₦airaland Forum

MaxInDHouse:
Each person has the right to talk about his own ancestors, you've presented yours and i never disputed it.

The evidence says that Jesus was an ape

Wilgrea7:
It's a discussion. If you don't believe it to be true, then challenge it. If you have contrary evidence, then bring it forward.

Are you OK?

Make i dey challenge ape pikin àbí wetin you just yan?

Ọmọ i only challenge humans who are inventors and who BELIEVE (TRUST) in the concept of a Grand Inventor not some people who BELIEVES they're from the family of APES.

Why challenge a descendant of ape nah?

Abeg mek sombodi com rescue me o!
Me (Max) challenge ape!

Workch:
The evidence says that Jesus was an ape

I've heard you loud and clear because i know that a naked person can't see any reason why others put on clothes.
So your ancestors were monkeys it's OK Sir!

MaxInDHouse:
I've heard you loud and clear because i know that a naked person can't see any reason why others put on clothes.
So your ancestors were monkeys it's OK Sir!

Jesus also was an Ape.
You are also an ape

MaxInDHouse:
Are you OK?

Make i dey challenge ape pikin àbí wetin you just yan?

Ọmọ i only challenge humans who are inventors and who BELIEVE (TRUST) in the concept of a Grand Inventor not some people who BELIEVES they're from the family of APES.

Why challenge a descendant of ape nah?

Abeg mek sombodi com rescue me o!
Me (Max) challenge ape!

m

Workch:
Jesus also was an Ape.
You are also an ape

I've told your brother why it's hazardous to challenge a naked person because he/she will like both of you to appear the same way.

So i've heard you Mr Ape it's only difficult for me to figure out how a descendant of ape now reason and talks but disputing what an old book says that snakes and donkeys once talked.

Abeg what makes you dispute the Bible's Author if you now believe APES can talk?

MaxInDHouse:
I've told your brother why it's hazardous to challenge a naked person because he/she will like both of you to appear the same way.
So i've heard you Mr Ape it's only difficult for me to figure out how a descendant of ape now reason and talks but disputing what an old book says that snakes and donkeys once talked.
Abeg what makes you dispute the Bible's Author if you now believe APES can talk?

Rotflmao

Wilgrea7:
With the long paragraph you wrote here, you still failed to answer the question. It was a very simple question.

The burden of proof is on the person making the claim.

I wanted to say this but I thought to let it be a trap to you knowing you are criminal and will surely go there.

So you are the one making the claim by trying to pass it to us. You even used the word "flip" which means THE BURDEN WAS FIRST ON YOU. see your words.

Wilgrea7(m): 8:43pm On Nov 28
Let me flip the question for you as well...

I won't let you flip it

So, you see, the burden is on you and because you were not able to remove it, you therefore thought to fraudulently remove it by committing the crime of switching the burden of proof.

MaxInDHouse:
Are you OK?
Make i dey challenge ape pikin àbí wetin you just yan?
Ọmọ i only challenge humans who are inventors and who BELIEVE (TRUST) in the concept of a Grand Inventor not some people who BELIEVES they're from the family of APES.
Why challenge a descendant of ape nah?
Abeg mek sombodi com rescue me o!
Me (Max) challenge ape!

Can't stop laughing

cornelboy:
Rotflmao

cornelboy:
Can't stop laughing

My brother, just continue to rejoice that you're now one of Jehovah's Witnesses because you'll see much more than the stupidest thing in the lives of disobedient humans.

Just imagine these same people who have been disputing what God's word said about the serpent and donkey talking now wants to prove that they descended from APES yet apes don't talk.
Then his brother expected me a whole me (Max) to challenge that!

MaxInDHouse:
I've told your brother why it's hazardous to challenge a naked person because he/she will like both of you to appear the same way.

So i've heard you Mr Ape it's only difficult for me to figure out how a descendant of ape now reason and talks but disputing what an old book says that snakes and donkeys once talked.

