₦airaland Forum

Jamiuokolaa:
Haha

The guy na Dele Momodu?

ijebosb:
Amendment votes are binary. Either you vote for the Amendment or against the Amendment.
Amendment 4 reads


Voting For IT it would Overturn FLorida's current 6 week Abortion ban
Voting Against IT would Keep Florida's current 6 week Abortion ban



Now, he said "I’m gonna be voting that we need more than six weeks".
And there are only two positions,
1.) a vote for Amendment that would fulfill "six weeks is too short, it has to be more time" and "I’m gonna be voting that we need more than six weeks.".
2.) A vote against the Amendment which would allow the 6 weeks into law which is the opposite of both his statements.
Therefore by his statements he would be voting for the Amendment. But, at the end of the day, no-one really cares how he personally votes. What people cared about was what message he would send to his supporters about how he would vote. And the message was that the six weeks was too short.

The bigger problem is that Trump is a Presidential Candidate and this Abortion issue and this Amendment isn't a new thing and isn't a thing where a lot of people don't have strong convictions. The fact that his words would be in any way unclear(purposefully or unpurposefully) on this topic is disqualifying for a candidate.

And lastly, I don't care what you think or believe. You won't vote. You're a troll who has limited influence outside of the likes of Raum, Basilico, Ono and SpaceX. Outside of Raum, all people who won't be voting as well. So, knock yourself out believing whatever nonsense you want.

raumdeuter:
The guy na mumu. Leave am

bemeruca:
Kamala Harris has not given a proper interview since she became the front-runner. the CNN interview lasted 16 minutes for her and she could not put a string of sentences together. everything she said did not make sense

ijebosb:
Everytime you post here, I think of that discussion about Roberts and the Immunity ruling.
You were someone trying so hard to punch above his weight but inherently limited and incapable of it.
Let this shit go. You're punching above your weight.
You are in the bucket of Bemeruca and Basilico and all that they are.

bemeruca:
Kamala Harris has not given a proper interview since she became the front-runner. the CNN interview lasted 16 minutes for her and she could not put a string of sentences together. everything she said did not make sense

ribbit:
Right below the belt. 😭😭

Wait until 10 sec mark and you’ll understand what’s going on…. pic.twitter.com/hZ55LoEjdN

— @amuse (@amuse) August 31, 2024

Obrigardo:
I've predicted multiple times that the republiqan party will splinter!
And now it's going big.

Everything rapist felon trump touches dies!

bemeruca:
dudes for kamala

Wait until 10 sec mark and you’ll understand what’s going on…. pic.twitter.com/hZ55LoEjdN

— @amuse (@amuse) August 31, 2024

armyofone:
Do you think the swallows you consume will give you the same strength and energy ?



Tough guy for Kamala! He must have fallen from the coconut tree and strong!

bemeruca:
You are an independent?

armyofone:
Yes, I am.
And you ?

bemeruca:
I am not a D, R, or I.

raumdeuter:
Would you say your views are conservative ?

LordReed:
MAGA

ijebosb:
Byron Donalds - "That one is smart. You have smart ones and then you have some that aren’t quite so good."

I'll leave this comment here and people can decide for themselves what they think he meant.
Listen to the crowd's reaction as well.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iioIRryc4_o

Americans are feeling the pain of kamala Harris rocket-high prices. President Trump will MAKE AMERICA AFFORDABLE AGAIN!

bemeruca:
Kamala Harris has not given a proper interview ....

Obrigardo:
You are damn stupid bro.

Have you ever, ever, for once watch a full rapist trump rally? Naa, I don't think you do coz you'll be ashamed writing this trash.

Criminal trump is a disaster when he speaks, man.

budaatum:
Prior to her interview on CNN, you didn't need the adjective "proper" to make sure you don't see, and I guess after she does give what you can't argue would be a proper interview, you'd need another adjective to cover your eyes with.

Funny that some humans do that, cover their eyes with adjectives, so they may claim they have not seen.

bemeruca:
What she gave on CNN was not an interview, it was just a show to ease the complaints and she still bombed it, despite Dana not pushing her like she did with Vance.

She failed to answer the most basic questions. Instead, she prepared word salad.

The interview was not live, meaning they selected the best to show us. She only spoke for 16 minutes. That's not an interview, that's a show.

budaatum:
Is "just a show" your new adjective (sentence) to describe Kamala's interview?

It's not really an adjective, mind, and its very weak, like the sort of adjectival sentence one would use to describe what musk did with dump if you asked me, though that is better described as a 'rambling shît show' despite and because of its length.

bemeruca:
Musk is not a journalist, that's more like a chat than an interview. They spoke live on Twitter for more than 2 hours. Kamala cannot make it to 17mins.

budaatum:
I guess we shall see. And when she does, I'll see what you say then too.

bemeruca:
She is not gonna have another one. She is trying to back out of the debate, she wants to read from notes in the debate. I would conclude she is expecting debate questions and to carry prepared answers.

They gave Hillary Clinton debate questions before, who is to say they are not planning to do the same thing?

budaatum:
I'm not surprised she'd want notes. I'd need notes too to fact check dumb's many lies. In fact, I'd need a whole lot of assistants with notes to fact check dumb's numerous lies!

As for planning. I'd rather see evidence than go yelling without any that the debate was rigged, considering Biden who might have needed them never had debate questions before hand.