garfield1:


This law has always been in existence right from independence.you csn complain to the nass not me

No problem, please just do me a favour and read the article...

Brendaniel:


No problem, please just do me a favour and read the article...

Show it to nass and close this chapter

Funny Tinubu

Who is light or darkness?

Abi thick darkness prevailed over darkness.

garfield1:


Show it to nass and close this chapter

I don't know anyone in NASS, I'm just a concerned Nigerian citizen, I don't know if you know someone there maybe you can help...

If you use part of stolen money to build your house and EFCC comes after you, will they give you part of the house or seal the entire house since it was just part used and not all?

Brendaniel:


By cancelling the entire polling units affected? why not deduct invalid votes (over votes) and count the remaining valid votes since BVAS picks the actual number of invalid votes(over votes)...

Dialpad:
If you use part of stolen money to build your house and EFCC comes after you, will they give you part of the house or seal the entire house since it was just part used and not all?

this is an election and doesn't involve 1 candidate, there are so many, please read this article and know why I am saying what I am saying.

https://www.nairaland.com/7544115/implication-osun-election-tribunal-anarchy#120437236

Brendaniel:
What criteria was used to deduct the over voting?

UPDATE:
How would you cancel the entire votes in the polling unit because of a few wrong votes, if the BVAS still identified the number of over votes, why not just delete only the over votes and count the rest, Tinubu is trying to use the BVAS to rig election...

it is a wrong form of deduction, they should have deducted the over votes only...

That is the Law.

The law is not emotional

Like for Oyetola Share for Adeleke dancer

Dancing Governor just fight on. Adeleke sef get money

Brendaniel:
What criteria was used to deduct the over voting?

UPDATE:
How would you cancel the entire votes in the polling unit because of a few wrong votes, if the BVAS still identified the number of over votes, why not just delete only the over votes and count the rest, Tinubu is trying to use the BVAS to rig election...

it is a wrong form of deduction, they should have deducted the over votes only...

the law says cancel whenever there is over voting, not to deduct,the law is for punishment not for correction

Heffalump:
I have been saying that Tinubu is the man behind the Osun tribunal. My assertion has been confirmed.
Let me say it for the record, Tinubu is a very bad politician whose antics is always inimical to good democratic tenets. He believes the name "Jagaban" means to conquer or dominate or trample on the weaklings at all times, because he has got the money and innumerable size of urchins and touts to back and support him effortlessly. Such a fellow is not good for Nigerian democracy. This is the reason why we must all retire this fool in 2023, by the grace of almighty God.

Tinubu is a very bad example for democracy.

Lol

He is your next president. Take it to the bank ✅

Brendaniel:


This is not even about Adeleke, why do we see rubbish and support it because of party affiliation, I'm not a PDP supporter, for me if after the deductions of invalid votes from each polling unit and Oyetola wins, they should swear him in, I will be in full support, this particular law is highly faulty, it will cause problems, in the end it will cause tensions and more violence in elections, please just read the article it will help you...

You’re a bit slow in your thinking process. The law is in place to deter over voting and penalise offenders

newnigerdelta00:






Acid N100 dey market,stop wailing just buy and drink

We go see who go later drink acid
Urchin 🦠

SultanOfPuna:
Honestly, as much as I hate Tinubu
You have to admit,The old man Sabi play this politics game

meanwhile, someone should check Tony Braxton's account balance.
E sure me say Emifile don knack this babe. See where our money dey go

tinubu errand boy like you can not hate him.

Aregbesola eating the humble pie..

Lol.

igbotormentor:
God bless jagaban the incoming president of the federal republic of Nigeria and Biafra

You said what

Brendaniel:
What criteria was used to deduct the over voting?

UPDATE:
How would you cancel the entire votes in the polling unit because of a few wrong votes, if the BVAS still identified the number of over votes, why not just delete only the over votes and count the rest, Tinubu is trying to use the BVAS to rig election...

it is a wrong form of deduction, they should have deducted the over votes only...

