₦airaland Forum

Women are willing to share a high-earning man.

Same with my nephew Chief Keef, he got 11 kids.

This made FP today?
Something that was on X and other sites since

I have always maintained that family planning should be centered around the male gender. No way a woman can have 14 children at 24 years of age. A woman can only get pregnant at most once a year, while a man, God bless his soul, can impregnate 10 women on a single day.
This is not a good way to live...the children need attention, money don't solve all issues.

I fear who no fear that gender

This guy no dey use condom. E just pour anyhow into the honey pot. Wetin 14 children at 25 omo that's rubbish

mamawin:
I have always maintained that family planning should be centered around the male gender. No way a woman can have 14 children at 24 years of age. A woman can only get pregnant at most once a year, while a man, God bless his soul, can impregnate 10 women on a single day.
This is not a good way to live...the children need attention, money don't solve all issues.

you are clearly not okay so as a man I should clip my vas deferens because I wan dey knack anyhow. Ladies should maintain their pills and we withdraw and creme on their face. Case closed

This one Na Tubaba and Davido HOD for that department

Kobranet123:
not the names again😭💀

How much is a packet of condom again?he needs a vasectomy!!

SalamRushdie:
I am always envious of this dude , he knows show to please God , the world has made us feel its bad to have to many children but in reality its the easiest way to know someone God loves

I mean, I knew the comments were going to br filled with negative thoughts and comments. Many of them cannot try what he is doing, they can't even afford to take care of 1 child but they know how to advise someone that he is a problem when he did not come to their door to ask for help. It's how rich people don't bother to respond to poor men projecting their fear to them. No need to explain if you are able to take care of what you have and get what you want. Many of these people cannot take care of their nuclear family but they reallt want the man to fail. It's just hate and fear of what they cannot do and they really want it to happen to the guy so they can say, "we said so"

pocohantas:
It is funny people see this as an alpha behaviour. Whereas there is a reason some vices are predominantly found in black communities. No way on earth this man avtively prioritises 14kids from one woman, let alone numerous women.

When he faces trouble in future, they will claim successful blacks are targeted. It is just the decisions we take as a race.

Parenting is what is absent, whether a single parent, two parent or even grandparents. Let parents do their jobs and let the community raise the children, you won't have this problem. It's a misconception to think that many children are the problem. Whether it's 1 child or 20, the most important thing is to train the child in the way of the Lord so they don't depart into nonsense. Africans are the ones who will be projecting rubbish stories on themselves. Please save me some victimhood mentality and take responsibility for what you have. Many people raise successful children without complaining but you guys just want tk complain without accepting responsibility. If he was not taking care of his family, I would have scolded him. Like you don't know men who leave their families, abandon them only to meet another woman and raise another family with her 🤡

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_W_Hf08owc


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xpThXnPI2A



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3v674Mct8oU



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dzZP6GgG9n4

mamawin:
I have always maintained that family planning should be centered around the male gender. No way a woman can have 14 children at 24 years of age. A woman can only get pregnant at most once a year, while a man, God bless his soul, can impregnate 10 women on a single day.
This is not a good way to live...the children need attention, money don't solve all issues.

I can put it to you that children don't need that much attention from a man as they will need from their mom. It has been proven that even if a man becomes a stay at home dad, his children won't be as encouraged as children who see their dads go out there to provide and win for them. Of course, tech bros (they can work from anywhere) are around but men don't need that amount of time with the kid as women do. What the father needs to do is provide, spend quality time and be a good example for the family with his actions. This is why women are home makers and men select those who make homes. Have you asked yourself why a woman who spends 12+ hrs with a child will shout and scream at him to do something and when the dad comes, only one eye message will send the same thing to the child the woman has been screaming her lungs out for That's what is called men's presence. Men's presence is not 24/7 availability, it's their ability to put structure in place and maintain it whether they are there or not. There are certain things men can see that women cannot but women are better nurturers than men. There are roles God gave men and gave women. We play different roles which makes us complement each other. When men were fighting wars in the past and leaving their families for years, were they useless men? Did the family break? He is a good man who sees good women, chooses them and builds with them. Men and women will never be the same. It's these recent woke ideologies that are trying to tame men and make them more feminine while women abandon their feminine nature of care and nurture to hustle out of the house and be slaves to the corporate merchants. Now, women are the breadwinners and men are the butter and we still want women to show their feminine side?

Again, no romance without finance but I can put it to you that while money is not everything, children don't like a dad who is present for them but absent in finance. He should only not just do too much finance at the expense of his romance and family but I am very certain children don't gain much from seeing their father every time at home as they will if it were the mom.


