GoodGovernance:


18,000 replicated errors can never be non deliberate.Physical copies may have been tampered with,more than 24hrs when they should have been scanned with the BVAS machine.

How do you confirm physical copies with certified,blurred copies?

If results were transmitted from polling units on election day,as required by the electoral act,the INEC officials would have retaken the blurred images.

Also,it seems you are not familiar with the provisions of electoral act.

[i][/i]

No one is more familiar with the electoral law than mour.you cannot assume physical copies were tampered without concrete proof except you don't know the meaning of blurred.there is a very big chance that a lot of the bvas cameras have issues or the adhoc were not diligent.we have seen several cases where pictures of adhoc staffs and even their person stuffs were uploaded.agsin,you have heard of widespread bvas malfunction.therefore,it is a big possibility.to be very sure you simply cross check.if your waec photocopy is blurred,won't you cross-check with your original? Will you draw conclusions?

Creeza:
employers however never see the need to tell others that they are employers of labour

I wonder... just maybe

Sorry if you are offended but did you read what the guy wrote? Make we no dey fight ourselves or try to look smart. We are here to catch fun. Don't take life too serious

LADEMINUS:


Going by your logic, and assuming there are no physical copies signed by all/majority the parties (WHICH THERE IS) that the court will defer to.... LP still has to prove that those results are Thiers! APC and PDP and even APM can claim the results

That is where substantial non compliance comes in.

I wonder why people are ignoring section 64(4) of the electoral act.

The failure to transmit results FROM the polling units in all over 700,000 polling units,contrary to provisions of 64(4),is enough evidence for substantial non compliance with the electoral total act.

Cancellation of the election, is more likely than than declaring Obi the winner.

IamV:


Q. You have an Act, the NITDA Act of 2007

A. Yes sir

Q. Have you read it?

A. Yes sir

Q. Is there any certification in the act described as 'ISO27001 2:2013'

A. The Act does not contain cyber security standard

Q. there's nothing in your Act that provides for communication between NITDA and INEC

A. Our Act doesn't mention that.

[ That's that for the cross examination of the witness by the 2nd & 3rd Respondent .
The 4th Respondent is about to cross examine the witness ]

The bolded will be used to rubbish whatever the LP cybersecurity expert brought forward because he misinformed the court that this ISO standard is in the NITDA Act but here is a NITDA IT staff on subpoena saying there's nothing like that in the NITDA Act.

He need to prove that he came second before even proving that he won.
So far, Peter Obi's people have submitted enough evidence to prove that
1. Shettima had another nomination before he was declared Tinubu's running mate
2. Tinubu didn't get 25% of Abuja votes, which is a constitutional requirement
3. Cast doubt on how INEC arrived at the decision that Tinubu won, especially as there were thousands of blurred results, and huge discrepancies in certain states.

The only point Peter Obi now has to prove is that he actually won that election. Even though I know he has submitted EC8A forms for the election, the prosecution still needs to collate the exact results in those forms, as the court may not have time to go through that mountain of evidence.

All I can say at the moment is that Peter Obi has proven enough points for the judges to cancel that election and call for a re-run. He needs to do a bit more for the courts to have enough evidence to declare him the winner.

Let us wait for the defence, and what points they have[/quote]

OfoIgbo:


So far, Peter Obi's people have submitted enough evidence to prove that
1. Shettima had another nomination before he was declared Tinubu's running mate
2. Tinubu didn't get 25% of Abuja votes, which is a constitutional requirement
3. Cast doubt on how INEC arrived at the decision that Tinubu won, especially as there were thousands of blurred results, and huge discrepancies in certain states.

The only point Peter Obi now has to prove is that he actually won that election. Even though I know he has submitted EC8A forms for the election, the prosecution still needs to collate the exact results in those forms, as the court may not have time to go through that mountain of evidence.

All I can say at the moment is that Peter Obi has proven enough points for the judges to cancel that election and call for a re-run. He needs to do a bit more for the courts to have enough evidence to declare him the winner.

Let us wait for the defence, and what points they have

.. and some people still like your epistles

Lovelive:
Alaye you are too pompous. Humility should be one of your guides.

Sorry if you feel offended but check the guy's response. Let's be fair in judgment. Thank you

fredoooooo:


oga, if you want attention go to ya mama go and suck some breast . I'm not responsible for ya generational frustration.
STAY ON YA LANE ...

ah I see

you lack maternal love, what a pity . at times life can be unnecessary cruel to some people. seeing you turn out this way, lost just like a scalar quantity with magnitude but no direction is heartbreaking

but what can one do to savage a lost, bitter, motherless vagabond like you... prayer definitely is the answer

LADEMINUS:


Going by your logic, and assuming there are no physical copies signed by all/majority the parties (WHICH THERE IS) that the court will defer to.... LP still has to prove that those results are Thiers! APC and PDP and even APM can claim the results

Inec regulations states that you can only defer to irev copies in the absence of the physical

LADEMINUS:



This is election tribunal, no witness is going to jail. If the court allows that nobody will testify

Make we laugh small now

You knows about the law then GO TO COURT and continue your deviant arguments.

senatordave1:


I have stated here timelessly that almost all obi fans do not know jack about the law.they are simply seeing things from a commonsensical and a moral perspective

GoodGovernance:


That is where substantial non compliance comes in.

