IjeBos:


Lol. Depths of Stupidity.
When you write something that's makes it abundantly clear you have 0 idea what you are talking about and are spinning like a top.

What you are saying he should do is the literal definition of an investigation.
investigation:
the act or process of examining a crime, problem, statement, etc. carefully, especially to discover the truth:
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/investigation

The depths of stupidity.

basilico:


If SpaceX did not hire non citizen assylum seekers then it hired local citizens.

budaatum:


The Justice Department says law was broken. I'd wait for the court's decision after they've seen the evidence instead of making crap up to believe either way.

basilico:


Now that you are an incorrigible fool, what do fools with room temperature IQs like you saying about this poll that shocked CNN

CNN poll, when
asked who they would mainly blame
for a government shutdown, 39% of
respondents pointed the finger at Joe
Biden or the Democrats in Congress.
In contrast, only 33% blamed the GOP
in Congress, and 22% said both
parties were equally responsible.
CNN reporter commented, “I think this
one was a bit of a surprise to me
given, I think, what the conventional
wisdom is.”

basilico:


The justice department also investigated Trump Russia collusion knowing very very well that it was Clinton who started it. Knew it was Clinton campaign who paid off Cris Steele junk dossier. Knew very well that there was no collusion or the flimsiest basis to start the Crossfire Hurricane.
It is the Injustice Department.

Obrigardo:


maga cultists are just pure evil and bad people like this dodo.
Bomboclat, how do you like it now. lol

budaatum:


Aren't you glad there are courts with judges and juries in them who get to decide if dump is guilty or not? It's not as if the Justice Department can find anyone guilty and jail them without a day in court. Or is your position that they are injudges and injuries incourts too?

basilico:


Horrifying that you can breed and pass your defective genes to an innocent soul

basilico:


If you thinkBiden justice department is apolitical and impartial I have a bridge to sell you.

Obrigardo:


I just wonder how miserable your life is, when you are always in a constant state of agitation, failure and grief. Lol

budaatum:


You should read patiently before you engage in typing. It would show you pay attention and ensure your replies are read past the above.

I ask again, are the judges and juries not impartial?

basilico:


Refer to the example I gave.Defendant clearly guilty.Jury verdict is no guilt. Judge agrees with jury.
Judge and jury were exceedingly impartial in that case?

BornAgainCow:
😂😂😂😂😂

Confusion everywhere.

I think this is the year God decided to expose the delusions and stupidity of liberalism and the Democrat party.

Their pie-in-the-sky open boarder policy is finally clashing with the hard political reality. It only took 18,000 border crossings per day for them to start thinking “maybe this is not sustainable” 😂

When we call these people stupid we know what we are saying.

basilico:


Refer to the example I gave.Defendant clearly guilty.Jury verdict is no guilt. Judge agrees with jury.
Judge and jury were exceedingly impartial in that case?

bemeruca:


They are racist anti immigrants. I am glad that I made the crossing long before they changed their minds

budaatum:


Read your junk? You kidding, right?

Mistakes and errors do not mean impartial. And the guilty can always appeal to a higher court.

IjeBos:
The Republican's candidate for President in court AGAIN for civil Fraud.

Imagine this. The Republicans are trying to impeach the current President with no evidence (as stated by their own witness) of criminality for actions that supposedly happened while he wasn't president, while their Presidential candidate is in court for damages after the court already DECIDED he committed fraud. Does that mean that if he did win. he could be immediately impeached?

bemeruca:


Yawn... Like you care

IjeBos:
The Republican's candidate for President in court AGAIN for civil Fraud.

Imagine this. The Republicans are trying to impeach the current President with no evidence (as stated by their own witness) of criminality for actions that supposedly happened while he wasn't president, while their Presidential candidate is in court for damages after the court already DECIDED he committed fraud. Does that mean that if he did win. he could be immediately impeached?

IjeBos:
The Republican's candidate for President in court AGAIN for civil Fraud.

Imagine this. The Republicans are trying to impeach the current President with no evidence (as stated by their own witness) of criminality for actions that supposedly happened while he wasn't president, while their Presidential candidate is in court for damages after the court already DECIDED he committed fraud. Does that mean that if he did win. he could be immediately impeached?

bemeruca:


Yawn... Like you care

Obrigardo:
Criminal trump was alone in court, none of his crooked family members were with him.
He looked weak, angry and evil as usual calling for an attack on the NY AG and Judge Engoron.
While Clarence Thomas is recusing himself from any criminal trump supreme court cases.

Criminal trump will die in jail and in misery.

IjeBos:
Imagine this. Trump has been vilifying the current judge in his NY Fraud trial, yet he declined a jury trial.