₦airaland Forum

raumdeuter:
You have been confirmed to be a dunce multiple times

Ivy League degree indeed. I will expect anyone with such to write better than a 3rd grader

His mates with Ivy League degrees are sending their kids to Ivy League schools from Lagos. Yet he is here bragging about his boy sending his kid away while he has nothing. This guy is almost 50 years old

raumdeuter:
You have been confirmed to be a dunce multiple times

Ivy League degree indeed. I will expect anyone with such to write better than a 3rd grader

Yes, you and your besties, Bemeruca and Basilico have confirmed me to be a dunce.
Well said. Repeat that to yourself.
I am the dunce with two degrees from schools you nor your children will ever sniff.
Show me your friends and I'll show you who you are.

ijebosb:
Yes, you and your besties, Bemeruca and Basilico have confirmed me to be a dunce.
Well said. Repeat that to yourself.
I am the dunce with two degrees from schools you nor your children will ever sniff.
Show me your friends and I'll show you who you are.

Obrigardo is your friend 😂😂😂

bemeruca:
His mates with Ivy League degrees are sending their kids to Ivy League schools from Lagos. Yet he is here bragging about his boy sending his kid away while he has nothing. This guy is almost 50 years old

Repeat that.
My mates(one, who was just here) are sending their kids who are legacies to IVY Leagues schools and paying in Dollars from Lagos.
Now ask yourself, how many of your mates are sending their kids who are legacies to Ivy Leagues schools in the US and can afford to pay $90,000 a year in Dollars from Nigeria.
Let me help you with that, 0. It would be 0. Because, like attracts like. And you're a BUM.

I think you missed the headline.

bemeruca:
Obrigardo is your friend 😂😂😂

Xenophobic black man hater asylum seeker who doubles as a hateful maga cultist says what..

ijebosb:
Yes, you and your besties, Bemeruca and Basilico have confirmed me to be a dunce.
Well said. Repeat that to yourself.
I am the dunce with two degrees from schools you nor your children will ever sniff.
Show me your friends and I'll show you who you are.

Almost everyone who has ever read your post confirmed you to be extremely dull and have the understanding of a 3rd grader

You are a joke around here.

bemeruca:
His mates with Ivy League degrees are sending their kids to Ivy League schools from Lagos. Yet he is here bragging about his boy sending his kid away while he has nothing. This guy is almost 50 years old

That shows he's a loser not just on the web but in real life

raumdeuter:
Almost everyone who has ever read your post confirmed you to be extremely dull and have the understanding of a 3rd grader

You are a joke around here.

You mean 3rd grade understanding somewhat like this?

ijebosb:
Repeat that.
My mates(one, who was just here) are sending their kids who are legacies to IVY Leagues schools and paying in Dollars from Lagos.
Now ask yourself, how many of your mates are sending their kids who are legacies to Ivy Leagues schools in the US and can afford to pay $90,000 a year in Dollars from Nigeria.
Let me help you with that, 0. It would be 0. Because, like attracts like. And you're a BUM.

I think you missed the headline.

100, 2000, you may never know. Stop talking about your mates, talk about you.

You are almost 50, yet all you do is to talk about your ex(s) and your imaginary girlfriend in Nigeria who has butlers and cook yet you spend nights sleeping at your boys couch sending his daughter to uni because you want to save little change 😂

Ibime:
3 Vs 1 is losers nonsense

He was talking so much nonsense about cats, dogs and abortion after birth. Media have a duty to set the record straight. Setting record straight on a mad man for the benefit of the public is not taking sides

He was even handed an alley hoop with the first question on economy, kicking off on his strong point. If they started off on abortion, I will know it was 3 Vs 1

Trump had all the ammunition that matters - Economy, Immigration and Afghanistan withdrawal and still lost the debate, Kamala didn't have much to work with except abortion and still won. If you give any reasonable politician Trumps strong points, it would have been a whitewash

