₦airaland Forum

Workch:
You are not touching it because you don't have any scientific backing for it. I dare you to prove me wrong 🤣

Scientific backing for a word called god 😂

Workch:
you would have touched the topic if you can demonstrate anything 😅

You are not touching it because you don't have any scientific backing for it. I dare you to prove me wrong 🤣

LoLz. Can you show me where atheism claims to be a scientific position?

Workch:
Do you have sufficient evidence to disbelief it?

Like we did when we found sufficient evidence against phlogiston?

There is no sufficient evidence to disbelieve either.

LordReed:
LoLz. Can you show me where atheism claims to be a scientific position?

No I can't, that's why the topic is correct 😂

LordReed:
There is no sufficient evidence to disbelieve either.

Which makes both atheism and Theism wrong for now at least.

Workch:
No I can't, that's why the topic is correct 😂

So what’s now the business of atheism?

Workch:
it's like explaining basic science to MaxInDHouse, how do you expect such person to understand that he can't believ something if evidence does not exist for it.

It's the same way you cannot understand that you can remain neutral until at least either evidence for or against comes.

And how do you demonstrate neutrality, by adopting the label agnostic?

LordReed:
And how do you demonstrate neutrality, by adopting the label agnostic?

I am waiting for either you or theists to provide any evidence so I can switch. It's as simple as that.
Get to work 😂

Workch:
Which makes both atheism and Theism wrong for now at least.

And we are back to me asking you to show me where I disbelieve the question of gods which of course you cannot show. When will you realise you have no point?

LordReed:
And we are back to me asking you to show me where I disbelieve the question of gods which of course you cannot show. When will you realise you have no point?

It's silly question since you are an atheist

Workch:
I am waiting for either you or theists to provide any evidence so I can switch. It's as simple as that.
Get to work 😂

LMFAO! Who is asking you to switch? I dunno why you are knocking your head against a label. Are you going to get paid or receive some benefit I am not aware of? If someone is cutting cheques for switching lemme know lemme go get mine. Bwahahahahaha!

Workch:
It's silly question since you are an atheist

Yet you are asking for demonstration and this simple thing that you are unable to demonstrate. LMFAO!

LordReed:
LMFAO! Who is asking you to switch? I dunno why you are knocking your head against a label. Are you going to get paid or receive some benefit I am not aware of? If someone is cutting cheques for switching lemme know lemme go get mine. Bwahahahahaha!

I'm going to be justified for always following the evidence where it leads and not making things up in my head.

Workch:
I'm going to be justified for always following the evidence where it leads and not making things up in my head.

Justified to whom?

Workch:
I'm going to be justified for always following the evidence where it leads and not making things up in my head.

Evidence for a word called “god” 😂😂

LordReed:
Justified to whom?

Just leave the red herring. Please focus

Workch:
Just leave the red herring. Please focus

Haaaaa Superior arguments 😂😂

Workch:
Just leave the red herring. Please focus

I quote you directly then you start crying. Stop bringing up stuff you are only going to cry about ok?

Maynman:
Haaaaa Superior arguments 😂😂

Very superior rat inside the wall. LMFAO!

Man, the polytheist gets no love!!!!

I have a thousand gods with evidence.

LordReed:
I quote you directly then you start crying. Stop bringing up stuff you are only going to cry about ok?

just substantiate your position with evidence 😂😂
Stop the distraction or agree that you lack any evidence

Workch:
just substantiate your position with evidence 😂😂
Stop the distraction or agree that you lack any evidence

Listen to your advice and substantiate your beliefs, laughing stock 😂

Workch:
just substantiate your position with evidence 😂😂
Stop the distraction or agree that you lack any evidence

Asking questions that have already been treated is a sign of something wrong. We just went over this and you are still asking the same question. LMFAO!

Some theists maintain that unless atheists can disprove the existence of a god, or gods, their position is untenable. It does, however, depend on which of the many thousands of humanity's gods one has in mind; strangely, such theists cheerfully accept the arguments against every god except their own preferred one(s).
On similar lines, some antitheists maintain that because theists cannot prove the existence of their chosen god or gods, their position is untenable. A similar fallacy, from the opposite direction.
The burden of proof lies with whoever is making the assertion. If there's no evidence either way, it's a matter of faith, or lack thereof. Expressing a personal belief/disbelief in the existence of a certain god/goddess is sound enough, but claiming their opinion is factual or denouncing the opponent's claim as false without any proof supporting one idea or disproving the other is fallacious. While an unfalsifiable claim/hypothesis can be proven neither right nor wrong, it is reasonable to dismiss it as non-factual if it lacks logical supporting evidence.

