₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,327,737 members, 8,432,346 topics. Date: Tuesday, 23 June 2026 at 03:09 PM

Toggle theme

The Implication Of Extreme Exaggeration in the Book of John! - Christianity Etc (6) - Nairaland

Nairaland ForumNairaland GeneralChristianity EtcThe Implication Of Extreme Exaggeration in the Book of John! (4828 Views)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Reply (Go Down)

Re: The Implication Of Extreme Exaggeration in the Book of John! by AntiChristian(op): 3:54pm On Nov 09, 2024
MaxInDHouse:
The language of the Middle East settlers have lots of words in common just as Salem and Salam both means peace but one is Hebrew the other is Arabic.
Does Hebrew have the word "sabachthani"?

What is "abandon" or "forsake" in Hebrew?

Answer and stop the diversion!
Re: The Implication Of Extreme Exaggeration in the Book of John! by Ohyoudidnt: 3:54pm On Nov 09, 2024
SIRTee15:
Finally U answered my question.
So U have admitted heavenly being can become humans.
So what's the noise about Jesus becoming a man?

As TenQ showed, even Jubril became a man when he appeared to Mary.

U can't function on earth as a spirit. U have to become a Man. That's the whole point of incarnation.

So AntiChristian logic he's trying to prove here is flawed by comparing characteristics of spirits to that of humans.
No you are misunderstanding my answer. That the angels were not in their heavenly nature doesn't equate to them becoming human.

Angel Jibril never became a man but took the appearance of a man towards enabling communication.

Are you trying to claim there are records of angel Jibril eating or doing manly activities or worse?
Re: The Implication Of Extreme Exaggeration in the Book of John! by SIRTee15: 4:02pm On Nov 09, 2024
Ohyoudidnt:
What exactly are you saying?

Did you not say you will rather take up the confusion about the father, son and holy spirit allegedly being coequal? Is that not the trinity?

Ascertain that the Athanasian creed wasn't written in the 4th century.
The highlighted is based on what. based on a creed or the bible. Your definition of trinity is based on what? a creed?
I want to be sure u understand trinity b4 we debate.

Athanasian creed is not an early creed and the writer is unknown.

Athanasian creed is Latin document composed in the Western Church, the creed was unknown to the Eastern Church until the 12th century. Since the 17th century, scholars have generally agreed that the Athanasian Creed was not written by Athanasius (died 373) but was probably composed in southern France during the 5th to 6th century. Many authors have been suggested, but no definite conclusions have been reached. In 1940 the lost Excerpta of Vincent of Lérins (flourished 440) was discovered, and this work contains much of the language of the creed. Thus, either Vincent or an admirer of his has been considered the possible author.

The earliest known copy of the creed was included as a prefix to a collection of homilies by Caesarius of Arles (died 542). The creed’s influence seems to have been primarily in southern France and Spain in the 6th and 7th centuries.



With respect to the history of the origins of the Athanasian Creed, it is generally thought now that the creed was first written in the fifth century—though the seventh century is also given its due, since the creed does not show up in the annals of history until 633 at the fourth council of Toledo. It was written in Latin and not in Greek. If written in the fifth century, several possible authors have been mentioned because of the influence of their thought including Ambrose of Milan and Augustine of Hippo, but it likely was the French saint, Vincent of Lérins.
Re: The Implication Of Extreme Exaggeration in the Book of John! by Ohyoudidnt: 4:17pm On Nov 09, 2024
SIRTee15:
The highlighted is based on what. based on a creed or the bible. Your definition of trinity is based on what? a creed?
I want to be sure u understand trinity b4 we debate.

Athanasian creed is not an early creed and the writer is unknown.

Athanasian creed is Latin document composed in the Western Church, the creed was unknown to the Eastern Church until the 12th century. Since the 17th century, scholars have generally agreed that the Athanasian Creed was not written by Athanasius (died 373) but was probably composed in southern France during the 5th to 6th century. Many authors have been suggested, but no definite conclusions have been reached. In 1940 the lost Excerpta of Vincent of Lérins (flourished 440) was discovered, and this work contains much of the language of the creed. Thus, either Vincent or an admirer of his has been considered the possible author.

The earliest known copy of the creed was included as a prefix to a collection of homilies by Caesarius of Arles (died 542). The creed’s influence seems to have been primarily in southern France and Spain in the 6th and 7th centuries.



