₦airaland Forum

cococandy:
you must have the memory of a gold fish to be attempting to use these tired propaganda points of porn in schools and plastic surgery being performed on kids in schools after you tried it before the election and showed you didn’t know what you were talking about.

Also a sexual assaulter being the best the republicans have is an insane compromise for a party of “protect the kids” do you realize how silly that sounds?

Porn is schools are tired propaganda points?

Its not propaganda madam, it's real and it's a problem.

You are disgusting for not caring about children unless you can say Republican bad

cococandy:
you must have the memory of a gold fish to be attempting to use these tired propaganda points of porn in schools and plastic surgery being performed on kids in schools after you tried it before the election and showed you didn’t know what you were talking about.

Also a sexual assaulter being the best the republicans have is an insane compromise for a party of “protect the kids” do you realize how silly that sounds?

COCO, I HAVE NOT FEED MY EYE SINCE TRUMP WON THIS ELECTION, OGINI NA EME?



NO FOOD!

bemeruca:
the DOJ calling parents who speak out domestic terrorists, she wants us to believe these are not true

They are propaganda (claim)

You people and facts have never been friends

Source: Politifact
Scott Perry stated on January 8, 2023 in ABC This Week interview: "Parents that go to school
board meetings" and question the curriculum are being "flagged by the Department of Justice
and the FBI for attending a meeting."
FBI, DOJ tagged threats against school officials, not
parents for attending school board meetings
House conservatives who held up Rep. Kevin McCarthy’s House
speaker vote demanded that lawmakers review criminal investigations
by the Justice Department and FBI.
Republicans are planning to create a panel that will probe federal
investigations related to what they consider a "violation of the civil
liberties of citizens of the United States" and the "weaponization of the
federal government."
On ABC’s "This Week" on Jan. 8, host George Stephanopoulos asked
U.S. Rep. Scott Perry, R-Pa., whether he would pledge not to serve on
such a subcommittee since he is part of a Justice Department
investigation related to events that led up to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on
the U.S. Capitol.
Perry did not say he wouldn’t serve on such a panel and suggested that
federal officials have overreached their power.
"We're talking about parents that go to school board meetings for the
schools that they pay for with their taxes and having the temerity to
question the curriculum, and then they're put on, you know, the red
flagged, they’re flagged by the Department of Justice and the FBI for
attending a meeting," Perry said. "That's not what America is
supposed to be about. That sounds like some tinhorn Third World
dictatorship."
Perry echoed a misleading and false Republican talking point that
suggests federal officials target parents for their views about schools.
Garland’s school threat memo set off backlash
In September 2021, following threats against school officials, the
National School Boards Association wrote a letter to President Joe
Biden requesting assistance to address concerns about school
employees’ and board members’ safety.
On Oct. 4, 2021, Attorney General Merrick Garland sent a five-
paragraph memo to the FBI and federal prosecutors acknowledging a
"disturbing spike in harassment, intimidation, and threats of violence"
against school officials. Garland directed the FBI to hold meetings
across the country and bring together government leaders to discuss
strategies to address those threats.
"While spirited debate about policy matters is protected under our
Constitution, that protection does not extend to threats of violence or
efforts to intimidate individuals based on their views," Garland wrote.
The memo focused on criminal conduct, not parents’ views about
COVID-19 policies or school curriculum.
The memo led to misinformation such as the debunked claim that
parents who "challenge school curriculums" were being labeled
"domestic terrorists."
A Trump-nominated judge dismissed a case by parents challenging the
memo. The judge concluded that the memo does not target protected
conduct under the Constitution and covers only criminal conduct.
FEATURED FACT-CHECK
Kat Cammack stated on March 2, 2023 in a speech at CPAC: “The Justice Department has
been “calling parents that are concerned about what their kids are being taught, they are
labeling them terrorists.”
Ohio lawmaker said federal officials were using threat tags against parents
We contacted Perry’s office to ask whether he had evidence that
federal law enforcement officials flagged parents for questioning
curriculum. We received no response.
An FBI spokesperson told PolitiFact that the agency does not "flag"
parents for attending meetings and questioning their children’s
curriculum.
It’s possible Perry’s claim is based on a letter Rep. Jim Jordan, R-
Ohio, wrote to Garland in November 2021.
Jordan wrote that he had information from a whistleblower showing
the FBI was compiling threat assessments related to parents. Jordan’s
letter said the FBI created a "threat tag" called EDUOFFICIALS.
The FBI uses "threat tags" to track information and spot trends — it
does not necessarily signal a full investigation, which occurs if there is
evidence of potential violence and violation of federal law, an FBI
spokesperson told PolitiFact. The EDUOFFICIALS tag was created to
track instances of threats directed against school officials.
House Republicans on the Judiciary Committee published a report in
November that said the FBI had opened investigations with the
EDUOFFICIALS threat tag in almost every region of the country,
according to a whistleblower. But the report doesn’t detail the
outcome or full scope of any investigation.
The report cited tips received by the National Threat Operations
Center. One tip led to a mother being interviewed by an FBI field office
after she allegedly told a local school board, "We are coming for you."
The mother, who is a member of the right-wing group Moms for
Liberty, told the FBI agent she meant her group would seek to vote
school board members out. The House Republicans’ report doesn’t
explain whether that was the end of the FBI’s query into the mother.
Our ruling
Perry said that "parents that go to school board meetings" and
question the curriculum are being "flagged by the Department of
Justice and the FBI for attending a meeting."
Perry’s office provided no evidence and his claim echoes misleading
statements about a 2021 Justice Department memo directing federal
law enforcement to hold meetings nationwide about criminal threats
against school officials.
The memo focused on monitoring criminal conduct; it wasn’t about
investigating parents who spoke about curriculum at school board
meetings.
The FBI created an EDUOFFICIALS "threat tag" as a logistical tool to
track threats of violence against school officials, not to flag parents for
attending meetings or questioning curriculum.
We rate Perry’s statement False

