₦airaland Forum

oteneaaron:
So why call him a liar then?

If he is a liar, prove it.

He never reason am reach that extent that. Since you say someone is lying like he said the burden of proof is on him.

The few conversation I had with him a while ago shows attributes of Jehovah's Witnesses that we are too familiar with....

1.Back and forth thinking

2. Contradicting their own words within space of minutes

Courz:
See me see wahala! Everything is in their website. They have been teaching them for years that only JWs will be in God's kingdom while the rest of Christians will be destroyed. Why is the Idiot denying it? Because he is an Apostate and he is ashamed of their doctrines. They planned to lie in this thread but their plan failed.

My dear leave this wicked souls that teach that only their church members will go to heaven. But jesus said nobody knows only God

Courz:
I have been asking for proof from this Idiot DollarLand2023 since 1914, he hasn't presented one! You call someone a Liar with no proof and expect to be taken seriously.

Too much insult. If I report you now, you will say JW.

So keep convincing people who listen to you. Don't kill yourself over argument that we have moved on from, this time tomorrow.

I have to step my cognition down to argue with you, but nah.

It's easy for you thrash talk JWs, I have a junior who is more vituperative to JWs than you are but in real life, he respects the attitude and good spiritual routines of JW.

This is my last engagement with you oga.

achorladey:


Chief I go fight you oooo. Why are you writing that god with small letter g.

Be respectful of our assistant god and write God.

Is that clear chief?

Sorry sir oo, pls Oga Assistant God, accept my apology

oteneaaron:
So why call him a liar then?

If he is a liar, prove it.

I'm not intending to dismiss you, but honestly I can't engage with you if you don't understand the statement, "there can be no counter evidence without evidence".
Thanks.

DollarLand2023:
Too much insult. If I report you now, you will say JW.

So keep convincing people who listen to you. Don't kill yourself over argument that we have moved on from, this time tomorrow.

I have to step my cognition down to argue with you, but nah.

It's easy for you thrash talk JWs, I have a junior who is more vituperative to JWs than you are but in real life, he respects the attitude and good spiritual routines of JW.

This is my last engagement with you oga.

Shut up your mouth. What is this rubbish you are typing? What were we discussing before? We are discussing Watchtower ordering you JWs to never marry outside the Cult never to associate with non JWs. I gave you a simple task, Prove to me that what I said were lies! Very simple task! What did you do? You were busy proving yourself to be an Apostate! Do you think Watchtower will be impressed with your efforts to explain your Satanic doctrines? I said what I said. You were busy denying them. Why? Because you are ashamed of your doctrines. You can see what the public is saying about you. Typical Cult! Once again, I ask you, Why are you ashamed of your doctrines? Are you aware that denying your doctrines makes you an Apostate?

Courz:
Hahahahaha. You don't know? Other Christians apart from JW will be destroyed at Armaggedon by God, your dead bodies will be fed by birds and the JWs will participate in a cleaning exercise to pack your dead bodies and then transform the Earth to a Paradise. This their Paradise Earth they are working for is no longer looking like Paradise again o because their leaders will still be controlling them there.

Ha haha haha, wahala oooo

Socialsunny14:
Sorry sir oo, pls Oga Assistant God, accept my apology

I will relay your apologies to assistant God accordingly. Be sure to receive his acknowledgement soon.

DollarLand2023:
I'm not intending to dismiss you, but honestly I can't engage with you if you don't understand the statement, "there can be no counter evidence without evidence".
Thanks.

You called him liar.

Why don't you prove what makes him a liar?

How difficult is that?

Socialsunny14:
My dear leave this wicked souls that teach that only their church members will go to heaven. But jesus said nobody knows only God

They have assigned themselves assistant Jesus to judge others that everyone will be destroyed except them. But they forget that the Bible talks about a Great Crowd which no man was able to number in the Book of Revelations. So, you have to ask them how they fit into a Great Crowd when their population is 0.0000001% of the World since they say they are the only ones that will be in God's Kingdom. Something is not adding up.

DollarLand2023:
Those screenshot is evidence that despite the thousands of teachings on how to treat family members, members are still found wanting. [/b]

[/quote]Well, this shows that you didn't read the scripture I told you to read. Again, that's 1Cor. 5:1-13 (a must read)

Socialsunny14:
Ha haha haha, wahala oooo

Hahahaha. Yes o. You can see how outrageous their doctrines are. This is just the tip of the iceberg. The Cult is meant for the Mentally unstable. If you start to question their beliefs, you are called an Apostate, telling you that the Cult is not meant for intelligent people.

achorladey:
What is obtainable biblically regarding marry only in the Lord?



Where in the Bible says marry only in the lord means marry only in Jehovah’s witnesses

Bro if you really want to learn let me know but about argument I'm off

cornelboy:
Lol Mathew 17:21.
It's not in NWT because that verse wasn't found in the original manuscripts.
Where do you think all these translations translated from?

Common research ona no fit do.

Try and use KJV.

