benalvino3:


The classified token Harvard nigga says on point 2 that she had classified documents no attempt to keep them. On point 3 the fool says she never had classified documents.

Hahaha. You mean points 3 and 3? He can’t even get his numbering right 😂

When you have sold your soul to defend the matrix at all cost you are prone to frequent moments of confusion and contradictions like this.

benalvino3:


The classified token Harvard nigga says on point 2 that she had classified documents no attempt to keep them. On point 3 the fool says she never had classified documents.

It’s especially frustrating how they only act like defenders of the black race when it suits them. As soon as it comes time to defend their white overlords in the democrat party they act like the US justice system is always fair and there is never any double standard.

Many rappers have been sent to jail for the exact gun crime Hunter committed. Most black and less privileged people in America would have faced prison time for the exact same offense and they know it! These people are so dishonest it’s amazing.

benalvino3:


You are a classified mumu.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79txF6dUBwE

This is the stupidity of yours I am speaking of. You keep posting videos and links you don't understand. Comey was wrong here. Don't ask me ask Comey and the IG investigation which I gave you. He later clarified he was wrong. I gave you a link to the Department of Justice's own IG investigation conducted after Comey gave this interview. It is the definitive rehashing of what occurred. You choose to not read it and when you are wrong you and your slowpoke lying friend do what you do well. Fall back to your racist trolling. Tell me what your Bible would say about this racist troll you are and consorting with the loser that you do?

As I said better to not argue with people smarter than you. Your posts literally drop the IQ of this thread. Facts are not your friends. Bombast doesn't make you right nor smart.

-None of the emails contained clear classification markings as required under Executive Order 13526 and its predecessor. Only three email chains contained any classification markings of any kind. These email chains had one or two paragraphs that were marked “(C)” for “Confidential” but contained none of the other required markings, such as classification headers
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/4515893/Justice-Dept-IG-report-on-handling-of-Clinton.pdf

After all this time and misreporting in the media, once again we need a reminder that, in fact, the FBI found that not one of Hillary Clinton’s 33,000 emails they reviewed contained any recognizable classified information marking.   
https://thehill.com/opinion/3836347-davis-time-to-correct-the-record-again-hillary-clinton-did-not-have-a-single-email-marked-classified/

At a Congressional hearing Thursday morning, however, Comey admitted that the three emails to which he was referring were not, in fact, properly marked as classified, and that even a person with reasonable expertise in identifying classified material could make the “reasonable inference” that these emails were not classified:
https://www.mediaite.com/online/fbi-director-admits-hillary-clinton-emails-were-not-properly-marked-classified/

benalvino3:


The classified token Harvard nigga says on point 2 that she had classified documents no attempt to keep them. On point 3 the fool says she never had classified documents.

Yes, you can call me that Rich Ass Harvard Educated Nigga.
This is what I wrote "Clinton had no intent to keep/hide classified documents"
If I wrote, if I had no intent to kill you, does that mean I killed you? This shit isn't even college level inferences.
Maybe if you studied more, you too could be a Harvard Nigga instead of some dumbass who consistently gets owned and has to lie about being in the US to make yourself feel more important than you are.

IjeBos:


This is the stupidity of yours I am speaking of. You keep posting videos and links you don't understand. Comey was wrong here. Don't ask me ask Comey and the IG investigation which I gave you. He later clarified he was wrong. I gave you a link to the Department of Justice's own IG investigation conducted after Comey gave this interview. It is the definitive rehashing of what occurred. You choose to not read it and when you are wrong you and your slowpoke lying friend do what you do well. Fall back to your racist trolling. Tell me what your Bible would say about this racist troll you are and consorting with the loser that you do?

As I said better to not argue with people smarter than you. Your posts literally drop the IQ of this thread. Facts are not your friends. Bombast doesn't make you right nor smart.

