₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,326,543 members, 8,427,029 topics. Date: Monday, 15 June 2026 at 10:02 AM

Toggle theme

Lamido v PDP: Another Federal High Court halts National Convention - Politics - Nairaland

Nairaland ForumNairaland GeneralPoliticsLamido v PDP: Another Federal High Court halts National Convention (8246 Views)

1 2 3 Reply (Go Down)

Lamido v PDP: Another Federal High Court halts National Convention by NgeneUkwenu(op): 12:27pm On Nov 11, 2025
A Federal High Court in Abuja has, for the second time, restrained the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) from going ahead with its National Convention scheduled to hold in Ibadan, Oyo State, between November 15 and 16.

The court also barred the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) from supervising, monitoring, or recognising the outcome of the Convention, where national officers are expected to be elected.

Justice Peter Lifu on Tuesday issued the fresh order while delivering a ruling in an application brought by a former governor of Jigawa state, Sule Lamido.

Lamido had taken the party before the court, complaining that he was denied the opportunity to buy the Chairmanship nomination form to enable him to participate in the convention.

The judge predicated the restriction order against PDP because the party refused, neglected, and failed to comply with relevant conditions and laws for the conduct of such conventions.

The judge held that evidence from Lamido showed that the timetable for the convention was not published for the attention of its members as required by law.
Justice Lifu also held that the balance of convenience tilted towards Lamido because he would suffer more if allowed to be unlawfully excluded from the planned convention.

According to the Judge, in a Constitution, due process of law must be strictly followed by those in charge, adding that to do otherwise will endanger democracy itself.

He also said that in line with section 6 of the 1999 Constitution, the court of law must not abdicate its role of dispensing justice without fear or favour.


Justice Lifu held that anarchy would be the order of the day, any day and anywhere the court of record abdicates its constitution-assigned functions.

Justice James Omotosho of the same court had on October halted the PDP’s convention and restrained INEC from monitoring and recognising the outcome.

But Justice Ladiran Akintola of the Oyo State High Court issued a counter ruling, directing the leadership of the party to go ahead with the convention.
https://www.thecable.ng/just-in-another-judge-restrains-pdp-from-holding-national-convention/

Re: Lamido v PDP: Another Federal High Court halts National Convention by NgeneUkwenu(op): 12:28pm On Nov 11, 2025
Very sound judgement. Fergie001 come outside grin grin

I warned you guys!
Re: Lamido v PDP: Another Federal High Court halts National Convention by ebukal67x: 12:33pm On Nov 11, 2025
Another case of judicial overreach.
Re: Lamido v PDP: Another Federal High Court halts National Convention by jmoore(m): 12:38pm On Nov 11, 2025
Judicial banditry. Is federal high court superior to supreme court?
We all know WIKED has bribed the judges.
Re: Lamido v PDP: Another Federal High Court halts National Convention by NgeneUkwenu(op): 12:38pm On Nov 11, 2025
ebukal67x:
Another case of judicial overreach.
How, can you explain? This is another case filled by Sule Lamido in another court, about his exclusion from the process of the botched convention.
Re: Lamido v PDP: Another Federal High Court halts National Convention by NgeneUkwenu(op): 12:39pm On Nov 11, 2025
jmoore:
Judicial banditry.
Is federal high court superior to supreme court?

We all know WIKED has bribed the judges.
So supreme court said, political parties should not obey their constitution simply because they are political parties? You sound like a typical Peter Obi supporter, are you one?
Re: Lamido v PDP: Another Federal High Court halts National Convention by Kastonkastroll(m): 12:39pm On Nov 11, 2025
But whats the business of the courts with a party's internal problems? Thought the SC have already gave their stand on such issues.

Why are PDP politicians always running to courts to resolve their internal problems? They should stop ridiculing the courts. Imagine what this one is asking the court to do. They didn't allow you buy chairmanship form, the next place you will go is a court.