I wonder why people are ignoring section 64(4) of the electoral act.

The failure to transmit results FROM the polling units in all over 700,000 polling units,contrary to provisions of 64(4),is enough evidence for substantial non compliance with the electoral total act.

Cancellation of the election, is more likely than than declaring Obi the winner.

Has obi proven substantially that elections were not actually transmitted from a large amount of units?

sreamsense:


Who can please help me direct this guy to where he will get brain therapy? Did I ask question before in my message you quoted that you expect me to ask you more questions? If I want to ask question, I will not ask someone like you with brain problem because I am not ready to waste my time. Simple logic you failed to apply that would have helped you determine that I did not ask question in my message you quoted talkless of asking you more as you requested. You need that "crash IT" than anybody else because your way of thinking is an inch higher than that of pig. Picking 12 sample spaces with labour party deceiver he claimed to have their consent out of 176,846 is just too small. He and those LP he used as consent with this should have known better

Lol

What does consent mean? Lets start grom there ?

My only problem with the witness is that he didn't specify who he took consent from " Inec,LP , ApC or even you Mr...

And i didn't say you asked questions. I actually wanted you to ask. On quote " What else is your question? Ask me i will answer "

But you don't have any so i will be asking the questions

fredoooooo:


oga, if you want attention go to ya mama go and suck some breast . I'm not responsible for ya generational frustration.
STAY ON YA LANE ...

it is a tragedy to be birthed by a woman of easy virtue but it becomes a double tragedy when the same woman of easy virtue abandons you

pls how re you coping? little wonder you turned out frustrated in life

00FFT00:


Elections are rigged by governors in the states. This is the so-called structure. That was the case in Imo, Rivers, Benue, Kogi, all SW and NW states. The overwhelming SE and SS and middle belt votes made it impossible to bend Lagos to APC. They shaved the numbers nonetheless.

Abuja!. Way too many Okoro's and progressive Nigerians in that location, and there is no governor to provide the criminal rigging structure. That's why you must win Abuja to become Nigeria's president, and Tinubu failed that primary test.

So going by your assertion, Ortom also rigged for Tinubu right, for him to win Benue? Same Ortom that publicly aligned himself with Peter Obi.

senatordave1:


Guy,you are intelligent and objective.i don't care who you support but you created a new vista,another perspective.
You have to prove massive or widespread irregularities to warrant cancellations and you must further show how it affected the margin of lead since the electoral act demands substantial noncompliance not in pockets.
Lp made a mistake.the import of different result copies is for crosschecking and confirmation or comparison.it is a checking mechanism to determine the true figure.yiu cannot determine based on one copy alone.see uzodinma vs ihedioha supra.see ajasin vs omoboriowo,onoh vs nwobodo,uduma vs arunsi..
The friendly nitda deftly or subtly absolved inec by saying no law mandates or binds them with inec.if actually he was officially sent by the dg,he would have brought an official permit.the DG with his job on the line cannot say he granted the staff leave

Onoh Vs Nwobodo 👍👍👍😂
Very intriguing precedent.
This is truly an experienced silk.

But I dare say you must be a crafty genius sha. May we cross paths one day in court so I will teach you some lessons.

Game recognise game

Majesty7:


Sorry if you are offended but did you read what the guy wrote? Make we no dey fight ourselves or try to look smart. We are here to catch fun. Don't take life too serious

Am not offended.

You are right and he is right
As well as you are both wrong

So in your defence he requested that you give him your own opinion and explanation of " truthfulness" " intelligence"

Instead you took the emotional route and quickly accepted defeat

Novarisammy2:

ah I see

you lack maternal love, what a pity . at times life can be unnecessary cruel to some people. seeing you turn out this way, lost just like a scalar quantity with magnitude but no direction is heartbreaking

but what can one do to savage a lost, bitter, motherless vagabond like you... prayer definitely is the answer

Isn't that obvious from ya frustrated post,. is dat not the reason why you keep looking for attention, by quoting people and comments online. you create different profiles just for you to get attention.. go and solve ya frustrated life offline or go home and suck some brea**st from momma..
And If ya ma*ma don die because of pov**erty, go and commit sui***cide.... just stop constituting nuisances up and down
PHOOL ...

It's alright my brother.

Peace and Joy to your heart !