-None of the emails contained clear classification markings as required under Executive Order 13526 and its predecessor. Only three email chains contained any classification markings of any kind. These email chains had one or two paragraphs that were marked “(C)” for “Confidential” but contained none of the other required markings, such as classification headers
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/4515893/Justice-Dept-IG-report-on-handling-of-Clinton.pdf

After all this time and misreporting in the media, once again we need a reminder that, in fact, the FBI found that not one of Hillary Clinton’s 33,000 emails they reviewed contained any recognizable classified information marking.   
https://thehill.com/opinion/3836347-davis-time-to-correct-the-record-again-hillary-clinton-did-not-have-a-single-email-marked-classified/

At a Congressional hearing Thursday morning, however, Comey admitted that the three emails to which he was referring were not, in fact, properly marked as classified, and that even a person with reasonable expertise in identifying classified material could make the “reasonable inference” that these emails were not classified:
https://www.mediaite.com/online/fbi-director-admits-hillary-clinton-emails-were-not-properly-marked-classified/

brainwashed zombie. Go waste the time of other people.

IjeBos:


Yes, you can call me that Rich Ass Harvard Educated Nigga.
This is what I wrote "Clinton had no intent to keep/hide classified documents"
If I wrote, if I had no intent to kill you, does that mean I killed you? This shit isn't even college level inferences.
Maybe if you studied more, you too could be a Harvard Nigga instead of some dumbass who consistently gets owned and has to lie about being in the US to make yourself feel more important than you are.

Mumu no one was investigated for intent... she was investigated for mishandling classified Documents. when you set up a server, Then transmit classified info and documents from it to unauthorized parties... that is mishandling of classified documents.

If i had the intention to kill you, does that mean i killed you? you see how stupid you are?

benalvino3:


Mumu no one was investigated for intent... she was investigated for mishandling classified Documents. when you set up a server, Then transmit classified info and documents from it to unauthorized parties... that is mishandling of classified documents.

[/b]If i had the intention to kill you, does that mean i killed you? you see how stupid you are? [b]

😂😂😂😂 Yup, that definitely sounds like the talk of a Harvard graduate elitist to me lol!

Sometimes I wonder why you even bother.

Wesley Snipes was also jailed for same tax offense as Hunter Biden. (Same one that one clown here said no one is ever prosecuted for)

Democrat party ass kissers here won’t complain about two-tier justice system now so they can protect their god Biden. It’s only when it’s time to fight Benalvino3 on nairaland that they become defenders of the black race LOL.

Hypocrites.

Meanwhile more whistleblowers from the IRS came forward yesterday to accuse the Biden DOJ of interfering in their investigation of Hunter Biden.

No wonder they have been distracting us with dumb submarine story when we all knew the people had died since as has just been confirmed by the US NAVY.

I really don’t see how Biden doesn’t get impeached before the end of his term now.

So proud of the few brave rank and file members of the IRS, FBI and other agencies who are putting their lives at risk to finally come out and expose the corruption of the Biden administration. It must have gotten too much for even they to bear.

The rubber room nutjob is also a stalker.

basilico:


Is a pity. Total blockheads.

benalvino3:


The classified token Harvard nigga says on point 2 that she had classified documents no attempt to keep them. On point 3 the fool says she never had classified documents.

He also says that James Comey did not have powers to indict .
He forgot that the AG Loretta Lynch had been spotted on the runway with Bill Clinton (discussing about their grandchildren?) , only for Hillary to be let go by James Comey a week later

Slyfoxx911:
Meanwhile more whistleblowers from the IRS came forward yesterday to accuse the Biden DOJ of interfering in their investigation of Hunter Biden.

No wonder they have been distracting us with dumb submarine story when we all knew the people had died since as has just been confirmed by the US NAVY.

I really don’t see how Biden doesn’t get impeached before the end of his term now.

Deflections by law enforcement. They knew the submersible had imploded ?

benalvino3:


Mumu no one was investigated for intent... she was investigated for mishandling classified Documents. when you set up a server, Then transmit classified info and documents from it to unauthorized parties... that is mishandling of classified documents.

If i had the intention to kill you, does that mean i killed you? you see how stupid you are?

Holy Shit. Did you just write that?

This is 18 U.S.C. §§ 793(d) which she was investigated for

Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or

You see that bolded willfully in that statute. That is intent. Not accidentally, but willfully or with intent. Mens Rea.
Holy Shit. How do you tell someone you have 0 idea about US law with out saying it? The statement you wrote above. Do you even understand what an element of a crime is?