So the court will make them sell form for you and also force party members to vote for you? These PDP guys are crazy
Re: Lamido v PDP: Another Federal High Court halts National Convention by Salewa97: 12:41pm On Nov 11, 2025
PDP, the party with no direction
Re: Lamido v PDP: Another Federal High Court halts National Convention by ddippset(m): 12:42pm On Nov 11, 2025
Lifu and Omotosho,,,

What do these 2 have in common?
Re: Lamido v PDP: Another Federal High Court halts National Convention by ddippset(m): 12:44pm On Nov 11, 2025
Salewa97:
PDP, the party with no direction
That's not the issue..

The issue is one man close to Aso Rock who has manipulated the Judiciary and put them in pocket for the past 10 years..

That man has a mission to destroy PDP,, that is his only remaining selling point to the Aso Rick cabal.
Re: Lamido v PDP: Another Federal High Court halts National Convention by saintopus(m): 12:47pm On Nov 11, 2025
I think PDP should simply zone the Presidential ticket to Wike then after which abandoned the party for him.
Re: Lamido v PDP: Another Federal High Court halts National Convention by jmoore(m): 12:48pm On Nov 11, 2025
NgeneUkwenu:
So supreme court said, political parties should not obey their constitution simply because they are political parties? You sound like a typical Peter Obi supporter, are you one?
You sound like Tinubu APC supporter that Daniel Bwala who is also APC supporter described how they behave

Re: Lamido v PDP: Another Federal High Court halts National Convention by Heffalump(m): 12:50pm On Nov 11, 2025
The judiciary is a big shame in Nigeria. What a joke!

It's worrisome, and indeed, heartbroken to see the legal profession, which was kown for fairness, integrity, and the last hope of the common man being degraded and humiliated because of greed for money in the hands of unpatriotic elements called politicians.

The sanctity of the legal profession in Nigeria is long gone.
Re: Lamido v PDP: Another Federal High Court halts National Convention by fergie001(mod):
So the FCT man has played all his cards lol grin

INEC will monitor the election. The Supreme Court have ruled succinctly that Political Parties are voluntary organisations and are supreme over their own affairs.

Lamido didn't pick the form and hence is not an aspirant and thus does not have locus to challenge same.

All PDP faithfuls worldwide should not fail to be at the Lekan Salami on the 15th of November.

success1smyn:
You are twisting matters, pre-primary matter should be taken to court before the primaries after you have exhausted all internal means to resolve it - and not after the primaries have been concluded.
I beg you in the name of God, please don't say this outside.
Our Courts, including the Supreme Court has said it many times that pre-primary matters are not to be touched by the Courts before the Primaries. If you have a pre-primary issue, and you are an aspirant, then contest the primary and go to Court fusing both the pre-primary and primary as basis for your suit, that is when you have locus. If you fight pre-primary before the Primaries, the Court will simply throw it out because you are not an aspirant.
See Timipre Sylva v PDP. That's how he lost his case in 2012. The PDP denied him ticket, he went to Court and lost as expected!

If you paid for forms and were denied, you can approach the court before the election. And if you can prove your case, the court will ask your party not to go ahead with the election untill they resolve the issue. It's as simple as that.
Did Lamido tell you he paid for nomination forms?
If a Party doesn't want to sell to you, they wouldn't even allow you to pay. Lamido went to the Secretariat with the intention to pay and then obtain the forms but he was not allowed to pay neither was he granted access to the form. So he has no locus, he is not an aspirant....
Re: Lamido v PDP: Another Federal High Court halts National Convention by iwaeda: 1:07pm On Nov 11, 2025
PDP may not have candidate in 2027. Why are they so much afraid of PDP rising? grin grin grin grin grin
Re: Lamido v PDP: Another Federal High Court halts National Convention by HgAkpobomeEr: 1:12pm On Nov 11, 2025
This is a good development.
Re: Lamido v PDP: Another Federal High Court halts National Convention by danijesus(m): 1:13pm On Nov 11, 2025
fergie001:
So the FCT man has played all his cards lol grin

INEC will monitor the election. The Supreme Court have ruled succinctly that Political Parties are voluntary organisations and are supreme over their own affairs.

Lamido didn't pick the form and hence is not an aspirant and thus does not have locus to challenge same.

