₦airaland Forum

englishmart:
Dr. Naik is into comparative analysis of religions. "Islam and Christianity" especially.
I saw a debate he had with a Christian in Sokoto where the guy asked, "If Islam is a religion of peace, how come it's responsible for violence all over the world?"

"The police is responsible for maintaining peace, why do they have guns?
Sometimes, you maintain peace forcefully," he added.

Law enforcement agency and religion are two different entities. You don't take laws into your hands and claim you're enforcing peace.

"I'm asking because..."
"I don't care why you're asking, I've answered your question," Dr. Naik interjected
His debater added, after several failed attempts to shut him down that the reason for his question was because a Christian girl was stoned and burnt to death in Sokoto for alleged blasphemy"

In his his response, he said "You can't blaspheme against Allah or his prophet. The penalty is death." He added that such act could cause chaos and the best way to avoid impending chaos was to take laws into one's hands, he responded

I'm beginning to understand why he was exiled from India his country for inciting violence and terrorism.
His points are always deflective, and I wonder how bereft of intellect one has to be to be so convinced by his disjointed, conflictory arguments to the extent of converting to Islam.

If I may have a debate with him, it will have to be somewhere in Enugu, not Sokoto.
He calls crucifixion, "cruciFICTION"
According to their definition of blasphemy, his points are usually blasphemous.
If I debate him in Sokoto, I won't come out alive.

bantilosha:
You're talking nonsense sir

englishmart:
What correlation does this garbage have with the discussion?

englishmart:
Everyone knows

englishmart:
What? Are you sad or what?

SMOGnow:
Non of your business.

AbuTwins:
Only sensible people can understand that comment!
People with low IQs will just type what you typed!

SMOGnow:
He still made his point

bantilosha:
You don't have IQ

englishmart:
Dr. Naik is into comparative analysis of religions. "Islam and Christianity" especially.
I saw a debate he had with a Christian in Sokoto where the guy asked, "If Islam is a religion of peace, how come it's responsible for violence all over the world?"

"The police is responsible for maintaining peace, why do they have guns?
Sometimes, you maintain peace forcefully," he added.

Law enforcement agency and religion are two different entities. You don't take laws into your hands and claim you're enforcing peace.

"I'm asking because..."
"I don't care why you're asking, I've answered your question," Dr. Naik interjected
His debater added, after several failed attempts to shut him down that the reason for his question was because a Christian girl was stoned and burnt to death in Sokoto for alleged blasphemy"

In his his response, he said "You can't blaspheme against Allah or his prophet. The penalty is death." He added that such act could cause chaos and the best way to avoid impending chaos was to take laws into one's hands, he responded

I'm beginning to understand why he was exiled from India his country for inciting violence and terrorism.
His points are always deflective, and I wonder how bereft of intellect one has to be to be so convinced by his disjointed, conflictory arguments to the extent of converting to Islam.

If I may have a debate with him, it will have to be somewhere in Enugu, not Sokoto.
He calls crucifixion, "cruciFICTION"
According to their definition of blasphemy, his points are usually blasphemous.
If I debate him in Sokoto, I won't come out alive.

AbuTwins:
Define IQ?