₦airaland Forum

This shameless Tinubu asslicker simply used words to confuse the simple minded. CIA did not reject FOIA Request but they fought against un-redacting the
their own data released on Tinubu via previous FOIA Request That's the issue at stake, not all this lamba by the hypocrite Reno. Don't let this hireling confuse you. Tinubu is definitely a CIA Mole

Stop talking n defending what you dnt know+

Nah today Reno dey find out that the average Nigerian is dumb and daft except when it comes to fraud

It’s a known fact that Secret Services worldwide don’t disclose the identity of their agents/officials but dumb Nigerians believed one lowlife journalist claiming the CIA told him that Tinubu is a CIA asset 😳

Emmanuel900:
Assuming Tinubu is really a CIA asset you guys really believe CIA would be so stupid to admit it and confirm it in a Statement ?

To be an obedient the IQ must be incredibly low

Court documents showed that BAT is a CIA agent and that is the foul cry.
If a court cannot state categorically and establish a fact in obvious terms, then no one else can!

Salewa97:
Reno is not a gullible person as he is always making sure he backs his claims with facts.

If you want to be respected, you must learn to respect others.

Respect is reciprocal

He is a barefaced liar and manipulator who rides on the weak mental capability of his gullible followers. Challenge him with superior facts and he will block you instantly.

Abagworo:
He is a barefaced liar and manipulator who rides on the weak mental capability of his gullible followers. Challenge him with superior facts and he will block you instantly.

But he is not as stupid and dumb like those that believed Buhari was dead and later cloned with one Jibrin from Sudan. These people are the most foolish and most stupid people ever walk on the surface of the earth

Reno=2 face

Defending him from you senseless lies

Draggun:
Barely two years ago, Reno Omockery protested against the presidential ambition of BAT on the streets of London when it was alleged BAT was a drug runner but he is defending him today against the same charge. Two faced hypocrite. Take him serious at your own peril.

fuckJones:
on Reno manhood I stand, no shaking

Me too!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bc6COWi65hU?si=IJvR-N0jfTx_2P-K

Reno the Self-appointed Àso Rock spokesman

Richtaiwo:
Reno simply mentioned "Nigerians" because he knows that we all know who the hair-brained sheeples are.

Na Igbo people....I mention am.

jaxxy:
So what is he?

President Tinubu.

tishbite42:
The CIA confirmed Bola Ahmed Tinubu as a CIA asset.
QED

Do you even know the meaning of CIA Assets?

Thunderfayamods:
President Tinubu.

ohh tpain?

jaxxy:
ohh tpain?

No President Tinubu.

Thunderfayamods:
No President Tinubu.

Thats tpain now. aka renewed shege? The one suffering people since he entered and yet taxing them? Lol

my broda suffer never taya u? even if he us ur towns man can u not see millions of all ethnicity suffering untold hardship?

Hahaha

Jonathan Israelis errand boy
Buhari jibrin assudani
Tinubu CIA agent


Why defend ? Whether true or false what will anyone do? Aside military

This man[color=#000099][/color]

LadyExcellency:
Tinubu is an acclaimed CIA Agent according to the court documents posted. We don't need Reno Omorkri's interpretation. We understand the legal language more than him. His obfuscation is balderdash.

Reno the rabble rouser as usual always try to deceive the gullible ones with words . Reno the bigot can see red and say it's black. Unfortunately, Reno always claims he has facts for everything could not provide evidence or alternate court records to counter the ones presented by David and Agbodorians are already foaming in the mouth.

Majority of them are retarded o, effect of the Biafra war. Even the so called educated ones o

Guestlander:
"hair-brained ideas, such as that then President Muhammadu Buhari had died and was replaced in a CIA plot with a clone from Sudan"

Makes you wonder if some of them are retarded.

jaxxy:
Thats tpain now. aka renewed shege? The one suffering people since he entered and yet taxing them? Lol

my broda suffer never taya u? even if he us ur towns man can u not see millions of all ethnicity suffering untold hardship?

Who tell you say I dey suffer, do you know me?

Brief summary about the cases mentioned by pasta Reno!
1. The case of Connell v. CIA involved journalist John Connell suing the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to gain access to certain CIA records. Connell, an investigative journalist, requested records related to CIA operations and personnel, believing that these documents held significant public interest. However, the CIA resisted, citing national security concerns and various FOIA exemptions that allow withholding information to protect classified materials and intelligence sources and methods.