The fact that you guys omitted those verses I quoted earlier shows that you guys don't believe those verses, hence the omissions from your scriptures.

You ppl don't believe in Jesus Christ, if you do, you wouldn't have removed Acts 8:37 from your bible. lol..

How are you Christians then?? Oh witnesses? lol

All those scriptures I quoted are things you don't believe in. I have use jw bible before so I know what am saying.

If you don't believe in Christ, you don't believe in whom who sent Him. I don't know where u got your religion.

Stop been ignorant.

DollarLand2023:
Too much insult. If I report you now, you will say JW.

So keep convincing people who listen to you. Don't kill yourself over argument that we have moved on from, this time tomorrow.

I have to step my cognition down to argue with you, but nah.

It's easy for you thrash talk JWs, I have a junior who is more vituperative to JWs than you are but in real life, he respects the attitude and good spiritual routines of JW.

This is my last engagement with you oga.

I bet you are not familiar with the activities of Jehovah's Witnesses here over the years as it applies to insults. Be calming down regarding reporting people here. Had we go that same way here with your members most of them will be outlawed here on nairaland.

Have you seen a Jehovah’s witness call people hobnockers here before?

Socialsunny14:
Where did you get your translation?

Google is our friend

ORIAYO70:
Bro if you really want to learn let me know but about argument I'm off

When questions are raised, it is meant to aid learning process.

Are you a learner in the field of learning?

ORIAYO70:
Bro if you really want to learn let me know but about argument I'm off

Lol.

Here we go again.

achorladey:
Follow closely.......



Good you see it as a fine research and they are the truth about members of your religious organization.



The point around this discussion is not honesty and determination to do what is right in them of a particular religious organization. I have other religious organization all around me and I don't ever see them preach that people should be determined to do what is bad or wrong. You get?

The discussion began with ....



Those screenshot is evidence that despite the thousands of teachings on how to treat family members, members are still found wanting.

On your last point:
shows that you didn't read the scripture I told you to read. Again, that's 1Cor. 5:1-13 (a must read)[i][/i]

LZAA:
Sadly it's not of the devil
It's one w**d puffing hippie in the late 60s to early 70s who created it
It cost the English a fine player in peter knowles and has cost many lives due to their abhorrence to blood transfusions
Smh

The Bible says we should not drink blood. When you do, it will digest and nutrients used. When blood is transfused, it is still living. The life is all that is needed.

When snake bites, the venom begins to reconstitute the chemistry of the blood. But, if the same venom is swallowed, it undergoes the process of digestion. The two don't produce same results.
They are just deceiving themselves.

DollarLand2023:
Well, this shows that you didn't read the scripture I told you to read. Again, that's 1Cor. 5:1-13 (a must read)

What is there to read in 1 Corinthians 5: 1-13? I am not interested in whether you remove Anthony Morris from the Governing body members based on whatever is contained in 1 Corinthians 5:1-13.

The point you already accept as truth is that despite the numerous Bible teaching on treating family members, members are still found wanting.

Should I enter discussion with you on 1 Corinthians 5:1-13 based on what you believe another diversion will enter. This is not the first time I am discussing that scriptures here. Your members that are familiar with me discussing that verse and I know what ends the discussion.

oteneaaron:
Lol.

Here we go again.

Na dem they qualify discussion into argument to eventually run from the issues discussed.

[quote author=MaxInDHouse post=125821703]Who is the God that Rahab and Ruth choose to worship?

This is what Rahab said about Jehovah the God of Israel:
Rahab ~

“I do know that Jehovah will give you the land and that the fear of you has fallen upon us. All the inhabitants of the land are disheartened because of you, for we heard how Jehovah dried up the waters of the Red Sea before you when you left Egypt and what you did to the two kings of the Amʹor·ites, Siʹhon and Og, whom you devoted to destruction on the other side of the Jordan. When we heard about it, we lost heart, and no one has any courage because of you, for Jehovah your God is God in the heavens above and on the earth beneath. Now, please, swear to me by Jehovah that, because I showed loyal love to you, you will also show loyal love to my father’s household; and you must give me a sign of good faith. You must spare the lives of my father and mother, my brothers and sisters, and all who belong to them, and you must save us from death" Joshua 2:9-13

Ruth~

“Do not plead with me to abandon you, to turn back from accompanying you; for where you go I will go, and where you spend the night, I will spend the night. Your people will be my people, and your God my God. Where you die I will die, and there I will be buried. May Jehovah do so to me and add to it if anything but death should separate me from you.” Ruth 1:16-17


Please are these two women loyal to the God of Israel or not?
I have told you time and time again that you've got nothing tangible to say whenever i'm talking about my God because you're faithless.
Both Rahab and Ruth NATIONALIZED themselves as Israelites the very moment they decided to become worshipers of Jehovah the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob along with God's people.
So just as you don't want to be part of Jehovah's Witnesses today you have nothing to do with Rahab and Ruth both of them deserted their own people and religion and followed God's people to worship Jehovah.

That's exactly what i did when i realized that Jehovah's Witnesses are the one and only people worshiping the true God!