cococandy:
So this particular hypocrisy you’re trying to project onto me is yours not mine.

This is what he does, project himself on to others.

I can't help think his rant here about underage sex is to hide his own sexual abuse of the underaged. It's what those being caught do. Rant against what they themselves are doing to hide the fact they are doing it.

budaatum:
This is what he does, project himself on to others.

I can't help think his rant here about underage sex is to hide his own sexual abuse of the underaged. It's what those being caught do. Rant against what they themselves are doing to hide the fact they are doing it.

LOOK THE ONLY REASON DEMOCRATS THREW KAMALA WAS BEACUSE THEY HAD ALREADY LOST THE ELECTION.



OTHERWSE, THEY WONT GIVE HER.


SO WHOSE FAULT REALLY IS THE ELECTION LOSS?


CERTAINLY NOT THE REPUBLICANS.

budaatum:
This is what he does, project himself on to others.

I can't help think his rant here about underage sex is to hide his own sexual abuse of the underaged. It's what those being caught do. Rant against what they themselves are doing to hide the fact they are doing it.

I saw him stylishly trying to differentiate 17 and 18 year olds from the rest. As if to tell himself that somehow makes it’s okay.

The other crazy guy quoting me up and down decided I became his enemy when I told him he belongs in jail for saying old men sleeping with teenage girls is part African tradition. He was basically implying that I’m supporting the ruin of African tradition by advocating for age of consent to be 18 years old.
He’s since disabled that account and now follows me around to cry about my politics.

It’s a strange day when people who have shown they won’t mind getting down with teenagers want to project themselves onto others on child abuse issues.

armyofone:
I doubt any K-12 library in US with any such books!

All parents want their children to go learn math, English, science and geo.

Budaatum follow this post and read up or down that page and see yourself making excuses for children grooming. You went as far as to claim it is the parents and students putting the books in the school libraries. Only armyofone was reasonable about this. She never downplayed or deny was she was seeing as cococandy is claiming parents in schools complaining are propaganda

This is you making excuses for the schools. Helping them to deny it

budaatum:
I do not support such books being in schools, and neither does the school once they knew its content.

Later you claimed its the parents putting the books there to make the parents look bad.

cococandy:
I saw him stylishly trying to differentiate 17 and 18 year olds from the rest. As if to tell himself that somehow makes it’s okay.

The other crazy guy quoting me up and down decided I became his enemy when I told him he belongs in jail for saying old men sleeping with teenage girls is part African tradition. He was basically implying that I’m supporting the ruin of African tradition by advocating for age of consent to be 18 years old.
He’s since disabled that account and now follows me around to cry about my politics.

It’s a strange day when people who have shown they won’t mind getting down with teenagers want to project themselves onto others on child abuse issues.

NA LIE, U SAID U WONT TALK TO ME AGAIN FOR SUPPORTING TRUMP.

COCOCANDY, DO U WANT TO BET THAT U WIL STILLL TALK TO ME, WEN U CALM DOWN.

DO U THINK THIS IS NORMAL?

