₦airaland Forum

bemeruca:
The only thing I want you to believe is that you are a special kind of stupid. But you can claim I want you to believe anything you like.

I'm proud of you benalvino1_benalvino2_benalvino3_bemurica. You used to to do the same things as basilico did, but seem to know your limitations now. I remember the famous episode when you posted a video which had a headline that aligned with what you were thinking (I think it was "People who got booster shots had a higher rate of testing positive for Covid " ) . The hilarious part was the video was actually explaining why people who believed the headline were wrong. Lol. Remember you then trying to argue why the video was wrong and I should just read the headline as it proved your point? Good times. Lol.

The good thing as evidenced by your post above is you've learned your limitations and don't post anything of substance anymore where you're sure to be wrong. The bad, you're just an unfunny, unwitty troll. Keep on keeping on.

This 14th amendment court challenge is going to be very interesting. I think there is a compelling case given then guilty verdicts for seditious conspiracy that he should be disqualified.

Bad Judicial Day for Trump

1.) The GA Judge didn't sever the trial of Chesebro and the Kraken Lady. They both filed for Speedy trials that will be on October 23rd. So, they both will be tried together and I think the odds of conviction went up for both. So, there is a good chance one will probably flip on everyone else sooner than later to keep themselves out of jail.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ehf01mkBf1E

2.) The Mar-a-Lago IT worker (who the used to be represented by a Trump paid lawyer until the Judge offered him a public defender) struck a cooperation agreement with the special counsel. Meaning he flipped on Trump. Very bad news for the obstruction portion of Trump's FL Federal Trial.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/06/politics/mar-a-lago-it-worker/index.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhGpBXrgXe4

IjeBos:
This 14th amendment court challenge is going to be very interesting. I think there is a compelling case given then guilty verdicts for seditious conspiracy that he should be disqualified.

Around criminal trump's first impeachment, i quickly welcomed the idea of the section 3 of the 14th amendment, because i knew early on that criminal trump will be a nuisance. Now rightly so after his 2nd impeachment, failed presidency, 4 criminal cases and 91+ criminal counts, there is STRONG BASIS to disqualify criminal trump from the ballot. It won't be possible in all states, but when states like Michigan, Arizona and co take this case to the supreme court, criminal trump will be kicked off the ballot. Why? because one guilty conviction in Georgia of any of the party tied to criminal trump is just ENOUGH for State Secretaries to kick him out. Thank God American law still works as sound, if not, why are republiqan vote suppressors losing every time in Court? Because they have no shit just like criminal trump. He will be jailed and will die in jail. I'm not sorry for his cult followers who are wet dreaming about a far-fetched 2nd criminal trump rodeo.

IjeBos:
Bad Judicial Day for Trump

1.) The GA Judge didn't sever the trial of Chesebro and the Kraken Lady. They both filed for Speedy trials that will happen by end of year. So, they both will be tried together and I think the odds of conviction went up for both. So, there is a good chance one will probably flip on everyone else sooner than later to keep themselves out of jail.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ehf01mkBf1E

2.) The Mar-a-Lago IT worker (who the used to be represented by a Trump paid lawyer until the Judge offered him a public defender) struck a cooperation agreement with the special counsel. Meaning he flipped on Trump. Very bad news for the obstruction portion of Trump's FL Federal Trial.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/06/politics/mar-a-lago-it-worker/index.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhGpBXrgXe4

THERE IS NO WAY criminal trump WILL ESCAPE THE LAW

Though it's been a long time coming but a pretty stubborn criminal like trump will not get any soft landing.
If he had played his cards well, and didn't play into this "messiah" syndrome, he would have gotten a soft landing and he will just slither away, and americans will just move on to the next wave.
It's not that sad we can actually feel the end of this criminal while his cult followers are just as deluded as him.

