Dtruthspeaker:


At least, this is the only book were it is proven that it is not lying to you.

the op shouldn't comment on what he knows nothing about.

The fact that the bible confirm that a thousand years is like a day to God also shows the possibility of evolution

paxonel:
the op shouldn't comment on what he knows nothing about.

The fact that the bible confirm that a thousand years is like a day to God also shows the possibility of evolution

Just a thousand years? That’s too low!
10,000 years is like a day to Leprechaun

Maynman:

Imagine if everyone has this indoctrinated mentality.

People like you are busy fasting and praying for divine healing while people like Charles Darwin were busy looking for the cure for SCD.

so for your mind you don drop quote abi,

For your information i am not against science, as a matter of fact many Christian scientists such as Michael faraday, blaise pascal and Gregor Mendel who is widely regarded today as the father of genetics have contributed to our understanding of things which we do know and use today.

But for one other scientist hiding under the guise of been a scientists to be proposing ideas, as stupid as it sound...that "man evolve from apes" or "apes and man are of common ancestors or whatever he Darwin thinks.....

That those not mean everyone one would swallow such in the name of science.
You are free too accept such theory if you wish too

It is not in your place to decide for others.

Johnycastro18:
so for your mind you don't drop quote abi,

For your information i am not against science, as a matter of fact many Christian scientists such as Michael faraday, blaise pascal and Gregor Mendel who is widely regarded today as the father of genetics have contributed to our understanding of things which we do know and use today.

But for one other scientist hiding under the guise of been a scientists to be proposing ideas, as stupid as it sound...that "man evolve from apes" or "apes and man are of common ancestors or whatever he Darwin thinks.....

That those not mean everyone one would swallow such in the name of science.
You are free too accept such theory if you wish too

It is not in your place to decide for others.

Do you think if the the big bang and evolution didn't happen there will be all this scientists with their inventions?
"Christian scientists such as Michael faraday, blaise pascal and Gregor Mendel"
https://www.rosicrucian.org/history

Maynman:

Do you think if the the big bang and evolution didn't happen there will be all this scientists with their inventions?
"Christian scientists such as Michael faraday, blaise pascal and Gregor Mendel"
https://www.rosicrucian.org/history

what are you even saying?

As far back as i could remeber, The big bang theory was postulated by George Lemaitre around 1927,

Charles Darwin and his theory of evolution existed around the 1800's

So how do this scientists mention above(George and Charles Darwin) with there supposed theories influence the supposed list of scientist you just posted oga?

Johnycastro18:
what are you even saying?

As far back as i could remeber, The big bang theory was postulated by George Lemaitre around 1927,

Charles Darwin and his theory of evolution existed around the 1800's

So how do this scientists mention above(George and Charles Darwin) with there supposed theories influence the supposed list of scientist you just posted oga?

It has everything to do with it.
Do you think George Lemaitre, a Catholic priest and George Darwin just woke up and formed their theory?
Science is saying the same thing.

Christian scientists such as Michael faraday, blaise pascal and Gregor Mendel"
https://www.rosicrucian.org/history

paxonel:
the op shouldn't comment on what he knows nothing about.

The fact that the bible confirm that a thousand years is like a day to God also shows the possibility of evolution

You wish!

Maynman:

It has everything to do with it.
Do you know George Lemaitre, a Catholic priest and George Darwin just woke up and formed their theory?

Christian scientists such as Michael faraday, blaise pascal and Gregor Mendel"
https://www.rosicrucian.org/history

George and Charles Darwin never influenced those three Scientists That i mentioned above for the records.

As for George lamaitre been a catholic Priest and also Been the brain behind the big bang theory, its still changes nothing....

LIKE I said every scientist is entitle to his/her own opinion on whatsoever theory he/she wants to Believe.

I hope you do know also, that some world acclaimed scientists do not Support this theorys By George and Charles DARWIN till date ?

So, me not accepting the theory's of those two scientist mentioned above Doesn't mean am against Science or Whatever it stand for as you were trying to potray earlier.

ITS A FREE WORLD TO CHOOSE WHAT IDEA TO BELIEVE OR NOT TOO.

Johnycastro18:
George and Charles Darwin never influenced those three Scientists That i mentioned above for the records.

