Subsidy Didn't Have To Go If We Had Strong Institutions. - Politics (3) - Nairaland
Nairaland Forum › Nairaland General › Politics › Subsidy Didn't Have To Go If We Had Strong Institutions. (1948 Views)
| Re: Subsidy Didn't Have To Go If We Had Strong Institutions. by nairalanda1(m): 8:23am On Jul 19, 2023 |
Workch:Fight for your subsidy then. |
| Re: Subsidy Didn't Have To Go If We Had Strong Institutions. by Workch(op): 8:24am On Jul 19, 2023 |
nairalanda1:lol |
| Re: Subsidy Didn't Have To Go If We Had Strong Institutions. by Iolo(m): 8:40am On Jul 19, 2023 |
The laws of demand and supply will always outweigh any forms of policing, regulation against it. Nigeria lacks strong institutions to prevent the outright theft and smuggling of petroleum products to neighbouring countries in a subsidy regime. However, I’m not convinced any country is capable of preventing such even the developed world. As an example, the US citizens are the largest consumers of illicit drugs (demand) and the U.S. has neighbouring countries like Mexico, Columbia etc. producing these illicit drugs (supply). With all the funding and resources poured into the drug war they still have been unable to stop the flow of drugs in the US entirely. You catch one drug lord and another takes his place. They built walls in the US border and the smugglers built tunnels below it. They even started to build low tech submarines to bypass US coastal forces. Simply because there is too much money to be made by meeting the demands of the market. I believe it’s the same scenario with Nigeria. The arbitrage opportunities in a scenario where you have a 50% price difference between the price of petrol in Nigeria vs neighbouring countries makes a strong business case for smugglers. Even if you put up a walled fence around our borders, people will find ways around it. The only solution is to remove the arbitrage opportunity and then invest aggressively in palliative measures to douce the blow on the population. Others have also made valid points around subsidies dissuading innovation and investments from the private sector. As far as I know, the few private refineries we have that are working in Nigeria have shied away from producing petrol because it’ll be a loss making venture for them (I.e. you don’t want to build a multi million or billion dollar business hoping the governments refunds you the difference between your cost price and market price. It’s just too much risk for any private investor to embark on. |
| Re: Subsidy Didn't Have To Go If We Had Strong Institutions. by wegevv: 8:40am On Jul 19, 2023 |
nairalanda1:Could not agree more. Removing subsidy will likely help solve our refining problem as the private sector is now incentivised. It should have been done a very long time ago. There’s clearly an ideological divide here. You’re a pro free markets capitalist. The country needs more people like you. I hope PBAT holds firm and doesn’t change course |
| Re: Subsidy Didn't Have To Go If We Had Strong Institutions. by gawu1: 9:06am On Jul 19, 2023 |
Hedonisco:Frankly speaking, these are the truths we are all dodging away from. |
| Re: Subsidy Didn't Have To Go If We Had Strong Institutions. by nairalanda1(m): 11:32am On Jul 19, 2023 |
Hedonisco: gawu1:1.No one is saying that supporting removal of subsidy means you don't want audits to be done. 2. As Libya, Angola, Venezuela, Iran and Saudi have successfuly tackled smuggling...no wait' they haven't. Subsidy is a great lubricator of smuggling. 3.Refineries can work when there is a profit motive, or ability to make profits which can only happen when there is no subsidy 4. In other words, you want the folks who drill for crude to supply crude at 'cheap prices' That works till they start losing money, then they stop drilling for crude, then jobs get lost, and wahala starts. Money has to be made for a host of things...including paying a decent wage to workers, and buying or leasing drilling equipment. 5. In other words, price controls...has been tried elsewhere. It caused more problems. No one is going to sell at a loss. |
| Re: Subsidy Didn't Have To Go If We Had Strong Institutions. by Workch(op): 12:14pm On Jul 19, 2023 |
nairalanda1:So why are they not doing it properly? We won't be in this situation if they have been doing that. 2. As Libya, Angola, Venezuela, Iran and Saudi have successfuly tackled smuggling...no wait' they haven't.there's no single country in the world that doesn't face smuggling but Nigerias borders are bigger than the vagina of a prostitute. Smuggling is almost free for all and customs is corrupt and deliberately won't stop it. The citizens should not be meant to suffer for Thr inefficiencies of customs who are relatively properly funded. Subsidy is a great lubricator of smuggling.is that not why we are funding customs. Should we disband them? Why pay them taxpayers money if they cannot do their primary duties? 3.Refineries can work when there is a profit motive, or ability to make profits which can only happen when there is no subsidythe cost of running a refinery is much lower than the cost of not running it. Do you know that we already run at lost from Importing fuel. Very silly thing we have been doing for years because of the ineptness of government. 4. In other words, you want the folks who drill for crude to supply crude at 'cheap prices' That works till they start losing money, then they stop drilling for crude, then jobs get lost, and wahala starts.the folks are not drilling oil for cheap price. You don't know how this thing works. Stop talking. Oil companies drills at normal price for government. Government takes the crude to it refineries and then sells to citizens at a subsidized rate. By doing this, the cost exporting the crude and importing the constituents back into this country will be saved. Government, the people and oil companies are all winners in this because our refineries made the product, our government can dictate price outside of external forces. What external market rate will only affect is the crude which we are selling to other countries. Think, it's no rocket science. Money has to be made for a host of things...including paying a decent wage to workers, and buying or leasing drilling equipment.Dude, you have brains draining. Students who studied petrochemistry in Nigeria don't have jobs. This will create massive employment too. You are not making any sense here 5. In other words, price controls...has been tried elsewhere. It caused more problems. No one is going to sell at a loss.price control is working in UAE and Saudi very well. It's not causing a y problem. Where did you get your from from? |