Obrigardo:
Around criminal trump's first impeachment, i quickly welcomed the idea of the section 3 of the 14th amendment, because i knew early on that criminal trump will be a nuisance. Now rightly so after his 2nd impeachment, failed presidency, 4 criminal cases and 91+ criminal counts, there is STRONG BASIS to disqualify criminal trump from the ballot. It won't be possible in all states, but when states like Michigan, Arizona and co take this case to the supreme court, criminal trump will be kicked off the ballot. Why? because one guilty conviction in Georgia of any of the party tied to criminal trump is just ENOUGH for State Secretaries to kick him out. Thank God American law still works as sound, if not, why are republiqan vote suppressors losing every time in Court? Because they have no shit just like criminal trump. He will be jailed and will die in jail. I'm not sorry for his cult followers who are wet dreaming about a far-fetched 2nd criminal trump rodeo.

I am sure it will go up to the Supreme Court. I am curious what the Supreme Court will do here. Given it's conservative bend I can see them punting on the issue.

Obrigardo:
THERE IS NO WAY criminal trump WILL ESCAPE THE LAW

Though it's been a long time coming but a pretty stubborn criminal like trump will not get any soft landing.
If he had played his cards well, and didn't play into this "messiah" syndrome, he would have gotten a soft landing and he will just slither away, and americans will just move on to the next wave.
It's not that sad we can actually feel the end of this criminal while his cult followers are just as deluded as him.

If he doesn't plead down, I'm convinced he will be convicted on some if not all the charges. I've sat on a couple of juries, and from what I've seen jurors generally want to do the right thing and follow the law. The question I have is what happens after will he go to jail or will they give him house arrest of some sort.

Obrigardo:
Around criminal trump's first impeachment, i quickly welcomed the idea of the section 3 of the 14th amendment, because i knew early on that criminal trump will be a nuisance. Now rightly so after his 2nd impeachment, failed presidency, 4 criminal cases and 91+ criminal counts, there is STRONG BASIS to disqualify criminal trump from the ballot. It won't be possible in all states, but when states like Michigan, Arizona and co take this case to the supreme court, criminal trump will be kicked off the ballot. Why? because one guilty conviction in Georgia of any of the party tied to criminal trump is just ENOUGH for State Secretaries to kick him out. Thank God American law still works as sound, if not, why are republiqan vote suppressors losing every time in Court? Because they have no shit just like criminal trump. He will be jailed and will die in jail. I'm not sorry for his cult followers who are wet dreaming about a far-fetched 2nd criminal trump rodeo.

Imagine doing 22 years (well probably less after parole) for a piece of sh*t like Trump. If it wasn't for maybe conjugal visits and the fact he may get out jail someday, Tarrio would be a top contender for a Darwin award.

IjeBos:
I'm proud of you benalvino1_benalvino2_benalvino3_bemurica. You used to to do the same things as basilico did, but seem to know your limitations now. I remember the famous episode when you posted a video which had a headline that aligned with what you were thinking (I think it was "People who got booster shots had a higher rate of testing positive for Covid " ) . The hilarious part was the video was actually explaining why people who believed the headline were wrong. Lol. Remember you then trying to argue why the video was wrong and I should just read the headline as it proved your point? Good times. Lol.

The good thing as evidenced by your post above is you've learned your limitations and don't post anything of substance anymore where you're sure to be wrong. The bad, you're just an unfunny, unwitty troll. Keep on keeping on.

Okay, so? What other lie can you recollect?

IjeBos:
If he doesn't plead down, I'm convinced he will be convicted on some if not all the charges. I've sat on a couple of juries, and from what I've seen jurors generally want to do the right thing and follow the law. The question I have is what happens after will he go to jail or will they give him house arrest of some sort.

I think house arrest is the more likely route. I think the logistics of having a former president in a prison would be too much to arrange to any security standard the SSS uses. Unless they want to build a special cell block just for him. They'll probably just ankle monitor his arse and limit his communications.

IjeBos:
Imagine doing 22 years (well probably less after parole) for a piece of sh*t like Trump. If it wasn't for maybe conjugal visits and the fact he may get out jail someday, Tarrio would be a top contender for a Darwin award.