I've watched that debate again. Kamala really didn't say anything of substance. Of course the dogs and cats talk is neither here nor there anyone clutching to that one is clutching at straws. I think the bar was set so low for Kamala that people are just happy that she sounded somewhat coherent

Peruse the image below. The media was clearly only setting one person straight. Kamala was allowed to say whatever. Zero pushback

Trump is not even anti abortion and they know it so yet another emotional distraction argument being thrown up by the libs

Trump's issue like I opined earlier is that he is not surgical, he's like that gregarious grandpa that doesn't know when to stop talking.

ijebosb:
Did you read any of this or did you just copy and paste it?
What is the point of copying and pasting something without reading it and asking yourself if it makes sense or sounds silly?

Understand we are not like dumb Biden Kamala voters who only see one thing. Orange man bad.

If you have any evidence to the contrary post a link here, or pen down those long love letters proving only one of the 5 issues pointed out were wrong.
Poor attempt at gaslighting. I also watched the whole debate as it unfolded and was already posting her lies here .

ijebosb:
You mean 3rd grade understanding somewhat like this?

Something as basic as knowing when to use WRITE or RIGHT

raumdeuter:
Top 5 lies that the ABC News moderators refused to fact-check or falsely fact-checked during the debate:

1. Mandatory Firearm Buybacks:

Kamala Harris told Trump to "stop lying" about her wanting to confiscate firearms. Harris has previously stated multiple times that she wants to launch a mandatory buyback program.

The ABC moderators said nothing.

2. "Fine People" Hoax:

Kamala Harris claimed Trump called neo-N*zi's "very fine people." This hoax was debunked by Snopes but the ABC moderators let it slide.

The ABC moderators said nothing.

3. Post-Birth Abortion:

Trump claimed babies were 'k*lled' outside the womb in failed abortions. Under Tim Walz, babies born alive in botched abortions are allowed to be left to d*e.

Eight babies who survived abortions in Minnesota were abandoned and sadly perished under Walz.

The ABC moderators simply said Trump was lying and moved on without adding context.

4. Defund the Police:

Kamala Harris laughed when Trump said she wanted to defund the police. During a previous interview, Harris said having more cops on the street is "wrong."

She also supported taking police officers out of schools.

The ABC moderators said nothing.

5. Bl**dbath Hoax:

Kamala Harris claimed Trump said there would be a bl**dbath if he is not elected, insinuating that his supporters would start k*lling people.

This is completely false. The comment was made during a rally where Trump said there would be a "bl**dbath" for the American auto industry if he is not elected.

The ABC moderators said nothing.

Top 5 lies that the ABC News moderators refused to fact-check or falsely fact-checked during the debate:

1. Mandatory Firearm Buybacks:

Kamala Harris told Trump to "stop lying" about her wanting to confiscate firearms. Harris has previously stated multiple times that she wants… pic.twitter.com/6aXznDnq7O

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) September 11, 2024

Anyone suggesting those moderators were not biased and anti Trump is simply not being objective.

Being biased is not a crime but don't insult our intelligence with faux objectivity

A40:
Trump's issue like I opined earlier is that he is not surgical, he's like that gregarious grandpa that doesn't know when to stop talking.

The main koko is Kamala is smart unlike what you made out. Her taking that debate is like Tinubu winning debate against Obi in present day Nigeria. Tinubu has no right to win any debate with the emotions people are feeling. Not that Dems are responsible for 2021-22 inflation anymore than Trump is responsible for 2011 to 2019 low interest rate environment , that's just the stage of the business cycle, but that's a matter for another day. Trump just has no right to lose the debate or even be close in the debate, given the conditions, unless his opponent is smart and wily.

bemeruca:
100, 2000, you may never know. Stop talking about your mates, talk about you.