With respect to the history of the origins of the Athanasian Creed, it is generally thought now that the creed was first written in the fifth century—though the seventh century is also given its due, since the creed does not show up in the annals of history until 633 at the fourth council of Toledo.It was written in Latin and not in Greek. If written in the fifth century, several possible authors have been mentioned because of the influence of their thought including Ambrose of Milan and Augustine of Hippo, but it likely was the French saint, Vincent of Lérins.
On what should the understanding of the trinity be based when it is not definitely stated in the Bible?
Re: The Implication Of Extreme Exaggeration in the Book of John! by TenQ: 4:19pm On Nov 09, 2024
Ohyoudidnt:
No you are misunderstanding my answer. That the angels were not in their heavenly nature doesn't equate to them becoming human.

Angel Jibril never became a man but took the appearance of a man towards enabling communication.

Are you trying to claim there are records of angel Jibril eating or doing manly activities or worse?
As a perfect man , did Jibril have every organ of the body of men?
Did Jibril breathe air as a perfect man?
If Jibril was a perfect man, did he experience every signal from his sense organs?
Re: The Implication Of Extreme Exaggeration in the Book of John! by TenQ: 4:21pm On Nov 09, 2024
AntiChristian:
We don't have heavenly beings in Islam! They are Angels. They can not become human! They can appear as human!
Jesus was born human by a human woman! Angels only appear as a human! They are not born!

Becoming a man is not the same as appearing as a man!

This is false! Prophet Muhammad saw Angel Gabriel in its true form by Allah's permission! And no human ever achieved this feat as far as i know!

You are the one who can't differentiate between "becoming a man" and "appearing as a man"!
If he appeared as a perfect man, did Mary see a perfect man or an angel?


Are angels physical beings?
Re: The Implication Of Extreme Exaggeration in the Book of John! by SIRTee15: 5:28pm On Nov 09, 2024
Ohyoudidnt:
On what should the understanding of the trinity be based when it is not definitely stated in the Bible?
Tawheed is not in the koran. But Muslims will say the concept is in the koran.

If your understanding of trinity is based on a creed and not the bible.....
Then we need to go back to theology basics and make U understand some foundational principles of the scripture.
That's the only way the creed can make sense to U.


That's why I've been asking do understand how the word GOD is used/applied in the bible.

Have U asked yourself why the Angel of the LORD is called God in the old testament.
Re: The Implication Of Extreme Exaggeration in the Book of John! by SIRTee15:
Ohyoudidnt:
No you are misunderstanding my answer. That the angels were not in their heavenly nature doesn't equate to them becoming human.

Angel Jibril never became a man but took the appearance of a man towards enabling communication.

Are you trying to claim there are records of angel Jibril eating or doing manly activities or worse?
My friend, the appearance of a spiritual being as a man is called incarnation.

Incarnation mean to take upon the appearance of another nature/substance. It doesn't mean changing your nature.

Mary saw Jubril as man, spoke to her as a man.
Jubril visited Muhammed as a man, behaved as a man. Muhammed's wife Zainab saw Jubril and thought he was one of Muhammed's friend.
That's because Zainab saw man with human qualities

Incarnate doesn't mean change. Incarnate mean become....
The confusion here is equating change with become.

If I become angry. Does that mean I have changed to anger?
If I become dirty, does that mean I have changed to dirt.


Jubril became a Man, that's why he could function as a Man.

Re: The Implication Of Extreme Exaggeration in the Book of John! by SIRTee15: 5:58pm On Nov 09, 2024
AntiChristian:
We don't have heavenly beings in Islam! They are Angels. They can not become human! They can appear as human!
Jesus was born human by a human woman! Angels only appear as a human! They are not born!

Becoming a man is not the same as appearing as a man!

This is false! Prophet Muhammad saw Angel Gabriel in its true form by Allah's permission! And no human ever achieved this feat as far as i know!

You are the one who can't differentiate between "becoming a man" and "appearing as a man"!

BECOMING A MAN IS THE SAME THING AS APPEARING AS A MAN.
BOTH DEFINES INCARNATION.

IF I BECOME NICE, DOES THAT MEAN I HAVE CHANGED TO NICE? DOES THAT MEAN MY NATURE IS NOW NICE?

IF I APPEAR DIRTY, IS NOT THE AS I BECAME DIRTY.

IF I BECOME ANGRY, IS IT NOT THE SAME THING AS APPEARING ANGRY.

