₦airaland Forum

FxMasterz:
I won't answer you according to the tenor of your words. Shouldn't the filthy show themselves filthy even in words and in deeds?

Now, what exactly were you trying to say I ran away from when I was the last person who mentioned J rabbit and she's yet to respond to my last mention since morning.?

Unlike your little brain, I do not believe she ran away. I believe she's busy and would respond in due cause.

Emotionally disturbed people like you are not worth debating. They can't think straight. Their emotions always get in the way.

God, you guys LIE so bleeping much! Why? Does it help you sleep well at night?!

JessicaRabbit:
Well, well, now if this isn't a beautiful irony. Uhm.. I thought you were the same guy who tried to punk Jaephoenix and say he ran away from a debate with you. You're chasing fishes in the sky my dear. This is starting to look like a scene in a 90s sitcom. 😂

I'll tell you what, let's do it like this. It may seem far fetched because it depends on the willingness of people to participate, but if you really want to prove the unfalsifiability of your argument, I'm sure you may agree.

Let's create a thread where you highlight the arguments you presented here, and we'll debate it over there. No other person besides the both of us is allowed to comment on that thread.

Then we'll open yet another thread for 13 other monikers who will comprise the jury. I'll try and come up with a method to select the jury in a way that will be fair to both parties. Just to give you a head start, I'll give you StillDTruth as one of the members of the jury, which means we'll have to find 12 more. They're not going to comment on the main thread, but they can comment on the commentary thread where they will eventually cast their votes on who possesses the superior logical argument.

If you don't accept, then it's a shame we won't be having any debate.

By the way I can't stop laughing at your screenshot of the AI conceding your point. You do realize AI is designed to avoid confrontational language and arguments revolving around faith and politics, right?

jaephoenix:
Oga, why u run from challenge wey dem put up? Stop dodging

FxMasterz:
.
You're the one deflecting. The question has nothing to do with this thread as clearly stated in the OP.

It's foolishness to start describing a Creator to someone who doesn't believe He exists.

Judas1X:
God, you guys LIE so bleeping much! Why? Does it help you sleep well at night?!

Where is your response to this post then, you stupid liar?

FxMasterz:
Can you prove she quoted and mentioned me with that post? Prove that now!

FxMasterz:
Why don't you create your own topic for that challenge.

You didn't address the OP but you want to create an unrelated line of argument!

FxMasterz:
Lol. The demons really did a good job on you but you're just too blind to see how filthy you are.

Stop trying to diss me, you're like a curb hooker trying anal for the first time

I don't know if you have hormonal crisis but it's really hard to ascertain if you're a male. Were you raised by an abusive, domineering mother that left you psychologically damaged so that you always sound so submissive and defeated? Or the bitch didn't push your brains out during labour leaving you to be birthed with brain lesions ?

See as I dey pound you like a lynch mob does to a market thief

JessicaRabbit:
You're really one to talk about honesty demanding that a user with a long history of dishonest arguments should be your lawyer. You must really lack self-awareness.

If you don't want a debate, then you can run off with your tail between your legs.

Judas1X:
Stop trying to diss me, you're like a curb hooker trying anal for the first time

I don't know if you have hormonal crisis but it's really hard to ascertain if you're a male. Were you raised by an abusive, domineering mother that left you psychologically damaged so that you always sound so submissive and defeated? Or the bitch didn't push your brains out during labour leaving you to be birthed with brain lesions ?

See as I dey pound you like a lynch mob does to a market thief

jaephoenix:
I did. Abi u go still lie for that one again?

FxMasterz:
Is this his you guys intend to detail this thread without facing the topic?

jaephoenix:
The topic says you have any water tight case. Now someone wants to debate you on this 'water tight case', and you chickened out, especially after chest thumping that you 'floored' an atheist

jaephoenix:
Does it matter? Do you evangelize to a fellow Christian or heathen? Isn't it when you drop your lie-filled gospel, then the person decides to believe? So drop your gospel of creator, lets see how it goes

FxMasterz:
Go and sit down. I don't have the time for filthy folks like you. We created a thread to discuss an important topic. This pestilent fellow just came around and littered the whole place with curse words. Afterwards, she sits back to congratulate herself.

Please get out. You don't worth my mentions. I have intelligent people to engage.

You really think you deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence with intelligent people? Come on brah . Get real.

FxMasterz:
Then, face the thread with that argument. That's not what we're doing here.

FxMasterz:
I chickened out and I'm still here tonight to reply all mentions including hers. How do you guys reason? Do you think everyone is jobless and sleeps on Nairaland as you folks do,?

FxMasterz:
Did I tell you I came here to evangelize? You lying lot cannot cease from lying. People don't just believe when we preach. They get a conviction by the Holy Ghost. That's something you can never understand till you die.

Here is a thread I created for debate. Not evangelism

jaephoenix:
Oh they get a conviction from the Holy bitch? So why can't your holy bitch convict us? Is she scared of atheists

jaephoenix:
The topic says you have any water tight case. Now someone wants to debate you on this 'water tight case', and you chickened out, especially after chest thumping that you 'floored' an atheist

Please help me ask FxMasterz, FxMasturbator or whatever he calls himself why he's still dodging this post right here. I think it's a good idea. Why isn't he replying to this ?