As for George lamaitre been a catholic Priest and also Been the brain behind the big bang theory, its still changes nothing....

LIKE I said every scientist is entitle to his/her own opinion on whatsoever theory he/she wants to Believe.

I hope you do know also, that some world acclaimed scientists do not Support this theorys By George and Charles DARWIN till date ?

So, me not accepting the theory's of those two scientist mentioned above Doesn't mean am against Science or Whatever it stand for as you were there to potray earlier.

ITS A FREE WORLD TO CHOOSE WHAT IDEA TO BELIEVE OR NOT TOO.

How is faraday solving his work without using speed of light?


It's a free world but unfortunately it has been destroyed with beliefs

Dtruthspeaker:


What kind of stupid question is this? So because Toyota makes cars iron is finished?

Beautiful! The question of why there are still monkeys is equally as stupid. Glad you could see it. LoLz!

Johnycastro18:


I hope you do know also, that some world acclaimed scientists do not Support this theorys By George and Charles DARWIN till date ?

Name the world acclaimed scientists who do not support evolution.

Maynman:

How is faraday solving his work without using speed of light?


It's a free world but unfortunately it has been destroyed with beliefs

How is faraday solving his work without using speed of light?

With the idea of ole roemer works offcourse who made the discovery's of light travel and measurement....

AND Certainly not with the idea of evolution or the big bang theory, as that is what this argument is premise upon.

Maynman:

How is faraday solving his work without using speed of light?


It's a free world but unfortunately it has been destroyed with beliefs

When naija Christian man hear influence, he thinks its about doing daddy my father in the lord.. 😁

Dtruthspeaker:


What kind of stupid question is this? So because Toyota makes cars iron is finished?

Have a taste of your own medicine.

Jesusjnr2020

LoLz! I guess you could see how unintelligent your previous title was, it is good you are learning.

Meanwhile, to answer your new title, monkeys came from a proto primate, the same common ancestor we humans came from.

EmperorCaesar

Sure, go ahead.

Johnycastro18:
How is faraday solving his work without using speed of light?

With the idea of ole roemer works offcourse who made the discovery's of light travel and measurement....

AND Certainly not with the idea of evolution or the big bang theory, as that is what this argument is premise upon.

Ok

kkins25:


When naija Christian man hear influence, he thinks its about doing daddy my father in the lord.. 😁

I tire

LordReed:
Jesusjnr2020

LoLz! I guess you could see how unintelligent your previous title was, it is good you are learning.

Meanwhile, to answer your new title, monkeys came from a proto primate, the same common ancestor we humans came from.

I understand you're clearly feeling the dazzling effects of a knockout punch on this one, but that doesn't mean you should resort to lies out of desperation to save face.

I never changed a single word from the original title since I first posted it.

Modified:

Okay sorry. I just realized i changed a word ("humans" to "man" ) which however still means the same thing, so don't think it's what you meant.

LordReed:


Name the world acclaimed scientists who do not support evolution.

go read on the British physcist lord kelvin argument against Darwin evolution

Nobel laureate and French Henri Bergson's
Argument as well.

Jean larmack theory, is not in total support of it as well

New York university
Michael rapino thesis

The above mentioned individuals work all have there argument against this very theory.

So if anyother person choose not to believe Darwin's evolution theory or not

It is not in anyones place to lecture anyone on been over religious, or indoctrinated as the previous poster maynman was suggesting as the cause.

You can't force or expect everyone to believe in any scientific theory, just because you do.

Know this and know peace

jesusjnr2020:
I understand you're clearly feeling the dazzling effects of a knockout punch on this one, but that doesn't mean you should resort to lies out of desperation to save face.

I never changed a single word from the original title since I first posted it.

Modified:

Okay sorry. I just realized i changed a word ("humans" to "man" ) which however still means the same thing, so don't think it's what you meant.

OK my bad, I must have conflated a statement in your OP with the title. However my answer to the question still stands and dismantles whatever gotcha you were going for.

Johnycastro18:
go read on the British physcist lord kelvin argument against Darwin evolution

Nobel laureate and French Henri Bergson's
Argument as well.