MY FRIEND JUBRIL BECAME A MAN WHEN HE APPEARED TO MARY.


TenQ, thanks for bringing up that Jubril angle. Muslims are trapped in their own game.
Re: The Implication Of Extreme Exaggeration in the Book of John! by AntiChristian(op): 6:12pm On Nov 09, 2024
SIRTee15:

BECOMING A MAN IS THE SAME THING AS APPEARING AS A MAN.
BOTH DEFINES INCARNATION.
That's false! A man can die. Can an Angel die when they become man?

IF I BECOME NICE, DOES THAT MEAN I HAVE CHANGED TO NICE? DOES THAT MEAN MY NATURE IS NOW NICE?

IF I APPEAR DIRTY, IS NOT THE AS I BECAME DIRTY.

IF I BECOME ANGRY, IS IT NOT THE SAME THING AS APPEARING ANGRY.

MY FRIEND JUBRIL BECAME A MAN WHEN HE APPEARED TO MARY.

TenQ, thanks for bringing up that Jubril angle. Muslims are trapped in their own game.
The main difference between "become" and "appear" is that "become" means to start to be something, while "appear" means to come into view or seem to look a certain way.

You can become angry. That's means you transitioned from not being angry to being angry! But when you appear to be angry you may be truly angry or just faking it.
Re: The Implication Of Extreme Exaggeration in the Book of John! by Ohyoudidnt: 6:13pm On Nov 09, 2024
SIRTee15:
My friend, the appearance of a spiritual being as a man is called incarnation.

Incarnation mean to take upon the appearance of another nature/substance. It doesn't mean changing your nature.

Mary saw Jubril as man, spoke to her as a man.
Jubril visited Muhammed as a man, behaved as a man. Muhammed's wife Zainab saw Jubril and thought he was one of Muhammed's friend.
That's because Zainab saw man with human qualities

Incarnate doesn't mean change. Incarnate mean become....
The confusion here is equating change with become.

If I become angry. Does that mean I have changed to anger?
If I become dirty, does that mean I have changed to dirt.


Jubril became a Man, that's why he could function as a Man.
I see that the cause of your confusion is really deep.

The way Jibril manifested did not change his fundamental nature as an angel. It was a temporal appearance to fulfil the passage of a message.

Angels can assume different forms for specific missions and still remain essentially angels.


You are trying but have feelings become physical manifestation? Please describe how anger looks
Re: The Implication Of Extreme Exaggeration in the Book of John! by Ohyoudidnt: 6:15pm On Nov 09, 2024
SIRTee15:

BECOMING A MAN IS THE SAME THING AS APPEARING AS A MAN.
BOTH DEFINES INCARNATION.

IF I BECOME NICE, DOES THAT MEAN I HAVE CHANGED TO NICE? DOES THAT MEAN MY NATURE IS NOW NICE?

IF I APPEAR DIRTY, IS NOT THE AS I BECAME DIRTY.

IF I BECOME ANGRY, IS IT NOT THE SAME THING AS APPEARING ANGRY.

MY FRIEND JUBRIL BECAME A MAN WHEN HE APPEARED TO MARY.


TenQ, thanks for bringing up that Jubril angle. Muslims are trapped in their own game.
So lame. So if a boy dresses up as a girl in a dress with wig and make up so he appears as a girl he has become a girl?
Re: The Implication Of Extreme Exaggeration in the Book of John! by AntiChristian(op): 6:15pm On Nov 09, 2024
TenQ:
If he appeared as a perfect man, did Mary see a perfect man or an angel?
Mary saw a perfect man and she was afraid the man may come close to her as she was in a secluded place!

Are angels physical beings?
Angels are usually physicals beings when on errands to humans!
Re: The Implication Of Extreme Exaggeration in the Book of John! by MaxInDHouse(m): 6:23pm On Nov 09, 2024
AntiChristian:
Does Hebrew have the word "sabachthani"?
What is "abandon" or "forsake" in Hebrew?
Answer and stop the diversion!
This is what Wikipedia says:

Why did Jesus say, “Eli, Eli, Lama sabachthani” that is to say, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? Is "Eli, Eli, lema/lama sabachthani?" Hebrew or Aramaic? The general consensus is that it is Aramaic rather than Mishnaic Hebrew, though given how similar these can be, this is not universally agreed.