Holy Shit. You spend your life on this forum talking about Hilary Clinton yet have 0 clue what she was investigated for.
No wonder why you don't understand why there is no double standard (beyond not understanding the meaning of the word) between Hillary and Trump.
Besides the fact that Hilary didn't have classified documents, there was no intent (there was no willfulness). That is the reason Pence and Biden(most likely) won't be prosecuted for having top secret documents. It's because once trump knew he had them and then didn't return them, he had an "intent" to keep them. His actions became willful. And intent is what this crime hinges on, in fact what a lot of US law hinges on.

But back to the elements of a crime and your example you seem not to understand.
A crime can have multiple elements(I'll use 2 for an example). Such that { "Element 1" AND "Element 2" = "The Crime"} (That AND is a logical AND for your feeble mind). So if "Element 1 = Have top secret documents" and "Element 2 = Willfulness (Intent)". If either of those conditions aren't met there is no crime. So when someone says, "She had no intent to steal classified items", it's legal speak, which means Element 2 is false and so there is no Crime. In this case we also know she didn't have classified documents either. So Element 1 would be false as well and there would be no crime even if she did have an "intent to retain classified items" which she didn't. That is how US law works. Why prosecutors are so careful what they bring to trial because in trial they have to prove each element which the Judge will instruct the jury on.

Holy shit though. I assume people are as capable of processing information as I am. You're not. For whatever reason you seem to have an inability to process these basic concepts. And on top of that you're intellectual uncurious and intellectual dishonest.

But, you keep posting shit in this forum you have 0 idea about. Anybody reading what you post will come out dumber for it. You are literally the Fox News of this thread. What makes it worse is that someone liked this LITERAL nonsense you posted.

IjeBos:


Holy Shit. Did you just write that?

This is 18 U.S.C. §§ 793(d) which she was investigated for



You see that bolded willfully in that statute. That is intent. Not accidentally, but willfully or with intent. Mens Rea.
Holy Shit. How do you tell someone you have 0 idea about US law with out saying it? The statement you wrote above. Do you even understand what an element of a crime is?

Holy Shit. You spend your life on this forum talking about Hilary Clinton yet have 0 clue what she was investigated for.
No wonder why you don't understand why there is no double standard (beyond not understanding the meaning of the word) between Hillary and Trump.
Besides the fact that Hilary didn't have classified documents, there was no intent (there was no willfulness). That is the reason Pence and Biden(most likely) won't be prosecuted for having top secret documents. It's because once trump knew he had them and then didn't return them, he had an "intent" to keep them. His actions became willful. And intent is what this crime hinges on, in fact what a lot of US law hinges on.

But back to the elements of a crime and your example you seem not to understand.
A crime can have multiple elements(I'll use 2 for an example). Such that { "Element 1" AND "Element 2" = "The Crime"} (That AND is a logical AND for your feeble mind). So if "Element 1 = Have top secret documents" and "Element 2 = Willfulness (Intent)". If either of those conditions aren't met there is no crime. So when someone says, "She had no intent to steal classified items", it's legal speak, which means Element 2 is false and so there is no Crime. In this case we also know she didn't have classified documents either. So Element 1 would be false as well and there would be no crime even if she did have an "intent to retain classified items" which she didn't. That is how US law works. Why prosecutors are so careful what they bring to trial because in trial they have to prove each element which the Judge will instruct the jury on.

Holy shit though. I assume people are as capable of processing information as I am. You're not. For whatever reason you seem to have an inability to process these basic concepts. And on top of that you're intellectual uncurious and intellectual dishonest.

But, you keep posting shit in this forum you have 0 idea about. Anybody reading what you post will come out dumber for it. You are literally the Fox News of this thread. What makes it worse is that someone liked this LITERAL nonsense you posted.

Stop being verbose. she would ask her aide to send nonsecure. ie remove the classified markings and send them to her bathroom server.
Then her maid would print them out

IjeBos:


Holy Shit. Did you just write that?