You are almost 50, yet all you do is to talk about your ex(s) and your imaginary girlfriend in Nigeria who has butlers and cook yet you spend nights sleeping at your boys couch sending his daughter to uni because you want to save little change 😂

He brings up my mates, gets embarrassed and then says stop talking about my mates. 😂😂

A guy who just built a house in Banana would invite me to stay with him and put me on a couch? Lol. The jealousy rotted your mind. Lol.
😂 😂 😂 😂

Ibime:
The main koko is Kamala is smart unlike what you made out. Her taking that debate is like Tinubu winning debate against Obi in present day Nigeria. Tinubu has no right to win any debate with the emotions people are feeling. Not that Dems are responsible for 2021-22 inflation anymore than Trump is responsible for 2011 to 2019 low interest rate environment , that's just the stage of the business cycle, but that's a matter for another day. Trump just has no right to lose the debate or even be close in the debate, given the conditions, unless his opponent is smart and wily.

Agree with you for the most part. But, I see it reversed. In a sane US, Trump wouldn't even be close and he would have had to step aside after that debate. And honestly, if you really did ask the question are we better off now than 4 years ago, the answer would be yes. But, I think that period was so chaotic and traumatic people forgot what it was like.

Ibime:
The main koko is Kamala is smart unlike what you made out. Her taking that debate is like Tinubu winning debate against Obi in present day Nigeria. Tinubu has no right to win any debate with the emotions people are feeling. Not that Dems are responsible for 2021-22 inflation anymore than Trump is responsible for 2011 to 2019 low interest rate environment , that's just the stage of the business cycle, but that's a matter for another day. Trump just has no right to lose the debate or even be close in the debate, given the conditions, unless his opponent is smart and wily.

That is a reach.

Trump just had to ignore the bait and press the moderators to be impartial. She'd have cratered.
That's how fragile her performance was.

You're trying to make this seem like 5D chess.
Everyone told Trump to ignore her attempts to goad him. Publicly. Before the debate.
That was her entire strategy. In fact, if actual smart folks like Shapiro or Klobuchar were on the podium, they'd have dissociated themselves from Biden and scored an actual win that'd tilt voters' preference.

Biden already goaded Trump into side talk about golf in the last debate.
That was a senile Biden. Is that your yardstick for smarts?

-Lord

Ibime:
The main koko is Kamala is smart unlike what you made out. Her taking that debate is like Tinubu winning debate against Obi in present day Nigeria. Tinubu has no right to win any debate with the emotions people are feeling. Not that Dems are responsible for 2021-22 inflation anymore than Trump is responsible for 2011 to 2019 low interest rate environment , that's just the stage of the business cycle, but that's a matter for another day. Trump just has no right to lose the debate or even be close in the debate, given the conditions, unless his opponent is smart and wily.

Howdy Ibime.. If the mods were professional Kamala should have bought a rope to hang herself by now.

Ibime:
The main koko is Kamala is smart unlike what you made out. Her taking that debate is like Tinubu winning debate against Obi in present day Nigeria. Tinubu has no right to win any debate with the emotions people are feeling. Not that Dems are responsible for 2021-22 inflation anymore than Trump is responsible for 2011 to 2019 low interest rate environment , that's just the stage of the business cycle, but that's a matter for another day. Trump just has no right to lose the debate or even be close in the debate, given the conditions, unless his opponent is smart and wily.

Your bar and the general bar for Kamala is extremely low. That's why she appeared smart. She didn't win that debate IMHO as Trump's only real goof was the Healthcare part where he talked about plans and what not, if I were a voter that's the only part that I would raise my eyebrow.

We are talking about the least scrutinized Presidential candidate of all time. Just like the CNN and this ABC debate she faced zero pressure and zero scrutiny and so of course it's easy to come out smelling like roses. Everywhere she's faced any type of resistance she has been left cackling as usual

Trump was not as prepared and did not come with his fast ball as I expected him to be cos put ordinary me there I would cook SKamala stir fry for 5 minutes straight.

ijebosb:
Agree with you for the most part. But, I see it reversed. In a sane US, Trump wouldn't even be close and he would have had to step aside after that debate. And honestly, if you really did ask the question are we better off now than 4 years ago, the answer would be yes. But, I think that period was so chaotic and traumatic people forgot what it was like.

