₦airaland Forum

budaatum:
I should go and ask "them" about a false claim you've made?

This is a maga strategy that is well used by basilico, and is the reason many don't waste time reading his drivel. He'd state one baseless conspiracy and expect us to go seek evidence and not notice his whole intent is to waste one's time.

My response to you is Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non quo negat:.

budaatum wrote :
So. In your opinion, the money Black Africans earned from slavery is "lots" compared to the money earned by the slavers they worked for for generations and who bred them for more profit?

IbeOkehie:
What is clear and is also implied by the query, is this - Black Africans earned money from the Slave Trade. Everyone knows this.

At least White America used their profits to build .....

budaatum:
No one is disputing the fact black Africans earned money from slavery, but making out black Africans earned anything significant or close to the buyers is a huge distortion of facts, since black Africans made nowhere near what the slave buyers made.

A similar argument might go something like, what did Africans do with the guns and gin they got for the land they 'sold' to european colonisers.

No one is disputing the fact black Africans earned money from slavery,

IbeOkehie:
Hopefully @DeepSight doesn't come after you for this:

basilico:
I out it to you that the negro has been given so much by the white person in terms of opportunities and money stemming from MLK efforts. Blacks in America are more wealthier than on my other continent. Democrats moreso have created so many chances for the black person than the republicans I admit that . Though I must add that the democrats want the family to be destroyed.
An unmarried single woman can get upto $3000+ 9000 per month depending on the number of kids. It's more economically advantageous for a single woman than a married woman if their gross income is less than $120K. Don't challenge me on this. This happens more to black families.

IjeBos:
Who is the bigger fool?
The person who licks someone's feet to get them to do something
or
The person who does something against their interests because someone licked their feet?

For diplomats and politicians, it's the latter.
Something your MAGA mind doesn't seem to comprehend.

basilico:
I out it to you that the negro ....

DeepSight:
Of course they did.

IbeOkehie:
The objection above is an understandable attempt to minimize Black African responsibility....

IbeOkehie:
And that is all I've tried to bring to this thread, on this particular matter.

budaatum:
No one is disputing the fact that black Africans earned money from slavery, but making out that black Africans earned anything significant or close to what the slave buyers made is a huge distortion of facts, since black Africans made nowhere near what the slave buyers made.

A similar argument might go something like, what did Africans do with the guns and gin they got for the land they 'sold' to european colonisers.

DeepSight:
The more pitiful aspect is that no one lic/ks his own feet in particular. People like him lic/k white feet for the sole pleasure of being able to say that they are inferior to whites.

basilico:
I out it to you that the negro has been given so much by the white person in terms of opportunities and money stemming from MLK efforts. Blacks in America are more wealthier than on my other continent. Democrats moreso have created so many chances for the black person than the republicans I admit that . Though I must add that the democrats want the family to be destroyed.

An unmarried single woman can get upto $3000+ 9000 per month depending on the number of kids. It's more economically advantageous for a single woman than a married woman if their gross income is less than $120K. Don't challenge me on this. This happens more to black families.

bemeruca:
This is subjective. No one is comparing whether their value allocation to their product (slaves) is high. To them it is, which is why they are making those deals.

They are selling their fellow humans for wealth, exchanging them for things they think are valuable.

What the buyers gained out of the deal is irrelevant. This is not a manliness contest.

Every culture was involved in taking slaves and using them in an inhumane way.

Let's start with the blame from home.

bemeruca:
Let's start with the blame from home.

IjeBos:
Exactly, he doesn't even see the connection.
While, people come to sing Trump's praises, to get billions for the US, weapons for their countries or favorable trade deals, Raumdeuter licks Trump's feet daily for what? The invisible affirmation of a white man?

budaatum:
This might be what you've attempted to do, but your claim that you wouldn't have benefitted from being in the land if Africans hadn't sold Africans, is the message I've gotten from you, sadly.

budaatum:
Except this conversation is not about blame, you'd find if you'd bothered following it from its beginning.

