₦airaland Forum

I'm a computer programmer, and the thing you all should know about the nature of databases is the fact that they can be modified by JAMB officials (even without trace).

JAMB is know to upgrade/downgrade results generally, and many here can testify to that.

What's happening right now IMO is that jamb may have Bleeped up, and trying to save face hence they'll go any length. The tech guys running jamb softwares misbehave a lot, and it might have been a mistake from jamb, but they just want to potray themselves as that perfect institution that cannot go wrong.

The solution: CCTV, and remarking.
Most of the CCTV cameras installed in jamb centers are very sharp ones placed in every corner, and if the girl wrote her exam in one of those centers with CCTV (which I think is a requirement for the center To be accredited), then they should access one that had feeds of her screen, and remark the results from what the see her ticking from the video kind-of in a live manner.

Why? Because at this point, if jamb was wrong, they've gone balls-deep enough to erase every trace of their error (speaking about the technical team trying to save their jobs and what not). This way even the DSS cannot save the day.

I work with databases everyday, and I most definitely can alter stuff that will be literally untraceable. Untraceable modifications are kind of the defacto with these stuff.

Tl;dr
Let the panel investigating her case access her live feeds as she wrote the exam. No one should fall for the "DSS will investigate the Case" that jamb is shouting all around.

Thanks.
Nlfpmod, I am a computer programmer with almost 10years experience coding, and this is my openion. This matter cannot be "investigated" without feed from CCTV camera.

You do not need CCTV. She should just tell us where and who printed the result.

logicalhumour:
I'm a computer programmer, and the thing you all should know about the nature of databases is the fact that they can be modified by JAMB officials (even without trace).

JAMB is know to upgrade/downgrade results generally, and many here can testify to that.

What's happening right now IMO is that jamb may have Bleeped up, and trying to save face hence they'll go any length. The tech guys running jamb softwares misbehave a lot, and it might have been a mistake from jamb, but they just want to potray themselves as that perfect institution that cannot go wrong.

The solution: CCTV, and remarking.
Most of the CCTV cameras installed in jamb centers are very sharp ones placed in every corner, and if the girl wrote her exam in one of those centers with CCTV (which I think is a requirement for the center To be accredited), then they should access one that had feeds of her screen, and remark the results from what the see her ticking from the video kind-of in a live manner.

Why? Because at this point, if jamb was wrong, they've gone balls-deep enough to erase every trace of their error (speaking about the technical team trying to save their jobs and what not). This way even the DSS cannot save the day.

I work with databases everyday, and I most definitely can alter stuff that will be literally untraceable. Untraceable modifications are kind of the defacto with these stuff.

Tl;dr
Let the panel investigating her case access her live feeds as she wrote the exam. No one should fall for the "DSS will investigate the Case" that jamb is shouting all around.

Thanks.
Nlfpmod, I am a computer programmer with almost 10years experience coding, and this is my openion. This matter cannot be "investigated" without feed from CCTV camera.

I have 13+ years experience writing database codes and creating all sorts of database modifications.
.
.
If jamb cannot provide a log of all database entries and editing for the past few months and weeks, then that alone is enough to indict them. Trust me, unless those logs are completely wiped, there will always be a trace.