.
Most people are better off today than 4,5 or 7 years ago.
I saw that report somewhere, I don't remember the source. Care to share a link?

LordAdam16:
That is a reach.

Trump just had to ignore the bait and press the moderators to be impartial. She'd have cratered.
That's how fragile her performance was.

You're trying to make this seem like 5D chess.
Everyone told Trump to ignore her attempts to goad him. Publicly. Before the debate.
That was her entire strategy. In fact, if actual smart folks like Shapiro or Klobuchar were on the podium, they'd have dissociated themselves from Biden and scored an actual win that'd tilt voters' preference.

Biden already goaded Trump into side talk about golf in the last debate.
That was a senile Biden. Is that your yardstick for smarts?

-Lord

VP cannot dissociate themself from President anymore than Tinubu could dissociate himself from Buhari in last elections. Leave that to your agents to do that online, but you cannot do that publicly even though we all know the Koko

Being realistic with yourself, there is no way you will have the ammunition Trump had and not bury the debate. Even on the economy, he had no stats, just making sweeping statements. You and I would have buried Kamala with stats. The fact she is perceived to have won, or it's even close, given the odds in Trump favour is testament to her debating skills, Trumps lack of it, or both.

Derek the Menswear Guy gives a good description of how tariffs work vis a vis Men's suits. Same principle for everything else.
https://x.com/dieworkwear/status/1833725667554607176

A40:
Your bar and the general bar for Kamala is extremely low. That's why she appeared smart. She didn't win that debate IMHO as Trump's only real goof was the Healthcare part where he talked about plans and what not, if I were a voter that's the only part that I would raise my eyebrow.

We are talking about the least scrutinized Presidential candidate of all time. Just like the CNN and this ABC debate she faced zero pressure and zero scrutiny and so of course it's easy to come out smelling like roses. Everywhere she's faced any type of resistance she has been left cackling as usual

Trump was not as prepared and did not come with his fast ball as I expected him to be cos put ordinary me there I would cook SKamala stir fry for 5 minutes straight.

Anyone on this thread will cook Kamala.
Even Obri.gardo go turn her like barber chair.

Trump walked in there fixing to end another career but then was distracted by crowd sizes.
If I tell you say e no pain me eh.
By now we suppose don dey write eulogy. Race tied. Position better than 2016, 2020.
Weakest candidate in a generation on a compressed timeline.
Just hammer her record. No time for recovery. He start dey pursue butterfly.

-Lord

LordAdam16:
Anyone on this thread will cook Kamala.
Even Obri.gardo go turn her like barber chair.

Trump walked in there fixing to end another career but then was distracted by crowd sizes.
If I tell you say e no pain me eh.
By now we suppose don dey write eulogy. Race tied. Position better than 2016, 2020.
Weakest candidate in a generation on a compressed timeline.
Just hammer her record. No time for recovery. He start dey pursue butterfly.

-Lord

Nairaland meet Misogyny.

Ibime:
VP cannot dissociate themself from President anymore than Tinubu could dissociate himself from Buhari in last elections. Leave that to your agents to do that online, but you cannot do that publicly even though we all know the Koko

Being realistic with yourself, there is no way you will have the ammunition Trump had and not bury the debate. Even on the economy, he had no stats, just making sweeping statements. You and I would have buried Kamala with stats. The fact she is perceived to have won, or it's even close, given the odds in Trump favour is testament to her debating skills, Trumps lack of it, or both.

The President is a lame duck one-term President that could have been charged and is indicted on corruption.
You have the entire media establishment on your side.
She will dissociate from him effortlessly if she was smart. Especially since Trump gave her the floor and the moderators dropped the assist.
She'll do it so well that members of her party will start publicly contemplating having her step in prematurely to drive home the change narrative she'd expertly craft.

To your second paragraph, Trump has lost 6 of 7 prior debates.
If Biden was coherent, Trump would have lost that single win. He wasn't answering questions.
The reason why many expected Trump to have it in the bag yesterday was because he had all of these missteps in the past.
And folks were like he has learned his lessons. He wouldn't fall for goading and start rambling. He wouldn't sink low to name-calling.
Well, we know how that turned out. What use is experience if you wouldn't apply it.