This is 18 U.S.C. §§ 793(d) which she was investigated for



You see that bolded willfully in that statute. That is intent. Not accidentally, but willfully or with intent. Mens Rea.
Holy Shit. How do you tell someone you have 0 idea about US law with out saying it? The statement you wrote above. Do you even understand what an element of a crime is?

Holy Shit. You spend your life on this forum talking about Hilary Clinton yet have 0 clue what she was investigated for.
No wonder why you don't understand why there is no double standard (beyond not understanding the meaning of the word) between Hillary and Trump.
Besides the fact that Hilary didn't have classified documents, there was no intent (there was no willfulness). That is the reason Pence and Biden(most likely) won't be prosecuted for having top secret documents. It's because once trump knew he had them and then didn't return them, he had an "intent" to keep them. His actions became willful. And intent is what this crime hinges on, in fact what a lot of US law hinges on.

But back to the elements of a crime and your example you seem not to understand.
A crime can have multiple elements(I'll use 2 for an example). Such that { "Element 1" AND "Element 2" = "The Crime"} (That AND is a logical AND for your feeble mind). So if "Element 1 = Have top secret documents" and "Element 2 = Willfulness (Intent)". If either of those conditions aren't met there is no crime. So when someone says, "She had no intent to steal classified items", it's legal speak, which means Element 2 is false and so there is no Crime. In this case we also know she didn't have classified documents either. So Element 1 would be false as well and there would be no crime even if she did have an "intent to retain classified items" which she didn't. That is how US law works. Why prosecutors are so careful what they bring to trial because in trial they have to prove each element which the Judge will instruct the jury on.

Holy shit though. I assume people are as capable of processing information as I am. You're not. For whatever reason you seem to have an inability to process these basic concepts. And on top of that you're intellectual uncurious and intellectual dishonest.

But, you keep posting shit in this forum you have 0 idea about. Anybody reading what you post will come out dumber for it. You are literally the Fox News of this thread. What makes it worse is that someone liked this LITERAL nonsense you posted.

Still on your verbal diarrhea.
Huma Abedin , Clinton right hand aide. Her husband was caught and jailed for sexting with minors. His laptop was confiscated by New York police and in it there were tens of thousands of emails from. Hilary to Huma Abedin
Wlhat happened to the Weiner laptop, FBI buried it Rumour had it it could have had CP

What happened to Hunter Biden laptop. FBI buried it

What was happening on Epstein island. FBi sat on it.
How is that Epstein and Ghislaine were trafficking children, but their clients have never been charged?

The brain rot, my god.

Everything I don't like is woke.

IjeBos:


Justice Ministry? Secret Police? Gotcha. You don't live in the US, have little understanding of the US and thus have 0 idea what you are talking about. Good to know. Continue on.

Sorry, maybe I wanted to say Ministry of Woke Justice, or Selective Justice and Regime Police.
But I don't know the country you're living in and if my comment applies to it, please.
Emperor's accusers and whistleblowers are going on exile for fear for their lives, like in NK.

basilico:


He also says that James Comey did not have powers to indict .
He forgot that the AG Loretta Lynch had been spotted on the runway with Bill Clinton (discussing about their grandchildren?) , only for Hillary to be let go by James Comey a week later

He is a brainwashed tool.

IjeBos:


Holy Shit. Did you just write that?

This is 18 U.S.C. §§ 793(d) which she was investigated for



You see that bolded willfully in that statute. That is intent. Not accidentally, but willfully or with intent. Mens Rea.
Holy Shit. How do you tell someone you have 0 idea about US law with out saying it? The statement you wrote above. Do you even understand what an element of a crime is?

Holy Shit. You spend your life on this forum talking about Hilary Clinton yet have 0 clue what she was investigated for.
No wonder why you don't understand why there is no double standard (beyond not understanding the meaning of the word) between Hillary and Trump.
Besides the fact that Hilary didn't have classified documents, there was no intent (there was no willfulness). That is the reason Pence and Biden(most likely) won't be prosecuted for having top secret documents. It's because once trump knew he had them and then didn't return them, he had an "intent" to keep them. His actions became willful. And intent is what this crime hinges on, in fact what a lot of US law hinges on.