Shooting yourself in the foot. Tarro is black. He never showed up at the Capitol.He gets the worst sentence, murderers get less
In Georgia, the black guy indicted by Fanny (sp ) was thrown in for five days..He was a flight risk/ Or could not afford a lawyer. I can't tell.
Democrats ( plus Ijeboss& Co) hate blacks who support Trump.

in other news Jackboot is adding two more charges to Trump.
This a few hours before Prosecutors filed to have a grand jury indict Hunter by Sep 29.Hmm this breaks the pattern. Any bad news on Bidens, Trump is indicted within a day.

basilico:
Shooting yourself in the foot. Tarro is black. He never showed up at the Capitol.He gets the worst sentence, murderers get less
In Georgia, the black guy indicted by Fanny (sp ) was thrown in for five days..He was a flight risk/ Or could not afford a lawyer. I can't tell.
Democrats ( plus Ijeboss& Co) hate blacks who support Trump.

Fact Check
1.) Tarro was the leader of the Proud Boys. Also, the US government has an incentive for making the penalty for insurrection and such crimes involving overthrowing the government very tough. Hence the death penalty for something like treason. And hence the 22 years Tarro received.

2.) As to Harrison Floyd, it seems he wanted to continue his grift and thought being arrested would help him with that so wanted to be booked and jailed.

The day Floyd turned himself in, Willis told an attorney who had previously represented him that she had sent someone to meet with him at the jail to offer him a bond but he refused it and said he didn’t want to talk without a lawyer, according to a recording of the call her office provided to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Willis said Floyd “made somewhat of a scene in the lobby of the jail and basically just begged to be booked in,” the newspaper reported.

https://apnews.com/article/trump-georgia-election-indictment-jail-harrison-floyd-6eee3a21aa8e90e17c84a20d6be94b5c

Also, it seems he was recently arrested on a Federal warrant for a different issue. That would affect his bail as well.

In addition to the Georgia charges, federal court records show Floyd, identified as a former U.S. Marine who’s active with the group Black Voices for Trump, was also arrested three months ago in Maryland on a federal warrant that accuses him of aggressively confronting two FBI agents sent to serve him with a grand jury subpoena.

LordReed:
I think house arrest is the more likely route. I think the logistics of having a former president in a prison would be too much to arrange to any security standard the SSS uses. Unless they want to build a special cell block just for him. They'll probably just ankle monitor his arse and limit his communications.

I used to agree with you. Not sure now. I recently read a piece where someone was arguing that there are jails designed to hold high value/security prisoners. And one of them would work for Trump. Hence, imprisoning him will be doable. But I also cans see a judge using security concerns as an excuse not to jail him.

IjeBos:
Fact Check
1.) Tarro was the leader of the Proud Boys. Also, the US government has an incentive for making the penalty for insurrection and such crimes involving overthrowing the government very tough. Hence the death penalty for something like treason. And hence the 22 years Tarro received.

2.) As to Harrison Floyd, it seems he wanted to continue his grift and thought being arrested would help him with that so wanted to be booked and jailed.

https://apnews.com/article/trump-georgia-election-indictment-jail-harrison-floyd-6eee3a21aa8e90e17c84a20d6be94b5c

Also, it seems he was recently arrested on a Federal warrant for a different issue. That would affect his bail as well.

Mumu who argued he wasn't the leader. The special kind of stupid will be stupid 🤣

"FACT CHECK". Jobkess emu. Hahaha

bemeruca:
Mumu who argued he wasn't the leader. The special kind of stupid will be stupid 🤣

"FACT CHECK". Jobkess emu. Hahaha

Did you fall on your head or have a stroke recently? It's a serious question. Your posts are becoming more and more incoherent and bizarre. You're soon going to be giving Mr. Kikkkikiki a run for his money when it comes to incoherent posters.

IjeBos:
Did you fall on your head or have a stroke recently? It's a serious question. Your posts are becoming more and more incoherent and bizarre. You're soon going to be giving Mr. Kikkkikiki a run for his money when it comes to incoherent posters.

I should be asking you if you fell on your head. What is "FACT CHECK" do you know how jobless and embarrassing you are? Seuun, Please just like facebook and Twitter, Nairaland needs fact check feature. you don't have to pay ijebos for it, He is a jobless notice-me.