All PDP faithfuls worldwide should not fail to be at the Lekan Salami on the 15th of November.
your take on political issues dy give me joy.kundus to you bro!
Re: Lamido v PDP: Another Federal High Court halts National Convention by Cherrybae(f): 1:16pm On Nov 11, 2025
Fergie001
Pls come inside and see something. I told you the conversation won't hold

PDP should just go to Appeal court. Even though I know they won't succeed.
Re: Lamido v PDP: Another Federal High Court halts National Convention by fergie001(mod): 1:17pm On Nov 11, 2025
Cherrybae:
Fergie001
Pls come inside and see something. I told you the conversation won't hold

PDP should just go to Appeal court. Even though I know they won't succeed.
The Convention must hold.
Re: Lamido v PDP: Another Federal High Court halts National Convention by Igirigimercenar: 1:19pm On Nov 11, 2025
fergie001:
So the FCT man has played all his cards lol grin

INEC will monitor the election. The Supreme Court have ruled succinctly that Political Parties are voluntary organisations and are supreme over their own affairs.

Lamido didn't pick the form and hence is not an aspirant and thus does not have locus to challenge same.

All PDP faithfuls worldwide should not fail to be at the Lekan Salami on the 15th of November.
. I hope you will be there barrister Fergie

Anyway congratulations to you guys
Re: Lamido v PDP: Another Federal High Court halts National Convention by Cherrybae(f): 1:19pm On Nov 11, 2025
Lamido and wike are sworn enemies. I wonder why obedient are mentioning wike up and down.

Leave wike alone and go put your house in order.
Re: Lamido v PDP: Another Federal High Court halts National Convention by Peterobiisathie(f): 1:24pm On Nov 11, 2025
Over to Obidients
Your crying is welcome

Re: Lamido v PDP: Another Federal High Court halts National Convention by adioolayi(m): 1:27pm On Nov 11, 2025
"A Federal High Court in Abuja has, for the second time, restrained the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) from going ahead with its National Convention scheduled to hold in Ibadan, Oyo State, between November 15 and 16.

The court also barred the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) from supervising, monitoring, or recognising the outcome of the Convention, where national officers are expected to be elected."


KASONGO YEYE

grin grin grin grin

Na Season film..

Another State High Court go give exparte by Friday grin grin
Re: Lamido v PDP: Another Federal High Court halts National Convention by Olatundex22(m): 1:30pm On Nov 11, 2025
The most abuse court in Nigeria is state high court they always favor the state government, before you know it another state high court will say another thing. I wish something can be done about state high court
Re: Lamido v PDP: Another Federal High Court halts National Convention by Sirleo05: 1:30pm On Nov 11, 2025
See how 9ja court dey fall dem hand, no cohesion. One court say dis, another object to what the former says. Only in 9ja
Re: Lamido v PDP: Another Federal High Court halts National Convention by Freshandfitpod: 1:30pm On Nov 11, 2025
Party filled with jiihadist from top to bottom.....
Re: Lamido v PDP: Another Federal High Court halts National Convention by adioolayi(m): 1:31pm On Nov 11, 2025
jmoore:
Judicial banditry.
Is federal high court superior to supreme court?

We all know WIKED has bribed the judges.
But OYO State Judge that gave PDP faction favorable judgment has given a fair judgment devoid of interference huh

grin grin grin grin grin
Re: Lamido v PDP: Another Federal High Court halts National Convention by SamGift0817: 1:33pm On Nov 11, 2025
Re: Lamido v PDP: Another Federal High Court halts National Convention by NgeneUkwenu(op): 1:33pm On Nov 11, 2025
fergie001:
So the FCT man has played all his cards lol grin

INEC will monitor the election. The Supreme Court have ruled succinctly that Political Parties are voluntary organisations and are supreme over their own affairs.

Lamido didn't pick the form and hence is not an aspirant and thus does not have locus to challenge same.