Abeg what makes you dispute the Bible's Author if you now believe APES can talk?

Jesus was an Ape.
The evidence is why Jesus was an Ape.

Workch:
Jesus was an Ape.
The evidence is why Jesus was an Ape.

No challenge Mr APE!

MaxInDHouse:
No challenge Mr APE!

Good then, worship your ape god in peace

Workch:
Good then, worship your ape god in peace

Naaaaaaaaaaaaa it's you that descended from APES, remember?

I was never from apes that's why i can talk, type and reason!

Templee333:
I'm not attacking ur religion, i asked you questions based on what u said in support of a perfect creator. But if u take it to be an attack on ur religion,then something is wrong somewhere.

I have answered that questions before and on several occasions
I'm a preacher, I also study the Bible with those that want to learn. Those questions once troubled me too. It is one of life's big questions
I won't answer you cos of your records on the ignorant, malicious posts against Jehovah's Witnesses. Go and ask your fellow atheist that question since they tell the truth... How are those innocent questions an attack on my religion? I even promised to illustrate when I charge my phone last night

The answers I now give is for you to ask fellow atheist.

Wilgrea7:
So let me get this straight. You're accusing me of using human or as you say, “animalistic" wisdom to think about a “higher being"

But when did i ever make such claims? I never said the creator, if it exists, has to have another creator.

All i asked was a simple question, and it's a bit funny watching all three of you fumble over it.

You're the ones who claim the creator is uncreated. I'm only asking why it has to be that way, and not any other way.

What sort of non-animalistic wisdom do you have that somehow led you to the conclusion that the creator cannot have another creator.

The fact that some organisms reproduce in a different way, doesn't mean all organisms reproduce in that way. You're proving my point further.

Probability is not certainty. And you of all people should know that.



I've not made any claims about the creator. All I'm doing is asking questions.

You're the one making claims, and you've given absolutely no solid reason to back them up. It seems your robot and dog analogy apply to you more than it does to me.

Lol, he's dodging
Remember how we first met
You flexed your muscles
Now, what has happened to those muscles

Aemmyjah:
I have answered that questions before and on several occasions
I'm a preacher, I also study the Bible with those that want to learn. Those questions once troubled me too. It is one of life's big questions
I won't answer you cos of your records on the ignorant, malicious posts against Jehovah's Witnesses. Go and ask your fellow atheist that question since they tell the truth... How are those innocent questions an attack on my religion? I even promised to illustrate when I charge my phone last night

The answers I now give is for you to ask fellow atheist.

okay sir. Enjoy yourself. Have a nice day.

Aemmyjah:
I have answered that questions before and on several occasions
I'm a preacher, I also study the Bible with those that want to learn. Those questions once troubled me too. It is one of life's big questions
I won't answer you cos of your records on the ignorant, malicious posts against Jehovah's Witnesses. Go and ask your fellow atheist that question since they tell the truth... How are those innocent questions an attack on my religion? I even promised to illustrate when I charge my phone last night

The answers I now give is for you to ask fellow atheist.

They're not interested in knowledge rather it's to drag everyone into their rebellious acts!

Aemmyjah:
Lol, he's dodging
Remember how we first met
You flexed your muscles
Now, what has happened to those muscles

Dodging what exactly? You're the one who has failed to answer my question from the very beginning. All you did was to insult my reasoning process without answering anything.

You, MaxinDhouse and Dtruthspeaker all failed to answer just 1 simple question. What stops a creator from having another creator?

You went off on a tangent talking about animalistic wisdom and whatnot. You're trying to establish a certainty from a probability, which proves my point even further. The other 2 devolved into throwing insults.

It's quite disappointing to be honest. But then again, I blame myself for expecting something better.

Wilgrea7:
You, MaxinDhouse and Dtruthspeaker all failed to answer just 1 simple question. What stops a creator from having another creator?...

Reversal of burden of proof does not allow us to answer your invalid question.

Wilgrea7:
Dodging what exactly? You're the one who has failed to answer my question from the very beginning. All you did was to insult my reasoning process without answering anything.

