I uploaded the verbatim part of the constitution on the 25% requirement for the winning candidate in the FCT and asked Chat GPT to interpret it. Here are the results of the query.

ChatGPT is right here

It has answerd thi question 1 milliom times already, its mandatory to score 25% in fct. Whether the writers of the constitution used the wrong grammar is a different question entirely.

It’s an echo chamber. Here is another interpretation of the same wording using an established context.

E be like you just dey use Chatgpt, it has been explained lots of times but agbado guys are ready to twist your brain to believe them. Lol

bynonyen:
It has answerd thi question 1 milliom times already, its mandatory to score 25% in fct. Whether the writers of the constitution used the wrong grammar is a different question entirely.

Sorry its not mandatory oga so stop winning rubbish. We in pdp won it in 2019 yet Atiku was not made the president so waka one side. Such constitution is a stupid constitution for zoo not for human. How can Abuja be a winner decider who or what the hell is Abuja. F u c k that constitution.

Even the supreme court would wish that was not what it means but maybe their English and it's use was not well cooked when they were writing the constitution at time.

Let them look for a better English or way writing that part of the constitution if they want Abuja to be seen as a state.

Otherwise, right now, it is what it is. You must win 25% of FCT.

In other words, Tinubu is a select president elect.

Foolish people everywhere, so if a candidate win 35 state with 80% votes and lost having 5% in Ekiti and FCT so it means he can be president

Craze dey worry all of you

ChatGPT is not perfect .

Let Chatwhatever come and stop his swearing in ....as una no wan get sense

jconsulting:
Foolish people everywhere, so if a candidate win 35 state with 80% votes and lost having 5% in Ekiti and FCT so it means he can be president

Craze dey worry all of you

Yes he won't become president, how can you win 35 states and fail to secure 25 in FCT, does that make sense to you too? Why's it hard to win FCT if you can win other states?

HydraFeeds:
ChatGPT is not perfect .

It doesn't have to be perfect, but this is English Grammar, and ChatGPT is spot on here. The APC mob are just trying to bully the judiciary into supporting their argument, by continuously misinterpreting something as basic as Conjunction - AND.

FCT is a Capital Territory, the President is the Governor. Every Governor must win their seat to be duly elected. Winning 25% is just a symbolic gesture for the president to meet. If he can't meet this token, what business does he have governing FCT? It's common sense law. FCT is compulsory.

The AI, ChatGPT is an unbiased arbiter here if you ask me.

PointB:



It doesn't have to be perfect, but this is English Grammar, and ChatGPT is spot on here. The APC mob are just trying to bully the judiciary into supporting their argument, by continuously misinterpreting something as basic as Conjunction - AND.

FCT is a Capital Territory, the President is the Governor. Every Governor must win their seat to be duly elected. Winning 25% is just a symbolic gesture for the president to meet. If he can't meet this token, what business does he have governing FCT? It's common sense law. FCT is compulsory.

The AI, ChatGPT is an unbiased arbiter here if you ask me.

I’m not debating the technicality of the fct 25% here cos every knowledgeable person knows that FCT is regarded as a state in the constitution and FCT people don’t have more than one head compared to other Nigerians.

My argument is that ChatGPT is not perfect and it was clearly stated there that it’s not perfect,if a system is not perfect,it has the tendency to generate erroneous results. How do you determine if the answer generated is not erroneous?

Here’s the response ChatGPT returned to my probe just now .

HydraFeeds:
I’m not debating the technicality of the fct 25% here cos every knowledgeable person knows that FCT is regarded as a state in the constitution and FCT people don’t have more than one head compared to other Nigerians.

My argument is that ChatGPT is not perfect and it was clearly stated there that it’s not perfect,if a system is not perfect,it has the tendency to generate erroneous results. How do you determine if the answer generated is not erroneous?

Here’s the response ChatGPT returned to my probe just now .

Baba,start the screenshot from the first question as the other person did.
The topic of that thread is different from your answer,we are not fools here.
I know how to use chatgpt, you asked first question it gives answer,then second question will be derived from the answer of the first question which you didn't upload.
You could have used "or" in place of "and" to make your answer this way

Though many are saying if Abuja has two heads than other states...
I beg to ask differently,if two-third insertion really matter if really majority individuals gave you the highest number of votes to win?
Shame on spread over majority.
Prov 18:17 NIV
In a lawsuit the first to speak seems right, until someone comes forward and cross-examines.

Abrahamweb:

Baba,start the screenshot from the first question as the other person did.
The topic of that thread is different from your answer,we are not fools here.
I know how to use chatgpt, you asked first question it gives answer,then second question will be derived from the answer of the first question which you didn't upload.
You could have used "or" in place of "and" to make your answer this way

my argument is that ChatGPT is not perfect and most times it depends on the structure of your question. Which still boils down to my initial response that ChatGPT response is not the law . It relies on data and machine learning techniques. That it gives me a different answer(under whatever circumstances)alone is enough to disqualify the AI when it comes to the OP argument.