The reason why i strongly believe it can't be Aramaic is because most Jews in Jesus' day speaks Aramaic so whatever makes it difficult for them to understand what he said then it couldn't have been the same language they all speak back then so it must have been Hebrew that most Jews don't really understood fully! smiley
Re: The Implication Of Extreme Exaggeration in the Book of John! by AntiChristian(op): 6:27pm On Nov 09, 2024
SIRTee15:
When Mary saw Jubril. Did she see a Man or saw a spiritual being.
A perfect man!

When Jubril visited Muhammed and Zainab thought he was his friend.
Did Jubril visit as a man or as a spiritual being.[quote]Almost all the case of the visitations Jubril appears as a man! Muhammad salallahu alayhi wasalam did saw Jubril in its real form two times!

[quote]When Jubril asked Muhammed to recite the koran in the presence of his companions, did he talked to Muhammed as a man or as a spiritual being.
As a perfect man!
Re: The Implication Of Extreme Exaggeration in the Book of John! by AntiChristian(op): 6:31pm On Nov 09, 2024
MaxInDHouse:
This is what Wikipedia says:

Why did Jesus say, “Eli, Eli, Lama sabachthani” that is to say, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? Is "Eli, Eli, lema/lama sabachthani?" Hebrew or Aramaic? The general consensus is that it is Aramaic rather than Mishnaic Hebrew, though given how similar these can be, this is not universally agreed.

The reason why i strongly believe it can't be Aramaic is because most Jews in Jesus' day speaks Aramaic so whatever makes it difficult for them to understand what he said then it couldn't have been the same language they all speak back then so it must have been Hebrew that most Jews don't really understood fully! smiley
Thanks sir!
Re: The Implication Of Extreme Exaggeration in the Book of John! by TenQ: 6:39pm On Nov 09, 2024
AntiChristian:
Mary saw a perfect man and she was afraid the man may come close to her as she was in a secluded place!

Angels are usually physicals beings when on errands to humans!
Good,
Mary saw a perfect man.

But you did not answer the second question as I didnt ask you how angels usually appear when they run errands to humans.

The Question was:
Are angels Physical Beings?
Re: The Implication Of Extreme Exaggeration in the Book of John! by SIRTee15: 6:43pm On Nov 09, 2024
Ohyoudidnt:
So lame. So if a boy dresses up as a girl in a dress with wig and make up so he appears as a girl he has become a girl?
Yes, if he appears like a girl, behaves like one and takes upon the physical identity of a girl. He has become a girl.
It's called social transitioning.

That doesn't mean his masculine nature has changed and that's doesn't mean he can't assume his full male identity.
Note I'm not taking of gender change here.


Now answer my question

What is the difference if I appear angry and when I become angry.
Tell me the difference.
Re: The Implication Of Extreme Exaggeration in the Book of John! by AntiChristian(op): 6:45pm On Nov 09, 2024
TenQ:
Good,
Mary saw a perfect man.

But you did not answer the second question as I didnt ask you how angels usually appear when they run errands to humans.

The Question was:
Are angels Physical Beings?
They are not!
Re: The Implication Of Extreme Exaggeration in the Book of John! by AntiChristian(op): 6:47pm On Nov 09, 2024
SIRTee15:
Yes, if he appears like a girl, behaves like one and takes upon the physical identity of a girl. He has become a girl.
It's called social transitioning.

That doesn't mean his masculine nature has changed and that's doesn't mean he can't assume his full male identity.
Note I'm not taking of gender change here.


Now answer my question

What is the difference if I appear angry and when I become angry.
Tell me the difference.
I have answered this some minutes ago!
You're insincere!

AntiChristian:
That's false! A man can die. Can an Angel die when they become man?



The main difference between "become" and "appear" is that "become" means to start to be something, while "appear" means to come into view or seem to look a certain way.

You can become angry. That's means you transitioned from not being angry to being angry! But when you appear to be angry you may be truly angry or just faking it.
Re: The Implication Of Extreme Exaggeration in the Book of John! by TenQ: 6:47pm On Nov 09, 2024
Ohyoudidnt:
So lame. So if a boy dresses up as a girl in a dress with wig and make up so he appears as a girl he has become a girl?
Quran 19:17
screening herself off from them. Then We sent to her Our angel, ˹Gabriel,˺ appearing before her as a man, perfectly formed.


Is Bobrisky a perfectly formed woman?


