₦airaland Forum

DesChyko:
Shey you can read sha?

sreamsense:
The victory here is not for Adeleke but for INEC which Adeleke was just a beneficiary. INEC tried to defend her integrity and Adeleke that was earlier announced as winner as not being a mistake. With this win for INEC which Adeleke has benefited, take home here is that INEC will also win presidential court case of which Tinubu will be beneficiary like that of Adeleke. INEC will like to defend her integrity by dwelling on Bvas data source which will favour INEC and Tinubu. The remaining personal charges against Tinubu holds no water. INEC/Adeleke winning in Osun means Obi will loose because court will rule in favour of INEC like that of Osun

Ofunaofu:
who have time for frivolities and technicalities when the constitution and INEC electoral guidelines have been violated.

frivolities and technicalities are the stock-in-trade of APC

tamdun:
Pls explain how electoral act was violated

Ofunaofu:
What will doom INEC and the APC at PEPT is the 25% FCT

Go mark it somewhere

Perfectbeing:
The 25% FCT issue has been settled a long time ago..
The FCT is the 37th State of the federation.

Ofunaofu:
I don't know where you got this 37th state

I will not banter words with you. The case is in court. Hire a lawyer to go there and argue that the FCT Abuja is the 37th state of Nigeria

Perfectbeing:
Na here we dey..

Perfectbeing:
The 25% FCT issue has been settled a long time ago..
The FCT is the 37th State of the federation.

oyatz:
Adeleke and Tinubu are in similar situations.


Oyetola and Atiku+ Obi are in similar situations.

Ofunaofu:
The case is already in court. Let us allow it to run its course

Thank you

9jahotblog:
nope, the case before the Lord justices sitting on Tinubu case in the presidential election petition tribunal is highly different from Adeleke’s case that got victories in the Appeal court of justice and Supreme Court of justice too. Very different seriously. There will be a write up on that soon.

blacknp:
6. On LP & Pdp witnesses.

“They have no personal knowledge of the case,
They were not present in any of the polling units,
Their entire testimony in the case is incurable inadmissible”

7.Supreme Court: Tinubu ought not to have even defended any of the allegations of Obi & Atiku because they are based on hear say.

8. Tinubu’s qualification was settled already - Supreme Court

9. Appeal failed and hereby dismissed

- Supreme Court holds.

XY23:
The primary issue in contention has to do with adherence to the Electoral Act including the use of BVAS as primary source of data. Recall, that BVAS as being alleged not to have been used in close to 10,000 PUs (hence results are not even uploaded even till now).

I like your logic, in essence INEC would have to defend it's declaration that APC won. This is very good news, because they would have to do so with BVAS, Voters register, EC8A and AWS. When you look at their filed response, you'd realize they are as much clueless as they were on Feb 25th. We want to see how they will defend the irregularities from their own instruments. The prosecution should rely more on digital forensics not backend server and INEC would mess up themselves.

andyre34:
You are very very confused to the point that your head is empty. Whether it is a 37th state or not does matter