph, the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called the Christ"
while Luke says:
"The son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli"
Both the statements clearly show that the authors were writing the genealogy of Joseph.

Fifthly, if we presume that Mary was the daughter of Heli, Luke’s statement will not be true unless it is proved that it was customary among the Jews that they, in the absence of a real son, used to include the name of a son-in-law in their genealogy. This has not so far been proved by any authentic argument. As far as the unauthentic claims of the scholars of the protestant faith are concerned, they remain unacceptable to us on account of their lack of proof and valid arguments.

We do not deny the possibility of a certain person being associated with another person who his related to him through his father or wife or even being his teacher or his priest and he may be associated with the name of another person. That is to say, we may, for example, refer to him as the king's nephew or the king's son-in-law in order to in other to recognize him through a known personality. This kind of association is totally a different thing from someone being included in the genealogical line of another person. It is possible that it might have been a custom among the Jews to say that someone was the son of his father-in-law but it remains to be historically proved that such a custom existed.

Another point to note here is that the gospel of Matthew cannot have been known or acknowledged in the time of Luke. Otherwise, it would not have been possible for Luke to have contradicted Matthew so blatantly that it has resulted in a serious embarrassment to the ancient and modern advocates of Christianity.

Buy "Truth For The Truth Seekers" Book on Amazon

advocatejare:


Let me help you add more contradictions from your Quran:

How long to breastfeed?

30 months:
"We have enjoined on man kindness to his parents: In pain did his mother bear him, and in pain did she give him birth. The carrying of the (child) to his weaning is (a period of) thirty months. At length, when he reaches the age of full strength and attains forty years, he says, “O my Lord! Grant me that I may be grateful for Thy favour which Thou has bestowed upon me, and upon both my parents, and that I may work righteousness such as Thou mayest approve; and be gracious to me in my issue. Truly have I turned to Thee and truly do I bow (to Thee) in Islam.” – Quran 46:15 85


24 months:
"And We have enjoined upon man concerning his partners – His mother beareth him in weakness upon weakness, and his weaning is in two years – Give thanks unto Me and unto thy parents. Unto Me is the journeying" – Quran 31:14


Did he create the heaven or the Earth first?

The earth:
“He it is Who created for you all that is in the earth. Then turned He to the heaven, and fashioned it as seven heavens. And He is knower of all things.” – Quran 2:29

The heaven:
“Are ye the harder to create, or is the heaven that He built? He raised the height thereof and ordered it; And He made dark the night thereof, and He brought forth the morn thereof. And after that He spread the earth. He extracted from it its water and its pasture, And the mountains He set firmly as provision for you and your grazing livestock.” – Quran 79:27-33


Does Allah forgive everything?

Yes:
Say: “O my Servants who have transgressed against their souls! Despair not of the Mercy of Allah: for Allah forgives all sins : for He is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. – Quran 39:53

No:
‘Allah forgiveth not (The sin of) joining other gods with Him; but He forgiveth whom He pleaseth other sins than this: one who joins other gods with Allah, Hath strayed far, far away’ – Quran 4:116

No:
‘Allah forgiveth not that partners should be set up with Him; but He forgiveth anything else, to whom He pleaseth; to set up partners with Allah is to devise a sin Most heinous indeed. – Quran 4:48


Where do disbelievers receive their record book on Judgment day?

On their back
‘But he who is given his Record behind his back” – Quran 84:10

On the left hand
“And he that will be given his Record in his left hand, will say: “Ah! Would that my Record had not been given to me! – Quran 69:25

Texcyndy:

Many Christians can see the spiritual world. We are not like Muslims who are decieving themselves thinking they worship God without any experience.

AntiChristian:


You can see the spiritual yet your Spirit self can't lead to reconcile the contradictions i put forward?
You must be a liar!

Texcyndy:

I left you in your delusion. You are in darkness and you enjoy this darkness. Only Jesus can save you.

Texcyndy:

I left you in your delusion. You are in darkness and you enjoy this darkness. Only Jesus can save you.

pastorkc4life:
There are twenty-six generations from David to Jesus in Matthew, but there are forty-two in Luke and not forty. I do not know from which source you got the period of time between David and Jesus to be a thousand years. You may have to do more explanation. However, to clear the seemingly contradiction about the geneology of Jesus. Jesus has two geneologies: the divine geneology and the human geneology. Matthew wrote about his divine geneology while Luke wrote about his human geneology. Luke wrote about all the generations i.e all the individual sons that make up the geneology of Jesus in his humanity. Matthew on the other hand, wrote about the individual sons chosen by God, in his providence, to make up the geneology of Jesus in his divinity. The generation of Jesus in his divinity began with Abraham(Matthew 1:1-16; John 8:58). And that of his humanity began with Adam(Genesis 5:1-3). I believe this will be of help to you. Shalom! Pastor K. C. Akano 07061582689