The legal proceedings focused on balancing the government’s need to protect sensitive information with the public's right to access government records under FOIA. Courts often upheld the CIA's use of exemptions in such cases, recognizing the need to safeguard national security. The case underscored the tension between transparency and security, a recurring issue in FOIA litigation involving intelligence agencies.

2. The case of ACLU v. CIA revolved around the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) suing the CIA under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to obtain information about the CIA’s involvement in drone strike programs. The ACLU argued that the public had a right to know about the scope, legal basis, and civilian impact of the drone strikes, especially given the program's controversial nature and potential implications on international law and human rights.

The CIA initially refused to confirm or deny the existence of relevant records, citing national security concerns. This response, often called a "Glomar response," led the ACLU to challenge the CIA's withholding of information in court. While the CIA argued that acknowledging any details about the drone program would jeopardize national security, the ACLU contended that such secrecy undermined democratic accountability and public oversight of government actions.

The court eventually ruled in favor of the CIA, allowing the agency to withhold the information under FOIA exemptions. This case highlighted the tension between government transparency and national security and sparked broader debates on the legality and ethical implications of covert drone warfare.

3. In National Security Archive v. CIA , the National Security Archive, a research institution focused on promoting transparency, filed a lawsuit against the CIA under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The case sought the release of documents related to past CIA operations and policies, particularly regarding historical events and intelligence activities that held substantial public interest. The Archive argued that the CIA was not meeting its obligations to release information that was no longer sensitive.

The CIA resisted, citing FOIA exemptions for protecting classified information and sources, even in cases where the documents pertained to decades-old events. The lawsuit raised critical questions about the CIA’s practices in declassifying historical records, and the Archive argued that the agency was overly restrictive. While the outcome varied based on specific document requests, the case underscored ongoing issues in accessing historical government information and highlighted the challenges in balancing transparency with national security concerns, especially in intelligence-related cases.

4. In Federation of American Scientists v. CIA, the Federation of American Scientists (FAS), a nonprofit organization focused on national security and transparency, sued the CIA under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The FAS requested records concerning intelligence budgets and policies, seeking to make information about CIA funding and operations more accessible to the public. The FAS argued that disclosure of this data was crucial for democratic oversight and informed public debate on national security spending.

The CIA denied the request, citing FOIA exemptions related to national security, arguing that the release of budgetary and policy details could harm intelligence operations and reveal sensitive information. The court sided with the CIA, allowing the agency to withhold the information under FOIA’s national security exemptions. This case highlighted the complex balance between public transparency in government spending and the need to protect intelligence operations from potentially compromising disclosures.

5. In Freedom Watch, Inc. v. CIA, the conservative watchdog group Freedom Watch sued the CIA under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), seeking documents related to covert operations and alleged intelligence activities involving government officials and foreign entities. Freedom Watch argued that public disclosure of these documents was essential for government accountability and to shed light on potential misconduct within the intelligence community.

The CIA denied the FOIA request, invoking national security exemptions and arguing that disclosing such information could compromise ongoing operations and jeopardize intelligence sources and methods. The case raised questions about the extent to which intelligence agencies can use FOIA exemptions to withhold information in the interest of national security.

Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of the CIA, supporting its stance on withholding the information due to potential risks to national security. This case underscored the ongoing tension between government transparency advocates and the CIA over access to classified information, especially in matters that are potentially sensitive or controversial.

If not that some people are just plainly daft and stupid, how does anyone believe that CIA will reveal the identity of its agent.... Does it even make sense?

So if Tinubu is CIA's agent, the same CIA will make that information public? Something that is supposed to be kept secret...

These our online people can be so gullible sha

Salewa97:
Reno is not a gullible person as he is always making sure he backs his claims with facts.

If you want to be respected, you must learn to respect others.

Respect is reciprocal

so the claims this same reno made about tinubu in the past are all true then? Going by your own statement about reno?

I never chop... You wan buy me food?

Ebenezer2021:
you don chop today?
Abi APC don carry 30k take close your hungry stomach

Active Asset aka Person of Interest aka Under WatchList

Choose One; others are synonyms: AA, PoI, UWL

No smoke without...

Nigerians know that all these fake news and propaganda are from the children of hate from sad east and other election losers whose brain have, not only been beclouded with hate and rage, but also tremendously affected their Sanities

Guestlander:
Right, By the way what happened to Jubril El Sudani?

Jubril has been decommissioned by the CIA. The real Buhari has been returned to the family, gbam