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof

KnownUnknown:
Man, the polytheist gets no love!!!!

I have a thousand gods with evidence.

Like that time Zeus turned into a bull and Sango obliterated that tree. LoLz.

LordReed:
Like that time Zeus turned into a bull and Sango obliterated that tree.

Funny thing is workch is a deist, and the root word of Deism is one and same with Zeus.
Sky father 😂

LordReed:
Like that time Zeus turned into a bull and Sango obliterated that tree. LoLz.

Lol. Zeus and Sango are two of The Divine Thousand. Just look at the complex complexity of the world. It didn’t come out of nothing and it’s too complexly complex to have been created by one god. That’s stupid! The Divine Thousand created the world!! The ancient Romans called them Divimum Mille.

Where is the evidence against them?!!

The Vatican is hiding the true records of creation by the Divinum Mille because they know if the information gets out, that’s the end of their magic Jew nonsense!!! Word is, the Spanish Inquisition was partly to destroy the truthful priesthood of Divinum Mille. When some of them escaped to West Africa,the Christians pursued them and they were captured and enslaved in America. But fortunately they buried their scrolls and totems which have since been rediscovered.

The scrolls say that there were multiple creations during the initial epoch when the Divinum Mille decided to reify the divine forms in the material plane. After observing the worlds and discovering what’s tenable, they reduced the number of worlds to 118. Why 118? Do a little research yourself.

LordReed:
Asking questions that have already been treated is a sign of something wrong. We just went over this and you are still asking the same question. LMFAO!

If you had provided evidence and not trying to run from pillar to post, we would have ended this debate.

Workch:
If you had provided evidence and not trying to run from pillar to post, we would have ended this debate.

Where is the evidence of your belief?

LordReed:
Dude. Are you OK? Have actually looked at the meaning of disbelief or are just going off half cocked as usual.

Then you are completely off or trying to play a deceptive game

Who is talking of disbelief alone ?

'I neither believe nor disbelieve ' is mentioned together to decribe something ,but you were comparing it to another thing that is completely different .

You don't know this at all .

I can see you don't like having your own bitter medicine which you like giving others .

I like it very much you are complaining .Lol

Next time discuss what you know and stop casting innuedoes at others for something they have said you barely understand .

I was the one who talked about ,"neither believing nor disbelieving" so don't come to ask me ,' where did I mention you '

And again , the terms ,lack of belief ,disbelief, and even lack of faith are all synonyms which describe the same thing ,atheism .

If you think otherwise, put your lack of belief in context and let me show you it can be replaced with the others .


Describes your lack of belief in a god using clear simple terms so others see what it really means to have a lack of belief in a god ,

Keep your copy and paste from Google . Let's see what you know .

Workch:
If you had provided evidence and not trying to run from pillar to post, we would have ended this debate.

LoLz! Asked and answered. Reread it if you have forgotten. Bwahahahahahahaha!

triplechoice:
Then you are completely off or trying to play a deceptive game

Who is talking of disbelief alone ?

'I neither believe nor disbelieve ' is mentioned together to decribe something ,but you were comparing it to another thing that is completely different .

You don't know this at all .

I can see you don't like having your own bitter medicine which you like giving others .

I like it very much you are complaining .Lol

Next time discuss what you know and stop casting innuedoes at others for something they have said you barely understand .

I was the one who talked about ,"neither believing nor disbelieving" so don't come to ask me ,' where did I mention you '

And again , the terms ,lack of belief ,disbelief, and even lack of faith are all synonyms which describe the same thing ,atheism .

If you think otherwise, put your lack of belief in context and let me show you it can be replaced with the others .


Describes your lack of belief in a god using clear simple terms so others see what it really means to have a lack of belief in a god ,

Keep your copy and paste from Google . Let's see what you know .

Deceive who? You? What would that accomplish for me? Bwahahahahahaha!

LoLz! Your saltiness doesn't move me. I have provided you what you asked, if you have questions ask them, I won't be indulging you in repeating what should be clear to someone with secondary school education.