Trump handed her the W on a platter and the moderators helped her take it home.
This is so similar to 2020. When Biden just had Trump dropping weekly assists. From the coronavirus briefings to the public debate about masks and social distancing. When it was time to make his case in a debate, he tried to have a 2016 Republican primary redux of a shouting match after 100K Americans had died of COVID. That was a layup of the ages.
This is not on that level, but it is bewildering self-sabotage.

His save right now is that Kamala is such a bad candidate with a terrible record that people see him being undisciplined and they're like, "f*cking id**t", but I'll still have to vote for him because of my fossil fuel job or so migrants are not bussed into my town.

I don't think she's smart.
I don't think her team expected the stars to align so perfectly. If they did, they'd not have hedged with a second debate proposal just before the debate started. Yesterday's play was a, hang in there, throw bait, spout platitudes, and wait for the moderators to carry you. Trump saw that plan and went, "babe, are those limited edition baits?! F*ck outta here. I want all of them."

Sorry about the long read.

-Lord

LordAdam16:
Anyone on this thread will cook Kamala.
Even Obri.gardo go turn her like barber chair.

Trump walked in there fixing to end another career but then was distracted by crowd sizes.
If I tell you say e no pain me eh.
By now we suppose don dey write eulogy. Race tied. Position better than 2016, 2020.
Weakest candidate in a generation on a compressed timeline.
Just hammer her record. No time for recovery. He start dey pursue butterfly.

-Lord

That's the point. He does a lot of bloviating at times even at his rallies. Speeches that should be 30 minutes this man can go a hour and a half. When you do that you leave room to say things that bad faith actors can tie on your neck.

This debate was basically him entering lion's den. You're are already on a compromised network ABC, then one of the two moderators just happens to be one of your opponent's sorority sisters.

She was not fact checked even a single time. In an over hour and half debate. Lol who's fooling who?

SKamala will never set foot on a Fox debate. Her handlers won't let her, Trump should know that his opps are not fighting fair but the trick though is to counter them in a controlled and cerebral manner.

I still reiterate Kamala said nothing worth clutching to apart from her abortion dogwhistlin as usual. Look at her response to the Israel/Hamas gbege for example

basilico:
.
Most people are better off today than 4,5 or 7 years ago.
I saw that report somewhere, I don't remember the source. Care to share a link?

4 - 5 years ago, not even debatable. Everyone is better off except those, making money on Covid. The first case of Covid in the US was Jan, 2020. 6 or 7 maybe more of a debate.
But you can't excuse Trump for Covid then blame Biden for what it took to recover from Covid.
But this is largely the Democrats fault.
The should have held hearings on Covid. Obama did the same thing after Iraq and Afghanistan.
They believe in moving on, not politicizing things, but that allows the Republicans who do believe in politicizing everything to backfill it with conspiracies and lies.

But you can google it. Story after story doing the comparison between now and 4 years ago.

IjeBos:
This was fair.
Some gripes. Abortion was probably one of Harris's best answers that night. Wasn't close. Trump was all to happy to not talk about it anymore. It's a lose lose. He loses more women or he loses his evangelical base.

kamala answer on abortion was filled with lies and shaming gestures, she claim Trump is planning a national ban on abortion if elected which we all know to be a lie. Also, she brought up extreme cases of R*pe and incests like Trump was against it which he clearly stated his stand on it.

Trump also mentioned that it will be difficult for her to make abortion federally, it all for vote and Kamala isn't sincere just like how Biden used student loan to bait for vote and three years in with Nothing to show for.

Trump asked a honest and intelligent question on How Early or Late one can get an abortion which to me needs to be clearly stated if kamala truly want it federally but the biased moderators ignored that part.