JessicaRabbit:
Well, well, now if this isn't a beautiful irony. Uhm.. I thought you were the same guy who tried to punk Jaephoenix and say he ran away from a debate with you. You're chasing fishes in the sky my dear. This is starting to look like a scene in a 90s sitcom. 😂

I'll tell you what, let's do it like this. It may seem far fetched because it depends on the willingness of people to participate, but if you really want to prove the unfalsifiability of your argument, I'm sure you may agree.

Let's create a thread where you highlight the arguments you presented here, and we'll debate it over there. No other person besides the both of us is allowed to comment on that thread.

Then we'll open yet another thread for 13 other monikers who will comprise the jury. I'll try and come up with a method to select the jury in a way that will be fair to both parties. Just to give you a head start, I'll give you StillDTruth as one of the members of the jury, which means we'll have to find 12 more. They're not going to comment on the main thread, but they can comment on the commentary thread where they will eventually cast their votes on who possesses the superior logical argument.

If you don't accept, then it's a shame we won't be having any debate.

By the way I can't stop laughing at your screenshot of the AI conceding your point. You do realize AI is designed to avoid confrontational language and arguments revolving around faith and politics, right?

jaephoenix:
But u have replied all mentions, except hers

jaephoenix:
Accept the debate. Lets go

FxMasterz:
Can you prove she quoted and mentioned me with that post? Prove that now!

It was the confidence for me. What an idiot .

StillDtruth:
See display of madness! Nothing was shot at me but.who shall tell the mad devil?

And of course satan's demon is complaining that i spoil his feeding.here hence the cry covered in deranged and maniacal laughter and madness

Anyway, what else shall a mad demon do than to display madness?

By this logic, you're a mad demon as well, since you're also fond of deranged and maniacal laughter. Poor StillDFool. You never fail to shoot off your own legs in any battle of words with me .

You see, StillDFool... What you don't understand is that besides the obvious difference in IQ, we're the exact same persons in every other aspect . But where I accept the fact that I'm a big bad troll and own it with pride, you try to portray yourself as an honest and decent individual when your actions betray you as the poster child for duplicity itself. This makes you a deceitful coward of a rare breed .

StillDtruth:
See, you are purely mad and moronically stupid. I just pointed out that it is because the opponent already has a lawyer on his side but like stones and mad people, the info is incapable of entering your foolish mad heads.

For you not to understand this simple statement just proves you are ncapable of understanding anything.

This uncircumcised monkey decided to wipe out the part of my post where I blatantly highlighted his self-contradiction and thought I wouldn't notice . I always tell you, StillDFool, that you're far less clever than you give yourself credit for. It wasn't enough for the cosmos to bless you with divine stupidity, it made you a pathological liar as well . You're just a soul that orbits around an imaginary object. The Jewish corpse you feverishly worship is your doom and your shackles. I pity your wife and children. And then your parents, what a loss your existence must have been to them. Bwahahahahaaa .

jaephoenix:
Lol. You're one dvmb idiotic dolt.
You asked where you made some comments (after denying u had made them), so I quoted your own comments in that post. Please idiota, look at the second post i quoted there, its your own post. That post is where you made the comment that everything must have a creator or manufacturer which you previously denied that you made. Same stunt you pulled against kingxsamz.
Lollest
You need Jesus lol 😆

jaephoenix:
If I(a random Internet dude) tell you I have 3 heads and another random dude confirms it, would you believe it without any evidence? Be honest

FxMasterz:
Oh, just seeing this mention right now. I met a lot of mentions at my return tonight. As I responded to them, more mentions came in and I missed your mention as a result. I thought you didn't reply.

As I said earlier, I only enlisted StillDtruth for my personal assistance. He has nothing to do regarding the debates we're having. He was to just alert me whenever you break a rule. That's all. Why are you intimidated by that? Moreso, he has rejected the invitation.

JessicaRabbit:
You're proposing we include people that can interject in our discussion and possibly even derail it. If you're so worried about breaking rules, then that's why we'll have the jury. They're the ones who will be keeping score. And like I said in my latest suggestion, they'll be free to make whatever comments they want in the "commentary thread", but we need a main thread where it's just you and me contributing with no one else posting on that thread. Basically two threads.

As for StillDtruth, rejecting him as a judge or referee was simply based on his past dishonest behavior and conduct towards debates, and the fact that I don't think he's competent enough to even understand the concepts we'll be discussing. It will be like calling a petulant 6 year old child to referee a political discussion between two scholars. He has no expertise to be making any sort of contributions there, and nearly everything he says would be straight up wrong and misleading.

Rejecting him as a lawyer though is simply because I see no need for a lawyer in this debate. What's the point? It will no longer be a 1v1, it will become a 2v2. And if it's going to be a 2v2, we might as well just allow everyone else to chip in instead of making the debate exclusive. If you've ever seen a real debate, you'll know that the only parties involved are the two individuals debating. I understand that he has fed you with baseless unevidenced lies about me, but I would hope that you're an adult who can think for himself and not let others think for you.

See, the Lies and deflection continue here You have no intergrity and honour. Even from the beginning you willingly broke some rules. So naturally, youwould not want me.

Judas1X:
Christians are such freaking liars tho! Gosh!

[b]This uncircumcised monkey decided to wipe out the part of my post where I blatantly highlighted his self-contradiction and thought I wouldn't notice ..

Judas1X:
[b]By this logic, you're a mad demon as well, since you're also fond of deranged and maniacal laughter. Poor StillDFool. You never fail to shoot off your own legs in any battle of words with me .

FxMasterz:
You're just running your mouth wild on this thread without any meaningful contribution other than to abuse people and call them names. What sort of human being are you? Do you have any moral training at all?