Edit: when a woman is working and she has kids, even if her workplace gives her the best daycare and baby care, she still feels guilty for not being there for her kids. This is not about men, she can be jealous if her maid is closer to the kid than her, so if that kind of woman has a man who is a stay at home, she will despise him for no fault of his. This is biology at work. A man can give birth to children and abandon them for a long time and come back to connect with the children. This is what they call a deadbeat dad who abandoned his family. If a woman does the same thing, she is not seen as a woman and she will keep feeling guilt because women are not built that way. This is why women are now choosing to work and close their laps because they don't want the trouble of deadbeat and the stress of children when they are pursuing careers. We are now at a stage where women think they can afford to have a baby without the dad and this is the beginning of the destruction of the family unit. Money can solve the problem and they can mould a child alone. If this man can provide for his family and be present when there is the need, set his family up and have his women as allies, all of you are just projecting your fears and inadequacies on this person. As some people have said, Elon is not always there for his baby mamas but we can forgive him because he's building starlink and saving the world shey?

papyjaypaul:
I can put it to you that children don't need that much attention from a man as they will need from their mom. It has been proven that even if a man becomes a stay at home dad, his children won't be as encouraged as children who see their dads go out there to provide and win for them. Of course, tech bros (they can work from anywhere) are around but men don't need that amount of time with the kid as women do. What the father needs to do is provide, spend quality time and be a good example for the family with his actions. This is why women are home makers and men select those who make homes. Have you asked yourself why a woman who spends 12+ hrs with a child will shout and scream at him to do something and when the dad comes, only one eye message will send the same thing to the child the woman has been screaming her lungs out for That's what is called men's presence. Men's presence is not 24/7 availability, it's their ability to put structure in place and maintain it whether they are there or not. There are certain things men can see that women cannot but women are better nurturers than men. There are roles God gave men and gave women. We play different roles which makes us complement each other. When men were fighting wars in the past and leaving their families for years, were they useless men? Did the family break? He is a good man who sees good women, chooses them and builds with them. Men and women will never be the same. It's these recent woke ideologies that are trying to tame men and make them more feminine while women abandon their feminine nature of care and nurture to hustle out of the house and be slaves to the corporate merchants. Now, women are the breadwinners and men are the butter and we still want women to show their feminine side?

Again, no romance without finance but I can put it to you that while money is not everything, children don't like a dad who is present for them but absent in finance. He should only not just do too much finance at the expense of his romance and family but I am very certain children don't gain much from seeing their father every time at home as they will if it were the mom.


Edit: when a woman is working and she has kids, even if her workplace gives her the best daycare and baby care, she still feels guilty for not being there for her kids. This is not about men, she can be jealous if her maid is closer to the kid than her, so if that kind of woman has a man who is a stay at home, she will despise him for no fault of his. This is biology at work. A man can give birth to children and abandon them for a long time and come back to connect with the children. This is what they call a deadbeat dad who abandoned his family. If a woman does the same thing, she is not seen as a woman and she will keep feeling guilt because women are not built that way. This is why women are now choosing to work and close their laps because they don't want the trouble of deadbeat and the stress of children when they are pursuing careers. We are now at a stage where women think they can afford to have a baby without the dad and this is the beginning of the destruction of the family unit. Money can solve the problem and they can mould a child alone. If this man can provide for his family and be present when there is the need, set his family up and have his women as allies, all of you are just projecting your fears and inadequacies on this person. As some people have said, Elon is not always there for his baby mamas but we can forgive him because he's building starlink and saving the world shey?

You aren't far from the truth, really. However, you mentioned spend quality time and be a good example for the family how much quality time will one have for over a dozen children, while you still have to work to provide for them.
Anyways, it's the live he has chosen to live........

EponObi:
I already knew he's black before opening the thread.

Ladies are funny sha. I'm sure there more on the sidelines waiting to make more babies with him.

Na child support go finish this one before 40.

Just read Trump gave him a pardon. He's got a very messy rap sheet too. High chance gang war go consume am or he ends in prison again. Lmaoo

Having 14 kids at just 25 is an extreme sport.

AngelahFlo:
At 25 the dude already has a mini clan

😁😁😁😁🤣🤣🤣

mamawin:
You aren't far from the truth, really. However, you mentioned spend quality time and be a good example for the family how much quality time will one have for over a dozen children, while you still have to work to provide for them.
Anyways, it's the live he has chosen to live........

thank you for having a mature discussion, something that is rare on NL.

Do you know that when I was responding to you yesterday, I remembered two things?