Your Factcheck stated he is/was the leader of the proudboys... who argued otherwise? Mumu, Don't go back to Naija and take care of your pops

basilico:
Back from the bot ban.
I like your reasoning. When it's a case of Trump saying he won elections he has to prove it to you by presenting unrefutable evidence. Video evidence of fraud.. Ruby Freeman, 2000mules etc not enough.
But a murderer only needs circumstancial evidence to be found guilty.

And that your misunderstanding makes sense to you Basilico? The cases below are why evidence is required for murder convictions. And yes, dump can't just say he won and we all just take his word for it without seeing credible evidence.

In October 2001, in Neuburg an der Donau, Germany, Rudolf Rupp [de] vanished. He drank excessively, and was not well-liked. His wife, their two daughters and the elder daughter's fiancé all gave police confessions and they were convicted of manslaughter, or being an accomplice to manslaughter. There was no physical evidence of a crime. In 2009, Rupp's car—and his body—were found in the Danube, seemingly having got there after a collision. A retrial was held in 2010.[23] All the original convictions were quashed on the grounds of insufficient evidence.

In spite of advances in forensic technology, the possibility of the supposed victim turning up alive remains. In 2003, Leonard Fraser, having allegedly confessed to the murder of teenager Natasha Ryan, was on trial for this, and other murders, when she reappeared after having been missing for four years.

The stupid idiot can't claim no "seditious conspiracy" no more.

Rising to speak before the sentence was handed down, Tarrio called Jan. 6 a “national embarrassment,” and apologized to the police officers who defended the Capitol and the lawmakers who fled in fear. His voice cracked as he said he let down his family and vowed that he is done with politics.

“I am not a political zealot. Inflicting harm or changing the results of the election was not my goal,” Tarrio said. “Please show me mercy,” he said, adding, “I ask you that you not take my 40s from me.”

U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly, who was appointed to the bench by Trump, said Tarrio was motivated by “revolutionary zeal” to lead the conspiracy that resulted in “200 men, amped up for battle, encircling the Capitol.” Noting that Tarrio had not previously shown any remorse publicly for his crimes, the judge said a stiff punishment was necessary to deter future political violence.

“It can’t happen again. It can’t happen again,” the judge repeated.

Tarrio and three lieutenants were convicted in May of seditious conspiracy and other crimes after a months-long trial that served as a vivid reminder of the violent chaos fueled by Trump’s lies about the election that helped inspire right-wing extremists like the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers.

https://apnews.com/article/enrique-tarrio-capitol-riot-seditious-conspiracy-sentencing-da60222b3e1e54902db2bbbb219dc3fb

bemeruca:
I should be asking you if you fell on your head. What is "FACT CHECK" do you know how jobless and embarrassing you are? Seuun, Please just like facebook and Twitter, Nairaland needs fact check feature. you don't have to pay ijebos for it, He is a jobless notice-me.

Your Factcheck stated he is/was the leader of the proudboys... who argued otherwise? Mumu, Don't go back to Naija and take care of your pops

I read this and am dumber for it. Thanks.

You're incoherent as a troll. And you're incoherent posting anything substantial. Honestly, you should go back to pretending to be a Christian in the Religion forum, at least your posts there had a semblance of sense.

IjeBos:
I read this and am dumber for it. Thanks.

You're incoherent as a troll. And you're incoherent posting anything substantial. Honestly, you should go back to pretending to be a Christian in the Religion forum, at least your posts there had a semblance of sense.

That's normal for you. You regress... You have no limit to how dumb you can get.

Again, you fact checked a strawman. Who argued otherwise?

bemeruca:
That's normal for you. You regress... You have no limit to how dumb you can get.

Again, you fact checked a strawman. Who argued otherwise?

1.) You have a talent for using words you don't understand. Here is the definition of a strawman argument. Put it on a flashcard and commit it to memory.

noun: strawman
1.an intentionally misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent's real argument.

2.) Basilico's basic argument: Tarrio got a heavier sentence because he was black.

basilico:
Tarro is black. He never showed up at the Capitol.He gets the worst sentence, murderers get less
In Georgia, the black guy indicted by Fanny (sp ) was thrown in for five days..

My argument: Tarrio was the leader of the group and leaders are usually given heavier sentences . That fact makes his argument dubious at best. (Yes I truncated my argument because I assumed most people would understand it. My fault for overestimating you.)

