₦airaland Forum

triplechoice:
Just imagine the talk

The prefix -dis before belief means ,not ,a negation ,

So, the word ,disbelief it's the same with the phrase lack of belief.

Leave Reed . He wants to confuse you because he is stuck .

He is the same person in the other thread who wanted to mock with

The half statement ,

"I don't believe '

With the full one ,


'I neither believe nor disbelieve '

He wanted to play some mental abracadabra ,but he failed woefully

Dude. Are you OK? Have actually looked at the meaning of disbelief or are just going off half cocked as usual.

LordReed:
Which Oxford Dictionary did you check?

LordReed, at the end of this your back and forth, all of them means someone who doesn't believe in God in this context.

Stop grabbing the straw and give us evidence 😂

LordReed:
Dude. Are you OK? Have actually looked at the meaning of disbelief or are just going off half cocked as usual.

whether disbeliever, unbeliever or non-believer, they all mean someone who doesn't believe in God.

You are runnng away from the point and shooting the strawman 🤣🤣

Leave the definition and face the point of the discussion. When atheists need real argument, they succumb to fallacies.

Workch:
LordReed, at the end of this your back and forth, all of them means someone who doesn't believe in God in this context.

Stop grabbing the straw and give us evidence 😂

Its Getting clearer now

Workch:
whether disbeliever, unbeliever or non-believer, they all mean someone who doesn't believe in God.

Which god?

Workch:
for the umpteenth time, you are saying rubbish. Lol 😂

Your diagram is a fallacy. It's not true just because LordReed thinks it's true.

I'm so shocked that I have been engaging someone who even doesn't know the difference between belief and disbelief 🤣

LoLz. Just knocking your head against a simple diagram because you think I am asking you to choose. Such a sad little baby. Bwahahahahaha!

Workch:
whether disbeliever, unbeliever or non-believer, they all mean someone who doesn't believe in God.

You are runnng away from the point and shooting the strawman 🤣🤣

Leave the definition and face the point of the discussion. When atheists need real argument, they succumb to fallacies.

Workch:
LordReed, at the end of this your back and forth, all of them means someone who doesn't believe in God in this context.

Stop grabbing the straw and give us evidence 😂

LMAO! Evidence of what?

triplechoice:
Just imagine the talk

The prefix -dis before belief means ,not ,a negation ,

So, the word ,disbelief it's the same with the phrase lack of belief.

Leave Reed . He wants to confuse you because he is stuck .

He is the same person in the other thread who wanted to mock with

The half statement ,

"I don't believe '

With the full one ,


'I neither believe nor disbelieve '

He wanted to play some mental abracadabra ,but he failed woefully

he knows what he's doing, LordReed is trying to create a strawman that he will attack so we can stop asking him to substantiate his disbelief, unbelief or non-belief (whatever he calls it) with an evidence.

Workch:
he knows what he's doing, LordReed is trying to create a strawman that he will attack so we can stop asking him to substantiate his disbelief, unbelief or non-belief (whatever he calls it) with an evidence.

Superior argument in mud 😂😂

LordReed:
LMAO! Evidence of what?

Evidence for your position "I do not believe in God".

Why did you reach such conclusion, show me with demonstrable evidence?

Workch:
Evidence for your position "I do not believe in God".

Why did you reach such conclusions with demonstrable evidence?

You are lost and confused 😂😂

LordReed:
LoLz. Just knocking your head against a simple diagram because you think I am asking you to choose. Such a sad little baby. Bwahahahahaha!

Lol, because you and I know that your disbelief is an appeal to ignorance

We both know this 🤣

Workch:
We both know this 🤣

We both know you not laughing

Workch:
Evidence for your position "I do not believe in God".

Why did you reach such conclusion, show me with demonstrable evidence?

Explain how I do not believe is a conclusion.

Workch:
Lol, because you and I know that your disbelief is an appeal to ignorance

We both know this 🤣

Appeal to what ignorance?

Workch:
he knows what he's doing, LordReed is trying to create a strawman that he will attack so we can stop asking him to substantiate his disbelief, unbelief or non-belief (whatever he calls it) with an evidence.

LoLz. What is the strawman I am trying to create?

LordReed:
LoLz. What is the strawman I am trying to create?

Focus on giving evidence. Stop asking too much questions 😅

Workch:
Focus on giving evidence. Stop asking too much questions 😅

It seems you have gone too deep and too ashamed to back out 😂😂

I should Give evidence why i don’t believe in a word called god 😂

Workch:
Focus on giving evidence. Stop asking too much questions 😅

Bwahahahahaha! Explain it if you are sure of what you are talking about.

LordReed:
Explain how I do not believe is a conclusion.

you explain how you ended up not believing it.
On what ground?

Workch:
you explain how to ended up not believing it.
On what ground?

Because i am not a believer 😂😂

LordReed:
Bwahahahahaha! Explain it if you are sure of what you are talking about.

Explain what?
That you are appealing to ignorance?

I can't explain anything to you, it's like explaining basic things to a theist 😂😂
You guys are same thing

Workch:
it's like explaining basic things to a theist 😂😂
You guys are same thing

Says a believer

Maynman:
It seems you have gone too deep and too ashamed to back out 😂😂

I should Give evidence why i don’t believe in a word called god 😂

LMAO! Na so.

Workch:
Explain what?
That you are appealing to ignorance?

I can't explain anything to you, it's like explaining basic things to a theist 😂😂
You guys are same thing

Bwahahahahaha! When you are sure of what you are saying come and explain how I am appealing to ignorance. LMFAO!

LordReed:
LMAO! Na so.

it's like explaining basic science to MaxInDHouse, how do you expect such person to understand that he can't believ something if evidence does not exist for it.

It's the same way you cannot understand that you can remain neutral until at least either evidence for or against comes.

LordReed:
Bwahahahahaha! When you are sure of what you are saying come and explain how I am appealing to ignorance. LMFAO!

The topic is atheism is not scientific. It has been proven.

I have proven it with you 😂

Workch:
you explain how you ended up not believing it.
On what ground?

On the ground that I have no reason or sufficent evidence that can form the basis for belief.

Workch:
The topic is atheism is not scientific. It has been proven.

I have proven it with you 😂

LoLz. I haven't even touched the topic yet so no you proved nothing. Bwahahahahaha!

LordReed:
On the ground that I have no reason or sufficent evidence that can form the basis for belief.

Do you have sufficient evidence to disbelief it?

Like we did when we found sufficient evidence against phlogiston?

Workch:
Do you have sufficient evidence to disbelief it?

Like we did when we found sufficient evidence against phlogiston?

Back to square one 😂😂

LordReed:
LoLz. I haven't even touched the topic yet so no you proved nothing. Bwahahahahaha!

you would have touched the topic if you can demonstrate anything 😅

You are not touching it because you don't have any scientific backing for it. I dare you to prove me wrong 🤣