1, Some people say it's better to have an absent father than a father who is around but not there. That is, a father who can be around the house, he is present and available but he is so busy with himself, playing with his toys and being the big baby boy in the house that he is next to useless

2, Naval staff or military service personnel who leave their families for a long time, before technology used to keep up with their families. They would write letters and the mother will tell them what is going on. Of course, back then, a single income household could provide for all the needs. Some people have the opinion that women in the work force is not because government wanted their liberation, they want more people to tax instead of 1 adult. Some people can take care of the house with 1 person being present and the other person goes out to find food and some people need 2 or more.

Parenting is not easy. I really can't tell how this guy lives his life but some men are very good at choosing the families they want to build. Who knows? He may be paying the extended family to take care of some things when he is away. We now have telephones and better communication. He has enough money to do things as he would wish but I just don't like narrow arguments because people don't like certain lifestyles that don't affect them. There are rich people in singular nuclear families who have nannies and help but they are never there for their children. It's the drivers and domestic staff who bring these kids up. How many years does a child spend with you before they grow up? Let people do what works for them 😊

walosky:
😁😁😁😁🤣🤣🤣

It's very true. With the way he's going if he doesn't stop he'll have a full blown tribe by the time he turns 50. I can see the Settlement Wars on his deathbed.

papyjaypaul:
thank you for having a mature discussion, something that is rare on NL.

Do you know that when I was responding to you yesterday, I remembered two things?

1, Some people say it's better to have an absent father than a father who is around but not there. That is, a father who can be around the house, he is present and available but he is so busy with himself, playing with his toys and being the big baby boy in the house that he is next to useless

2, Naval staff or military service personnel who leave their families for a long time, before technology used to keep up with their families. They would write letters and the mother will tell them what is going on. Of course, back then, a single income household could provide for all the needs. Some people have the opinion that women in the work force is not because government wanted their liberation, they want more people to tax instead of 1 adult. Some people can take care of the house with 1 person being present and the other person goes out to find food and some people need 2 or more.

Parenting is not easy. I really can't tell how this guy lives his life but some men are very good at choosing the families they want to build. Who knows? He may be paying the extended family to take care of some things when he is away. We now have telephones and better communication. He has enough money to do things as he would wish but I just don't like narrow arguments because people don't like certain lifestyles that don't affect them. There are rich people in singular nuclear families who have nannies and help but they are never there for their children. It's the drivers and domestic staff who bring these kids up. How many years does a child spend with you before they grow up? Let people do what works for them 😊

While your post smacks of wisdom I beg to differ on this. It's important that the Children have the beneficial input of both parents regardless of the situation. A child who grew up in a household of both parents usually turn out better in life than the one without. Money can't fix things like Love
Acceptance
Encouragement
Safety and a host of other intrinsic values that makes a good family upbringing.

What good is it if Dad only sends Child support judiciously but is never there for your birthday
Never there for your prom
Never there for your graduation
Never there for those quiet moments u need a man to help you man up

While it's true he has the money to get his extended family take care of his kids; those kids will grow up not knowing him. They may know about him but not know him which is more important.
Wisdom demands that parenting be a joint effort. If that can't be achieved, then there's no point raising a tribe cos the money, swag and abilities are there. When he gets old this lifestyle of his will come back and haunt him unless he plans his life such that he gets to spend time with his kids even if it's to be at their special days. I have much to say but lemme live the floor for others

papyjaypaul:
thank you for having a mature discussion, something that is rare on NL.

Do you know that when I was responding to you yesterday, I remembered two things?

1, Some people say it's better to have an absent father than a father who is around but not there. That is, a father who can be around the house, he is present and available but he is so busy with himself, playing with his toys and being the big baby boy in the house that he is next to useless

2, Naval staff or military service personnel who leave their families for a long time, before technology used to keep up with their families. They would write letters and the mother will tell them what is going on. Of course, back then, a single income household could provide for all the needs. Some people have the opinion that women in the work force is not because government wanted their liberation, they want more people to tax instead of 1 adult. Some people can take care of the house with 1 person being present and the other person goes out to find food and some people need 2 or more.

Parenting is not easy. I really can't tell how this guy lives his life but some men are very good at choosing the families they want to build. Who knows? He may be paying the extended family to take care of some things when he is away. We now have telephones and better communication. He has enough money to do things as he would wish but I just don't like narrow arguments because people don't like certain lifestyles that don't affect them. There are rich people in singular nuclear families who have nannies and help but they are never there for their children. It's the drivers and domestic staff who bring these kids up. How many years does a child spend with you before they grow up? Let people do what works for them 😊

Thanks for the good words. And, I must say, you write very well. I do not know your age, but you make me want to think you're in my age bracket(50-55).
Parenting is a big deal, honestly, and most of the time, we all handle it, based on the way we were raised, what we lacked or enjoyed growing up, our exposure to life, access to funds, etc.

Well, it's nice chatting with you @pappyjpaul