In fact the judge said this at sentencing. Maybe the judge was also using a strawman. Lol

“Mr. Tarrio was the ultimate leader, the ultimate person who organized, who was motivated by revolutionary zeal,” Kelly said at the end of the three hour hearing, adding that he has shown “no remorse.”

https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/05/politics/enrique-tarrio-sentencing-proud-boys-seditious-conspiracy/index.html

3.) Look it, you are a mental midget. When you accept that, you'll stop putting yourself in positions to get pummeled by me. Take the L and stop chasing me around this thread seeking my affirmation.

IjeBos:
1.) You have a talent for using words you don't understand. Here is the definition of a strawman argument. Put it on a flashcard and commit it to memory.


2.) Basilico's basic argument: Tarrio got a heavier sentence because he was black.


My argument: Tarrio was the leader of the group and leaders are usually given heavier sentences . That fact makes his argument dubious at best. (Yes I truncated my argument because I assumed most people would understand it. My fault for overestimating you.)

In fact the judge said this at sentencing. Maybe the judge was also using a strawman. Lol

https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/05/politics/enrique-tarrio-sentencing-proud-boys-seditious-conspiracy/index.html

3.) Look it, you are a mental midget. When you accept that, you'll stop putting yourself in positions to get pummeled by me. Take the L and stop chasing me around this thread seeking my affirmation.

Hahahaha. So tell me why your fact check has a claim basilico was not disputing?

Who argued that tario was not the leader of proud boys?

budaatum:
And that your misunderstanding makes sense to you Basilico? The cases below are why evidence is required for murder convictions. And yes, dump can't just say he won and we all just take his word for it without seeing credible evidence.

They confessed right.Makes a difference when there is no body.

Trump needs to produce cold hard evidence in court. A woman whose cat is named vagina accused him of rape but can't remember the year it happened.Her trees are painted a wild blue color and her poodle is dyed pink.She is on air fantasizing about getting raped.

IjeBos:
1.) You have a talent for using words you don't understand. Here is the definition of a strawman argument. Put it on a flashcard and commit it to memory.


2.) Basilico's basic argument: Tarrio got a heavier sentence because he was black.


My argument: Tarrio was the leader of the group and leaders are usually given heavier sentences . That fact makes his argument dubious at best. (Yes I truncated my argument because I assumed most people would understand it. My fault for overestimating you.)

In fact the judge said this at sentencing. Maybe the judge was also using a strawman. Lol

https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/05/politics/enrique-tarrio-sentencing-proud-boys-seditious-conspiracy/index.html

3.) Look it, you are a mental midget. When you accept that, you'll stop putting yourself in positions to get pummeled by me. Take the L and stop chasing me around this thread seeking my affirmation.

leader of a group.
A certain person stood at the grounds of the Capitol urging Trump supporters not to go in. Biden wants to jail him for 120 days.
An insurrection where noone was killed by the protesters and no arms were found on the protesters

Witch-hunt, the only way forward is for democrats to never lose the presidency.
Freebies my fren coming your way.Repaeations probably for you because whites don't like your skin color.

Montez Lee of BLM, looted a store then burnt it down during a protest. The fire killed a father of five. DoJ appealed for leniency in the sentencing. He got 10 years.
**SNIP*** DoJ asked for leniency saying that Lee was moved by the mob,quoted Martin Luther non violence in the hearings. Yet for J6ers no leniency, exculpatory evidence is withheld from them, media and democrats gets a free pass calling them insurrectionists.
What a two tiered justice system.

Ijeboss. California about to enact a law forcing parents to affirm their children gender identity, buy them dollies and dresses etc. Else their children can be taken away from them.

I'd rather support the Republicans gerrymandering to give them electoral advantage (as if the democrats are not the worst villains on this) than democrats wanting to take or rather groom children.
The big headed Budaa supports this too.