The law says they should cancel the whole unit

Edipet:
Nothing concern us. All what we want is Obi.
Let the two corrupt party themselves

No be only, we enjoy Obi splitting PDP votes, the more Obi get more popular, the less his chance. Obi, Atiku and kwakwaso are all in same PDP. THEY ARE JUST ATTACKING EACH OTHER TO MAKE TINUBU WIN WITH WILDER MARGIN

millionaireman:
And there is real darkness looming ahead if a Tinubu who forfeited drug trafficking money to the US government, is allowed in today's world to preside over a country. No country in the world today will have that.
Nigeria must slide down to a pariah State, or to a Banana Republic, if a man listed in the US for hard drugs trafficking offence, is voted to lead Nigeria.

where is the prove .

Why do everyone seem to hold Tinubu's hand up??

[10quote author=igbotormentor post=120434278]
https://punchng.com/tinubu-congratulates-oyetola-says-light-prevailed-over-darkness/?utm_term=Autofeed&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook#Echobox=1674848276[/quote]

iamkberg:


The law says they should cancel the whole unit

It is a wrong law where the BVAS is able to detect the number of over votes....

Bovis:


You’re a bit slow in your thinking process. The law is in place to deter over voting and penalise offenders

Do you guys get it, look at what you are saying, you are insulting me for a good suggestion that will help our electoral process, and which offenders have been penalised in the Osun election, cancelling the entire polling unit when BVAS can identify the exact number of over votes is like throwing a baby with the bath water, when you can simply remove the baby and throw away the bath water. opponents will use this to keep destroying votes in opponent strong holds, is that what we want, please read the article below, I won't join in throwing insults, read and make objective contributions

https://www.nairaland.com/7544115/implication-osun-election-tribunal-anarchy#120437236

tinubu apc is now light

Devil is a liar

walex2:
the law says cancel whenever there is over voting, not to deduct,the law is for punishment not for correction

That is why I am trying to explain to you why that law is an error with BVAS in place, it needs to be changed.

After finding out the method used for the judgement on the election tribunal that gave victory to Oyetola over Adeleke, I would say it is a recipe for disaster, the method applied was cancelling all the votes of a polling unit because of over voting in that particular polling unit.


The questions I ask are:

1. As it happened that there were over voting in various polling units in the Osun election, what if each opposition connives to perpetrate over voting in polling units in each opposition strong holds?

2. What then is the use for BVAS in over voting if after the BVAS is able to identify the number of over votes only to end up cancelling all votes(valid) and over votes(invalid)?

3. If there is an election tribunal like this and a rerun takes place, what if the same over voting keeps occurring over and over, would they keep repeating the election tribunal process and back to rerun again?

In my opinion, the law is just an error or a purposeful scheme to rig an election using what I call reverse voting
Just simply tamper with your opposition strong holds and invalidate their votes, So we might be having a case where a carefully selected and protected minority will determine winners of an election instead of the majority carrying the votes.


Implications:

1. It will make elections become very dirty because politicians will be all about scheming to invalidate votes in opposition strong holds.

2. It will make the voters lose confidence in the electoral process, because a voter will not be sure if his vote will be invalidated or not by someone else scheming with a politician in his/her polling unit.

3. It will make voters wear out easily and may cause voter apathy when you have reruns after stressful elections, thereby reducing voters turn-up in reruns.

4. It may not reflect the true will of the people and also reduce the total number of voter participation, just like the Osun election tribunal, the total number of votes cast for both PDP and APC after the cancellation doesn't reflect the true will of the people to declare Oyetola the winner.

5. Elections will cost more because of Tribunal, reruns and time wasting.

6. It could lead to anarchy and total chaos, like in some volatile states in the north where they riot over political results, just imagine after election and INEC says they have cancelled over 20,000 polling units across the north which were all stronghold of a particular candidate, because of over voting of less than 2000 voters, imagine what will happen in the aftermath of such news.