So, I'm still wondering what is special with what she said? If this is her best performing point it definitely means the rest was all blabbing and low IQ answers.

ijebosb:
He brings up my mates, gets embarrassed and then says stop talking about my mates. 😂😂

A guy who just built a house in Banana would invite me to stay with him and put me on a couch? Lol. The jealousy rotted your mind. Lol.
😂 😂 😂 😂

gets embarrassed that you have nothing while your mate whose couch you were sleeping on since you cannot afford to spend cash in a hotel is sending his daughter to uni as you are older and almost 50 with no kids or anything to show for?

Yeah, I am so jealous. hahahaha

Ibime:
When the excuses start coming out (moderators, earrings etc) and when even Elon Musk accepts Kamala took the debate, just know the debate was lost. Trump had no right losing that debate when all the key stats are on his side.

Ibime, if someone cannot get to the office because of an accident and they tell you why, it is an excuse. If Trump had an excuse and the moderators were the reason Harris seemed to perform well or they made him look bad while making her look good that is a good excuse because you are here saying she won. She was poor. this happens in football. recently rice was sent off and the game ended in a draw because the ref might have made an error giving Rice a 2nd yellow card and it affected the outcome of the game. Eze scored a goal but the ref blew and disallowed the goal. palace lost that match and saying they did because of the ref is a good excuse because it is true and the ref's action affected Palace negatively. so what you are saying does not make sense if that is the case.

This clip

This clip may be the most egregious example of ABC debate moderators' direct actions/inactions to affect viewers’ perceptions of the information presented at the debate.

There are at least seven instances of this within a two-minute span.

This is not “bias."

It’s much worse.… pic.twitter.com/tYJhZwGwdW

— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) September 11, 2024

may be the most egregious example of ABC debate moderators' direct actions/inactions to affect viewers’ perceptions of the information presented at the debate.

There are at least seven instances of this within a two-minute span.

This is not “bias."

It’s much worse.

This is direct, planned interference in the debate outcome. When moderators take on the role of “fact checkers" the inference is that the absence of a “fact check” confers validity to the non-fact-checked information.

When one side is repeatedly “fact checked,” while the other is not, that is a signal to the viewer that one side is not reliable and truthful, while the other side is.

The ABC moderators had their orders, and here you see those orders executed.

In this clip:

1) Trump says Pelosi is responsible for security at the Capitol. True. Muir intervenes on Kamala’s behalf by cutting him off with snarky retort, doesn’t acknowledging the validity of Trump’s statement, and immediately redirects to Kamala to set up her “answer" he knows is coming. This is direct action by Muir to affect the outcome of this exchange.

2) Kamala says she was at the Capitol on J6. She was there in the morning, but left to go to DNC HQ prior to the riot. Critical information is omitted. No fact-check.

3) Kamala says Trump incited a mob to attack the Capitol. False. Trump’s “peacefully and patriotically” comments are ignored. Trump is not charged with inciting violence. No fact check.

4) Kamala says that “some" police officers died on January 6. False. No fact check.

5) Kamala recites the Charlottesville “Fine People” hoax. This has been thoroughly and repeatedly debunked. No fact check.

6) Kamala recites the “stand back and stand by” hoax. This is designed to infer that Trump was ordering a “militia” to act on later orders, when he was clearly asking for a cooling of tensions. No fact check.

7) Kamala recites the “bloodbath" hoax. Trump was talking about the automobile industry, not violence. No fact check.

To quote Megyn Kelly on the ABC moderators:

"They did exactly what their bosses wanted." -western

"In Springfield they are eating the dogs, the people that came in, they're eating the cats. They're eating the pets of the people that live there," Trump said during Tuesday's presidential debate.

I thought he wanted to add they are eating the owners of the dogs and cats too

I laughed so hard yesterday night

Haiti people have suffered

armyofone:
"In Springfield they are eating the dogs, the people that came in, they're eating the cats. They're eating the pets of the people that live there," Trump said during Tuesday's presidential debate.

I thought he wanted to add they are eating the owners of the dogs and cats too

I laughed so hard yesterday night

Haiti people have suffered

trump should have said they are making 404 with pets