The bill could potentially make you guilty of
child abuse if you refuse to call your son
“Jane” and buy him dresses. Authorities could
take your kid away if you don’t bend the knee:
California courts would be given complete
authority under Section 3011 of California’s
Family Code to remove a child from his or her
parents’ home if parents disapprove of LGBTQ+ ideology.
By changing the definition of what constitutes
the “health, safety, and welfare of [a] child,”
schools, churches, hospitals, and other
organizations interacting with children would be required to affirm “gender transitions” in minors by default—or risk charges of child abuse

Another case of democrat Madness Five prolifers went to a Planned Parenthood baby murder premise to protest the innocent slaughter of babies.They physically obstructed the baby killing process by blocking the entrance. Only violence was by the staff members who brandished broomsticks
Found guilty of engaging in a conspiracy by mobilizing on Facebook and in furtherance of the conspiracy they travelled to DC.
They face 11 yeas in jail. And are in jail waiting sentencing.



t the trial, which commenced on Aug. 9, a
nun praying the rosary in the gallery, joined by
a priest reading Bible verses, was reportedly
reprimanded for making the sign of the cross
in the direction of the witness stand. Other
observers had been ordered on Day One of
witness testimony not to pray "visibly,"
because doing so could be perceived as
"threatening" acts of intimidation.



Praying in a court room is threatening. They should have prayed in Arabic. Allahu Akbar.

basilico:
Another case of democrat Madness Five prolifers went to a Planned Parenthood baby murder premise to protest the innocent slaughter of babies.They physically obstructed the baby killing process by blocking the entrance. Only violence was by the staff members who brandished broomsticks
Found guilty of engaging in a conspiracy by mobilizing on Facebook and travelling to DC.
They face 11 yeas in jail. And are in jail waiting sentencing.

Wait a baby killing minute, I thought you guys like Castle doctrine and stand your ground laws? Why are you bellyaching over people defending their territory?

LordReed:
Wait a baby killing minute, I thought you guys like Castle doctrine and stand your ground laws? Why are you bellyaching over people defending their territory?

I've learnt something new. Castle doctrine. A medieval law.
I'm concerned about the potential sentences in play here, which does not invoke any sympathy from you. Only a heartless, soulless being would support such sentencing guidelines. I honestly thought devil worshippers don't exist.

basilico:
I've learnt something new. Castle doctrine. A medieval law.
I'm concerned about the potential sentences in play here, which does not invoke any sympathy from you. Only a heartless, soulless being would support such sentencing guidelines. I honestly thought devil worshippers don't exist.

LMAO! Well tell your fellow repubs who use it to kill young black people who deign to innocently darken their door that it is medieval.

Meanwhile tell me what they were charged with to potentially earn 11years incarceration.

Spare me the sanctimonious bùllshit, not interested in your favourite boogeyman today or ever.

basilico:
They confessed right.Makes a difference when there is no body.

You obviously lack the ability to understand I chose two where the confessions were untrue to show you why we just don't take people's word for it and why evidence is important bas, but I guess you at least try a tiny bit harder than stupid idiot who doesn't even acknowledge a brain is in his own head.

LordReed:
LMAO! Well tell your fellow repubs who use it to kill young black people who deign to innocently darken their door that it is medieval.

Meanwhile tell me what they were charged with to potentially earn 11years incarceration.

Spare me the sanctimonious bùllshit, not interested in your favourite boogeyman today or ever.

More black people are killed/shot by democrats than repubs.
Democrat policies have resulted in more deadly drugs. While Biden stopped the border wall and flung the gates open, drug cartels have upped their game of drug smuggling and human trafficking. Those are the democrats you defend .

Lauren Handy was on trial with four others
who were charged with violating the Freedom
of Access to Clinic Entrances Act
, a 1994 law that prohibits threats to and
obstruction of a person seeking reproductive
health services or providers. A U.S. District
Court jury in D.C. found Handy and all four of
her co-defendants guilty on all counts.
Based o n the convictions, the Judge ordered Handy and the other co-defendants jailed until sentencing later this year. The defendants face up to 11 years in prison and a fine of up to $350,000.

They were not blocking a theatre where life saving surgeries are done, they wanted to prevent babies from premeditated murder. What a heinous crime they did
This clinic was advertising abortion upto 27 weeks. I suggest you read up on how the D&C is performed. They cut up the babies head and pull the remains out with forceps or a vacuum pump. They use a kinder term..dilation and evacuation I must add