Solution:

In situations of over voting, Why not just deduct the invalid votes(over votes) and count the rest, the BVAS already identifies the number of over votes(invalid votes), doing so, INEC will avoid a lot of election tribunals, scheming by politicians, reduce cost of doing reruns, make more accurate results, increase voters confidence, reduce time wasting, reflect the true will of the people and avoid anarchy.

Between this two people, who is holding each other?
I thought it will be the other way round?

Brendaniel:
What criteria was used to deduct the over voting?

UPDATE:
How would you cancel the entire votes in the polling unit because of a few wrong votes, if the BVAS still identified the number of over votes, why not just delete only the over votes and count the rest, Tinubu is trying to use the BVAS to rig election...

it is a wrong form of deduction, they should have deducted the over votes only...

Should they deduct the over votes from Adeleke vote or from Oyetola vote?

When will sadist Buhari congratulate Oyetola? I guess he's busy scheming how Tinubu won't succeed him in office

Abbeytoy:


Should they deduct the over votes from Adeleke vote or from Oyetola vote?

Many of them are not intelligent at all

Brendaniel:


That is why I am trying to explain to you why that law is an error with BVAS in place, it needs to be changed.

After finding out the method used for the judgement on the election tribunal that gave victory to Oyetola over Adeleke, I would say it is a recipe for disaster, the method applied was cancelling all the votes of a polling unit because of over voting in that particular polling unit.


The questions I ask are:

1. As it happened that there were over voting in various polling units in the Osun election, what if each opposition connives to perpetrate over voting in polling units in each opposition strong holds?

2. What then is the use for BVAS in over voting if after the BVAS is able to identify the number of over votes only to end up cancelling all votes(valid) and over votes(invalid)?

3. If there is an election tribunal like this and a rerun takes place, what if the same over voting keeps occurring over and over, would they keep repeating the election tribunal process and back to rerun again?

In my opinion, the law is just an error or a purposeful scheme to rig an election using what I call reverse voting
Just simply tamper with your opposition strong holds and invalidate their votes, So we might be having a case where a carefully selected and protected minority will determine winners of an election instead of the majority carrying the votes.


Implications:

1. It will make elections become very dirty because politicians will be all about scheming to invalidate votes in opposition strong holds.

2. It will make the voters lose confidence in the electoral process, because a voter will not be sure if his vote will be invalidated or not by someone else scheming with a politician in his/her polling unit.

3. It will make voters wear out easily and may cause voter apathy when you have reruns after stressful elections, thereby reducing voters turn-up in reruns.

4. It may not reflect the true will of the people and also reduce the total number of voter participation, just like the Osun election tribunal, the total number of votes cast for both PDP and APC after the cancellation doesn't reflect the true will of the people to declare Oyetola the winner.

5. Elections will cost more because of Tribunal, reruns and time wasting.

6. It could lead to anarchy and total chaos, like in some volatile states in the north where they riot over political results, just imagine after election and INEC says they have cancelled over 20,000 polling units across the north which were all stronghold of a particular candidate, because of over voting of less than 2000 voters, imagine what will happen in the aftermath of such news.

Solution:

In situations of over voting, Why not just deduct the invalid votes(over votes) and count the rest, the BVAS already identifies the number of over votes(invalid votes), doing so, INEC will avoid a lot of election tribunals, scheming by politicians, reduce cost of doing reruns, make more accurate results, increase voters confidence, reduce time wasting, reflect the true will of the people and avoid anarchy.

You are here again pasting this nonsense and crap all over places!

Abbeytoy:


Should they deduct the over votes from Adeleke vote or from Oyetola vote?

Deduct from any party that got the invalid votes, mind you as it stands now I am not supporting any candidate in Osun state, I am only supporting a good electoral system...

Why can't tinubu come out open and say the fact about this isue other than coming from the back to act like a saint..


This man is too rugged to rule a fragile country like Nigeria.