But back to the elements of a crime and your example you seem not to understand.
A crime can have multiple elements(I'll use 2 for an example). Such that { "Element 1" AND "Element 2" = "The Crime"} (That AND is a logical AND for your feeble mind). So if "Element 1 = Have top secret documents" and "Element 2 = Willfulness (Intent)". If either of those conditions aren't met there is no crime. So when someone says, "She had no intent to steal classified items", it's legal speak, which means Element 2 is false and so there is no Crime. In this case we also know she didn't have classified documents either. So Element 1 would be false as well and there would be no crime even if she did have an "intent to retain classified items" which she didn't. That is how US law works. Why prosecutors are so careful what they bring to trial because in trial they have to prove each element which the Judge will instruct the jury on.

Holy shit though. I assume people are as capable of processing information as I am. You're not. For whatever reason you seem to have an inability to process these basic concepts. And on top of that you're intellectual uncurious and intellectual dishonest.

But, you keep posting shit in this forum you have 0 idea about. Anybody reading what you post will come out dumber for it. You are literally the Fox News of this thread. What makes it worse is that someone liked this LITERAL nonsense you posted.

You are the biggest fool here. Because willfully is there it means she was investigated for intent but not transmitting and abusing classified documents. How stupid are you?

You have to have the documents, transmit them, abuse them etc... Before they can see if you intended to abuse them, collect them, transmit them.

You are so dumb.

basilico:


Deflections by law enforcement. They knew the submersible had imploded ?

Yes they knew on the very 1st day. They picked up the sound of the implosion on their system but they had to keep the story in the front pages for a few more days because Biden needed cover from another whistleblower story.

Evil people!

Slyfoxx911:


Yes they knew on the very 1st day. They picked up the sound of the implosion on their system but they had to keep the story in the front pages for a few more days because Biden needed cover from another whistleblower story.

Evil people!

Well put. Evil people taking down an empire. I would also assume they are covering up the 5m dollar bribe paid to Joe Biden by Burisma.
Except something major esp concerning Trump to be on the news when anything unsavoury about JB is about to drop. Look at this sordid Hunter Biden story.

https://nationalfile.com/hunter-biden-identified-himself-as-heteroflexible-on-fetish-hook-up-site/

basilico:


Well put. Evil people taking down an empire. I would also assume they are covering up the 5m dollar bribe paid to Joe Biden by Burisma.
Except something major esp concerning Trump to be on the news when anything unsavoury about JB is about to drop. Look at this sordid Hunter Biden story.

https://nationalfile.com/hunter-biden-identified-himself-as-heteroflexible-on-fetish-hook-up-site/

Yup. That’s exactly what they are doing. Same day the burisma bribe story broke was the same day they indicted Trump. That’s the whole job of that thug faced special counsel Jack smith.

Expect more “breaking” Trump news each time more damning evidence of Biden’s corruption is revealed. That is the distraction tactic they’ve been using for a while.

For those who think thug face jack smith is certain to put Trump in jail you obviously know nothing about the man’s history. He has a record of prosecuting high profile politicians before elections and losing in court. Most notable was the John Edwards case but there are many more.

He was the right man for the job because the whole idea is to “dirty up” Trump ahead of the election not to put him in jail. They know they will lose in court. That’s why Trump isn’t even worried.

MUST WATCH!

See how this guy masterfully destroys the Biden DOJ’s case against Trump in 30 mins. Imagine how much more Trumps expensive lawyers will do. Lol.

The Biden DOJ stand no chance in this case. It also doesn’t help them that the jury will be from Florida and the presiding judge is not a liberal lunatic.

Cc: Basilico, benalvino3



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYXbw9GWsSI&pp=ygUXV29sdmVzIGFuZCBmaWFuY2UgdHJ1bXA%3D

Hunter Biden sordid character
He threatens a Chinese director to send him money , Claims he was seated next to his dad when sending this message.
On his laptop He was actually at Delaware with his folks by the time he was sending this.
.
In the WhatsApp message, Hunter Biden continued: "Tell the director that I would like to resolve this now before it gets out of hand, and now means tonight. And, Z, if I get a call or text from anyone involved in this other than you, Zhang, or the chairman, I will make certain that between the man sitting next to me and every person he knows and my ability to forever hold a grudge that you will regret not following my direction. All too often people mistake kindness for weakness—and all too often I am standing over top of them saying I warned you. From this moment until whenever he reaches me."