WEN WAS THE LAST TIME U POSTED ON THE FOOD SECTION?


EXACTLY!

BEFORE THE ELECTION, GO AND SEE HER BAKING BREAD, COOKING EVERYTHING IN AMERICA AND SHARING.

AFTER THE ELECTION, SHE CAMP HERE, SEEKING THE HEAD OF TRUMP SUPPORTERES.

descarado:
There was once a group of extremists under the umbrella of PIE whatever that were pro pedophile in United kingdom. They argued that children from age 4 can give consent for more than a decade. Uk people tolerated such for more than a decade. The person who told me this said they are all in jail. Without law, regulations and order, people will come up with the most bizarre stuffs and it becomes the order of the day.

I don't even have the mind to dig for the stories.

Man sometimes behave like animals

Of course you wouldn't have the mind to dig for the story that someone told you and that you never bothered to verify. And you don't have to I suppose, since the deplorables you are trying to convince of your lies don't need evidence neither, and will just take your word for it just as you seem to have taken the word of someone in jail.

It does say a lot about you though, to those who use their brains.

cococandy:
I saw him stylishly trying to differentiate 17 and 18 year olds from the rest. As if to tell himself that somehow makes it’s okay.

The other crazy guy quoting me up and down decided I became his enemy when I told him he belongs in jail for saying old men sleeping with teenage girls is part African tradition. He was basically implying that I’m supporting the ruin of African tradition by advocating for age of consent to be 18 years old.
He’s since disabled that account and now follows me around to cry about my politics.

It’s a strange day when people who have shown they won’t mind getting down with teenagers want to project themselves onto others on child abuse issues.

I believe you live in California. Have you asked them why their age of consent for marriage is 18?

I said clean your house before you talk about dirt in other people's house.

budaatum:
Of course you wouldn't have the mind to dig for the story that someone told you and that you never bothered to verify. And you don't have to I suppose, since the deplorables you are trying to convince of your lies don't need evidence neither, and will just take your word for it just as you seem to have taken the word of someone in jail.

It does say a lot about you though, to those who use their brains.

He did. You default position is to defend and deny

EVEN THOUGH, COCOCANDY BEGGED AND BRIBED ME NOT TO CAMPAIGN FOR TRUMP DURING THE ELECTIONS.



I AGREED AND DID NOT CAMPAIGN.



SHE STILL NEVER FORGAVE ME FOR SUPPORTING HIM.

descarado:
A secret list of more than 300 people who belonged to a network that called publicly for the legalisation of sex with children has been handed to the BBC.

A secret list of more than 300 people that called publicly for legislation?

Did they wear klu klux klan outfits too, I wonder, to disguise themselves in public?

raumdeuter:
Like they are doing in Wake county, Sumner county, Washington county

All over the country accross different states

Budaatum wants us to believe parents all over the states over different counties are sneaking the book past their librarian to make the schools look bad

According to budaatum, the schools does not know. It is the parents putting it in the schools

budaatum:
A secret list of more than 300 people that called publicly for legislation?

Did they wear klu klux klan outfits too, I wonder, to disguise themselves in public?

Go and read that up on BBC. I don't have strength for this back and forth.
The article was straight from BBC

Stolen:
I WANT TO HELP COCOCANDY HEAL.


THIS IS NOW SERIOUS, NO FOOD?

I think you should want to heal yourself.

bemeruca:
Don't fight it. You are known to defend child grooming here. I am glad you stay away from those topics or things these days but it is what it is.

Only a stupid idiot like you knows such lies. Its why you are not worth my time.

raumdeuter:
Buda that was telling us parents sneaked the book

This is in fairfax county where the schools actually RETURNED the book to the library

This is a school council arguing that there is no pornography in it and actually returning it to the shelves

Yet buda is here claiming it was sneaked into the library and no school authorized it

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/dec/3/fairfax-parents-fume-school-system-returning-lawn-/

Budaatum said the parents are the one putting porn in schools and the schools don't support it.

Raskimonojendor:
Lol. Who knows.

Although I find the book disgusting and I won't be reading such, let alone allow kids to read it, but the author of the book also said that it was never meant for the books to be in school libraries, I wonder how it got there.

Although the author offered some insight:

Evison, the author, never meant for his book to be placed in school libraries, he told The Post in an interview. He was surprised when the American Library Association gave “Lawn Boy” an award in 2019 for its appeal to teens. Evison believes that some librarians who chose the novel did so because of the award — and he says that, if any recommended it to lower- or middle-schoolers, they probably confused it with the children’s book “Lawn Boy,” by Gary Paulsen.