How many times did Jesus call God Jehovah while on earth?
He called God Father.
The Jewish Name of God is NOT Jehovah, it is YAHWEH.
Why not call Him His original Name, if you're really particular about NAME?

@DollarLand2023

Take a look at the screenshots below

MaxInDHouse:
I really love this!

So please tell all your fellow religionists to stop thinking of marrying JWs so that you can marry unah sef and we too will continue to marry awa sef.

Respond to the issue and stop trying to be funny.

Aemmyjah:
Marriage is an institution
Not a doctrine

I gave you definition of doctrine.

Is marriage a religious word?

Reason why it fits into doctrine.

Not everyone eats and dress same way too... We can't say dressing is a doctrine

You can call it whatever you want.

Next time you want to direct someone to your church beliefs, send them a link to your church website (if you have any)

What has this got to do with the discussion?

Chijindu160:
Try and use KJV.

The fact that you guys omitted those verses I quoted earlier shows that you guys don't believe those verses, hence the omissions from your scriptures.

You ppl don't believe in Jesus Christ, if you do, you wouldn't have removed Acts 8:37 from your bible. lol..

How are you Christians then?? Oh witnesses? lol

All those scriptures I quoted are things you don't believe in. I have use jw bible before so I know what am saying.

If you don't believe in Christ, you don't believe in whom who sent Him. I don't know where u got your religion.

Stop been ignorant.

Lol do common research you say no.

We do believe Jesus as the son of God.
But whatever is written in Acts 8:37, isn't in the original manuscripts where most Bible translations were translated from. Some translation didn't include the verse. Not just NWT.

KJV is not an accurate translation. For example, they intentionally added 1 John 5:7 to their translation to support their unscriptural trinity doctrine whereas that verse wasn't in original manuscripts.

Baba do your research and hold on to the truth.

cornelboy:
Lol Mathew 17:21.
It's not in NWT because that verse wasn't found in the original manuscripts.
Where do you think all these translations translated from?

Common research ona no fit do.

For your own good and enlightenment!

For now, nothing like ORIGINAL MANUSCRIPTS because we haven't discovered it.

What we have now are just OLDEST MANUSCRIPTS

MaxInDHouse:
The idiot always want to chat with me before i started ignoring him, he will never follow the course of faithful people but he wants their blessings.
Just imagine the faithless miscreant comparing himself with Rahab and Ruth both of whom deserted their own people and religion to become Jehovah's Witnesses!

Imagine someone who thinks he is a true christian and believer in God's ordain principles calling people idiots, miscreant.

You have a long way to go, you need to purge yourself.

Emusan:
For your own good and enlightenment!

For now, nothing like ORIGINAL MANUSCRIPTS because we haven't discovered it.

What we have now are just OLDEST MANUSCRIPTS

Before manipulations and lies start on what does not exist

achorladey:
What is there to read in 1 Corinthians 5: 1-13? I am not interested in whether you remove Anthony Morris from the Governing body members based on whatever is contained in 1 Corinthians 5:1-13.

The point you already accept as truth is that despite the numerous Bible teaching on treating family members, members are still found wanting.

Should I enter discussion with you on 1 Corinthians 5:1-13 based on what you believe another diversion will enter. This is not the first time I am discussing that scriptures here. Your members that are familiar with me discussing that verse and I know what ends the discussion.

C'mon... Why do vocal people like you hate to be referred to the Bible? The scripture I cited is straightforward. There were some wrongdoers in the early Christian congregation. What happened to them? They were disfellowshipped. That did not make Christians bad or fornicators then. Just a few bad eggs and they were removed.
Same happens in our modern time. That's the whole essence of what I asked you to read. No long story.

On how we treat family members, we are kind to all our family members but we do not involve in some of their practices that conflict with our conscience.

That someone you named was removed based on 1Cor. 5:1-13. The entirety of that your assertion is wrong. I wonder where you cooked that story from? Gosh!

cornelboy:
Lol do common research you say no.

You that did research, how come you accused KJV of INTENTIONALLY included 1 John 5:7?

But whatever is written in Acts 8:37, isn't in the original manuscripts where most Bible translations were translated from. Some translation didn't include the verse. Not just NWT.

Nothing like ORIGINAL MANUSCRIPTS. Stop lying.

KJV is not an accurate translation.

How many accurate translation are out there?

For example, they intentionally added 1 John 5:7 to their translation to support their unscriptural trinity doctrine whereas that verse wasn't in original manuscripts.

Nothing like ORIGINAL MANUSCRIPTS.

Also, this is a plain lie that KJV INTENTIONALLY added 1 John 5:7. The manuscripts USED by KJV contains 1 John 5:7. Which some scholars disagree with because it was a later manuscripts while some older manuscripts don't contain 1 John 5:7. That leads to it to be called spurious but there's evidence that the verse was removed as many early people used it to defend Jesus deity.

Baba do your research and hold on to the truth.

Do you do your own research OR just listening to what you were told by Watchtower followers?