"I am sitting here waiting for the call with my father. I sure hope whatever it is you are doing is very very important," Hunter Biden said in a subsequent message, adding that it was 9:45 a.m. when he sent the messag


More on Hunter. He was paying prostitutes plus a sex club Then deducting it from his tax returns.

basilico:
Hunter Biden sordid character
He threatens a Chinese director to send him money , Claims he was seated next to his dad when sending this message.
On his laptop He was actually at Delaware with his folks by the time he was sending this.
.
In the WhatsApp message, Hunter Biden continued: "Tell the director that I would like to resolve this now before it gets out of hand, and now means tonight. And, Z, if I get a call or text from anyone involved in this other than you, Zhang, or the chairman, I will make certain that between the man sitting next to me and every person he knows and my ability to forever hold a grudge that you will regret not following my direction. All too often people mistake kindness for weakness—and all too often I am standing over top of them saying I warned you. From this moment until whenever he reaches me."

"I am sitting here waiting for the call with my father. I sure hope whatever it is you are doing is very very important," Hunter Biden said in a subsequent message, adding that it was 9:45 a.m. when he sent the messag


More on Hunter. He was paying prostitutes plus a sex club Then deducting it from his tax returns.

Gosh! Is there a more disgusting presidential child than Hunter Biden in US history?

Don’t mind the fools here who keep asking why we focus on Hunter. It says a lot about Joe Biden that he raised this utter garbage human being of a son. The apple NEVER falls far away from the tree.

benalvino3:


You are the biggest fool here. Because willfully is there it means she was investigated for intent but not transmitting and abusing classified documents. How stupid are you?

You have to have the documents, transmit them, abuse them etc... Before they can see if you intended to abuse them, collect them, transmit them.

You are so dumb.

Holy shit. You might as well just wrote GOOBLYGOOK over and over and over. It would have made more sense than what you wrote.
I really wonder what someone like you with such a low ability to process information could possible do for a living.

I'm going to place this warning label on any post you post about Hilary Clinton from now.

Warning: Reading Benvalino3's post above may cause, sudden confusion, headaches, dizziness, loss of brain cells, and a drop in IQ. The information in this post is just as informative as asking a crack head when he is high what he thinks about astrophysics. If you are interested in what happened in the Hilary Case and Comey's involvement read the DOJ IG's (the independent Inspector General) office report of their investigation into the Hilary investigation and Comey's actions (press conferences and Congressional testimony). It was started and finished during the Trump Presidency. The investigation found Clinton had no classified documents in her emails, Comey's conduct (commenting on Hilary Clinton) was inappropriate but his conclusion on not charging Clinton was correct as she not only didn't have classified documents but had no intent to take them. The Executive Summary of the report is a good read and should be sufficient.

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/4515893/Justice-Dept-IG-report-on-handling-of-Clinton.pdf

IjeBos:



Holy shit. You might as well just wrote GOOBLYGOOK over and over and over. It would have made more sense than what you wrote.
I really wonder what someone like you with such a low ability to process information could possible do for a living.

I'm going to place this warning label on any post you post about Hilary Clinton from now.

Warning: Reading Benvalino3's post above may cause, sudden confusion, headaches, dizziness, loss of brain cells, and a drop in IQ. The information in this post is just as informative as asking a crack head when he is high what he thinks about astrophysics. If you are interested in what happened in the Hilary Case and Comey's involvement read the DOJ IG's (the independent Inspector General) office report of their investigation into the Hilary investigation and Comey's actions (press conferences and Congressional testimony). It was started and finished during the Trump Presidency. The investigation found Clinton had no classified documents in her emails, Comey's conduct (commenting on Hilary Clinton) was inappropriate but his conclusion on not charging Clinton was correct as she not only didn't have classified documents but had no intent to take them. The Executive Summary of the report is a good read and should be sufficient.

