Mitchy49:
Na una sabi o.... Whatever u like, do. Interprete the laws however u like it but every Stolen Mandate must be returned when the time comes

thesicilian:

Lol
Some of you are irredeemably obstinate.

thesicilian:

Lol
Some of you are irredeemably obstinate.
You guys must be feeling dizzy as the bedrocks of your petition are being dislodged one after the other

Mitchy49:
Na una sabi o.... Whatever u like, do. Interprete the laws however u like it but every Stolen Mandate must be returned when the time comes

Johans2023:
Yes but why lieing under oath?
Perjury can stop him.

AdaojoTheUrchin:
This corrupt Aondoakaa is looking for a leeway back to looting the country.

As former AGF, this man looted the country to stupor and then lobbied to put his cousin in charge of NAFDAC after the demise of Prof. Akunyili, and then his cousin almost destroyed NAFDAC completely, collecting largess from Chinese and Indian fake drug manufacturers to import their rotten drugs.

In an interview with ARISE NEWS on Tuesday, Aondoakaa stated that the clear terms for citizenship and its exceptions are stated in the sections 25-29 of the Nigerian 1999 Constitution. He stated that conditions for being a citizen of Nigeria are determined by virtue of nationality and birth.

He also stated that this was not a case made in the electoral petition made against the president-elect, thus it is currently not a determinant of his disqualification.

However, Aondoakaa has stated that the issue of dual citizenship and perjury is “hype” because they only came up after the election petitions had been filed against Tinubu.

However, when questioned about the issue of public morality and the people’s cry of selective justice, the Senior Advocate of Nigeria said that though it is valid, it cannot hold water in court at the time.

“The issue of morality comes in but morality is not law. Evidence is needed.”
https://www.arise.tv/aondoakaa-no-perjury-case-filed-against-tinubu-petition-cant-be-amended/

QuotaSystem:
I nearly laughed my head off at the disappointment on Arise TV’s anchors faces as Aondoakaa dismantled the dual citizenship and perjury allegations before their very eyes; told them the former was baseless and the latter was jus post-election hype🤣

They brought him on air expecting him to say what they wanted him to hear (even captioned the interview “can a candidate be disqualified for perjury?”) but the experienced constitutional lawyer tore their dreams to pieces with surgical accuracy and left it on the floor. He made it very clear that aside the weightless claim of dual citizenship that holds no water since they cannot prove Tinubu is not a Nigerian by birth, it is too late amend Peteru’s watery petition to add any emergency claims.

Difrent:


Watch they wont call that man for analysis again.

Asleeptv.

Nduka Obiagbena will learn the hard way. He should go and ask Dokpesi. He should know that Dokpesis misadventure in 2015 killed AIT...and made AriseTV popular.... i could still see Dokpesis Apology that ran for almost a week on his stations and newspapers for the lion of boudillon propaganda documentary.....since then government patronage dried up and is still afloat only in PDP states.

AdaojoTheUrchin:
This corrupt Aondoakaa is looking for a leeway back to looting the country.

As former AGF, this man looted the country to stupor and then lobbied to put his cousin in charge of NAFDAC after the demise of Prof. Akunyili, and then his cousin almost destroyed NAFDAC completely, collecting largess from Chinese and Indian fake drug manufacturers to import their rotten drugs.

AustineE1:

your problem is that you believe so much in stomach infrastructure,you think everybody think and cares about what your thiefing government can offer them,you think everyone should go silent in the face of evil because of financial and government patronage,with or without there patronage, the 'man get oil for his head' and better than your slaving fathers.

Johans2023:
Yes but why lieing under oath?
Perjury can stop him.

ManOfMan:
But perjury does

Gbogbowa:
im suprise you can believe a former lawyer talking about constitution and cannot mention any part of the constitution to support his claims