Here’s the beginning of my question .

Chucks13:


Sorry its not mandatory oga so stop winning rubbish. We in pdp won it in 2019 yet Atiku was not made the president so waka one side.

They're talking about 25%, you're talking about winning.

Jumping into conclusions like a housewife on menopause.

DesChyko:


They're talking about 25%, you're talking about winning.

Jumping into conclusions like a housewife on menopause.

Your headache. Oga such constitution don't exist its a pure fallacy that hold no ground infact its a silly conclusion.

Abuja is never a decider who become the president so pls waka one side.

However, get the fact right now Obi will never become Nigeria till he die, put your cash on the table for a bet if you doubt me.

Chucks13:


Your headache. Oga such constitution don't exist its a pure fallacy that hold no ground infact its a silly conclusion.

Abuja is never a decider who become the president so pls waka one side.

However, get the fact right now Obi will never become Nigeria till he die, put your cash on the table for a bet if you doubt me.

They're talking about 25%, you're talking about winning.

Get a hold of your comprehension ability first before vomiting more nonsense abeg.

DesChyko:


They're talking about 25%, you're talking about winning.

Get a hold of your comprehension ability first before vomiting more nonsense abeg.

I had told you 10%, 40% or whatever is a bullshit take it or leave it. Good day.

bynonyen:
It has answerd thi question 1 milliom times already, its mandatory to score 25% in fct. Whether the writers of the constitution used the wrong grammar is a different question entirely.

why is it mandatory?... That means other state is nonsense nah... My own is just that a drug baron should never be our president and not this their 25% nonsense

Chucks13:


Sorry its not mandatory oga so stop winning rubbish. We in pdp won it in 2019 yet Atiku was not made the president so waka one side. Such constitution is a stupid constitution for zoo not for human. How can Abuja be a winner decider who or what the hell is Abuja. F u c k that constitution.

You forgot that buhari also got 25% in FCT from the 2019 presidential result.

jconsulting:
Foolish people everywhere, so if a candidate win 35 state with 80% votes and lost having 5% in Ekiti and FCT so it means he can be president

Craze dey worry all of you

If a student scores 9 A's in other subjects and failed English language in waec, name the institution in Nigeria that will admit him.

Common sense isn't common.

Wonder what you guys will ask chat GPT after may 29th swearing in

Okay

HydraFeeds:
I’m not debating the technicality of the fct 25% here cos every knowledgeable person knows that FCT is regarded as a state in the constitution and FCT people don’t have more than one head compared to other Nigerians.

My argument is that ChatGPT is not perfect and it was clearly stated there that it’s not perfect,if a system is not perfect,it has the tendency to generate erroneous results. How do you determine if the answer generated is not erroneous?

Here’s the response ChatGPT returned to my probe just now .

No, not in this regards that you say ChatGpt is not perfect. You didn't frame your question properly. That's why it's saying you don't need to have 25% in Abuja for presidential or gubernatorial elections in Abuja. At least to avoid confusion, just give it the exact wordings in the constitution for interpretation. You can't expect correct answers when your question is wrongly framed.

othermen:
It’s an echo chamber. Here is another interpretation of the same wording using an established context.

No, the electoral college voting system is not the same as Nigeria's vote counting approach. Wrong comparison!

Donpeak:
No, not in this regards that you say ChatGpt is not perfect. You didn't frame your question properly. That's why it's saying you don't need to have 25% in Abuja for presidential or gubernatorial elections in Abuja. At least to avoid confusion, just give it the exact wordings in the constitution for interpretation. You can't expect correct answers when your question is wrongly frame.

what of like this ? Is it properly framed ?

PS : I stand on my initial comment that ChatGPT is not perfect and therefore cannot be an authority of our law . Remember the fundamentals of science ? Before a law can be made ,it must have passed the theoretical phase .

HydraFeeds:
what of like this ? Is it properly framed ?

PS : I stand on my initial comment that ChatGPT is not perfect and therefore cannot be an authority of our law . Remember the fundamentals of science ? Before a law can be made ,it must have passed the theoretical phase .

. But that is still not the constitution. The only unbiased input that you can give ChatGPT to interpret will be the exact words from the constitution. I agreed that ChatGPT isn't perfect from my initial comment but I am only saying if we can't hear the court verdict now and we need an honest answer from an unbiased entity, ChatGPT can help interpret the constitution if uploaded verbatim.

Donpeak:
. But that is still not the constitution. The only unbiased input that you can give ChatGPT to interpret will be the exact words from the constitution. I agreed that ChatGPT isn't perfect from my initial comment but I am only saying if we can't hear the court verdict now and we need an honest answer from an unbiased entity, ChatGPT can help interpret the constitution if uploaded verbatim.

passing a law exam is just like passing any other subject exam . It simply responded to the questions based on existing data stored by the programmer .

Here’s the response when I uploaded the section in verbatim .

You’re welcome