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/4515893/Justice-Dept-IG-report-on-handling-of-Clinton.pdf

Mumu,

Hillary mishandled Classified Documents, Put it and her private server and transmit it. She was investigated for that and was found that she had classified data in the server and transmitted them.

You are the one who lied she never had classified documents in her Server.... james just woke up one morning and decided to investigate someone if she has intent.

intent to take something she never took according to you.

You too mumu. you cannot even make a reasonable argument here. you are contradicting yourself.

James himself

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4uRQLwCNZY

he was not talking about investigating intent here.

benalvino3:


Mumu,

Hillary mishandled Classified Documents, Put it and her private server and transmit it. She was investigated for that and was found that she had classified data in the server and transmitted them.

You are the one who lied she never had classified documents in her Server.... james just woke up one morning and decided to investigate someone if she has intent.

intent to take something she never took according to you.

You too mumu. you cannot even make a reasonable argument here. you are contradicting yourself.

James himself

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4uRQLwCNZY

he was not talking about investigating intent here.

Warning : Reading Benvalino3's post above may cause, sudden confusion, headaches, dizziness, loss of brain cells, and a drop in IQ. The information in this post is just as informative as asking a crack head when he is high what he thinks about astrophysics. If you are interested in what happened in the Hilary Case and Comey's involvement read the DOJ IG's (the independent Inspector General) office report of their investigation into the Hilary investigation and Comey's actions (press conferences and Congressional testimony). It was started and finished during the Trump Presidency. The investigation found Clinton had no classified documents in her emails (Comey's comments and testimony were wrong), Comey's conduct (commenting on Hilary Clinton) was inappropriate but his conclusion on not charging Clinton was correct as she not only didn't have classified documents but had no intent to take them. The Executive Summary of the report is a good read and should be sufficient.

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/4515893/Justice-Dept-IG-report-on-handling-of-Clinton.pdf

IjeBos:



Holy shit. You might as well just wrote GOOBLYGOOK over and over and over. It would have made more sense than what you wrote.
I really wonder what someone like you with such a low ability to process information could possible do for a living.

I'm going to place this warning label on any post you post about Hilary Clinton from now.

Warning: Reading Benvalino3's post above may cause, sudden confusion, headaches, dizziness, loss of brain cells, and a drop in IQ. The information in this post is just as informative as asking a crack head when he is high what he thinks about astrophysics. If you are interested in what happened in the Hilary Case and Comey's involvement read the DOJ IG's (the independent Inspector General) office report of their investigation into the Hilary investigation and Comey's actions (press conferences and Congressional testimony). It was started and finished during the Trump Presidency. The investigation found Clinton had no classified documents in her emails, Comey's conduct (commenting on Hilary Clinton) was inappropriate but his conclusion on not charging Clinton was correct as she not only didn't have classified documents but had no intent to take them. The Executive Summary of the report is a good read and should be sufficient.

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/4515893/Justice-Dept-IG-report-on-handling-of-Clinton.pdf

Part of Comeys statement.Note these were the ones she returned.
She deleted another 30k emails claiming it was yoga and her daughter's wedding ( Ghislaine Maxwell was a guest).
Not forgetting after being subpoenad, she deleted and crushed her mobile devices with hammers

From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent.

She Claimed that she did not know that the C in the emails meant classified.

basilico:


Part of Comeys statement.Note these were the ones she returned.
She deleted another 30k emails claiming it was toga and her daughter's wedding ( Ghislaine Maxwell was a guest).
Not forgetting after being subpoenad, she deleted and crushed her mobile devices with hammers

From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent.

Dumbass for the last time, Comey was wrong. Comey admitted he was wrong. The IG investigation into the investigation found he was wrong.
Here is the timeline:
A- Comey makes comments saying Clinton had 3 classified documents
B- Comey corrects his statement saying though the emails had "c" in them they didn't have classified headers. So noone would have known they were classified.
C- The IG investigation further said that "c" meant confidential not classified. And further went on to say Clinton had no classified documents. The IG investigation is the definitive account of what happened.

Just like the alphabet what happened in C came after what happened in B and C. But for some reason you and your ilk keep repeating A as if time stood still after that.