₦airaland Forum

Gandollar:
They are boys, what do they know?

MORIERA:
Driver sue the company ?

I noo understand

Breach of privacy inside company’s car? You sure say you dey ok so? Why not get your personal car and turn it to a brothel, why use a company’s car

APOPTOSIS:
Completely unacceptable.
That's the height of breach of privacy.
He should sue them.
However, that country is already lawless. I expect nothing

MORIERA:
Driver sue the company ?

I noo understand

Kobicove:
For your information in order for a recorded voice or video tape to be admissible in court as evidence at least one of the parties involved must be aware of the camera or recording device.

In the same vein installing a secret camera in a workplace without informing personnel who will be there is an invasion of privacy, this is why you will notice that in supermarkets and car parks where they have CCTV cameras they always put up signs informing people about the cameras.

GistMedia0:
A company driver was unknowingly filmed engaging in intimate activity with a call girl in a company vehicle, which was secretly equipped with a hidden camera. While the driver had no idea that he was being watched, back at the office, other workers were viewing the footage on a monitor, laughing and making fun of him as his private moment was broadcasted for their entertainment

The driver, thinking he was using the company vehicle for personal reasons to "relieve some stress," had no knowledge that the vehicle was fitted with a hidden camera. Meanwhile, in the office, employees—including the manager—gathered around the monitor to watch the intimate footage as it unfolded. The situation quickly became a source of ridicule, with workers laughing and mocking the driver as the video played, unaware that their actions would lead to public outrage.

Legal experts and members of the public are calling for the driver to sue the company for invasion of privacy, arguing that the driver’s intimate actions were recorded without consent. Many are also citing a clear breach of trust, as the company did not inform the driver that there were surveillance cameras in the vehicle.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7gyBdjryRY

ElevationD:
Look at how they gathered as if they were watching Chelsea - Man united football match. Even see the lady there. They probably were shouting “see as e dry do waist like learner”.

Very nonsense people.

By the way, why should they be sued?
Is it not the driver who will lose his job first?

chris51:
It means it was going on during official hours. He should be disciplined

TUANKU:
Yes, he can sue them. Try this in the US and watch the driver ruin the company. When you install surveillance cameras you have to inform your personnel, failure to do so means you are recording them without their consent which is illegal.

cr7lomo:
Una think say usa na hollywood movie ... th company should sack him for doing that in a property that belongs to the company .... if u have sex in the bathroom of the company and u are caught , u are loosing ur job... the vehicle doesn't belong to the driver , its company's vehicle and they don't have to tell hi that there are cameras in the vehicle ...the vehicle is not his bedroom , and not a place to have sex...he should and will be fired

APOPTOSIS:
Completely unacceptable.
That's the height of breach of privacy.
He should sue them.
However, that country is already lawless. I expect nothing

TUANKU:
Yes, he can sue them. Try this in the US and watch the driver ruin the company. When you install surveillance cameras you have to inform your personnel, failure to do so means you are recording them without their consent which is illegal.

columbus007:
This thing they call the virgina has been making men loose their goddam mind since time immemorial.

Monday60655:
Every extra marital or premarital sex is sin and must not go unpunished.
But for breach of personal privacy, the driver should sue the company.

columbus007:
This thing they call the virgina has been making men loose their goddam mind since time immemorial.

AngelicDamsel:
It baffles me how some people are saying "the female staff will want to nack the driver because they watched him having sex"


How do you guys reason?
Olosho don scatter una mindset

columbus007:
This thing they call the virgina has been making men loose their goddam mind since time immemorial.

MORIERA:
Driver sue the company ?

I noo understand

Jungleluv5:
No matter what the driver has the right to sue the company for privacy invasion yes he may have his own fault for the intimacy act but he is an adult the company on the other hand should have informed all the drivers in the company of the new development. He should look for a good lawyer and sue the company straight away assuming they put something that harm the driver and they want to watch it live how he is going to react to the harmful device he will just die like that. This is very bad one