#One love

Majesty7:


Sorry if you feel offended but check the guy's response. Let's be fair in judgment. Thank you

senatordave1:


No one is more familiar with the electoral law than mour.you cannot assume physical copies were tampered without concrete proof except you don't know the meaning of blurred.there is a very big chance that a lot of the bvas cameras have issues or the adhoc were not diligent.we have seen several cases where pictures of adhoc staffs and even their person stuffs were uploaded.agsin,you have heard of widespread bvas malfunction.therefore,it is a big possibility.to be very sure you simply cross check.if your waec photocopy is blurred,won't you cross-check with your original? Will you draw conclusions?

It seems you do not even understand the meaning of certified true copy.

When you certify blurred document as a true copy of the original,what does that imply?

That the original too is blurred!!!

This is big indictment on the part of INEC.

GoodGovernance:


That is where substantial non compliance comes in.

I wonder why people are ignoring section 64(4) of the electoral act.

The failure to transmit results FROM the polling units in all over 700,000 polling units,contrary to provisions of 64(4),is enough evidence for substantial non compliance with the electoral total act.

Cancellation of the election, is more likely than than declaring Obi the winner.

Sir, Equity, Justice and Fairness are the pillars of the Law. Election can never be cancelled until you show me BVAS and iRev states in that law. If you have a legal background. You will understand my point

I will say no more on that..

Sheggy13:

The bolded will be used to rubbish whatever the LP cybersecurity expert brought forward because he misinformed the court that this ISO standard is in the NITDA Act but here is a NITDA IT staff on subpoena saying there's nothing like that in the NITDA Act.

He did not say there is no NITDA Act lol. Of course there is an act/law setting up NITdA and guiding it's activities.

senatordave1:


In the eyes of the law,he actually did nothing as irregularities in 12 units only affects the 12 and nowhere else.he failed to call witnesses from that units to corroborate his claims

He's not an election expert, he needs not doing that. He's a cyber security expert and not an election expert. If he do that he has rubbish his work.

LADEMINUS:



Sir, Equity, Justice and Fairness are the pillars of the Law. Election can never be cancelled until you show me BVAS and iRev states in that law. If you have a legal background. You will understand my point

I will say no more on that..

Have you read 64(4). Combined with 60?

I would be disappointed if you have a legal background.

Hope15:
Did anyone notice the respondents lawyers tried to use the testimony of the guy from NITDA to punch holes in the LP's Cybersecurity expert? Per ISO 27001/2 being in the NITDA Act, and the need to communicate with INEC. I don't know what they would make of those though.

LP cyber security expert has already been bursted by Fagbemi regarding NTIDA ACT ISO27001 2:2013. What he affirmed is different from what NTIDA lawyer confirmed.

GoodGovernance:


It seems you do not even understand the meaning of certified true copy.

When you certify blurred document as a true copy of the original,what does that imply?

That the original too is blurred!!!

This is big indictment on the part of INEC.

You still do not understand it.the certification came from the physical document.when you certify a document,the photocopy still carries that tag na...
In osun,inec gave apc certified true copy of server reports yet it was thrashed

Majesty7:


How is that response hot when he didn't even knew who won the election in the LGA he quoted.

Most of these guys will end up in jail. We are all here

Mr. Man, if he says he knows it, it has rubbish his work. All the witness have you seen anyone of them that have answered positively to who won in any particular instant. None. If you go out of your jurisdiction, it has rubbish everything you do. Expert witness is quite different from election expert.

Alhari:
He hasn't proven a point on the past election, you also need to go and read about past elections in Nigeria, no elected president has ever won Abuja during presidential election. Peter obi never won the election and didn't come close to winning it's high time you wake up from your slumber.

No presidential candidate who won, never had less than 25% in abuja

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NDnafhuCj8

LADEMINUS:



He did not say there is no NITDA Act lol. Of course there is an act/law setting up NITdA and guiding it's activities.

Read to comprehend. Is that too hard? If all you can bring out from what I wrote is to falsely infer I said there's no NITDA Act then I can't help you. Does saying there's no ISO standard in the NITDA Act means the same as saying there's no NITDA Act? Gosh.

senatordave1:


You still do not understand it.the certification came from the physical document.when you certify a document,the photocopy still carries that tag na...
In osun,inec gave apc certified true copy of server reports yet it was thrashed

Your ignorance is probably deliberate or you truly do not understand the legal implication of a CTC which is as valid as the original.

Once you've certified a copy of a document as a replica of the original,what else?
The court is no longer interested in the original because the CTC.is tenable in court,for God's sake!!!

The headache is that of INEC and not peter Obi or the court!

senatordave1:


Apc need not prove anything but inorder to bury obi,they will simply call presiding officers and collation officers that will attest to upload.
Secondly,they will provide hardcopies of 18000 unit results and also show that obi didn't have agents in most of them.
They will show that inec can have a glitch locally.
They will show that tinubu won in all result copies.
The nitda dg will reject the staff that came.aws will be called to reject their so called staff

I love your illusory tales by moonlight