Jean larmack theory, is not in total support of it as well

New York university
Michael rapino thesis

The above mentioned individuals work all have there argument against this very theory.

So if anyother person choose not to believe Darwin's evolution theory or not

It is not in anyones place to lecture anyone on been over religious, or indoctrinated as the previous poster maynman was suggesting as the cause.

You can't force or expect everyone to believe in any scientific theory, just because you do.

Know this and know peace

The same Lord Kelvin who said he didn't believe heavier than air flight was going to be possible? Or that only 400years of oxygen supply remained on earth? He clearly could not be relied upon to opine on fields of science he was not well versed in and he certainly was not any kind of biologist.

The same Larmack whose work formed the basis for Darwin's evolution by natural selection?

I can't find an Michael Rapino who is a world acclaimed scientist, what field of science did or does he work in?

jesusjnr2020:
Evolution Vs Creation: If Man Came From Monkeys, Where Did Monkeys Come From?

According to the Bible, humans and monkeys were made by God on the same day (6th) of creation. Genesis 1:25-31

However science through evolution theory claims otherwise, that Humans evolved From Monkeys.

But we still have humans existing alongside monkeys till this day on earth.

So if Humans came from monkeys, where did monkeys come from and why are there still monkeys on earth?

Your guess is as good as mine.

The Bible's version of man's origin makes much more logical sense than that of science.

God bless.

kobojunkie must have an answer to this.

Righthussle:
If god created humans who created god

I think the bible should have answer for this.
On a second note
Are you saying who created Jesus because he is lord

LordReed:


If the god made man from dust why is there still dust?

This really cracked me😅😅😅

LordReed:


The same Lord Kelvin who said he didn't believe heavier than air flight was going to be possible? Or that only 400years of oxygen supply remained on earth? He clearly could not be relied upon to opine on fields of science he was not well versed in and he certainly was not any kind of biologist.

The same Larmack whose work formed the basis for Darwin's evolution by natural selection?

I can't find an Michael Rapino who is a world acclaimed scientist, what field of science did or does he work in?

pointing out lord kelvin errors, as though Charles Darwin's theory wasn't confirmed to contain errors as we'll, despite basing some of his narration on larmacks works.

Well incase you don't know, same charles darwin with his lack of understanding in genetics propounded the pangenesis theory thas has now been proven wrong among scientist across the globe.

At least in admitting lord kelvin errors, you admit to the fact that scientist do make errors and mistakes in the course of there various theory's and work.

science is good no doubt
But what ever theory propounded by any scientist (who by the way are humans like you,) especially as in the case of charles Darwin evolution theory that has its own inconsistency and mistakes(his pangenesis claim as case study)

It is within one's jurisdiction to chose to accept
such theory or not, and such decision should be respected.

And if its that difficult to respect others decision, as it seems to be going so far....
Then don't bother qouting me, cos you won't get further reply

Johnycastro18:
pointing out lord kelvin errors, as though Charles Darwin's theory wasn't confirmed to contain errors as we'll, despite basing some of his narration on larmacks works.

Well incase you don't know, same charles darwin with his lack of understanding in genetics propounded the pangenesis theory thas has now been proven wrong among scientist across the globe.

At least in admitting lord kelvin errors, you admit to the fact that scientist do make errors and mistakes in the course of there various theory's and work.

science is good no doubt
But what ever theory propounded by any scientist (who by the way are humans like you,) especially as in the case of charles Darwin evolution theory that has its own inconsistency and mistakes(his pangenesis claim as case study)

It is within one's jurisdiction to chose to accept
such theory or not, and such decision should be respected.

And if its that difficult to respect others decision, as it seems to be going so far....
Then don't bother qouting me, cos you won't get further reply

LoLz. At least the point might be getting across to you that scientists are not people we hold as immutable authorities so saying some scientist disputes a well established theory means nothing if said scientist cannot produce contrary evidence.

Righthussle:


This really cracked me😅😅😅

Evolutionary theory does not state that man came from monkeys.humans and primates have a common ancestor. That's why they're similar.

Righthussle:
If your god created humans who created your god

God is an atheist lol

mysticwarrior:
kobojunkie must have an answer to this.

You mean the atheist (wolf) that comes in sheep clothing to deceive the sheep?