| Re: Subsidy Didn't Have To Go If We Had Strong Institutions. by FoolishBoy419: 12:31pm On Jul 19, 2023 |
nairalanda1:I am with you on the subsidy removal issue but I don't think NHIS gives drugs at a discounted price. They are denying a lot of people access to the drugs even though many workers are forced to pay them monthly. |
| Re: Subsidy Didn't Have To Go If We Had Strong Institutions. by nairalanda1(m): 12:31pm On Jul 19, 2023 |
Workch:Work within the system.. there's no single country in the world that doesn't face smuggling but Nigerias borders are bigger than the vagina of a prostitute. Smuggling is almost free for all and customs is corrupt and deliberately won't stop it. The citizens should not be meant to suffer for Thr inefficiencies of customs who are relatively properly funded.I dare say that Venezuela (which loses 18 billion dollars through smuggling yearly) and Libya (which is now using airstrikes to attack smugglers) and even Angola (big issues on its borders) would love to agree with you. is that not why we are funding customs. Should we disband them? Why pay them taxpayers money if they cannot do their primary duties?Yeah, and when there are opportunites for arbitage... the cost of running a refinery is much lower than the cost of not running it. Do you know that we already run at lost from Importing fuel. Very silly thing we have been doing for years because of the ineptness of government.So remove subsidy, and let it run at a price the folks are not drilling oil for cheap price. You don't know how this thing works. Stop talking.Erm, was telling him that they cannot sell crude oil at cheap prices because it would mean they lose money You sure you understood what was being discussed? Oil companies drills at normal price for government. Government takes the crude to it refineries and then sells to citizens at a subsidized rate. By doing this, the cost exporting the crude and importing the constituents back into this country will be saved. Government, the people and oil companies are all winners in this because our refineries made the product, our government can dictate price outside of external forces. What external market rate will only affect is the crude which we are selling to other countries.And then the government sustains a large deficit doing so, because crude oil prices rise and rise and rise. Therein is the problem Dude, you have brains draining. Students who studied petrochemistry in Nigeria don't have jobs. This will create massive employment too. You are not making any sense hereThis is a nairaland convo. Calm down. price control is working in UAE and Saudi very well. It's not causing a y problem. Where did you get your from from?[/quote]Yes because Saudi 10million barrels a day of crude, 40 MILLION people UAE : 2.5-8 million barrels of crude, 14 MILLION people Nigeria meanwhile...1.5 million barrels of crude, 220 million We can't afford it. See the issue. |
| Re: Subsidy Didn't Have To Go If We Had Strong Institutions. by nairalanda1(m): 12:32pm On Jul 19, 2023 |
FoolishBoy419:They also don't pay some hospitals their due.... Still, better than nothing. |
| Re: Subsidy Didn't Have To Go If We Had Strong Institutions. by ChybuzzDD(m): 1:30pm On Jul 19, 2023 |
Workch:That is just an an a.ss-hole. I always wonder how much they paid him to be throwing those puerile, purulent, and annoying defence lines where ever petrol subsidy is mentioned in this forum. |
| Re: Subsidy Didn't Have To Go If We Had Strong Institutions. by nairalanda1(m): 2:26pm On Jul 19, 2023 |
ChybuzzDD: ![]() |
| Re: Subsidy Didn't Have To Go If We Had Strong Institutions. by nairalanda1(m): 2:26pm On Jul 19, 2023 |
ChybuzzDD:Well, they do pay me in tons of lithium.... |
| Re: Subsidy Didn't Have To Go If We Had Strong Institutions. by orisa37: 2:42pm On Jul 19, 2023 |
SUBSIDIES IS GONE FOREVER. NOW BRING THE FOLLOWING PRICES DOWN. N100 : $1 PETROL N250 PER LITRE GAS NIOO PER KG ELECTRICITY N35 PER UNIT LET LEVENTIS, CHELLARAM, KINGSWAY, BOJOTSIN ETCETERA ETCETERA COME IN. I WAS GOING TO NAIL IBORI FOR $32MILLION WHEN HE GAVE RIBADU $15 MILLION, TINUBU SHOULD COLLECT BOTH THE FIFTEEN AND THE SEVENTEEN MILLION DOLLARS FROM RIBADU AND IBORI BUT NOT PROSECUTE THEM. |
| Re: Subsidy Didn't Have To Go If We Had Strong Institutions. by Workch(op): 4:29pm On Jul 19, 2023 |
nairalanda1:I have a feeling that you are helinues |
| Re: Subsidy Didn't Have To Go If We Had Strong Institutions. by nairalanda1(m): 5:31pm On Jul 19, 2023 |
Workch:I have a feeling that you must be King Charles III. |
| Re: Subsidy Didn't Have To Go If We Had Strong Institutions. by nairalanda1(m): 5:34pm On Jul 19, 2023 |
Workch:For the record, here is some banter I had with that APC supporter Just to show you how far away I am from him, he thought I was an Obidient...lol. People like Helinues would oppose fuel subsidy removal if Obi or Atiku did it. As for me, I woke up in 2012. I am not going back to sleep. Ojota crew can go and sit down. |
Ethical Leadership, Strong Institutions Key To Peace Tinubu Tells Global Leader • [PHOTOS NEWS] Gambari To Paschal Mbawuike Led Delegation: Strong Institutions Ke • 2023: We Need A Strong Leader To Fight Corruption & Build Strong Institutions • 2 • 3 • 4
Niger Coup: It Will Be War – Burkina Faso, Mali Join Forces With Niger. • US Professor Narrates How Igbos Saved Him From Police On His Return To Lagos • .