Allah says that Jibril came to Mary as a perfectly formed man: stop telling lies


Are you saying that Allah doesn't know what he is saying?
Are you saying that the kunfayakun of Allah cannot turn Jibril into a perfectly formed man?
Re: The Implication Of Extreme Exaggeration in the Book of John! by MaxInDHouse(m): 6:48pm On Nov 09, 2024
AntiChristian:
Thanks sir!
You are welcome always! smiley
Re: The Implication Of Extreme Exaggeration in the Book of John! by TenQ: 6:50pm On Nov 09, 2024
AntiChristian:
That's false! A man can die. Can an Angel die when they become man?



The main difference between "become" and "appear" is that "become" means to start to be something, while "appear" means to come into view or seem to look a certain way.

You can become angry. That's means you transitioned from not being angry to being angry! But when you appear to be angry you may be truly angry or just faking it.
If Jibril came or appeared as a perfectly formed man: are you saying that he wasn't a perfectly formed man?

What happened to the kunfayakun of Allah if he cannot make Jubril indistinguishable from any man?
Re: The Implication Of Extreme Exaggeration in the Book of John! by TenQ: 6:58pm On Nov 09, 2024
Ohyoudidnt:
No you are misunderstanding my answer. That the angels were not in their heavenly nature doesn't equate to them becoming human.

Angel Jibril never became a man but took the appearance of a man towards enabling communication.

Are you trying to claim there are records of angel Jibril eating or doing manly activities or worse?
What does it mean that an entity (Jibril) appeared as a PERFECT MAN?
Does it mean that such[b] an entity (Jibril)[/b] is INDISTINGUISHABLE from a Human Being?
Re: The Implication Of Extreme Exaggeration in the Book of John! by SIRTee15: 6:58pm On Nov 09, 2024
Ohyoudidnt:
I see that the cause of your confusion is really deep.

The way Jibril manifested did not change his fundamental nature as an angel. It was a temporal appearance to fulfil the passage of a message.

Angels can assume different forms for specific missions and still remain essentially angels.


You are trying but have feelings become physical manifestation? Please describe how anger looks
Are U ok? Did I mention Jubril changed his nature?
Where did I say Jubril changed his nature.
Pls if your English comprehension is poor, sort yourself out. Don't project that on me.

Incarnation doesn't mean change.
Change is substituting a substance for another. This is not incarnation.

I said Jubril became a man, I never said Jubril changed to a man

Appearance and become is the same thing within the context we talking about here.

When U take upon yourself another nature to appear as such. That's incarnation and U become the new nature.
That doesn't mean the original nature is gone...it's still intact.

If English hard, it's ok. But let me help U

Tell me the difference btw
I became angry and I appeared angry.

I want to know the difference.
Re: The Implication Of Extreme Exaggeration in the Book of John! by TenQ: 7:07pm On Nov 09, 2024
AntiChristian:
We don't have heavenly beings in Islam! They are Angels. They can not become human! They can appear as human!
Jesus was born human by a human woman! Angels only appear as a human! They are not born!

Becoming a man is not the same as appearing as a man!

This is false! Prophet Muhammad saw Angel Gabriel in its true form by Allah's permission! And no human ever achieved this feat as far as i know!

You are the one who can't differentiate between "becoming a man" and "appearing as a man"!
Antichrists Antichristian: why do Muslims tell lies every time as if their life depend on it?

If Angels are NOT Heavenly beings, are you saying that All the stories of your Prophet when he ascended on the Al_Burak with Jibril to the first, secon d, third, fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh heaven are pure lies?

Angels must be earthly beings then! LOL!!


Secondly,
You said that Angels CANNOT become human!
Is it because of the powerlessness of Allah?

If Angels become appear as PERFECT Humans, do they have indistinguishable Human Flesh, Human Blood, Human Organs etc?
Re: The Implication Of Extreme Exaggeration in the Book of John! by Ohyoudidnt: 7:12pm On Nov 09, 2024
SIRTee15:
Are U ok? Did I mention Jubril changed his nature?
Where did I say Jubril changed his nature.
Pls if your English comprehension is poor, sort yourself out. Don't project that on me.

Incarnation doesn't mean change.
Change is substituting a substance for another. This is not incarnation.

I said Jubril became a man, I never said Jubril changed to a man

Appearance and become is the same thing within the context we talking about here.

When U take upon yourself another nature to appear as such. That's incarnation and U become the new nature.
That doesn't mean the original nature is gone...it's still intact.

If English hard, it's ok. But let me help U

Tell me the difference btw
I became angry and I appeared angry.