You, MaxinDhouse and Dtruthspeaker all failed to answer just 1 simple question. What stops a creator from having another creator?

You went off on a tangent talking about animalistic wisdom and whatnot. You're trying to establish a certainty from a probability, which proves my point even further. The other 2 devolved into throwing insults.

It's quite disappointing to be honest. But then again, I blame myself for expecting something better.

Answer my question first
Does that idea disprove the existence of a creator?

Aemmyjah:
Answer my question first
Does that idea disprove the existence of a creator?

No. Absolutely not.

And i never, ever for once, claimed that it did. So I really don't see your point here.

Aemmyjah:
Let's forget about religion, let's pretend there is no religion but use our brains and be fair

As to the origin of life, we all know that nothing can produce nothing, it is proven that life CANNOT be formed from nonlife
That logic has helped many to conclude that someone should be responsible for making all living forms, the universe with it's order and bodies and laws and regulations and mechanisms. Though no one has claimed to have seen such one on when he made all these, the evidence is so compelling that majority of people give credit to a higher power but people have different ideas and beliefs about who or what that One is

On the other hand, some believe that someone is not responsible. Some say so cos they don't believe in something they cannot see but they believe in gravity, mind, temperature, electricity, air, wind as if we can see them.
Others believe so cos they see that most books or myths as to the origin of life and the beginning of the universe is completely unscientific especially the Greek legends, Roman mythology and many others but one record stands out that they can't dispute but based on the other books, they hold onto it
Others believe so cos of the problems of life and the hypocrisy of those who claim to represent the One they say formed all life. Does that make sense to prove that one is not responsible for making life? They won't say that nobody made a knife cos someone or some people used it in stabbing others to death. If at the end of today, someone hijack a airplane and use it on suicide mission as we been hearing, will it make sense to believe that no one made that plane?
Others believe so cos there are different ideas and beliefs about the One who is responsible for life. Does that make sense? If I say, Mr A drew that painting, someone says it is Mr B, someone else says it is Mrs D, another says it is Miss Y. These are really confusing, all are not true but will you simply say that the art has no painter cos of these contrary opinions? Or because the person did not reveal himself to you.

Belief in a creator should not be stupid or gullible or cos you were taught in a religious centre. It must be out of personal conviction that you must be willing to defend
Belief in a no creator should likewise be intelligible, not cos you were taught at school or betrayed by religion. That religion is no compatible with science is actually a lie. The most renowned scientists of all times were actually religions people, some were monks and priests and they loved sciences.

Without any insults, what is your conviction that there is a Creator or that there is no Creator

Watchtowers using jw to sell book and make money.That us to say monkey dey. Work babbon dey chop and one jw was typing pastorpreneur after watchtower used jw to make they still used the jw girls as refreshment lol
Publisher my foot
Lmao

kissdabride:
Watchtowers using jw to sell book and make money.That us to say monkey dey. Work babbon dey chop and one jw was typing pastorpreneur after watchtower used jw to make they still used the jw girls as refreshment lol
Publisher my foot
Lmao

Pls try n type what we can understand
This your English sef
We are either called kingdom publishers or Kingdom proclaimers
Have we ever sold our books to you?

Mention the books your church published? You can't
Mention your church. You can't
Mention you pastor. Shame catch you
Mention what your church do. You can't

Aemmyjah:
Pls try n type what we can understand
This your English sef
We are either called kingdom publishers or Kingdom proclaimers
Have we ever sold our books to you?

Mention the books your church published? You can't
Mention your church. You can't
Mention you pastor. Shame catch you
Mention what your church do. You can't

Go to Christian church and start worshipping there not this ur publisher that you sell book and beg for money everywhere
So jw too like money jw publisherpreneur

kissdabride:
Go to Christian church and start worshipping there not this ur publisher that you sell book and beg for money everywhere
So jw too like money jw publisherpreneur

Jealousy don de embrace this woman