And that's apart from the denial of the non-complicity in slavery of many Africans, and the lack of awareness in the greater loss of resource a country experiences when it loses it's able bodied people, which no sales income can compensate for.

RodgersAkpafu:
Nothing will happen to any of them

Which one is "Clinton's judge"

A judge IS a judge

DeepSight:
The more pitiful aspect is that no one lic/ks his own feet in particular. People like him lic/k white feet for the sole pleasure of being able to say that they are inferior to whites.

budaatum:
No one is disputing the fact black Africans earned money from slavery, but making out black Africans earned anything significant or close to the buyers is a huge distortion of facts, since black Africans made nowhere near what the slave buyers made.

A similar argument might go something like, what did Africans do with the guns and gin they got for the land they 'sold' to european colonisers.

raumdeuter:
Why would you who was so against slavery want someone to lick your feet? Starmer a white man licking the feet of Trump a white man, but somehow your inferiority complex and victimhood still came into it

bemeruca:
John Bolton is in a very serious problem. Biden's admin could have indicted him if the indictment had not tipped the Iranians off that the US intelligence had access to their systems.

Bolton's email account was compromised by Iran, and they had classified documents from it that the US intelligence got from Iranian servers.
They are all in huge trouble, at least Bolton and Letitia

IbeOkehie:
Buddaaaaaa !!!! Ah ah, wetin?

Liberals & Progressives should also find time to point out the non-complicity of Swedish Americans and Norwegian Americans. A high percentage of White Americans in the State of Minnesota are of Scandinavian origin and they didn't partake in any Slavery, yet they're routinely roped in when it's time to blackmail the White Man to give us money.

I started my life in America in the South. When I moved to Baltimore, I met MANY White Americans whose parents only got to the USA as immigrants in the 1970's. One particular guy my age is Irish and his parents only got to the USA in 1970, there's also another one whose parents are SERBIAN and got here in the 1970's too. What do they have to do with slavery?

Come on people, let's be fair.

Good Luck to Nigerians.

DeepSight:
I refuse to engage in what will amount to a conversation between a writer and a stone.

DeepSight:
How is it special to say that the wealthiest set of black people in the world live in the wealthiest nation in the world?

That statement by the way can be qualified and debated, but even taking it as a given, how is it saying something special? Oh, I get it - because in your view, they have been thereby specially blessed by the white man and should thus be grateful right? Ride on.

IjeBos:

bemeruca:
John Bolton is in a very serious problem. Biden's admin could have indicted him if the indictment had not tipped the Iranians off that the US intelligence had access to their systems.

Bolton's email account was compromised by Iran, and they had classified documents from it that the US intelligence got from Iranian servers.
They are all in huge trouble, at least Bolton and Letitia

IbeOkehie:
OK, the wealthiest national group of Negroes in Africa live in South Africa. In fact the Blacks of South Africa are the 2nd or 3rd wealthiest and highest HDI Negroes in the world.

Before 2001, the Blacks of Zimbabwe were wealthier or had higher HDI than Nigerians, I don't know about today. By the way, Zambia and Zimbabwe used to be one country. The history of the separation and the results are interesting to know.

Today the Negroes of Botswana and Namibia live at higher HDI than Nigeria.

I've always wondered why Nigeria with its crude oil AND natural gas bonanza isn't generally better than those countries. Hmmmm. The thing is a big mystery.

Good Luck to Nigerians.

IbeOkehie:
There's a high probability that Letitia James WILL NOT be convicted.

Until those who made the USA the great nation it is, pick up courage and once again "pledge their lives, property and sacred honor" to the defense and survival of this Republic, there will be only be DELAY on the way to ultimate ruin. There will be many more Letitia James and John Bolton in the decades ahead.

Good Luck to Nigeria.

DeepSight:
I refuse to engage in what will amount to a conversation between a writer and a stone.

raumdeuter:
In simple terms you don't have a coherent comeback just like a typical liberal

DeepSight:
I refuse to engage in what will amount to a conversation between a writer and a stone.

DeepSight:
When you say you don’t know who made more money off it, then I have to walk away from wasting my energy because clearly you have no desire to attempt a serious discussion.