I want to know the difference.
Mind your temper .

A caterpillar transforms into a butterfly and is very different from a butterfly appearing as a butterfly.

Becoming angry is an internal emotion while appearing angry is a perception which can differ from the truth of emotion.

Part of your triune god incarnated without the rest isn't it and while in its incarnation still remained same with the other parts?

Keep spinning maybe the music will one day make me dance.
Re: The Implication Of Extreme Exaggeration in the Book of John! by SIRTee15: 7:12pm On Nov 09, 2024
AntiChristian:
That's false! A man can die. Can an Angel die when they become man?
Yes, if they incarnate into a real human nature. That's why the fallen angels could have sex and procreate.
They had real human nature.

AntiChristian:
The main difference between "become" and "appear" is that "become" means to start to be something, while "appear" means to come into view or seem to look a certain way.

You can become angry. That's means you transitioned from not being angry to being angry! But when you appear to be angry you may be truly angry or just faking it.
🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😅🤣😂😆😄
AntiChristian no go kill me

So if I appear nice, I can fake it; but if I become nice, I'm not faking it.
Is that what U saying? Does that make sense to U.

TenQ really created serious problem with that Jubril appearing as a man angle.
It's a very serious problem.
Re: The Implication Of Extreme Exaggeration in the Book of John! by Ohyoudidnt: 7:14pm On Nov 09, 2024
SIRTee15:
Yes, if he appears like a girl, behaves like one and takes upon the physical identity of a girl. He has become a girl.
It's called social transitioning.

That doesn't mean his masculine nature has changed and that's doesn't mean he can't assume his full male identity.
Note I'm not taking of gender change here.


Now answer my question

What is the difference if I appear angry and when I become angry.
Tell me the difference.
Social transitioning doesn't eliminate the reality or does it? Will the 'social girl' experience the real girls monthly cycle too?
Re: The Implication Of Extreme Exaggeration in the Book of John! by TenQ: 7:14pm On Nov 09, 2024
AntiChristian:
They are not!
Is it untrue then that Mary saw a Physical Jibril?
Re: The Implication Of Extreme Exaggeration in the Book of John! by SIRTee15:
Ohyoudidnt:
Social transitioning doesn't eliminate the reality or does it? Will the 'social girl' experience the real girls monthly cycle too?
exactly what we talking about here.
A boy doesnt change to a girl simply because he looks like a girl.
Jubril didnt change to a man simply because he looks like a man
and God the Son didnt change to a man simply because he looks like a man.

The word became flesh doesnt mean the word changed to flesh.


Do u get it now. highlighted is very fundamental in the understanding of trinity.
Re: The Implication Of Extreme Exaggeration in the Book of John! by AntiChristian(op): 7:37pm On Nov 09, 2024
TenQ:
Antichrists Antichristian: why do Muslims tell lies every time as if their life depend on it?

If Angels are NOT Heavenly beings, are you saying that All the stories of your Prophet when he ascended on the Al_Burak with Jibril to the first, secon d, third, fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh heaven are pure lies?

Angels must be earthly beings then! LOL!!
Only a fools calls one a liar without even understanding ones position! What does heavenly beings mean? It has no meaning in Islam. Allah is above the heavens and rose over His throne! Call angels Angels! Call God God! Call Allah Allah! And angels are stationed everywhere Allah wills them to be. Malik is the gatekeeper of hell! Is Malik an heavenly being?
If you don't understand one's position just desist from putting the lies on me! As far as I know you are the ignorant liar here!

Secondly,
You said that Angels CANNOT become human!
Is it because of the powerlessness of Allah?
Allah is All-Powerful and once again this seems to me to be a foolish question since you know Allah has power to do all things! But of what use is an angel becoming a man when man is already available in his place?

If Angels become appear as PERFECT Humans, do they have indistinguishable Human Flesh, Human Blood, Human Organs etc?
Angels do not become men! Angel Jubril and Angel of death to be specific, temporary appears as men to whoever Allah wills.

They are perfect men in appearance i.e. they have all what a normal man has!
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Reply

Spiritual Implication Of The Nigerian Flood And Connection To SulemanThe Word And The Watchtower: An Exegesis Of John 1:1Why Was The Book Of Enoch Removed From The Bible?234

Do You Believe in Infant Water Baptism?Muslim Caller Hears The Gospel And Becomes A Christian⚫⚫ Jesus Taught About Speaking In Tongues