All PDP faithfuls worldwide should not fail to be at the Lekan Salami on the 15th of November.
So supreme court gave political parties blanket orders to be above the law. According
to you, they should subvert their constitutions, and it will be simply regarded as internal matters? Two of the NWC members can even take over the party instruments and it will be regarded as internal matters.... Thank God, i have another lawyer grin grin

Barrister Fergie. PDP should simply ignore the court orders? INEC should simply ignore the court orders? grin grin Shebi na here we go dey? I love your ginger my man!
Re: Lamido v PDP: Another Federal High Court halts National Convention by adioolayi(m): 1:34pm On Nov 11, 2025
Kastonkastroll:
But whats the business of the courts with a party's internal problems? Thought the SC have already gave their stand on such issues.

Why are PDP politicians always running to courts to resolve their internal problems? They should stop ridiculing the courts. Imagine what this one is asking the court to do. They didn't allow you buy chairmanship form, the next place you will go is a court.

So the court will make them sell form for you and also force party members to vote for you? These PDP guys are crazy
Where he for go, since the party has disobeyed their own constitutionhuh

It's true, party affairs has to be internal affair of the party...but an internal affair must be based on fairness and equity of all party members. They all have to agree on key decisions
Re: Lamido v PDP: Another Federal High Court halts National Convention by fergie001(mod):
NgeneUkwenu:
Barrister Fergie.001. PDP should simply ignore the court orders? INEC should simply ignore the court orders? grin grin Shebi na here we go dey? I love your ginger my man!
Whether INEC monitors or not, it's on them.

You remember when INEC failed to monitor the Akpabio's Primary, what the Supreme Court said was loud...... Been that these judgements cannot survive scrutiny from higher Courts.... The Convention will hold, you go bet?

It could be postponed but it MUST hold this November.

success1smyn:
If your political party deny you the chance to participate in a process you have the constitutional right to participate in, then you approach the court. It very simple. PDP have no respect for their own constitution.
success1smyn:
An APC member can go to court and challenge it. NOT an OUTSIDER. So if no member of APC approach the court then that's it. That's the meaning of party affair. If Sule Lamido didn't go to court as a member of the party that was denied chance to participate in the process, no court will rule to the effect. Let PDP appeal those rullings and get a good court judgement before going ahead with the planned 'illegal' convention.
It is not true.
You do not have that right.

We have these cases copiously as recent as 2022.....

This case happened in Edo and forms were not given to the Wike faction but to the Obaseki faction. The Wike faction held it was their rights as party members and the Courts said you are party members but you were not given forms, you are not aspirants, hence it is a pre-primary matter and the Court has no jurisdiction.

A party is supreme over its own affairs… A party is like a club. A voluntary association. It has its rules, regulations, guidelines and Constitution. Members join the party of their own free will. By joining, they have freely given their consent to be bound by its rules, regulations, guidelines and Constitution of the party. These rules of the party must be obeyed by all the members of the party, as the party’s decision is final over its own affairs. Members of a party would do well to understand and appreciate the finality of a party’s decision over its domestic or internal affairs (Amina Augie JSC in Osagie v Enoghama)


In the same 2022..
Magnus Abe's delegates were denied forms to participate in the Ward, LG Congresses because Amaechi's men were in charge.... George Orlu & Ors (Abe's men) approached the Courts with membership cards that they wanted to purchase forms and were denied. The Federal High Court ruled in their favour, but hear the Appeal Court who dismissed same.
1. That the members were not aspirants having neither purchased the forms nor participated in the Ward/LG Congresses election.

2. It is a pre-primary election matter and deeply rooted in the internal affairs of a political party.

3. That the person's didn't exhaust the full internal resolution mechanisms of the Party.


That you are a Party member doesn't mean you must be given forms to participate in any election, no way. Even in the case of Oyebanji, nobody can challenge same because that person is not an aspirant hence it will fall like a pack of cards.
1 2 3 Reply

PDP v PDP: Rivers EXCO disagrees with National leadership over appealWike V PDP: Court To Deliver Judgement On May 31, 2023Insecurity: Give PDP Another Chance In 2023 – Saraki To Nigerians234

Gani Fawehinmi open letter to ObasanjoWe Have Forgiven Killers Of Our Operatives - SSS DGWe’ll Develop Alternatives To Road Transport In Lagos – Sanwo-olu