I am suprised the book was given an award as well by the American Library Association.

Even your guy admitted the extent of the issue

budaatum:
I think you should want to heal yourself.

A WOMAN WEILDING MACHETE AND CALLING FOR HEADS TO ROLL IS NOT A JOKE.

budaatum:
Having not seen the book myself I am unable to say. I am aware however of people who think a book says "maths is racist", so I'd take opinions with salt.

Look at budaatum running from evidence just to make excuses for child grooming. We saw that today from cococandy

cococandy:
I saw him stylishly trying to differentiate 17 and 18 year olds from the rest. As if to tell himself that somehow makes it’s okay.

The other crazy guy quoting me up and down decided I became his enemy when I told him he belongs in jail for saying old men sleeping with teenage girls is part African tradition. He was basically implying that I’m supporting the ruin of African tradition by advocating for age of consent to be 18 years old.
He’s since disabled that account and now follows me around to cry about my politics.

It’s a strange day when people who have shown they won’t mind getting down with teenagers want to project themselves onto others on child abuse issues.

That's what they do, and is why I limit going back and forth with them.

Just see below what that stupid idiot posted as evidence of supporting child sexual abuse. And his fellow idiot is raumming with it.

cococandy:
Hopefully they’ll keep exposing themselves and keep getting caught and jailed.

I don’t know one person with common sense or even a sense of right vs wrong who will try to minimize or justify anyone advocating to normalize sexual attraction to children. Much less children as young as 4 years old. Literal babies.

Well, it happened and as you were shocked, so more than 50 of us who listened to it.
The topic came when we were discussing children Act during a workshop.

It makes me sick to my stomach. Actually,that case and some others gave birth to the amendment of children Act.

bemeruca:
Budaatum said the parents are the one putting porn in schools and the schools don't support it.

And making a senseless case against what I raised.
He should just type pro pedophile uk and everything he want will show.


I have read countless times that he supports these types of things but I always don't like judging people.


This is shocking.

The PIE group is also in America, but originated from Europe. Uk carry am for head That was why I said we should be careful of what we support.

Check them out.
I feel so sick.

IjeBos:
Mind Blown.

The cognitive dissonance and hypocrisy in these posts between you and Raumdeuter is nothing but breathtaking.

You impregnated a teenager. (your words).

This thread is even a microcosm of this discussion. Who in this thread are the ones always talking about raping people, posting explicit sexual imagery and writing about explicit sex? The so called conservatives in this thread.

You two should sit this discussion out.

I purposefully didn’t bring that up since I wasn’t present when he said it but I pointedly asked him what his thoughts were on sexual relationships between teenagers and adults and he started dancing around the 17 and 18 year old can go to war BS. Lmao. Nothing further to say.

I hear you. I do try to limit my back and forths sometimes. Especially since they’re know gaslighters

But I had energy today. Emphasis on had 🥱

Thank you jare

budaatum:
That's what they do, and is why I limit going back and forth with them.

Just see below what that stupid idiot posted as evidence of supporting child sexual abuse. And his fellow idiot is raumming with it.

cococandy:
There’s another deranged lunatic on the loose.

Mr man actually told me once (when I used to think he had common sense and would make the mistake of engaging him) that age of consent is a western ideology and that I was too Americanized for saying a woman who got pregnant by her students deserves to go to jail. You can’t make this ish up. That’s when I knew he was clinically insane and stopped talking to him ever.

He has known no peace since then.

Too many sick people here. Some of them deserve their d.icks cut off.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FoLfR3pi3r4?si=IjN9qkZxFC0d59PF

cococandy:
You people and facts have never been friends

Top officials of a national school board group talked to the White House days before Attorney General Merrick Garland ordered the FBI to investigate complaints of threats from parents, newly released emails reveal.

The emails raise serious questions about whether the White House ordered Garland to have the FBI investigate confrontations and other incidents at local school board meetings across the US.

They were obtained through a public records request by the group Parents Defending Education and first reported by the Washington Free Beacon.

In a letter to the president last month, the head of the nation’s largest school board association reached out to the Biden administration before suggesting that parents who object to mask mandates and the imposition of critical race theory in classrooms are engaging in “a form of domestic terrorism,” the emails show.

Garland announced on Oct. 4 that the FBI would take the lead on probing what he called “a disturbing spike in harassment, intimidation, and threats of violence against school administrators, board members, teachers, and staff.”


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_DEf57H17HQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bm7FUfm-3sE?si=rZp5srmcsHD74PGX